Surgery

1344 questions

Question 981Question →

A 31-year-old man is brought to the emergency department by ambulance after sustaining a stab wound to the abdomen during a physical altercation. On arrival, he is lethargic and pale. Vital signs are temperature 36.8∘C36.8^\circ\text{C} (98.2∘F98.2^\circ\text{F}), blood pressure 78/42 mmHg78/42\text{ mmHg}, pulse 142/min142/\text{min}, and respirations 24/min24/\text{min}. Pulse oximetry is 97%97\% on high-flow oxygen. Primary survey reveals a patent airway and equal bilateral breath sounds. There is a single 4 cm4\text{ cm} laceration in the left upper quadrant, just below the costal margin. The patient's abdomen is markedly distended, rigid, and exhibits diffuse rebound tenderness. Peripheral pulses are thready. Two large-bore intravenous lines are established, and isotonic fluid resuscitation is initiated. Which of the following is the most appropriate next step in the management of this patient?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Immediate exploratory laparotomy

Answer

Immediate exploratory laparotomy
The correct action is immediate exploratory laparotomy. This patient presents with penetrating abdominal trauma, profound hemodynamic instability (blood pressure 78/42 mmHg78/42\text{ mmHg}, pulse 142/min142/\text{min}), and clear signs of peritonitis (abdominal rigidity, rebound tenderness). According to Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) principles, the presence of hemodynamic instability, peritonitis, or evisceration following penetrating abdominal trauma are absolute indications for immediate surgical exploration. The primary goal is emergent hemorrhage control and repair of intra-abdominal injuries. Any further diagnostic testing would dangerously delay definitive, life-saving treatment.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Assess the patient's hemodynamic status.
The patient is in profound hypovolemic shock (blood pressure 78/42 mmHg78/42\text{ mmHg}, pulse 142/min142/\text{min}, lethargy).
Hemodynamic stability dictates whether a trauma patient can safely undergo imaging or requires immediate surgical intervention.
2
Evaluate the mechanism of injury and abdominal exam findings.
The patient has penetrating abdominal trauma (stab wound) with clear signs of peritonitis (rigidity, diffuse rebound tenderness).
Peritonitis indicates hollow viscus perforation or severe intra-abdominal hemorrhage, both of which are absolute surgical indications.
3
Determine the next appropriate clinical step based on established trauma protocols.
The patient must be taken directly to the operating room for an exploratory laparotomy.
In penetrating abdominal trauma, hemodynamic instability or peritonitis mandates immediate laparotomy. Any delay for imaging is strictly contraindicated.

Key Concept

Hemodynamically unstable patients with penetrating abdominal trauma and signs of peritonitis have an absolute indication for immediate exploratory laparotomy.
Question 982Question →

A 61-year-old man is evaluated on postoperative day 2 following an open repair of a large ventral hernia. He reports mild shortness of breath and states that it is extremely painful to take a deep breath or cough. His temperature is 38.3∘C38.3^\circ\text{C} (101.0∘F101.0^\circ\text{F}), blood pressure is 135/85 mmHg135/85\text{ mmHg}, pulse is 92/min92/\text{min}, and respiratory rate is 20/min20/\text{min}. Pulse oximetry shows an oxygen saturation of 93%93\% on room air. On physical examination, the abdominal dressing is clean, dry, and intact with no surrounding erythema. Pulmonary auscultation reveals decreased breath sounds at the lung bases bilaterally, but no crackles, rhonchi, or wheezing are heard. Cardiac examination shows a regular rate and rhythm without murmurs. The calves are soft and non-tender. Laboratory studies show a leukocyte count of 12,200/mm312,200/\text{mm}^3. Which of the following are the most appropriate management steps for this patient's current condition? (Select 2)

Select all that apply

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Encourage frequent use of incentive spirometry; Optimize systemic analgesia to reduce abdominal splinting

