Caselets and Paragraph-Based Data

20 questions

Question 1Question

A state tourism board recorded a total of 8,5008,500 visitors across three heritage sites—Site Alpha, Site Beta, and Site Gamma—during a cultural festival. The number of visitors to Site Alpha accounted for 40%40\% of the total visitors. Out of the visitors to Site Alpha, the ratio of domestic to international tourists was 3:23:2. Site Beta received 1,5001,500 fewer visitors than Site Alpha. At Site Beta, the number of international tourists was equal to the number of international tourists at Site Alpha. The remaining visitors went to Site Gamma, where 70%70\% were domestic tourists.

What is the difference between the total number of domestic tourists and the total number of international tourists across all three sites?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: 1,1401,140

Answer

The difference between the total number of domestic tourists and the total number of international tourists is 1,1401,140.
To find the final difference, the data must be extracted step-by-step for each site. Site Alpha has 3,4003,400 visitors (40%40\% of 8,5008,500), splitting into 2,0402,040 domestic and 1,3601,360 international based on the 3:23:2 ratio. Site Beta has 1,9001,900 visitors (3,4001,5003,400 - 1,500), with 1,3601,360 international tourists (matching Alpha) and the remaining 540540 being domestic. Site Gamma receives the leftover 3,2003,200 visitors, of which 70%70\% (2,2402,240) are domestic and 960960 are international. Summing the categories gives 4,8204,820 domestic and 3,6803,680 international tourists. The final difference is 4,8203,680=1,1404,820 - 3,680 = 1,140.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Calculate the tourist breakdown for Site Alpha.
Total = 3,4003,400. Domestic = 2,0402,040. International = 1,3601,360.
Site Alpha has 40%40\% of 8,5008,500 total visitors, which is 3,4003,400. The ratio of domestic to international is 3:23:2. Domestic = 35×3,400=2,040\frac{3}{5} \times 3,400 = 2,040. International = 25×3,400=1,360\frac{2}{5} \times 3,400 = 1,360.
2
Calculate the tourist breakdown for Site Beta.
Total = 1,9001,900. International = 1,3601,360. Domestic = 540540.
Site Beta received 1,5001,500 fewer visitors than Site Alpha, so 3,4001,500=1,9003,400 - 1,500 = 1,900. The number of international tourists equals that of Site Alpha (1,3601,360). The remaining 1,9001,360=5401,900 - 1,360 = 540 are domestic tourists.
3
Calculate the tourist breakdown for Site Gamma.
Total = 3,2003,200. Domestic = 2,2402,240. International = 960960.
Site Gamma received the remaining visitors: 8,500(3,400+1,900)=3,2008,500 - (3,400 + 1,900) = 3,200. Since 70%70\% are domestic, Domestic = 0.70×3,200=2,2400.70 \times 3,200 = 2,240. International = 3,2002,240=9603,200 - 2,240 = 960.
4
Calculate overall totals and their difference.
Total Domestic = 4,8204,820. Total International = 3,6803,680. Difference = 1,1401,140.
Total Domestic = 2,040+540+2,240=4,8202,040 + 540 + 2,240 = 4,820. Total International = 1,360+1,360+960=3,6801,360 + 1,360 + 960 = 3,680. The difference is 4,8203,680=1,1404,820 - 3,680 = 1,140.

Key Concept

Data Extraction and Sequential Problem Solving in Caselets
Question 2Question

A State Public Service Commission conducted a detailed employment survey across three major districts: District A, District B, and District C. The total workforce across all three districts combined is 100,000100,000.

- District A accounts for 40%40\% of the total workforce, and the ratio of male to female workers in District A is 3:23 : 2.
- District B has a total workforce that is 25%25\% greater than the total workforce of District A. Females constitute 44%44\% of District B's workforce.
- District C comprises the remaining workforce across the three districts, with a male-to-female ratio of 3:23 : 2.
- Across all three districts combined, 25%25\% of the total female workforce is employed in the government sector.
- Specifically, 30%30\% of females in District A and 20%20\% of females in District B are employed in the government sector, while the remaining government-employed females work in District C.

Based on the given information, what is the ratio of the number of female government sector workers in District C to the total number of male workers across all three districts combined?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: 13:58013 : 580

Answer

The ratio of the number of female government sector workers in District C to the total number of male workers across all three districts combined is 13:58013 : 580.
The total female government workers across all districts is 10,500 (25% of 42,000 total females). Subtracting District A's 4,800 and District B's 4,400 yields 1,300 government females in District C. The total male population across all three districts is 58,000 (24,000 + 28,000 + 6,000). The ratio 1,300 : 58,000 simplifies directly to 13 : 580.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Calculate total workforce and gender breakdown for District A
Total workforce of District A = 40%40\% of 100,000=40,000100,000 = 40,000. With a Male:Female ratio of 3:23:2, Male workforce = 35×40,000=24,000\frac{3}{5} \times 40,000 = 24,000 and Female workforce = 25×40,000=16,000\frac{2}{5} \times 40,000 = 16,000.
Establishing District A numbers is required as the baseline for District B and total female count.
2
Calculate total workforce and gender breakdown for District B
Workforce of District B = 1.25×40,000=50,0001.25 \times 40,000 = 50,000. Female workforce = 44%44\% of 50,000=22,00050,000 = 22,000. Male workforce = 50,00022,000=28,00050,000 - 22,000 = 28,000.
District B's population is given relative to District A.
3
Determine workforce and gender breakdown for District C
Workforce of District C = 100,000(40,000+50,000)=10,000100,000 - (40,000 + 50,000) = 10,000. With Male:Female ratio of 3:23:2, Male workforce = 35×10,000=6,000\frac{3}{5} \times 10,000 = 6,000 and Female workforce = 25×10,000=4,000\frac{2}{5} \times 10,000 = 4,000.
District C contains the residual workforce from the total 100,000100,000.
4
Calculate overall male and female workforce totals
Total Male workforce = 24,000+28,000+6,000=58,00024,000 + 28,000 + 6,000 = 58,000. Total Female workforce = 16,000+22,000+4,000=42,00016,000 + 22,000 + 4,000 = 42,000.
The total male workforce forms the denominator of the required ratio.
5
Calculate government-employed females in District C
Total Female Government Workers = 25%25\% of 42,000=10,50042,000 = 10,500. District A Female Government Workers = 30%30\% of 16,000=4,80016,000 = 4,800. District B Female Government Workers = 20%20\% of 22,000=4,40022,000 = 4,400. District C Female Government Workers = 10,500(4,800+4,400)=1,30010,500 - (4,800 + 4,400) = 1,300.
Subtracting District A and B government females from the overall total isolates District C's count.
6
Compute the final ratio
Ratio = 1,30058,000=13580\frac{1,300}{58,000} = \frac{13}{580} or 13:58013 : 580.
Simplifying the fraction gives the required final ratio.

