Examkin

Logical Reasoning and Analytical Ability

493 questions

All types493Multiple choice252Multiple select97True / False59Numeric6Matching51Ordering20Short answer8
Question 481Question →

Consider the following statement and the two candidate assumptions that follow it.

Statement:
The city's municipal corporation has launched a new mobile application that allows citizens to report local civic issues, such as broken streetlights and uncollected garbage, by directly uploading geotagged photographs.

Assumption I:
A significant number of citizens in the city possess the technical means and knowledge to utilize a smartphone-based reporting system.

Assumption II:
The total volume of civic complaints received by the municipal corporation will increase dramatically in the months following the application's launch.

Which of the following options correctly identifies the implicit assumption(s)?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Only assumption I is implicit

Answer

Only assumption I is implicit.
An assumption is an unstated premise that must be true for a statement's logic to hold. For the municipal corporation to launch a mobile app specifically designed for citizen reporting, they must assume that citizens actually possess the means (smartphones, internet) and knowledge to use it. Without this assumption, launching the app would be completely illogical. Therefore, Assumption I is implicit. Assumption II, however, predicts a dramatic increase in complaints; this is a potential consequence or inference regarding what might happen after the launch, not an underlying assumption required to make the decision to launch the app.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the core action and purpose described in the Statement.
The municipal corporation is launching a mobile app specifically for citizens to report civic issues.
Understanding the action helps identify what conditions must exist for the action to make logical sense.
2
Evaluate Assumption I against the Statement.
Assumption I is implicit.
For the mobile application to successfully serve its purpose, the creators must assume that the target user base (citizens) has the smartphones, internet access, and knowledge required to use it.
3
Evaluate Assumption II against the Statement.
Assumption II is not implicit.
An anticipated increase in complaints is a logical inference or potential consequence of making reporting easier, not a foundational premise that must be true for the app to be launched.

Key Concept

Distinguishing between implicit premises and logical inferences in administrative statements.
Question 482Question →

Read the provided statements and the conclusions that follow.

Statements:
1. According to a recent labor survey, most independent contractors in the regional transport sector experience severe income fluctuation, even if they log more than fifty working hours per week.
2. Any individual who experiences severe income fluctuation will consistently struggle to qualify for a standard mortgage loan.

Conclusions:
I. Some individuals who log more than fifty working hours per week struggle to qualify for a standard mortgage loan.
II. All independent contractors in the regional transport sector struggle to qualify for a standard mortgage loan.

Which of the following logically follows from the given statements?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Only conclusion I follows

Answer

Only conclusion I logically follows from the given statements.
Conclusion I is logically valid because Statement 1 confirms that at least some people who log more than fifty hours face severe income fluctuation, and Statement 2 dictates that anyone facing this fluctuation struggles to qualify for a mortgage. Conclusion II is invalid because Statement 1 explicitly refers to 'most' independent contractors, meaning we cannot apply the rule to 'all' of them.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze Statement 1
Establishes that a majority of transport sector independent contractors face severe income fluctuation, including those who work over fifty hours a week.
To identify the subject group and their specific conditions.
2
Analyze Statement 2
Establishes a strict conditional rule: Severe income fluctuation guarantees a struggle to qualify for a standard mortgage.
To determine the necessary consequence of experiencing income fluctuation.
3
Evaluate Conclusion I
Since some individuals work over fifty hours AND face income fluctuation (Statement 1), and those with income fluctuation struggle with mortgages (Statement 2), it must be true that some individuals working over fifty hours struggle with mortgages.
To test the logical validity of the first conclusion against the established facts.
4
Evaluate Conclusion II
Statement 1 specifies that 'most' independent contractors experience this fluctuation, not 'all'. Therefore, we cannot logically deduce that 'all' struggle with mortgages.
To test the logical validity of the second conclusion against the specific quantifiers in the text.