Answer

The most appropriate management steps are to encourage frequent use of incentive spirometry and to optimize systemic analgesia to reduce abdominal splinting.
This patient's presentation of low-grade fever, mild hypoxemia, and decreased basilar breath sounds on postoperative day 2 following open abdominal surgery is a classic presentation for atelectasis. Following abdominal or thoracic surgery, patients frequently experience significant pain that leads to shallow breathing and decreased coughing (a phenomenon known as splinting). This lack of deep lung expansion promotes alveolar collapse. Furthermore, mild leukocytosis (12,200/mm312,200/\text{mm}^3) is a normal physiologic stress response to surgery and does not independently indicate infection. The most effective management for postoperative atelectasis relies on aggressive pulmonary hygiene. Encouraging incentive spirometry helps to mechanically re-expand collapsed alveoli. Simultaneously, optimizing systemic analgesia is critical because it relieves the pain that is causing the patient to splint, thereby allowing for deep, effective breaths and coughing.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the patient's timeline and vital signs.
The patient presents with low-grade fever, mild hypoxemia, and mild tachycardia on postoperative day 2 following a major open abdominal surgery.
Establishing the postoperative timeline (the '5 Ws') is crucial for narrowing the differential diagnosis of postoperative fever.
2
Correlate the timeline with physical examination and laboratory findings.
The exam reveals decreased basilar breath sounds without crackles, and the patient reports severe pain preventing deep breaths. The mild leukocytosis is a normal postoperative stress response.
These findings point away from infectious causes (like pneumonia, UTI, or surgical site infection) or fluid overload, and strongly suggest atelectasis due to abdominal splinting.
3
Determine the optimal clinical interventions based on the diagnosis.
The patient requires mechanical re-expansion of the alveoli and elimination of the barrier to deep breathing.
Incentive spirometry addresses the alveolar collapse directly, while optimizing pain control prevents the shallow breathing that caused the condition in the first place.

Key Concept

Fever on postoperative days 1-2 is most commonly caused by atelectasis, which is driven by shallow breathing (splinting) secondary to surgical pain. The primary management is preventative and supportive, utilizing aggressive pulmonary hygiene (e.g., incentive spirometry) alongside optimized analgesia.
Question 983Question →

An 82-year-old woman is brought to the emergency department from a skilled nursing facility due to a 3-day history of progressive abdominal distension, colicky abdominal pain, and intractable vomiting. The nursing facility staff reports that her vomit has a dark green, bilious appearance and she has not had a bowel movement or passed flatus for the last 4 days. Her medical history is significant for moderate dementia, hypertension, and recurrent episodes of postprandial right upper quadrant pain for which she previously declined surgical intervention.

Vital signs are:
Temperature: 37.4°C (99.3°F)
Heart rate: 105/min
Blood pressure: 110/70 mm Hg
Respiratory rate: 18/min

Physical examination reveals a markedly distended abdomen with high-pitched, hyperactive bowel sounds. There is mild, diffuse tenderness to palpation, but no guarding, rigidity, or rebound tenderness. Laboratory studies show a leukocyte count of 11,000/mm³ and mild hypokalemia.

A computed tomography (CT) scan of the abdomen and pelvis reveals dilated loops of small bowel with a distinct transition point in the right lower quadrant, air within the biliary tree, and a 3-cm radio-opaque, calcified mass impacted in the terminal ileum.

Which of the following is the most appropriate next step in management?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Exploratory laparotomy with enterolithotomy

Answer

Exploratory laparotomy with enterolithotomy
The correct approach for gallstone ileus is an exploratory laparotomy with enterolithotomy alone. The primary surgical goal is to relieve the mechanical small bowel obstruction by extracting the impacted gallstone, typically found at the terminal ileum. Because gallstone ileus predominantly affects elderly, frail patients, minimizing the surgical footprint is critical. A more extensive one-stage procedure (involving enterolithotomy, cholecystectomy, and closure of the cholecystoenteric fistula) is associated with significantly higher morbidity and mortality and should be avoided in the acute setting.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the clinical presentation and imaging findings.
The patient presents with signs and symptoms of a small bowel obstruction (SBO), including bilious vomiting, abdominal distension, obstipation, and hyperactive bowel sounds. The CT scan reveals the Rigler triad: pneumobilia, SBO, and an ectopic gallstone in the terminal ileum.
Identifying the classic triad confirms the diagnosis of gallstone ileus.
2
Determine the optimal management strategy for gallstone ileus.
Gallstone ileus requires surgical extraction of the impacted stone (enterolithotomy) to relieve the mechanical obstruction.
Large gallstones that cause ileus rarely pass spontaneously. Delaying surgery can lead to bowel necrosis.
3
Consider whether concurrent biliary surgery is indicated.
Concurrent cholecystectomy and fistula repair should be avoided.
A one-stage procedure carries a high mortality rate in elderly patients. The safest approach is a simple enterolithotomy, reserving definitive biliary surgery for patients who later develop recurrent biliary symptoms.

Key Concept

Gallstone ileus is a mechanical small bowel obstruction managed acutely with a simple enterolithotomy; concurrent cholecystectomy and fistula repair are generally avoided due to high mortality rates in this predominantly elderly patient population.
Question 984Question →

A 38-year-old man is brought to the trauma bay following a high-speed motorcycle collision. He is confused and agitated. His blood pressure is 75/40 mm Hg, and his heart rate is 142/min. His airway is patent, and breath sounds are clear and equal bilaterally. The pelvis is clinically stable on examination, and there are no obvious sources of external hemorrhage. Arrange the following steps in the most appropriate chronological sequence for the evaluation and management of this patient's condition.