Key Concept

Multi-step quantitative interpretation of paragraph data involving percentage base shifts and system of equations.
Estimated Time:3m 0s
Question 3Question

In a state public infrastructure development scheme for the fiscal year 2025–26, a total budget of ₹9,0009,000 crore was allocated across four major sectors: Agriculture Irrigation, Highway Expansion, Solar Infrastructure, and Rural Electrification.

Agriculture Irrigation received 28%28\% of the total allocated budget. The budget allocated to Highway Expansion was 37.5%37.5\% more than the budget allocated to Agriculture Irrigation. The remaining allocated budget was divided between Solar Infrastructure and Rural Electrification in the ratio 5:45 : 4.

Regarding the actual expenditures recorded at the end of the fiscal year:
- Agriculture Irrigation utilized 85%85\% of its allocated funds.
- Highway Expansion utilized 92%92\% of its allocated funds.
- Solar Infrastructure had an unspent budget of ₹315315 crore.
- Rural Electrification spent an amount equal to 1.251.25 times the unspent budget of Agriculture Irrigation.

Based on the information provided, what is the total unspent budget across all four sectors combined, expressed in crore rupees?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: 1837.7

Answer

The total unspent budget across all four sectors combined is 1837.7 crore rupees.
By accurately deriving each sector's allocation from the given base percentage, percentage increment, and ratio, and then computing the respective unspent components according to the expenditure conditions, the total unspent amount is determined to be 1837.7 crore rupees.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Calculate allocations for Agriculture Irrigation and Highway Expansion
Agriculture Irrigation = ₹2,520 crore; Highway Expansion = ₹3,465 crore
Agriculture Irrigation receives 28% of 9,000 crore = 2,520 crore. Highway Expansion gets 37.5% more than Agriculture Irrigation, which is 2,520 * (1 + 0.375) = 3,465 crore.
2
Calculate allocations for Solar Infrastructure and Rural Electrification
Solar Infrastructure = ₹1,675 crore; Rural Electrification = ₹1,340 crore
Remaining budget = 9,000 - (2,520 + 3,465) = 3,015 crore. Dividing 3,015 in ratio 5:4 gives (5/9)*3,015 = 1,675 crore for Solar and (4/9)*3,015 = 1,340 crore for Rural Electrification.
3
Determine unspent amounts for each sector individually
Agriculture Irrigation Unspent = ₹378 crore; Highway Expansion Unspent = ₹277.2 crore; Solar Infrastructure Unspent = ₹315 crore; Rural Electrification Unspent = ₹867.5 crore
15% of Agriculture Irrigation budget is unspent = 0.15 * 2,520 = 378 crore. 8% of Highway Expansion budget is unspent = 0.08 * 3,465 = 277.2 crore. Solar unspent is given as 315 crore. Rural Electrification expenditure is 1.25 * 378 = 472.5 crore, leaving 1,340 - 472.5 = 867.5 crore unspent.
4
Sum unspent amounts across all four sectors
Total Unspent Budget = ₹1,837.7 crore
Summing unspent amounts: 378 + 277.2 + 315 + 867.5 = 1,837.7 crore rupees.

Key Concept

Multi-step caselet data extraction, ratio division, percentage calculation, and aggregation
Question 4Question

In an agricultural extension survey conducted across three blocks—Block A, Block B, and Block C—a total of 800800 farmers were interviewed regarding their adoption of organic farming practices. Out of the total interviewed farmers, 40%40\% were from Block A. The remaining farmers were equally divided between Block B and Block C. How many farmers were interviewed from Block B?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: 240240

Answer

The number of farmers interviewed from Block B is 240240.
The total number of interviewed farmers is 800800. Block A accounts for 40%40\% of 800800, which equals 320320 farmers. The remaining farmers across Block B and Block C combined total 800320=480800 - 320 = 480. Since these remaining farmers are divided equally between Block B and Block C, Block B has 480÷2=240480 \div 2 = 240 farmers.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Calculate the number of farmers in Block A
40% of 800=0.40×800=32040\% \text{ of } 800 = 0.40 \times 800 = 320 farmers.
Block A accounts for 40%40\% of the total 800800 farmers.
2
Calculate the remaining number of farmers for Block B and Block C combined
800320=480800 - 320 = 480 farmers.
The paragraph states that the remaining farmers belong to Block B and Block C.
3
Divide the remaining farmers equally to find the count for Block B
480÷2=240480 \div 2 = 240 farmers.
Block B and Block C share the remaining farmers equally.

Key Concept

Paragraph Data Extraction and Simple Multi-Step Calculation
Estimated Time:45s
Question 5Question

In a university central library, a survey was conducted on 500500 students who visited on Monday. Out of the total 500500 students, 300300 students borrowed books, while the remaining 200200 students used the reading room only. Among the students who borrowed books, 180180 were undergraduate students and the rest were postgraduate students. Among the students who used the reading room only, 120120 were undergraduate students and the rest were postgraduate students.

Based on the information provided in the paragraph above, which of the following statements are correct?

Select all that apply

Show answer & explanation

Answer: The total number of postgraduate students surveyed is 200200.; The ratio of undergraduate students to postgraduate students who borrowed books is 3:23 : 2.

Answer

The correct statements are that the total number of postgraduate students surveyed is 200, and the ratio of undergraduate students to postgraduate students who borrowed books is 3 : 2.
The total number of postgraduate students surveyed is 200200 (120120 who borrowed books and 8080 who used the reading room only). Furthermore, the ratio of undergraduate borrowers (180180) to postgraduate borrowers (120120) simplifies correctly to 3:23 : 2.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Extract data for students who borrowed books
Total borrowing books = 300300. Undergraduate borrowers = 180180. Postgraduate borrowers = 300180=120300 - 180 = 120.
Separating the borrowing group into undergraduate and postgraduate categories.
2
Extract data for students using the reading room only
Total reading room only = 200200. Undergraduate reading room users = 120120. Postgraduate reading room users = 200120=80200 - 120 = 80.
Separating the reading room group into undergraduate and postgraduate categories.
3
Calculate total postgraduate and undergraduate counts across both categories
Total postgraduate students = 120+80=200120 + 80 = 200. Total undergraduate students = 180+120=300180 + 120 = 300.
Summing values across both activity categories to verify totals.
4
Verify ratios and percentages
Ratio of UG borrowers to PG borrowers = 180:120=3:2180 : 120 = 3 : 2. Percentage of PG students in reading room = 80200×100=40%\frac{80}{200} \times 100 = 40\%.
Testing each option statement against computed values.