Key Concept

Statement and Conclusions or Inferences
Question 483Question →

Six debate finalists—Aris, Bella, Chen, David, Elena, and Felix—are seated in two parallel rows of three seats each, facing each other for a practice session. One row faces North, and the other faces South. The following conditions are observed:

1. Chen sits at one of the extreme ends and faces North.
2. Aris sits exactly opposite to Chen.
3. Bella faces South and does not sit adjacent to Aris.
4. David sits exactly opposite to the person who sits to the immediate right of Bella.
5. Elena does not sit at any extreme end.

Based on the seating arrangement, which of the following statements are correct? (Select all that apply)

Select all that apply

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Felix sits exactly opposite Bella and faces North.; Aris and Bella occupy the extreme ends of the South-facing row.

Answer

The statements asserting that Felix sits opposite Bella facing North, and that Aris and Bella occupy the extreme ends of the South-facing row are correct.
Following the given constraints step-by-step, the South-facing row consists of Aris, Elena, and Bella (from West to East). The North-facing row consists of Chen, David, and Felix (from West to East). This configuration proves that Aris and Bella occupy the extreme ends of their row, and Felix (facing North) sits exactly opposite Bella. Thus, these two statements are correct.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Determine the rows and extreme ends for Chen and Aris.
Chen is in the North-facing row (Row 2) at an extreme end (assume West end for orientation). Aris is in the South-facing row (Row 1) at the opposite extreme end (West end).
Clues 1 and 2 directly establish their relative opposite positions at an extremity.
2
Determine Bella's position.
Bella is in Row 1 (South-facing). Since Row 1 has only three seats and she cannot sit adjacent to Aris (who is at the West end), Bella must sit at the East end of Row 1.
Clue 3 restricts Bella's placement to the only non-adjacent seat available in a three-seat row.
3
Determine the middle positions for David and Elena.
Bella faces South, meaning her immediate right is to the West (the middle seat of Row 1). David sits opposite this seat, placing him in the middle of Row 2. Elena takes the remaining middle seat in Row 1.
Clue 4 locks David's position based on Bella's relative direction. Clue 5 confirms Elena cannot be at an end, so she takes the only remaining middle seat.
4
Determine Felix's position.
Felix takes the remaining seat, which is the East end of Row 2 (North-facing), directly opposite Bella.
By elimination, Felix must occupy the final available seat in the arrangement.

Key Concept

Parallel Row Seating and Relative Direction Orientation
Estimated Time:2m 0s
Question 484Question →

Read the following public health notice and evaluate the underlying assumptions.

Notice:
"The State Health Department urges all citizens to refrain from buying loose, unbranded spices from temporary street vendors following a recent spike in severe food poisoning cases linked to chemical adulterants."

Candidate Assumptions:
I. A section of the public will heed the advisory and modify their purchasing behavior.
II. Packaged and branded spices sold in registered supermarkets are completely free from chemical adulterants.

Which of the assumptions is/are implicit in the given notice?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Only assumption I is implicit

Answer

Only assumption I is implicit
The correct answer identifies that only the first assumption is an unstated premise. Whenever a public authority issues an advisory, there is an inherent, logical assumption that the target audience will pay attention and respond to it. The second statement is an extreme generalization that goes beyond the scope of the notice.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the notice and its core purpose
The notice is a public warning aiming to stop the consumption of unbranded spices due to health risks.
Understanding the intent of the statement is necessary to identify what the author takes for granted.
2
Evaluate Assumption I
Assumption I is implicit. The health department inherently assumes that issuing the advisory will lead to citizens changing their behavior.
An authority issues a directive or advisory with the logical premise that it will be read and acted upon by at least some members of the public; otherwise, issuing it would be pointless.
3
Evaluate Assumption II
Assumption II is not implicit. The notice targets a specific danger (unbranded spices) but does not claim or assume that all branded alternatives are perfectly safe.
Warnings against one hazard do not automatically establish the absolute safety of all other options. Assuming this creates a false binary.

Key Concept

Identifying Implicit Premises in Public Advisories
Question 485Question →

Five candidates—Aarav, Bhavna, Chirag, Divya, and Esha—are sitting on a bench from left to right. Based on the clues provided, arrange the candidates in their correct seating order from the leftmost position to the rightmost position.