Drag items to arrange them in the correct order

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The correct sequence is to first establish intravenous access and initiate blood transfusion, then perform a FAST examination, subsequently transport the patient to the operating room for laparotomy, perform damage control surgery with temporary closure, and finally transfer the patient to the intensive care unit.
The management of hemodynamically unstable trauma patients follows a strict algorithm. After confirming adequate Airway and Breathing, Circulation is addressed by establishing large-bore intravenous access and initiating a massive transfusion protocol. Diagnostic adjuncts, specifically the FAST examination, are then utilized to rapidly identify the source of hemorrhage. An unstable patient with a presumed intra-abdominal source requires immediate exploratory laparotomy. During the operation, damage control surgery principles dictate that temporary abdominal closure should be performed once major hemorrhage and spillage are controlled, as the patient will not tolerate a prolonged definitive reconstruction. Finally, the patient is transferred to the intensive care unit to actively correct the lethal triad (hypothermia, acidosis, and coagulopathy) before returning to the operating room for a second-look procedure.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Address the patient's Circulation (C in the ABCDE algorithm).
Two large-bore peripheral IV lines are established, and uncrossmatched blood products are initiated.
The patient is in Class IV hemorrhagic shock and requires immediate volume resuscitation before any other diagnostic maneuvers.
2
Perform a diagnostic adjunct to identify the source of bleeding.
A Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (FAST) examination is performed.
In an unstable patient with blunt trauma, FAST is a rapid, bedside modality used to detect intra-abdominal hemorrhage without delaying definitive care.
3
Proceed to definitive hemorrhage control.
The patient is transported directly to the operating room for an exploratory laparotomy.
An unstable patient with suspected intra-abdominal bleeding requires immediate surgical exploration.
4
Apply damage control surgery principles during the operation.
The surgical team performs temporary abdominal closure.
Due to severe physiologic derangement (hemorrhagic shock), prolonged definitive repair will exacerbate the lethal triad; therefore, surgery is abbreviated.
5
Restore physiologic baseline before returning for definitive repair.
The patient is transferred to the surgical intensive care unit (ICU).
The patient must be actively warmed and resuscitated to correct acidosis, hypothermia, and coagulopathy before undergoing a second-look operation.

Key Concept

The management of unstable blunt abdominal trauma relies on immediate circulatory resuscitation, rapid point-of-care ultrasound (FAST), emergent operative hemorrhage control, and damage control principles to prevent the lethal triad.
Estimated Time:2m 0s
Question 985Question →

A 68-year-old man is evaluated on postoperative day 1 following an open partial gastrectomy for a perforated gastric ulcer. His past medical history is significant for hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus. The nursing staff reports that his urine output over the last 2 hours has been a total of 2525 mL. His temperature is 37.2∘C37.2^{\circ}\text{C} (99.0∘F99.0^{\circ}\text{F}), blood pressure is 105/65105/65 mmHg, pulse is 108/min108/\text{min}, and respiratory rate is 16/min16/\text{min}. The patient is currently receiving intravenous normal saline at 100100 mL/hr and has an indwelling Foley catheter in place. The abdomen is tender near the surgical incision with no rebound or guarding. Arrange the following steps in the most appropriate chronological order for the evaluation and management of this patient's postoperative oliguria.

Drag items to arrange them in the correct order

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The correct sequence is: 1) Inspect and flush the urinary catheter, 2) Administer an intravenous fluid bolus, 3) Reassess urine output and hemodynamics, and 4) Obtain laboratory studies to assess for intrinsic renal failure.
The correct sequence prioritizes non-invasive, immediate diagnostic and therapeutic maneuvers before moving to more complex testing. In any catheterized patient with abrupt oliguria, mechanical obstruction must be excluded first by inspecting and flushing the catheter. Once patency is confirmed, the most common physiologic cause in the early postoperative setting is hypovolemia due to bleeding, sensible losses, or third-spacing. A fluid challenge with isotonic crystalloid is administered, followed by a reassessment of the clinical response. If the oliguria does not resolve with fluid administration, a laboratory evaluation (including BUN, creatinine, and urine electrolytes) is indicated to rule out intrinsic renal causes such as acute tubular necrosis.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Rule out mechanical obstruction
Ensures the oliguria is not falsely low due to a blocked catheter.
Checking and flushing the Foley catheter is the quickest and least invasive initial step.
2
Treat presumed hypovolemia
Restores intravascular volume if the patient is dehydrated or has third-spaced fluids.
Prerenal acute kidney injury due to hypovolemia is the most common physiologic cause of early postoperative oliguria.
3
Evaluate response to therapy
Determines if the fluid bolus successfully increased urine output.
Continuous reassessment guides whether more fluid is needed or if another etiology must be considered.
4
Investigate intrinsic renal causes
Differentiates between persistent prerenal azotemia and acute tubular necrosis.
If the patient does not respond to fluid resuscitation, intrinsic kidney injury must be evaluated via serum and urine chemistries.