Key Concept

Data Extraction and Tabulation from Caselets
Question 6Question

During a public health immunization drive in a rural district, a total of 1,5001,500 vaccines were administered across three primary health centers: PHC Alpha, PHC Beta, and PHC Gamma. PHC Alpha administered 550550 vaccines, while PHC Beta administered 600600 vaccines. The remaining vaccines were administered by PHC Gamma. What is the total number of vaccines administered by PHC Gamma?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: 350350

Answer

The total number of vaccines administered by PHC Gamma is 350350.
The total number of vaccines administered across all three health centers is 1,5001,500. Adding the vaccines administered by PHC Alpha (550550) and PHC Beta (600600) yields a total of 1,1501,150. Subtracting 1,1501,150 from 1,5001,500 gives 350350 vaccines administered by PHC Gamma.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Calculate the total vaccines administered by PHC Alpha and PHC Beta combined.
550+600=1,150550 + 600 = 1,150 vaccines
To find the remaining amount for PHC Gamma, first aggregate the given counts of the other two health centers.
2
Subtract the combined count from the grand total of vaccines administered.
1,5001,150=3501,500 - 1,150 = 350 vaccines
Subtracting the known portions from the total gives the remaining vaccines administered by PHC Gamma.

Key Concept

Data extraction and simple subtraction from paragraph-based caselets
Question 7Question

A regional energy transition board reviewed the adoption of residential solar panels across three counties: County Alpha, County Beta, and County Gamma. At the beginning of 20252025, there were a total of 4,0004,000 households equipped with solar panels across these three counties. The number of such households in County Alpha was 1,5001,500. At that time, County Beta had 50%50\% more solar-equipped households than County Gamma.

Over the course of 20252025, the number of solar-equipped households in County Alpha increased by 20%20\%, while County Gamma saw a 40%40\% increase. By the end of 20252025, the total number of solar-equipped households across all three counties reached 5,0005,000.

Based on the information provided, which of the following statements are correct?

Select all that apply

Show answer & explanation

Answer: The percentage increase in solar-equipped households in County Beta during 20252025 was 20%20\%.; The ratio of the number of solar-equipped households in County Gamma to County Alpha at the end of 20252025 was 7:97:9.

Answer

The statements confirming that County Beta saw a 20%20\% increase and that the final ratio of County Gamma to County Alpha was 7:97:9 are both correct.
The valid statements accurately reflect that County Beta's solar adoption increased by exactly 300300 households from a base of 1,5001,500 (a 20%20\% rise), and the final counts for County Gamma (1,4001,400) and County Alpha (1,8001,800) produce a ratio of 7:97:9.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Determine the initial number of solar-equipped households for all three counties at the start of 20252025.
Total = 4,0004,000. Alpha = 1,5001,500. Remaining for Beta and Gamma = 4,0001,500=2,5004,000 - 1,500 = 2,500. Let Gamma = G. Beta is 50%50\% more, so Beta = 1.5G1.5G. Equation: 1.5G+G=2,5002.5G=2,500G=1,0001.5G + G = 2,500 \Rightarrow 2.5G = 2,500 \Rightarrow G = 1,000. Thus, Beta = 1,5001,500.
Establishing the baseline data for each category is necessary before applying growth percentages.
2
Calculate the growth and final number of households for County Alpha and County Gamma.
Alpha increase = 0.20×1,500=3000.20 \times 1,500 = 300, so Alpha final = 1,8001,800. Gamma increase = 0.40×1,000=4000.40 \times 1,000 = 400, so Gamma final = 1,4001,400.
These figures are explicitly given as percentage increases in the text and are required to find the unknown variables.
3
Deduce the final number and percentage increase for County Beta.
Total increase = Final Total - Initial Total = 5,0004,000=1,0005,000 - 4,000 = 1,000. Beta increase = Total increase - (Alpha increase + Gamma increase) = 1,000(300+400)=3001,000 - (300 + 400) = 300. Beta final = 1,500+300=1,8001,500 + 300 = 1,800. Beta percentage increase = (300/1,500)×100%=20%(300 / 1,500) \times 100\% = 20\%.
Using the overall total allows extraction of the missing piece of data through subtraction.
4
Evaluate all provided statements against the extracted data.
County Beta's growth was 20%20\% (True). County Beta's final count was 1,8001,800, not 2,1002,100 (False). Gamma to Alpha final ratio is 1,400:1,800=7:91,400:1,800 = 7:9 (True). Overall total growth is 1,000/4,000=25%1,000 / 4,000 = 25\%, not 20%20\% (False).
Comparing the mathematical findings directly to the given options determines the correct answers.

Key Concept

Extracting quantitative variables from paragraph text and executing multi-step percentage calculations.
Question 8Question

In a state e-governance initiative, a total of 2,4002,400 Common Service Centers (CSCs) are distributed across three districts: District P, District Q, and District R. District P contains 30%30\% of the total CSCs. The ratio of the total number of CSCs in District Q to those in District R is 4:34:3. Each CSC is operated by either a male or a female entrepreneur. In District P, 25%25\% of the CSCs are operated by female entrepreneurs. The number of female-operated CSCs in District Q is 50%50\% more than the number of female-operated CSCs in District P. If the total number of female-operated CSCs across all three districts combined is 600600, what is the ratio of male-operated CSCs in District Q to the female-operated CSCs in District R?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: 23:523:5

Answer

The correct ratio is 23:523:5.
Based on the text, District Q has a total of 960 CSCs and District P has 180 female-operated CSCs. Since District Q has 50% more female-operated CSCs than P, it has 270 female-operated CSCs. This leaves 690 male-operated CSCs in Q. Since the total female-operated CSCs across all districts is 600, District R has 600 - (180 + 270) = 150 female-operated CSCs. The ratio of male-operated CSCs in Q to female-operated CSCs in R is 690:150, which simplifies to 23:5.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Calculate the total number of CSCs in each district.
District P = 720. District Q = 960. District R = 720.
District P has 30% of 2,400 = 720. The remaining 1,680 CSCs are divided between Q and R in a 4:3 ratio. District Q = (4/7) * 1,680 = 960. District R = (3/7) * 1,680 = 720.
2
Calculate the number of female-operated CSCs in Districts P and Q.
Female in P = 180. Female in Q = 270.
Female CSCs in P = 25% of 720 = 180. Female CSCs in Q is 50% more than in P, meaning 180 + (0.50 * 180) = 180 + 90 = 270.
3
Calculate the number of female-operated CSCs in District R.
Female in R = 150.
Total female CSCs = 600. Female in R = Total - (Female P + Female Q) = 600 - (180 + 270) = 600 - 450 = 150.
4
Calculate the number of male-operated CSCs in District Q.
Male in Q = 690.
Total CSCs in Q (960) - Female in Q (270) = 690.
5
Find the requested ratio.
23:5
Ratio of Male in Q to Female in R = 690 : 150. Dividing both sides by 30 gives 23 : 5.