1. Divya is sitting exactly in the middle of the bench.
2. Bhavna is sitting to the immediate right of Aarav.
3. Esha is not sitting at either of the extreme ends of the bench.
4. Chirag is sitting somewhere to the right of Divya, but he is not sitting immediately next to her.

Drag items to arrange them in the correct order

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The correct order from left to right is Aarav, Bhavna, Divya, Esha, and Chirag.
Based on the clues, Divya is in the middle (Seat 3). Chirag is to her right but not adjacent, so he must be at Seat 5. Aarav and Bhavna must sit together with Bhavna on the right, which only fits Seats 1 and 2 respectively. Esha takes the remaining Seat 4, which correctly places her away from the extreme ends. Therefore, the left-to-right sequence is Aarav, Bhavna, Divya, Esha, and Chirag.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify Divya's position.
Divya is in Seat 3.
The problem states she is sitting exactly in the middle of the five candidates.
2
Determine Chirag's position.
Chirag is in Seat 5.
Chirag is to the right of Divya (Seats 4 or 5) but not adjacent to her (not Seat 4).
3
Locate Aarav and Bhavna.
Aarav is in Seat 1 and Bhavna is in Seat 2.
They must sit together with Bhavna on the immediate right of Aarav. The only two consecutive empty seats remaining are 1 and 2.
4
Place the remaining candidate.
Esha is in Seat 4.
Esha is the only candidate left and Seat 4 is the only seat left. This also satisfies the condition that she is not at an extreme end.

Key Concept

Linear Seating Arrangement
Question 486Question →

Consider the following statement and the two candidate assumptions that follow it.

Statement:
"The metropolitan transport authority has decided to implement a congestion charge for all private vehicles entering the central business district during peak hours to encourage the use of public transit."

Assumption I: A significant number of commuters currently use private vehicles to enter the central business district during peak hours.
Assumption II: The implementation of the congestion charge will permanently eliminate all traffic jams in the central business district.

Which of the following logically applies?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Only assumption I is implicit

Answer

Only assumption I is implicit.
Assumption I is an implicit premise because the authority's goal to reduce private vehicle usage by imposing a charge logically assumes that there is currently a significant volume of private vehicles causing congestion. Assumption II is not implicit; while the authority aims to reduce congestion, assuming the policy will 'permanently eliminate all' traffic jams is an extreme exaggeration and an unsupported future prediction.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the transport authority's statement to determine the problem and the proposed solution.
Problem: Congestion during peak hours. Solution: Implement a congestion charge on private vehicles to encourage a shift to public transit.
Identifying the core goal helps in evaluating what the author must believe to be true for the policy to make sense.
2
Evaluate Assumption I for logical necessity against the statement.
Assumption I is valid. The authority must assume that private vehicles are currently a significant contributor to peak hour traffic; otherwise, targeting them with a charge would not be a logical solution.
An assumption must act as a foundational, unstated reason for the stated action.
3
Evaluate Assumption II for validity and extreme language.
Assumption II is invalid. While the statement aims to reduce congestion, it does not assume 'all' traffic jams will be 'permanently' eliminated.
Extreme absolute terms like 'permanently' and 'all' are rarely valid implicit assumptions in practical administrative decisions.

Key Concept

Identifying Implicit Premises and Avoiding Extreme Extrapolations
Question 487Question →

Six architects—Kael, Lin, Mateo, Nadia, Omar, and Priya—are sitting around a circular table at equal distances. Kael, Mateo, and Omar are facing the center, while Lin, Nadia, and Priya are facing away from the center.

Read the following information carefully:
1. Mateo sits second to the left of Priya.
2. Lin sits to the immediate right of Mateo.
3. Kael sits second to the left of Lin.
4. Nadia is not an immediate neighbor of Priya.

Based on the seating arrangement, which of the following statements are correct?

Select all that apply

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Priya sits to the immediate left of Omar.; Nadia sits second to the right of Mateo.

