High-resolution manometry (HRM) is the gold standard for diagnosing esophageal motility disorders. According to the Chicago Classification v4.0, match the following esophageal motility disorders with their precise defining manometric criteria.
- Type I AchalasiaElevated IRP, 100% failed peristalsis, and absence of panesophageal pressurization
- Type II AchalasiaElevated IRP, 100% failed peristalsis, and panesophageal pressurization in 20% or more of swallows
- Type III AchalasiaElevated IRP and premature (spastic) contractions in 20% or more of swallows
- Distal Esophageal SpasmNormal IRP and premature (spastic) contractions in 20% or more of swallows
- Hypercontractile (Jackhammer) EsophagusNormal IRP and at least 20% of swallows with a Distal Contractile Integral (DCI) > 8,000 mmHg·s·cm
Answer
Type I Achalasia matches with elevated IRP, 100% failed peristalsis, and no pressurization. Type II Achalasia matches with elevated IRP, 100% failed peristalsis, and pan-esophageal pressurization. Type III Achalasia matches with elevated IRP and premature contractions. Distal Esophageal Spasm matches with normal IRP and premature contractions. Hypercontractile Esophagus matches with normal IRP and a DCI > 8,000 mmHg·s·cm.
The correct matches strictly follow the Chicago Classification algorithm for esophageal motility disorders. The first critical metric is the IRP. Achalasia requires an elevated IRP, while DES and Jackhammer require a normal IRP. Once IRP is established, the contractility pattern (failed, pressurized, premature, or hypercontractile) differentiates the specific subtype.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Diagnosis and classification of esophageal motility disorders using high-resolution manometry criteria.
Estimated Time:2m 0s