Key Concept

In the postoperative period, oliguria should first be evaluated for mechanical obstruction (e.g., catheter kink), followed by a fluid challenge to treat presumed hypovolemia (prerenal etiology) before initiating a workup for intrinsic renal failure.
Question 986Question →

Following three days of progressive obstipation and bilious vomiting, a 48-year-old man arrives at the emergency department. He states that his abdominal pain, which was initially intermittent and crampy, has abruptly become constant and excruciating within the last few hours. His surgical history includes a midline laparotomy for a ruptured appendix a decade ago. Vital signs show a temperature of 38.6°C (101.5°F), a pulse of 118/min, and a blood pressure of 96/60 mm Hg. The abdominal examination demonstrates widespread rigidity, diffuse rebound tenderness, and absent bowel sounds. Blood tests indicate a leukocyte count of 18,500/mm³ and an elevated serum lactate. Upright abdominal radiographs reveal prominent dilated loops of small bowel with multiple air-fluid levels and no free air. Which of the following is the most appropriate next step in the management of this patient?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Immediate exploratory laparotomy

Answer

Immediate exploratory laparotomy is the most appropriate next step.
The correct answer is immediate exploratory laparotomy. This patient presents with a classic small bowel obstruction (SBO) likely secondary to adhesions from his previous laparotomy. While many SBOs can be managed conservatively with nasogastric decompression and intravenous fluids, this patient has developed clear signs of strangulation and peritonitis (constant severe pain, fever, tachycardia, hypotension, elevated lactate, and abdominal rigidity). These findings dictate that conservative management has failed or is contraindicated, and emergent surgical exploration is required to prevent bowel necrosis, sepsis, and death.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the primary diagnosis based on the clinical presentation and imaging.
The patient has a small bowel obstruction, evidenced by bilious vomiting, obstipation, prior abdominal surgery, and air-fluid levels on X-ray.
Establishing the underlying structural problem guides the treatment algorithm.
2
Assess for complications such as ischemia, strangulation, or perforation.
The transition to constant severe pain, fever, tachycardia, hypotension, lactic acidosis, and a rigid abdomen strongly indicate bowel strangulation and peritonitis.
Complicated small bowel obstructions require a different management pathway than uncomplicated cases.
3
Determine the most appropriate management based on the presence of complications.
Immediate exploratory laparotomy is required.
Patients with a strangulated bowel obstruction and peritonitis need emergent surgical exploration to resect ischemic bowel and prevent further clinical deterioration.

Key Concept

Indications for emergent laparotomy in small bowel obstruction
Question 987Question →

Match each patient's clinical presentation with the most likely surgical diagnosis.

Click a left item, then click its matching right item

Items

A 24-year-old man with periumbilical pain migrating to the right lower quadrant and anorexia.
A 45-year-old woman with right upper quadrant pain radiating to the right scapula after a fatty meal.
A 65-year-old man with acute onset of constant left lower quadrant pain, fever, and leukocytosis.
A 50-year-old man with sudden-onset, severe diffuse abdominal pain and a rigid, board-like abdomen.
A 55-year-old woman with prior pelvic surgery presenting with colicky abdominal pain, bilious vomiting, and obstipation.

Matches

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The correct matches pair the classic clinical presentations with their respective acute abdominal conditions: migrating RLQ pain with Acute appendicitis, postprandial RUQ pain radiating to the scapula with Acute cholecystitis, LLQ pain with fever with Acute diverticulitis, sudden rigid abdomen with Perforated peptic ulcer, and colicky pain with obstipation after prior surgery with Small bowel obstruction.
Each clinical vignette describes the hallmark findings of a specific acute abdominal condition. Recognizing these classic patterns is fundamental for rapid surgical triage and determining the need for operative intervention versus conservative management.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the presentation of migrating periumbilical to right lower quadrant pain.
Identified as acute appendicitis.
This pain migration sequence is the classic initial manifestation of appendiceal inflammation.
2
Analyze the presentation of right upper quadrant pain following a fatty meal.
Identified as acute cholecystitis.
Fat-induced cholecystokinin release causes gallbladder contraction, which produces pain if a gallstone obstructs the cystic duct.
3
Analyze the older patient with acute left lower quadrant pain.
Identified as acute diverticulitis.
The sigmoid colon is anatomically located in the left lower quadrant and is the most common site for diverticula to form and become inflamed.
4
Analyze the presentation of sudden-onset severe pain with a rigid abdomen.
Identified as a perforated peptic ulcer.
A board-like abdomen indicates diffuse chemical peritonitis, typically resulting from spilled gastric or duodenal contents.
5
Analyze the presentation of prior surgery, bilious vomiting, and colicky pain.
Identified as small bowel obstruction.
Postoperative adhesions are the leading cause of small bowel obstructions, leading to these classic obstructive symptoms.