Answer

The statements confirming that Priya sits to the immediate left of Omar, and that Nadia sits second to the right of Mateo, are both correct.
Based on the completed arrangement (Clockwise: Priya, Kael, Nadia, Lin, Mateo, Omar), Omar is at position 6 facing the center, making his left clockwise (position 1), where Priya sits. Mateo is at position 5 facing the center, making his right anti-clockwise (position 3), where Nadia sits. Therefore, both of these positional statements perfectly match the deduced layout.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Establish the directional rules based on facing orientation.
For individuals facing the center (IN), left is clockwise and right is anti-clockwise. For individuals facing outward (OUT), left is anti-clockwise and right is clockwise.
Correctly translating left and right directions based on inward vs. outward facing is strictly required before placing anyone.
2
Assign positions 1 through 6 clockwise and place Priya to determine Mateo's seat.
Place Priya at position 1 (facing OUT). Because she faces outward, her left is anti-clockwise. The second position anti-clockwise from position 1 (sequence: 1 -> 6 -> 5) is position 5. Therefore, Mateo (facing IN) sits at position 5.
This establishes a starting anchor for the arrangement based on the first definite clue.
3
Place Lin based on Mateo's position.
Lin sits to the immediate right of Mateo. Mateo (at position 5) faces IN, so his right is anti-clockwise. The immediate position anti-clockwise from 5 is 4. Thus, Lin (facing OUT) sits at position 4.
Utilizes the second clue connected to a known position.
4
Place Kael based on Lin's position.
Kael sits second to the left of Lin. Lin (at position 4) faces OUT, so her left is anti-clockwise. The second position anti-clockwise from 4 (sequence: 4 -> 3 -> 2) is 2. Thus, Kael (facing IN) sits at position 2.
Maintains the chain of logic using established seats and specific facing directions.
5
Place the remaining two people, Nadia and Omar.
The empty seats are positions 3 and 6. Nadia cannot be an immediate neighbor of Priya (at position 1). Since position 6 is directly next to position 1, Nadia must take position 3 (facing OUT). Omar (facing IN) takes the final remaining seat at position 6.
Applies the final negative constraint to complete the deterministic seating layout.

Key Concept

Multi-variable seating arrangement requiring strict orientation rules (inward vs. outward) and sequential logical deduction.
Estimated Time:2m 0s
Question 488Question →

Consider the following policy initiative and evaluate which of the provided assumptions are logically implicit within it.

Statement: The State Agriculture Department has announced a new initiative providing a 75% subsidy on equipment costs for farmers who transition from traditional flood irrigation to drip irrigation systems.

Which of the following assumptions are implicit in the given statement? (Select all that apply)

Select all that apply

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Providing financial incentives will encourage at least a portion of the farming community to adopt the new irrigation technology.; Drip irrigation systems possess operational benefits or water efficiencies that make them preferable to traditional flood irrigation.

Answer

The implicit assumptions are that financial incentives will encourage adoption, and that drip irrigation offers preferable benefits over traditional methods.
The correct selections represent the foundational beliefs necessary for the policy to exist. For the government to offer a subsidy for drip irrigation, it must inherently believe that the subsidy will work to motivate farmers and that drip irrigation is a preferable method worth funding.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the core premise of the given statement.
The statement outlines a government policy offering a 75% subsidy to incentivize a shift from flood to drip irrigation.
Understanding the administrative action and its goal is the first step in identifying underlying assumptions.
2
Evaluate the candidate assumption regarding financial incentives.
The assumption is logically valid. The policy exists to drive a transition, implying the government believes the subsidy will successfully motivate farmers.
A proposed solution inherently assumes its own potential efficacy.
3
Evaluate the candidate assumption regarding the benefits of drip irrigation.
The assumption is valid. Promoting a transition to a new system implies the new system is recognized as superior or more efficient.
Governments do not sponsor transitions to alternative methods unless the alternative is deemed advantageous.
4
Evaluate the remaining candidate options for logical fallacies.
The options regarding developed nations (external fact) and future bans (future inference) are rejected.
Implicit assumptions must be foundational to the statement itself, avoiding outside knowledge or unstated future consequences.