Key Concept

Data Extraction and Percentage Multi-step Calculations in Caselets
Question 9Question

In a state public health drive conducted across three administrative zones—Zone X, Zone Y, and Zone Z—a total of 12,00012,000 vaccines were administered. Zone X received 35%35\% of the total vaccines administered. In Zone Y, the total number of vaccines administered was 800800 more than that in Zone X, and the ratio of vaccines administered to children versus adults was 2:32 : 3. The remaining vaccines were administered in Zone Z, where 60%60\% of the recipients were adults and the rest were children. If 40%40\% of the recipients in Zone X were children, what is the total number of children who received vaccines across all three zones combined?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: 4,8004,800

Answer

4,8004,800 children received vaccines across all three zones combined.
The total vaccines administered across the three zones equal 12,00012,000. Zone X accounts for 35%35\% (4,2004,200 vaccines), of which 40%40\% are children (1,6801,680). Zone Y receives 800800 more than Zone X (5,0005,000 vaccines), with children making up 2/52/5 of this amount (2,0002,000). Zone Z receives the remaining 2,8002,800 vaccines, where 40%40\% are children (1,1201,120). Adding these together (1,680+2,000+1,1201,680 + 2,000 + 1,120) yields 4,8004,800.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Calculate total vaccines and child recipients in Zone X
Total in Zone X = 0.35×12,000=4,2000.35 \times 12,000 = 4,200. Children in Zone X = 0.40×4,200=1,6800.40 \times 4,200 = 1,680.
Zone X receives 35%35\% of total vaccines, and 40%40\% of Zone X recipients are children.
2
Calculate total vaccines and child recipients in Zone Y
Total in Zone Y = 4,200+800=5,0004,200 + 800 = 5,000. Children in Zone Y = 22+3×5,000=25×5,000=2,000\frac{2}{2 + 3} \times 5,000 = \frac{2}{5} \times 5,000 = 2,000.
Zone Y receives 800800 more vaccines than Zone X, and children make up 22 parts out of 55 total parts.
3
Calculate total vaccines and child recipients in Zone Z
Total in Zone Z = 12,000(4,200+5,000)=2,80012,000 - (4,200 + 5,000) = 2,800. Children percentage in Zone Z = 100%60%=40%100\% - 60\% = 40\%. Children in Zone Z = 0.40×2,800=1,1200.40 \times 2,800 = 1,120.
Zone Z receives the remainder of total vaccines, and children constitute the remaining 40%40\% of Zone Z recipients.
4
Sum child recipients across all three zones
Total children = 1,680+2,000+1,120=4,8001,680 + 2,000 + 1,120 = 4,800.
Adding the child counts from Zone X, Zone Y, and Zone Z yields the final combined total.

Key Concept

Multi-step quantitative extraction, ratio division, and percentage base calculation from paragraph-based caselets.
Estimated Time:2m 30s
Question 10Question

In a state disaster relief operation, a total of 1,2001,200 food packets were distributed among three relief camps: Camp A, Camp B, and Camp C. Camp A received 400400 packets, while Camp B received 150150 more packets than Camp A. The remaining food packets were distributed to Camp C. How many food packets were distributed to Camp C?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: 250

Answer

The total number of food packets distributed to Camp C is 250.
Camp A receives 400 packets. Camp B receives 150 more than Camp A, which equals 400 + 150 = 550 packets. Combined, Camp A and Camp B receive 400 + 550 = 950 packets. Subtracting 950 from the total allocation of 1,200 packets leaves 250 packets for Camp C.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the number of packets given to Camp A and calculate the packets given to Camp B.
Camp A = 400 packets; Camp B = 400 + 150 = 550 packets.
The paragraph states Camp B received 150 more packets than Camp A.
2
Calculate the total number of packets distributed to Camp A and Camp B together.
Total for Camp A and Camp B = 400 + 550 = 950 packets.
Adding the individual allocations of Camp A and Camp B.
3
Subtract the combined allocation of Camp A and Camp B from the overall total packets.
Camp C = 1200 - 950 = 250 packets.
The remaining packets out of the total 1,200 were given to Camp C.

Key Concept

Data extraction and step-by-step arithmetic computation from narrative caselets
Question 11Question

Under a state renewable energy initiative, a total capacity of 15,000 kW15,000\text{ kW} of solar panels was installed across three districts: District Alpha, District Beta, and District Gamma. District Alpha was allocated 40%40\% of the total capacity. The capacity installed in District Beta was 34\frac{3}{4} of that in District Alpha, while the remaining capacity was installed in District Gamma. In District Alpha, 60%60\% of the installed capacity consists of rooftop solar panels, and the remainder consists of ground-mounted panels. In District Beta, the ratio of rooftop solar capacity to ground-mounted solar capacity is 2:32 : 3. In District Gamma, the ground-mounted solar capacity exceeds the rooftop solar capacity by 1,500 kW1,500\text{ kW}.

Based on the provided information, which of the following statements regarding the solar panel capacity distribution are correct?

Select all that apply

Show answer & explanation

Answer: The total rooftop solar capacity installed across all three districts is 6,900 kW6,900\text{ kW}.; The ground-mounted solar capacity in District Gamma is exactly twice its rooftop solar capacity.; The ratio of total ground-mounted solar capacity to total rooftop solar capacity across all three districts is 27:2327 : 23.

Answer

The statements confirming that total rooftop solar capacity is 6,900 kW6,900\text{ kW}, ground-mounted capacity in District Gamma is twice its rooftop capacity, and the ratio of total ground-mounted to rooftop capacity is 27:2327 : 23 are all correct.
Evaluating the data step by step shows that District Alpha has 3,600 kW3,600\text{ kW} rooftop and 2,400 kW2,400\text{ kW} ground-mounted capacity; District Beta has 1,800 kW1,800\text{ kW} rooftop and 2,700 kW2,700\text{ kW} ground-mounted capacity; District Gamma has 1,500 kW1,500\text{ kW} rooftop and 3,000 kW3,000\text{ kW} ground-mounted capacity. This confirms that total rooftop capacity is 6,900 kW6,900\text{ kW}, District Gamma's ground-mounted capacity is twice its rooftop capacity (3,000 kW=2×1,500 kW3,000\text{ kW} = 2 \times 1,500\text{ kW}), and the overall ratio of ground-mounted to rooftop capacity is 8,100:6,900=27:238,100 : 6,900 = 27 : 23.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Calculate total capacity allocation for each district.
Alpha = 40% of 15,000=6,000 kW40\% \text{ of } 15,000 = 6,000\text{ kW}. Beta = 34×6,000=4,500 kW\frac{3}{4} \times 6,000 = 4,500\text{ kW}. Gamma = 15,000(6,000+4,500)=4,500 kW15,000 - (6,000 + 4,500) = 4,500\text{ kW}.
Determining individual district totals is necessary to break down capacity by panel type.
2
Determine rooftop and ground-mounted capacities for District Alpha and District Beta.
District Alpha: Rooftop = 60% of 6,000=3,600 kW60\% \text{ of } 6,000 = 3,600\text{ kW}, Ground = 2,400 kW2,400\text{ kW}. District Beta: Ratio 2:3    2:3 \implies Rooftop = 25×4,500=1,800 kW\frac{2}{5} \times 4,500 = 1,800\text{ kW}, Ground = 35×4,500=2,700 kW\frac{3}{5} \times 4,500 = 2,700\text{ kW}.
Applying given percentages and ratios yields the exact breakdown for Alpha and Beta.
3
Determine rooftop and ground-mounted capacities for District Gamma.
Let Rooftop = RR and Ground = GG. We have G+R=4,500G + R = 4,500 and GR=1,500G - R = 1,500. Solving gives 2G=6,000    G=3,000 kW2G = 6,000 \implies G = 3,000\text{ kW} and R=1,500 kWR = 1,500\text{ kW}.
Setting up simultaneous equations resolves the unknown components for Gamma.
4
Verify overall totals and evaluate each statement.
Total Rooftop = 3,600+1,800+1,500=6,900 kW3,600 + 1,800 + 1,500 = 6,900\text{ kW}. Total Ground = 2,400+2,700+3,000=8,100 kW2,400 + 2,700 + 3,000 = 8,100\text{ kW}. Gamma Ground/Rooftop ratio = 3,000/1,500=23,000 / 1,500 = 2. Beta percentage of total = 4,500/15,000=30%4,500 / 15,000 = 30\%. Ground to Rooftop ratio = 8,100/6,900=27/238,100 / 6,900 = 27 / 23.
Direct comparison evaluates which statements are factually supported by the paragraph data.