Key Concept

Clinical presentation of acute surgical abdomen
Question 988Question →

A 42-year-old woman is brought to the emergency department by ambulance following an all-terrain vehicle (ATV) rollover. She was thrown from the vehicle and struck her abdomen against a large rock. She reports severe diffuse abdominal pain. On presentation, her temperature is 36.6°C (97.9°F), blood pressure is 82/50 mmHg, pulse is 132/min, and respirations are 24/min. Intravenous fluid resuscitation with lactated Ringer's is initiated. Primary survey demonstrates an intact airway and clear, equal breath sounds bilaterally. The abdomen is visibly distended with diffuse involuntary guarding and rebound tenderness. Compression of the iliac crests reveals a stable pelvis. A bedside focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) is performed and demonstrates an anechoic fluid collection in the hepatorenal recess (Morison pouch). Which of the following is the most appropriate next step in management?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Exploratory laparotomy

Answer

Exploratory laparotomy
The correct answer is exploratory laparotomy. According to the Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) algorithm for blunt abdominal trauma, initial management involves assessing hemodynamic stability. In patients who are hemodynamically unstable (e.g., hypotension, tachycardia), a primary survey must be followed immediately by a bedside FAST exam to identify the source of bleeding. A positive FAST indicates massive intra-abdominal hemorrhage. The standard of care for these patients is emergent exploratory laparotomy to identify the injured organs, repair them, and stop the hemorrhage.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Assess the patient's hemodynamic status.
The patient is hemodynamically unstable, evidenced by hypotension (82/50 mmHg) and tachycardia (132/min).
Hemodynamic instability following blunt trauma indicates active, potentially life-threatening hemorrhage.
2
Identify the source of the hemorrhage.
The FAST exam is positive for anechoic fluid in the hepatorenal recess.
A positive FAST in the setting of trauma confirms the presence of intraperitoneal bleeding, likely from a solid organ injury.
3
Determine the definitive intervention based on ATLS guidelines.
Immediate exploratory laparotomy is required.
An unstable patient with confirmed intra-abdominal hemorrhage must be taken directly to the operating room to surgically control the bleeding.

Key Concept

Hemodynamically unstable patients with blunt abdominal trauma and a positive FAST exam require emergent exploratory laparotomy.
Estimated Time:1m 0s
Question 989Question →

Emergency medical services bring a 24-year-old male to the trauma center following a high-velocity motorcycle collision. He was found approximately 30 meters from his vehicle without a helmet. Due to a severely depressed level of consciousness (Glasgow Coma Scale score of 5), he was intubated at the scene. Upon arrival, he is receiving mechanical ventilation. Vital signs show a blood pressure of 76/40 mmHg76/40 \text{ mmHg} and a heart rate of 142 /min142 \text{ /min}. Physical examination reveals a right pupil that is 7 mm7 \text{ mm} and unresponsive to light, while the left pupil is 3 mm3 \text{ mm} and reactive. Breath sounds are clear and symmetric bilaterally. A portable chest radiograph shows clear lung fields without pneumothorax. A portable pelvic radiograph demonstrates intact pelvic ring structures. Bedside ultrasonography of the abdomen demonstrates a significant anechoic fluid collection between the liver and the right kidney. Two large-bore intravenous lines are present, and the massive transfusion protocol is actively running. What is the most appropriate next step in the management of this patient?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Transfer the patient to the operating room for abdominal exploration