Key Concept

Identifying Implicit Premises in Administrative Statements
Question 489Question →

Five researchers—Tariq, Uma, Victor, Wendy, and Xander—are seated evenly around a circular table. Tariq, Uma, and Victor are facing the center of the table, while Wendy and Xander are facing outwards (away from the center). The following seating conditions are observed:

1. Wendy is seated second to the left of Tariq.
2. Victor is seated to the immediate left of Wendy.
3. Uma is seated second to the right of Victor.

Based on these conditions, who is seated to the immediate right of Xander?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Uma

Answer

Uma is seated to the immediate right of Xander.
Tracing the positions step-by-step: If Tariq is at seat 1, Wendy (second to his left, CW) is at seat 3. Wendy faces outward, so her immediate left (CCW) is seat 2, where Victor sits. Victor faces inward, so second to his right (CCW) is seat 5, where Uma sits. Xander takes the last seat, seat 4. Since Xander faces outward, his immediate right is in the CW direction, which is seat 5, occupied by Uma.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Establish the directional rules for the circular table.
For inward-facing people (Tariq, Uma, Victor), Left is Clockwise (CW) and Right is Counter-Clockwise (CCW). For outward-facing people (Wendy, Xander), Left is CCW and Right is CW.
Correctly orienting relative directions based on facing is essential before placing anyone.
2
Place Tariq at an arbitrary starting position (let's call it Position 1) and find Wendy.
Tariq faces the center. His left is CW. Second to the left means moving 2 seats CW. Wendy is at Position 3.
Utilizes the first explicit seating condition.
3
Determine Victor's position relative to Wendy.
Wendy is at Position 3 and faces outwards. Her left is CCW. Immediate left means moving 1 seat CCW. Moving 1 seat CCW from Position 3 brings us to Position 2. Victor is at Position 2.
Applies the second condition, carefully applying the reversed directional rule for an outward-facing person.
4
Determine Uma's position relative to Victor.
Victor is at Position 2 and faces the center. His right is CCW. Second to the right means moving 2 seats CCW. Moving 2 seats CCW from Position 2 (past Position 1) lands on Position 5. Uma is at Position 5.
Applies the third condition.
5
Place Xander in the remaining seat and answer the final question.
Xander must be in the only empty seat, Position 4. Xander faces outwards, so his right is CW. Moving 1 seat CW from Position 4 gives Position 5, which is occupied by Uma.
Completes the logical deduction to identify the requested relationship.

Key Concept

Positional mapping with mixed facing orientations in circular seating arrangements.
Question 490Question →

Eight delegates are attending a bilateral summit. They are seated in two parallel rows, with four delegates in each row, such that there is an equal distance between adjacent persons.

In Row 1: P, Q, R, and S are seated, and all of them are facing South.
In Row 2: W, X, Y, and Z are seated, and all of them are facing North.
Therefore, each delegate in a row faces exactly one delegate from the other row.

Read the following information carefully:
- R sits second to the right of P.
- The delegate who faces P sits to the immediate left of Y.
- W sits at an extreme end of the row.
- Only one person sits between W and X.
- Q does not face Z.

Who sits to the immediate right of the delegate who faces X?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: S