Key Concept

Data extraction and simultaneous calculation from unstructured paragraph-based quantitative scenarios.
Question 12Question

In a state sericulture development drive, three agricultural districts—District R, District S, and District T—produced a cumulative total of 3,000 kg3,000\text{ kg} of raw silk, consisting exclusively of Mulberry silk and Eri silk. Across all three districts combined, Mulberry silk accounted for 60%60\% of the total raw silk production. In District R, total raw silk production was 1,000 kg1,000\text{ kg}, of which 65%65\% was Mulberry silk. District S produced a total of 1,200 kg1,200\text{ kg} of raw silk with a Mulberry silk to Eri silk production ratio of 7:57 : 5. The remaining raw silk was produced in District T. What is the absolute difference between the quantity of Mulberry silk and the quantity of Eri silk produced in District T?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: 100 kg100\text{ kg}

Answer

The absolute difference between Mulberry silk and Eri silk produced in District T is 100 kg100\text{ kg}.
Total raw silk produced is 3,000 kg3,000\text{ kg}, making total Mulberry silk 1,800 kg1,800\text{ kg} (60%60\%) and total Eri silk 1,200 kg1,200\text{ kg}. District R produces 650 kg650\text{ kg} Mulberry and 350 kg350\text{ kg} Eri silk. District S produces 700 kg700\text{ kg} Mulberry and 500 kg500\text{ kg} Eri silk. Consequently, District T produces 450 kg450\text{ kg} Mulberry silk (1,8001,3501,800 - 1,350) and 350 kg350\text{ kg} Eri silk (1,2008501,200 - 850). The difference between Mulberry and Eri silk in District T is 450350=100 kg450 - 350 = 100\text{ kg}.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Calculate overall production totals for Mulberry and Eri silk
Total Mulberry silk = 60% of 3,000 kg=1,800 kg60\% \text{ of } 3,000\text{ kg} = 1,800\text{ kg}. Total Eri silk = 3,000 kg1,800 kg=1,200 kg3,000\text{ kg} - 1,800\text{ kg} = 1,200\text{ kg}.
Establishing aggregate category totals provides the basis to determine missing District T values.
2
Determine breakdown for District R and District S
District R: Total = 1,000 kg1,000\text{ kg}, Mulberry = 65%×1,000=650 kg65\% \times 1,000 = 650\text{ kg}, Eri = 350 kg350\text{ kg}. District S: Total = 1,200 kg1,200\text{ kg}, Mulberry = 712×1,200=700 kg\frac{7}{12} \times 1,200 = 700\text{ kg}, Eri = 512×1,200=500 kg\frac{5}{12} \times 1,200 = 500\text{ kg}.
Extract specific entity values from given percentage and ratio conditions.
3
Derive Mulberry and Eri silk quantities for District T
District T Mulberry = 1,800(650+700)=450 kg1,800 - (650 + 700) = 450\text{ kg}. District T Eri = 1,200(350+500)=350 kg1,200 - (350 + 500) = 350\text{ kg}.
Subtracting known district totals from overall state totals yields District T quantities.
4
Calculate the absolute difference for District T
Difference = 450 kg350 kg=100 kg450\text{ kg} - 350\text{ kg} = 100\text{ kg}.
Directly answers the final prompt query.

Key Concept

Data extraction, multi-entity category balance, and multi-step quantitative calculation from unstructured paragraph data.
Question 13Question

Under a State Skill Development Mission, a total of 4,5004,500 candidates were enrolled across three vocational sectors: IT & Electronics, Healthcare & Allied Sciences, and Textile & Apparel. The IT & Electronics sector accounted for 40%40\% of the total enrolled candidates. The ratio of candidates enrolled in Healthcare & Allied Sciences to those in Textile & Apparel was 7:87 : 8. Upon completion of the training, 65%65\% of the enrolled candidates in IT & Electronics successfully obtained certification. The number of certified candidates in Healthcare & Allied Sciences was equal to 80%80\% of the certified candidates in IT & Electronics. If the total number of certified candidates across all three sectors combined was 2,8982,898, what percentage of the enrolled candidates in the Textile & Apparel sector successfully obtained certification?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: 55

Answer

The certification percentage of enrolled candidates in the Textile & Apparel sector is 55%55\%.
To find the certification percentage for the Textile & Apparel sector, first determine the enrollment figures: IT & Electronics has 1,8001,800 candidates (40%40\% of 4,5004,500), leaving 2,7002,700 candidates split in a 7:87 : 8 ratio between Healthcare (1,2601,260) and Textile (1,4401,440). Next, calculate certified candidates: IT & Electronics has 1,1701,170 certified (65%65\% of 1,8001,800), and Healthcare has 936936 certified (80%80\% of 1,1701,170). Subtracting these from the total 2,8982,898 certified candidates leaves 792792 certified candidates in Textile & Apparel. Finally, 7921,440×100%=55%\frac{792}{1,440} \times 100\% = 55\%.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Calculate the number of candidates enrolled in IT & Electronics
Enrolled in IT & Electronics = 0.40×4,500=1,8000.40 \times 4,500 = 1,800 candidates.
IT & Electronics accounts for 40%40\% of the overall 4,5004,500 candidates.
2
Determine enrollment in Healthcare & Allied Sciences and Textile & Apparel
Remaining candidates = 4,5001,800=2,7004,500 - 1,800 = 2,700. Enrolled in Healthcare = 715×2,700=1,260\frac{7}{15} \times 2,700 = 1,260. Enrolled in Textile = 815×2,700=1,440\frac{8}{15} \times 2,700 = 1,440.
The remaining 2,7002,700 candidates are distributed between Healthcare and Textile in the ratio 7:87 : 8 (total 1515 parts).
3
Calculate certified candidates in IT & Electronics
Certified in IT & Electronics = 0.65×1,800=1,1700.65 \times 1,800 = 1,170 candidates.
65%65\% of the enrolled IT & Electronics candidates achieved certification.
4
Calculate certified candidates in Healthcare & Allied Sciences
Certified in Healthcare = 0.80×1,170=9360.80 \times 1,170 = 936 candidates.
Healthcare certified candidates equal 80%80\% of certified candidates in IT & Electronics.
5
Determine certified candidates in Textile & Apparel
Certified in Textile = 2,898(1,170+936)=2,8982,106=7922,898 - (1,170 + 936) = 2,898 - 2,106 = 792 candidates.
Total certified across all sectors is 2,8982,898.
6
Compute the certification rate for Textile & Apparel
Certification percentage = (7921,440)×100%=55%\left(\frac{792}{1,440}\right) \times 100\% = 55\%.
Divide certified Textile candidates by total enrolled Textile candidates and convert to percentage.