Answer

Transfer the patient to the operating room for abdominal exploration
The correct action is to immediately transfer the patient to the operating room for abdominal exploration. This patient presents with a classic 'competing priorities' trauma scenario: impending uncal herniation (indicated by the fixed, dilated right pupil and depressed GCS) versus active, massive intra-abdominal hemorrhage (indicated by profound shock and a positive bedside ultrasound). According to Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) principles, circulation and hemorrhage control must be established to ensure any end-organ perfusion, including the brain. Cerebral Perfusion Pressure (CPP) is defined as Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) minus Intracranial Pressure (ICP). Without restoring the MAP by surgically stopping the bleeding, all neurosurgical interventions will fail. Therefore, the immediate priority is an exploratory laparotomy. The neurosurgery team should be consulted to evaluate the patient simultaneously in the operating room, where interventions such as placing an intracranial pressure monitor or performing burr holes can occur concurrently with the laparotomy.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Assess the patient's primary survey and hemodynamic status.
The patient has a secured airway and adequate breathing, but is in severe hemorrhagic shock (blood pressure 76/40 mmHg76/40 \text{ mmHg}, heart rate 142 /min142 \text{ /min}).
ATLS protocols dictate a strict ABCDE approach, prioritizing immediate life threats.
2
Identify the source of hemorrhage using physical exam and bedside adjuncts.
Chest and pelvic radiographs are negative, but bedside ultrasound reveals fluid in Morison's pouch (hemoperitoneum).
Rapid identification of the bleeding source directs definitive surgical management.
3
Evaluate competing clinical priorities (Traumatic Brain Injury vs. Hemorrhagic Shock).
The patient has signs of uncal herniation (blown right pupil, low GCS). However, cerebral perfusion cannot be maintained without adequate systemic blood pressure.
While neurosurgical intervention is urgently needed, hemorrhagic shock is the most immediate threat to life and must be addressed first.
4
Determine the definitive next step.
The patient must be taken immediately to the operating room to stop the intra-abdominal bleeding.
Hemodynamically unstable trauma patients should never be transported to a CT scanner. Neurosurgery can be consulted to perform concurrent interventions in the operating room.

Key Concept

In patients with multiple traumatic injuries including severe traumatic brain injury and active intra-abdominal hemorrhage, immediate operative control of bleeding (laparotomy) takes precedence over diagnostic imaging of the brain.
Estimated Time:2m 0s
Question 990Question →

A 19-year-old male collegiate rugby player collapses on the field after being tackled forcefully around the midsection by an opposing player. He is rushed to the emergency department. En route, emergency medical services administer 2 L of intravenous crystalloid solution. On arrival, he is restless and complaining of severe abdominal pain. His temperature is 36.1°C (97.0°F), pulse is 142/min, blood pressure is 76/40 mm Hg, and respiratory rate is 26/min. Oxygen saturation is 98% on high-flow oxygen. Physical examination reveals an exquisitely tender, board-like abdomen with severe rebound tenderness across all four quadrants. There is early ecchymosis developing over the periumbilical area. The pelvis is mechanically stable to anteroposterior and lateral compression. Cardiopulmonary auscultation reveals clear breath sounds bilaterally. Which of the following interventions should be prioritized next for this patient?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Transfer directly to the operating room for exploratory laparotomy

Answer

Immediate transfer to the operating room for an exploratory laparotomy is required due to the combination of severe hemodynamic instability and acute peritonitis.
This patient presents with hemorrhagic shock and an acute surgical abdomen (peritonitis) following blunt abdominal trauma. According to ATLS protocols, hemodynamically unstable patients who exhibit unequivocal signs of peritonitis (e.g., rigid, board-like abdomen, rebound tenderness) require immediate surgical exploration. Proceeding directly to an exploratory laparotomy is the only appropriate step to rapidly achieve hemostasis and control hollow viscus contamination. No further diagnostic workup is needed before surgery.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Assess the patient's hemodynamic status.
The patient is in class III/IV hemorrhagic shock with a blood pressure of 76/40 mm Hg and a heart rate of 142/min despite 2 L of crystalloid resuscitation.
Hemodynamic instability dictates whether the patient can safely undergo time-consuming diagnostic imaging or requires immediate intervention.
2
Evaluate the abdominal physical examination findings.
The patient exhibits a board-like abdomen with severe rebound tenderness.
These are unequivocal signs of peritonitis, indicating massive intra-abdominal hemorrhage or hollow viscus perforation.
3
Apply the Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) algorithm for blunt abdominal trauma.
The combination of shock and clear peritonitis mandates emergent laparotomy.
This specific clinical presentation bypasses the need for a FAST exam to achieve immediate surgical source control.

Key Concept

In patients with blunt abdominal trauma, the presence of hemodynamic instability combined with unequivocal peritonitis mandates immediate exploratory laparotomy, bypassing FAST or CT imaging.
Estimated Time:1m 15s
Question 991Question →

A 74-year-old man is brought to the emergency department from a long-term care facility due to progressive abdominal distension, severe pain, and recurrent vomiting for the past 48 hours. He has not had a bowel movement or passed flatus for 3 days. His medical history is significant for an open ventral hernia repair 8 years ago. On arrival, his temperature is 39.4°C (102.9°F), blood pressure is 85/50 mm Hg, pulse is 128/min, and respirations are 24/min. Physical examination reveals a markedly distended abdomen with diffuse rigidity, severe rebound tenderness, and absent bowel sounds. Laboratory studies show a leukocyte count of 24,000/mm³ and a serum lactate level of 6.8 mmol/L. An upright abdominal radiograph demonstrates multiple dilated loops of small bowel with prominent air-fluid levels and a paucity of colonic gas. Which of the following is the most appropriate next step in the management of this patient?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Immediate exploratory laparotomy