Answer

S
Based on the logical deductions from the clues, the final seating arrangement from left to right is R, S, P, Q in the South-facing row, and W, Z, X, Y in the North-facing row. The delegate facing X is P. Since P is facing South, their immediate right is the seat to their left from the viewer's perspective, which is occupied by S.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Determine the relative positions in Row 1 based on facing direction.
Since Row 1 faces South, their 'right' translates to the viewer's 'left'. Placing R second to the right of P means R is positioned two seats to the left of P from our perspective. Possible positions (from Left to Right) are either (Seat 1: R, Seat 3: P) or (Seat 2: R, Seat 4: P).
To establish the initial positional anchors for the South-facing row.
2
Use the cross-row relationships to fix exact seats for P, R, and Y.
If P is at Seat 4, the person facing P (Seat 4 in Row 2) must be to the immediate left of Y. Since Row 2 faces North, this forces Y to an impossible 5th seat. Therefore, P must be at Seat 3 and R at Seat 1. The delegate facing P is at Seat 3 in Row 2, which makes Y sit at Seat 4.
To eliminate the invalid configuration and lock in the definitive locations of P, R, and Y.
3
Complete Row 2 using the constraints for W and X.
In Row 2, Seat 4 is occupied by Y, so W must be at the other extreme end (Seat 1). With exactly one person sitting between W and X, X must be seated at Seat 3. The remaining Seat 2 is occupied by Z.
To finalize the entire North-facing row layout.
4
Finalize Row 1 using Q's constraint.
Row 2 has Z at Seat 2. Since Q does not face Z, Q cannot be at Seat 2 in Row 1. Thus, Q takes Seat 4, leaving S at Seat 2. The arrangement is complete: Row 1 (R, S, P, Q) and Row 2 (W, Z, X, Y).
To complete the full seating matrix and ensure all conditions are met.
5
Answer the specific question asked in the stem.
X is at Seat 3. The delegate facing X is P. P is facing South, so P's immediate right is the seat immediately to their left from the viewer's perspective (Seat 2), which is occupied by S.
To accurately derive the final answer from the completed seating arrangement.

Key Concept

Linear and Parallel Seating Arrangements
Question 491Question →

An official press release from the Regional Transport Office (RTO) states the following:

"In a bid to enhance passenger safety and bring down highway collision rates, it is now mandatory for all inter-state commercial buses to be equipped with electronic speed limiters capped at 80 km/h."

Two candidate assumptions are proposed based on the text above:
I. The mandatory installation of electronic speed limiters will successfully prevent these buses from traveling faster than 80 km/h.
II. Driving at speeds exceeding 80 km/h is the sole cause of highway collisions involving inter-state commercial buses.

Which of the following options correctly identifies the assumption(s) implicit in the RTO's press release?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Only assumption I is implicit

Answer

Only assumption I is implicit
Assumption I is logically implicit because the RTO's entire strategy to reduce collisions relies on the unstated premise that the electronic speed limiters will successfully perform their intended function. Assumption II is invalid because, although the text implies high speed is a contributing factor (hence the mandate to 'bring down' collision rates), it does not assume that speeding is the 'sole' cause of all such incidents.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the core objective and the mandated action presented in the statement.
The RTO's objective is to 'enhance passenger safety and bring down highway collision rates'. To achieve this, the action is mandating 'electronic speed limiters capped at 80 km/h'.
Identifying the cause-and-effect relationship intended by the author is strictly necessary to deduce their underlying assumptions.
2
Evaluate Assumption I strictly against the logic of the original statement.
Assumption I suggests the limiters will successfully cap the speed at 80 km/h. This is a required, unstated premise. If the RTO did not assume the devices would function as intended, mandating them would not achieve their stated safety objective.
An assumption is a premise that must be taken for granted for the statement's logic to hold true.
3
Evaluate Assumption II, paying close attention to qualitative modifiers and absolute language.
Assumption II claims that speeding over 80 km/h is the 'sole cause' of collisions. While the statement aims to 'bring down' (reduce) collisions, which assumes speed is a contributing factor, it does not logically assume speed is the only factor.
Extreme language (such as 'sole', 'only', 'always') in an assumption usually makes it logically invalid unless the original text explicitly supports such an absolute condition.

Key Concept

Evaluating Implicit Premises and Identifying Extreme Language Traps in Logical Reasoning
Question 492Question →

Consider the following statement and the two assumptions that follow it.

Statement:
"The National Cyber Security Agency advises all smartphone users to install the latest OS update immediately to patch a critical vulnerability that could allow hackers to access personal data."