Key Concept

Data extraction, ratio partitioning, and sequential percentage calculation from unstructured text caselets.
Question 14Question

In a municipal solid waste management drive across three processing centers—Plant North, Plant South, and Plant East—a total of 10,000 tonnes10,000\text{ tonnes} of waste was processed in a month.

- Plant North processed 30%30\% of the total waste. Of the waste processed at Plant North, 60%60\% was biodegradable and the rest was non-biodegradable.
- Plant South processed 1.51.5 times the amount of non-biodegradable waste processed by Plant North. The ratio of biodegradable to non-biodegradable waste processed at Plant South was 4:34 : 3.
- Plant East processed the remaining waste, with a ratio of biodegradable to non-biodegradable waste of 5:25 : 2.

Based on the information provided above, which of the following statements are correct?

Select all that apply

Show answer & explanation

Answer: The total quantity of biodegradable waste processed across all three plants combined is 6,200 tonnes6,200\text{ tonnes}.; The ratio of non-biodegradable waste processed by Plant South to that processed by Plant East is 9:49 : 4.

Answer

The statements confirming that total biodegradable waste across all plants is 6,200 tonnes and that the ratio of non-biodegradable waste between Plant South and Plant East is 9 : 4 are correct.
The total biodegradable waste is indeed 1,800+2,400+2,000=6,200 tonnes1,800 + 2,400 + 2,000 = 6,200\text{ tonnes}, making the first statement correct. Furthermore, comparing non-biodegradable waste of Plant South (1,800 tonnes1,800\text{ tonnes}) and Plant East (800 tonnes800\text{ tonnes}) gives the ratio 1,800:800=9:41,800 : 800 = 9 : 4, making the second statement correct.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Calculate waste quantities for Plant North.
Total = 3,000 tonnes3,000\text{ tonnes}; Biodegradable = 1,800 tonnes1,800\text{ tonnes}; Non-biodegradable = 1,200 tonnes1,200\text{ tonnes}.
Plant North processed 30%30\% of 10,000 tonnes=3,000 tonnes10,000\text{ tonnes} = 3,000\text{ tonnes}. Biodegradable is 60%60\% of 3,000=1,800 tonnes3,000 = 1,800\text{ tonnes}, leaving 1,200 tonnes1,200\text{ tonnes} non-biodegradable.
2
Calculate waste quantities for Plant South.
Non-biodegradable = 1,800 tonnes1,800\text{ tonnes}; Biodegradable = 2,400 tonnes2,400\text{ tonnes}; Total = 4,200 tonnes4,200\text{ tonnes}.
Non-biodegradable at South is 1.5×1,200=1,800 tonnes1.5 \times 1,200 = 1,800\text{ tonnes}. Given Bio : Non-bio ratio of 4:34 : 3, 3 parts=1,800 tonnes    1 part=600 tonnes3\text{ parts} = 1,800\text{ tonnes} \implies 1\text{ part} = 600\text{ tonnes}. Thus, Biodegradable = 4×600=2,400 tonnes4 \times 600 = 2,400\text{ tonnes}.
3
Calculate waste quantities for Plant East.
Total = 2,800 tonnes2,800\text{ tonnes}; Biodegradable = 2,000 tonnes2,000\text{ tonnes}; Non-biodegradable = 800 tonnes800\text{ tonnes}.
Remaining total waste = 10,000(3,000+4,200)=2,800 tonnes10,000 - (3,000 + 4,200) = 2,800\text{ tonnes}. Given Bio : Non-bio ratio of 5:25 : 2, total parts = 77. 1 part=400 tonnes1\text{ part} = 400\text{ tonnes}. Biodegradable = 5×400=2,000 tonnes5 \times 400 = 2,000\text{ tonnes} and Non-biodegradable = 2×400=800 tonnes2 \times 400 = 800\text{ tonnes}.
4
Verify each statement against calculated values.
Total Biodegradable = 1,800+2,400+2,000=6,200 tonnes1,800 + 2,400 + 2,000 = 6,200\text{ tonnes} (True). South Non-bio : East Non-bio = 1,800:800=9:41,800 : 800 = 9 : 4 (True). Plant East share = 2,800/10,000=28%2,800 / 10,000 = 28\% (False). South Non-bio (1,8001,800) vs North Bio (1,8001,800) are equal (False).
Comparing calculated numerical values directly evaluates statement validity.

Key Concept

Caselet Data Extraction and Multi-Step Proportionate Allocation
Question 15Question

A state public transport corporation operates a total of 500500 buses across three urban divisions: Division X, Division Y, and Division Z. Division X accounts for 40%40\% of the total fleet, Division Y accounts for 30%30\%, and Division Z operates the remaining buses. In Division X, 25%25\% of the buses are electric. In Division Y, the ratio of electric buses to non-electric buses is 2:32 : 3. In Division Z, the number of electric buses is equal to 50%50\% of the number of electric buses in Division X. What is the ratio of the total number of non-electric buses to the total number of electric buses across all three divisions combined?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: 73 : 27

Answer

The ratio of the total number of non-electric buses to the total number of electric buses across all three divisions combined is 73 : 27.
Division X has 200 buses with 50 electric buses. Division Y has 150 buses with 60 electric buses (using the 2:3 ratio). Division Z has 150 buses with 25 electric buses (50% of 50). Total electric buses equal 135, leaving 365 non-electric buses. The simplified ratio of non-electric to electric buses is 365 : 135 = 73 : 27.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Calculate the total fleet size for each division
Division X = 40%40\% of 500=200500 = 200 buses; Division Y = 30%30\% of 500=150500 = 150 buses; Division Z = 500(200+150)=150500 - (200 + 150) = 150 buses.
Establishing the total fleet per division is required to extract category values.
2
Calculate electric buses in each division
Division X electric = 25%25\% of 200=50200 = 50 buses. Division Y electric = 22+3×150=60\frac{2}{2+3} \times 150 = 60 buses. Division Z electric = 50%50\% of 50=2550 = 25 buses.
Extracting the electric bus count per division using the specified percentages and ratios.
3
Calculate total electric and non-electric buses combined
Total Electric = 50+60+25=13550 + 60 + 25 = 135 buses. Total Non-Electric = 500135=365500 - 135 = 365 buses.
Summing values across all divisions to find overall totals.
4
Compute the required ratio of non-electric to electric buses
Ratio = 365:135=73:27365 : 135 = 73 : 27.
Simplifying the ratio by dividing both terms by their greatest common divisor, 55.