Answer

Immediate exploratory laparotomy is required for a small bowel obstruction presenting with signs of peritonitis and hemodynamic instability.
The correct answer is immediate exploratory laparotomy. This patient presents with a classic small bowel obstruction (SBO) complicated by strangulation and bowel ischemia, evidenced by fever, hypotension, a rigid abdomen with rebound tenderness (peritonitis), significant leukocytosis, and elevated serum lactate. When an SBO is complicated by peritonitis or hemodynamic instability, the bowel is assumed to be ischemic or perforated. Emergent surgical exploration is the definitive standard of care to relieve the obstruction, control the infectious source, and resect any non-viable intestine.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the primary diagnosis based on the clinical presentation and initial imaging.
The patient's symptoms (vomiting, obstipation, distension), surgical history, and radiograph findings indicate a small bowel obstruction (SBO), likely due to adhesions from his prior hernia repair.
Establishing the mechanical cause of the symptoms is the first step in abdominal pain triage.
2
Assess the patient for complications of SBO such as ischemia, strangulation, or perforation.
The presence of fever, hypotension, diffuse rigidity, rebound tenderness, severe leukocytosis, and lactic acidosis points to a complicated SBO with compromised bowel viability.
Differentiating between uncomplicated and complicated SBO is critical because it dictates the urgency and type of treatment.
3
Determine the definitive next step in management for a complicated SBO in an unstable patient.
Immediate exploratory laparotomy is indicated for source control, decompression, and likely resection of necrotic bowel.
Hemodynamically unstable patients with peritonitis cannot undergo conservative management or time-consuming advanced imaging; they require emergent surgical intervention.

Key Concept

Management of complicated small bowel obstruction requires immediate surgical intervention when signs of peritonitis, strangulation, or hemodynamic instability are present.
Estimated Time:1m 0s
Question 992Question →

An individual in his late sixties is evaluated in the surgical assessment unit due to persistent crampy abdominal pain and multiple episodes of bilious vomiting over the past 48 hours. He reports no passage of stool or flatus since the symptoms began. The patient has a surgical history significant for an open partial colectomy performed a decade ago. Vital signs demonstrate a temperature of 38.5°C (101.3°F), pulse of 118/min, and blood pressure of 96/60 mmHg. Physical examination reveals a markedly distended abdomen with absent bowel sounds. Palpation elicits diffuse guarding and pronounced rebound tenderness, particularly in the periumbilical area. Laboratory investigations show a leukocyte count of 18,200/mm³ with 85% neutrophils and a serum lactate concentration of 4.1 mmol/L. Upright radiograph displays dilated small intestinal loops with prominent air-fluid levels and a complete lack of colonic gas. Which of the following is the most appropriate next step in management?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Surgical exploration of the abdomen

Answer

Surgical exploration of the abdomen
The correct answer is surgical exploration of the abdomen. This patient has a classic presentation of a small bowel obstruction (SBO) secondary to adhesions from a previous laparotomy. While many cases of SBO can be managed conservatively with bowel rest and nasogastric decompression, the development of fever, tachycardia, localized abdominal tenderness (peritonitis), significant leukocytosis, and elevated serum lactate strongly indicates bowel strangulation (ischemia). When an SBO is complicated by strangulation or impending perforation, conservative management must be abandoned in favor of immediate operative intervention to resect the nonviable bowel and prevent fatal sepsis.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the patient's presentation and surgical history.
The patient has a history of prior abdominal surgery, current obstipation, bilious vomiting, and radiologic evidence of dilated small bowel loops, confirming an adhesive small bowel obstruction.
Establishing the primary diagnosis is required before assessing for complications.
2
Evaluate for signs of complications such as ischemia or perforation.
The patient exhibits fever, tachycardia, hypotension, leukocytosis with a left shift, elevated lactate, and localized peritonitis (rebound tenderness and guarding).
These findings reliably indicate that the obstruction has progressed to bowel strangulation and impending or actual necrosis.
3
Determine the definitive management based on the presence of complications.
The presence of peritonitis and hemodynamic instability in the setting of small bowel obstruction mandates immediate operative intervention.
Conservative management is no longer safe when strangulation is evident, as necrotic bowel must be resected promptly.