Assumptions:
I. At least some smartphone users will pay attention to this advisory and update their operating systems.
II. Hackers have already successfully stolen personal data from users who have not yet installed this update.

Based on the given statement, which of the following options is correct?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Only assumption I is implicit

Answer

The option stating that only assumption I is implicit is the correct answer. Issuing a public advisory inherently assumes that people will heed it, whereas the statement does not assume a hack has already occurred.
Assumption I is valid because the very act of issuing a public advisory fundamentally relies on the premise that the target audience will pay attention and take the suggested action. Assumption II is invalid because the statement only identifies a potential vulnerability ('could allow' access) and does not assume that hackers have already successfully exploited it to steal data.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the nature and purpose of the given statement.
The statement is a public advisory issued by a government agency urging action (installing an update) to prevent a negative outcome (data theft).
Identifying the type of statement helps in determining its underlying logical premises.
2
Evaluate Assumption I against the statement.
Assumption I states that some users will follow the advisory. This is implicitly assumed.
Any public notice, warning, or advisory is issued under the fundamental assumption that it will be read and acted upon by at least a portion of the target audience. Otherwise, issuing it would be pointless.
3
Evaluate Assumption II against the statement.
Assumption II claims that hackers have already stolen data. This is not implicitly assumed.
The statement uses the phrase 'could allow hackers to access', indicating a potential future risk or vulnerability. It does not state or assume that the vulnerability has already been actively exploited.

Key Concept

Identifying implicit premises in public advisories and distinguishing them from unstated inferences or factual exaggerations.
Question 493Question →

Six delegates (Aisha, Bilal, Chloe, David, Elena, and Farid) are seated in a single row of chairs facing North. The chairs are numbered consecutively from Seat 1 (leftmost) to Seat 6 (rightmost).

The seating arrangement is determined by the following conditions:
1. Farid is seated immediately to the right of Elena.
2. Chloe is seated immediately to the right of David.
3. There are exactly two delegates seated between Aisha and Bilal.
4. Elena is seated at Seat 5.
5. Aisha is seated to the left of Elena, but to the right of Chloe.

Match the following delegates to their correct seat numbers.

Click a left item, then click its matching right item

Items

Bilal
David
Aisha
Farid

Matches

Show answer & explanation

Answer

Bilal sits at Seat 1, David at Seat 2, Aisha at Seat 4, and Farid at Seat 6.
By anchoring Elena at Seat 5 and extending Farid to Seat 6, the remaining constraints deterministically force David and Chloe into Seats 2 and 3. This leaves only Seats 1 and 4 for Bilal and Aisha, correctly separated by two seats.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Place Elena and Farid based on direct statements.
Elena is at Seat 5, and Farid is at Seat 6.
Rule 4 explicitly places Elena at Seat 5. Rule 1 states Farid is to her immediate right. Since they are facing North, the immediate right is the next higher seat number.
2
Determine the possible positions for David and Chloe.
David must be at Seat 2 and Chloe at Seat 3.
Rule 5 states Aisha is to the right of Chloe and left of Elena, meaning Chloe must be at Seat 3 or lower. Rule 2 states Chloe is immediately right of David. If David were at Seat 1 and Chloe at Seat 2, Aisha would be at Seat 3 or 4, which creates a conflict when trying to place Bilal with exactly two seats apart. Thus, David takes Seat 2 and Chloe takes Seat 3.
3
Place Aisha and Bilal in the remaining seats.
Aisha is at Seat 4, and Bilal is at Seat 1.
With Seats 2, 3, 5, and 6 occupied, only Seats 1 and 4 remain. Rule 5 states Aisha is right of Chloe (Seat 3), so Aisha must be at Seat 4. Rule 3 states there are two seats between Aisha and Bilal. Seat 4 and Seat 1 have exactly two seats (Seats 2 and 3) between them, confirming Bilal is at Seat 1.

Key Concept

Linear Seating Arrangement with Position and Neighbor Constraints
PreviousPage 25 / 25
Logical Reasoning and Analytical Ability Practice Questions — State PSC Exam — Page 25 | Examkin