Key Concept

Caselet Data Extraction and Multi-step Ratio & Percentage Calculations
Estimated Time:1m 30s
Question 16Question

In a state handloom and textile development initiative, data was collected from three handicraft clusters: Cluster A, Cluster B, and Cluster C. A total of 1,2001,200 weavers are registered across these three clusters. The number of weavers in Cluster C is 300300, of which 40%40\% are female. The number of weavers in Cluster A is 25%25\% more than the number of weavers in Cluster B. In Cluster B, the ratio of male to female weavers is 3:23:2. If the total number of female weavers across all three clusters is 480480, what is the total number of male weavers registered in Cluster A?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: 300

Answer

The total number of male weavers registered in Cluster A is 300.
By determining the total weavers in Cluster A (500) and Cluster B (400), and finding the female counts in Cluster C (120) and Cluster B (160), we deduce that Cluster A has 200 female weavers. Subtracting 200 from the 500 total weavers in Cluster A leaves 300 male weavers.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Determine total weavers in Clusters A and B combined
900 weavers
Subtract Cluster C weavers (300) from the overall total of 1,200 weavers.
2
Calculate weavers in Cluster B and Cluster A
Cluster B = 400 weavers, Cluster A = 500 weavers
Set Cluster A = 1.25 × Cluster B. Then 2.25 × Cluster B = 900, yielding Cluster B = 400 and Cluster A = 500.
3
Determine female weavers in Cluster C and Cluster B
Cluster C females = 120, Cluster B females = 160
40% of 300 is 120 for Cluster C. Based on the 3:2 male to female ratio in Cluster B, females account for 2/5 of 400, which is 160.
4
Calculate female weavers in Cluster A
200 female weavers
Subtract known females in B (160) and C (120) from the total 480 female weavers: 480 - (120 + 160) = 200.
5
Calculate male weavers in Cluster A
300 male weavers
Subtract female weavers in Cluster A from total weavers in Cluster A: 500 - 200 = 300.

Key Concept

Data extraction, multi-step ratio calculation, and percentage breakdown from paragraph caselets.
Question 17Question

A metropolitan public library system launched a project to digitize a total of 12,00012,000 rare manuscripts. The manuscripts were distributed among three main facilities: the Central Library, the North Branch, and the South Branch in the ratio of 5:4:35:4:3, respectively. After one month of continuous operations, a progress report revealed that the Central Library had successfully digitized 60%60\% of its allocated manuscripts. The North Branch had completed 45%45\% of its assigned quota, while the South Branch managed to digitize 70%70\% of the manuscripts allocated to it.

Based on the information provided in the passage, which of the following statements are correct? (Select all that apply)

Select all that apply

Show answer & explanation

Answer: The North Branch currently has a greater number of manuscripts left to digitize compared to the Central Library.; The three facilities combined successfully digitized a total of 6,9006,900 manuscripts during the first month.

Answer

The correct statements are that the North Branch has more manuscripts left to digitize than the Central Library, and that the three facilities combined digitized a total of 6,900 manuscripts.
Based on the data derived from the caselet, the three facilities digitized a total of 3,000+1,800+2,100=6,9003,000 + 1,800 + 2,100 = 6,900 manuscripts. Additionally, the North Branch has 2,2002,200 manuscripts remaining (4,0001,8004,000 - 1,800), which is strictly greater than the Central Library's 2,0002,000 remaining manuscripts (5,0003,0005,000 - 3,000).

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Calculate the initial allocation of manuscripts for each facility based on the 5:4:35:4:3 ratio.
Central Library: 5,0005,000; North Branch: 4,0004,000; South Branch: 3,0003,000.
The total ratio parts are 5+4+3=125 + 4 + 3 = 12. Each part is worth 12,000/12=1,00012,000 / 12 = 1,000 manuscripts. Multiplying by each facility's ratio gives their total quota.
2
Calculate the number of manuscripts digitized by each facility in the first month.
Central: 3,0003,000; North: 1,8001,800; South: 2,1002,100.
Multiply each facility's allocated quota by their respective completion percentage (e.g., 60%60\% of 5,000=3,0005,000 = 3,000).
3
Calculate the number of manuscripts remaining to be digitized for each facility.
Central: 2,0002,000; North: 2,2002,200; South: 900900.
Subtract the number of digitized manuscripts from the initial quota for each facility.
4
Evaluate the accuracy of the given statements using the extracted data.
The total digitized is 3,000+1,800+2,100=6,9003,000 + 1,800 + 2,100 = 6,900. North remaining (2,2002,200) is greater than Central remaining (2,0002,000).
Comparing the processed numbers against the claims confirms which statements are factually correct based on the passage.

Key Concept

Extracting proportional allocations and applying distinct percentage rates to multi-entity caselet data.
Estimated Time:2m 0s
Question 18Question

A recent agricultural survey evaluated the annual yield of three crops—Wheat, Rice, and Maize—across two neighboring regions, Region Alpha and Region Beta. The combined yield of all three crops in both regions was 8,0008,000 metric tons. Region Alpha accounted for 55%55\% of the total combined yield. In Region Alpha, the yield of Maize was 800800 metric tons, and the remaining yield was distributed between Wheat and Rice in the ratio of 5:45:4, respectively. In Region Beta, the yield of Rice was exactly half of the Wheat yield in Region Alpha. Additionally, the Maize yield in Region Beta was 20%20\% higher than the Maize yield in Region Alpha.

Based on the survey data, what is the ratio of the Wheat yield in Region Beta to the total Maize yield from both regions combined?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: 41:4441:44

Answer

The ratio of the Wheat yield in Region Beta to the total Maize yield from both regions is 41:4441:44.
The correct ratio is determined by first finding the Wheat yield in Region Beta (1,6401,640 metric tons) and the total Maize yield from both regions combined (1,7601,760 metric tons). Simplifying the ratio 1,640:1,7601,640 : 1,760 by dividing both values by 4040 yields the final result of 41:4441:44.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Determine the total crop yield for each region.
Region Alpha total = 4,4004,400 tons; Region Beta total = 3,6003,600 tons.
Region Alpha is 55%55\% of the 8,0008,000 total (0.55×8000=44000.55 \times 8000 = 4400). Region Beta is the remainder (80004400=36008000 - 4400 = 3600).
2
Calculate the individual crop yields for Region Alpha.
Maize = 800800 tons, Wheat = 2,0002,000 tons, Rice = 1,6001,600 tons.
Maize is given as 800800. The remainder for Wheat and Rice is 4,400800=3,6004,400 - 800 = 3,600. Using the 5:45:4 ratio, Wheat is 59×3600=2000\frac{5}{9} \times 3600 = 2000, and Rice is 49×3600=1600\frac{4}{9} \times 3600 = 1600.
3
Calculate the individual crop yields for Region Beta.
Rice = 1,0001,000 tons, Maize = 960960 tons, Wheat = 1,6401,640 tons.
Rice is half of Region Alpha's Wheat (0.5×2000=10000.5 \times 2000 = 1000). Maize is 20%20\% higher than Region Alpha's Maize (800+0.20×800=960800 + 0.20 \times 800 = 960). Wheat is the remainder of Region Beta's total (36001000960=16403600 - 1000 - 960 = 1640).
4
Calculate the required ratio.
The final ratio is 41:4441:44.
Total Maize from both regions is 800+960=1,760800 + 960 = 1,760. The ratio of Region Beta's Wheat to Total Maize is 1640:17601640 : 1760, which simplifies to 164:176164 : 176, and further to 41:4441 : 44 by dividing both numbers by 44.

Key Concept

Extracting interrelated data points from a narrative caselet to compute multi-step ratios and percentages.
Question 19Question

A multinational corporation allocated a total annual training budget of 140,000 dollars across its three major divisions: Sales, Information Technology (IT), and Human Resources (HR). According to the financial distribution guidelines, the IT division received exactly 20% more funding than the Sales division. Meanwhile, the HR division was allocated exactly half of the amount given to the IT division. If the HR division dedicates 40% of its allocated training budget specifically to onboarding programs, what is the exact amount (in dollars) spent by the HR division on onboarding?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: 12000

Answer

12000
By converting the text into an algebraic equation, we establish the Sales budget as xx, IT as 1.2x1.2x, and HR as 0.6x0.6x. The sum 2.8x2.8x equals 140,000 dollars, making x=50,000x = 50,000. The HR division receives 0.6x0.6x, which is 30,000 dollars. Finally, taking 40% of the HR division's 30,000 dollar budget yields 12,000 dollars for onboarding programs.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Define algebraic variables for each division's allocation.
Sales = xx, IT = 1.2x1.2x, HR = 0.6x0.6x
To translate the relative proportional statements from the paragraph into a solvable mathematical model.
2
Set up an equation representing the total corporate training budget.
x+1.2x+0.6x=140,000x + 1.2x + 0.6x = 140,000
The sum of the three divisional budgets must equal the total allocated amount.
3
Solve the equation for xx to find the Sales division's baseline budget.
2.8x=140,000x=50,0002.8x = 140,000 \Rightarrow x = 50,000
To isolate the base variable from which the other departmental budgets are derived.
4
Calculate the total training budget allocated specifically to the HR division.
HR = 0.6×50,000=30,0000.6 \times 50,000 = 30,000
The question asks about a subset of the HR budget, so the total HR budget must be known first.
5
Calculate 40% of the HR division's budget.
0.40×30,000=12,0000.40 \times 30,000 = 12,000
The paragraph specifies that exactly 40% of the HR training budget goes to onboarding programs.

Key Concept

Extracting quantitative relationships from text to form algebraic equations and calculating sequential percentages.
Question 20Question

A municipal health department organized a vaccination drive across three different wards: Ward X, Ward Y, and Ward Z. The total population across the three wards is 12,00012,000, and this population is distributed among Ward X, Ward Y, and Ward Z in the ratio of 5:4:35:4:3, respectively.

In Ward X, 60%60\% of the population received Dose 1, and out of those who received Dose 1, 40%40\% also received Dose 2. The number of people who received Dose 1 in Ward Y is equal to the number of people who received Dose 1 in Ward X. In Ward Y, the number of people who received Dose 2 is half the number of people who received Dose 1 in the same ward. In Ward Z, the number of people who received Dose 1 is 40%40\% less than the number of people who received Dose 1 in Ward X. Furthermore, 50%50\% of the individuals who received Dose 1 in Ward Z went on to receive Dose 2.

Based on this information, what is the ratio of the total number of people who received Dose 2 in Ward X and Ward Z combined to the number of people in Ward Y who did NOT receive Dose 1?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: 21:1021:10

Answer

The correct ratio is 21:1021:10.
Based on the given ratios and percentages, Ward X has 1,2001,200 people with Dose 2, and Ward Z has 900900 people with Dose 2, combining for 2,1002,100. Ward Y has a total population of 4,0004,000, and 3,0003,000 received Dose 1, leaving exactly 1,0001,000 people who did not receive Dose 1. The ratio is 2,100:1,0002,100 : 1,000, which simplifies to 21:1021:10.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Calculate the total population for each ward based on the 5:4:35:4:3 ratio.
Total ratio parts = 5+4+3=125 + 4 + 3 = 12. Multiplier = 12,000÷12=1,00012,000 \div 12 = 1,000. Ward X population = 5×1,000=5,0005 \times 1,000 = 5,000. Ward Y population = 4×1,000=4,0004 \times 1,000 = 4,000. Ward Z population = 3×1,000=3,0003 \times 1,000 = 3,000.
Establishing the base population for each ward is necessary to apply the subsequent percentages.
2
Calculate Dose 1 and Dose 2 recipients for Ward X.
Dose 1 in X = 60%60\% of 5,000=3,0005,000 = 3,000. Dose 2 in X = 40%40\% of 3,000=1,2003,000 = 1,200.
The problem states 40%40\% of those who received Dose 1 went on to get Dose 2, meaning the base for Dose 2 is the Dose 1 count, not the total population.
3
Calculate the relevant statistics for Ward Y.
Dose 1 in Y = Dose 1 in X = 3,0003,000. People in Y who did NOT receive Dose 1 = Total Y population - Dose 1 in Y = 4,0003,000=1,0004,000 - 3,000 = 1,000.
The question asks for the number of people in Ward Y who did not receive Dose 1 to be used as the denominator in the final ratio.
4
Calculate Dose 1 and Dose 2 recipients for Ward Z.
Dose 1 in Z is 40%40\% less than Dose 1 in X (3,0003,000), which is 3,000(0.40×3,000)=1,8003,000 - (0.40 \times 3,000) = 1,800. Dose 2 in Z = 50%50\% of 1,800=9001,800 = 900.
This establishes the final required values needed for the numerator of the ratio.
5
Formulate and simplify the required ratio.
Ratio = (Dose 2 in X + Dose 2 in Z) : (No Dose 1 in Y) = (1,200+9001,200 + 900) : 1,000=2,100:1,000=21:101,000 = 2,100 : 1,000 = 21:10.
Combines the extracted data to answer the specific question asked in the stem.

Key Concept

Extracting and chaining percentage-based data across multiple entities to form relationships.