Key Concept

Management of complicated small bowel obstruction (strangulation)
Question 993Question →

A 42-year-old woman is evaluated in the post-anesthesia care unit 3 hours after a total thyroidectomy for a large multinodular goiter. The nurse urgently calls for evaluation because the patient is agitated and reports increasing difficulty breathing. Her blood pressure is 162/94 mm Hg, pulse is 118/min, and respirations are 28/min. Pulse oximetry shows an oxygen saturation of 88% on room air. Physical examination reveals audible inspiratory stridor. The anterior neck appears significantly swollen, tense, and ecchymotic beneath the surgical dressing. Arrange the following steps in the most appropriate chronological order for the immediate management of this patient's condition.

Drag items to arrange them in the correct order

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The correct sequence is to first open the cervical incision at the bedside, then manually evacuate the blood clots, followed by establishing a secure airway via endotracheal intubation, and finally transporting the patient to the operating room for definitive surgical hemostasis.
The correct sequence prioritizes immediate bedside decompression of the expanding neck hematoma. Opening the wound and evacuating the clot relieves external tracheal compression, which is absolutely necessary before attempting intubation or transferring the patient to the operating room.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Recognize an expanding postoperative neck hematoma causing airway compromise.
Identification of a surgical emergency requiring immediate intervention.
Stridor, hypoxemia, and a tense neck mass shortly after thyroidectomy indicate life-threatening external tracheal compression.
2
Prioritize immediate bedside decompression.
The incision is opened and the hematoma is evacuated.
External compression prevents successful intubation; relieving the pressure is absolutely required to restore airway patency and allow subsequent intubation.
3
Secure the airway and transfer for definitive care.
Endotracheal intubation is performed followed by transfer to the operating room.
Definitive vascular control requires the operating room, but the patient must have a secure airway prior to any transport.

Key Concept

Management of Postoperative Neck Hematoma
Question 994Question →

A 28-year-old man is brought to the emergency department via ambulance after being rescued from a house fire. The incident occurred exactly 2 hours prior to arrival. He weighs 8080 kg. Primary survey reveals a patent airway, clear breath sounds bilaterally, and a heart rate of 115115/min. Physical examination shows deep partial-thickness and full-thickness burns covering his entire anterior torso, entire right arm, and the anterior surface of his right leg. Peripheral intravenous access is established. Based on current Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) guidelines for adult thermal burn resuscitation (using 2 mL/kg/%TBSA2 \text{ mL/kg/\%TBSA}), what should be the initial intravenous crystalloid fluid infusion rate programmed for the remainder of the first 8 hours post-injury?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: 480

Answer

480 mL/hr
The patient requires acute burn resuscitation based on the extent of his injuries and time elapsed. The Rule of Nines dictates that the anterior torso is 18%, the entire right arm is 9%, and the anterior right leg is 9%, resulting in a 36% TBSA. Using the current ATLS recommendation of 2 mL/kg/%TBSA2 \text{ mL/kg/\%TBSA}, the total 24-hour fluid requirement is 2×80×36=5760 mL2 \times 80 \times 36 = 5760 \text{ mL}. Half of this volume (2880 mL2880 \text{ mL}) must be given in the first 8 hours calculated from the time of injury. Because 2 hours have already passed since the fire, the remaining 2880 mL2880 \text{ mL} must be infused over the next 6 hours, yielding a target rate of 480 mL/hr480 \text{ mL/hr}.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Calculate the involved Total Body Surface Area (TBSA).
TBSA = 36%
The Rule of Nines assigns 18% to the anterior torso, 9% to an entire arm, and 9% to the anterior half of a leg.
2
Calculate the total 24-hour fluid resuscitation volume.
Total volume = 5760 mL
Using the ATLS formula: 2 mL×80 kg×36% TBSA=5760 mL2 \text{ mL} \times 80 \text{ kg} \times 36\% \text{ TBSA} = 5760 \text{ mL}.
3
Determine the fluid volume for the first 8 hours.
First 8-hour volume = 2880 mL
Half of the total 24-hour fluid requirement must be given in the first 8 hours post-injury (5760/2=2880 mL5760 / 2 = 2880 \text{ mL}).
4
Calculate the hourly infusion rate.
Infusion rate = 480 mL/hr
The 2880 mL must be administered over the remaining 6 hours of the first 8-hour window (8 hours - 2 hours elapsed = 6 hours). 2880/6=480 mL/hr2880 / 6 = 480 \text{ mL/hr}.

Key Concept

Burn fluid resuscitation calculations require determining TBSA via the Rule of Nines, calculating the 24-hour fluid requirement, and administering half of that total volume over the first 8 hours, strictly calculated from the time of injury (not the time of hospital presentation).
Question 995Question →

A 35-year-old male construction worker is brought to the emergency department after falling 20 feet (6 meters) from a scaffold. He is secured to a backboard with a rigid cervical collar in place. He is obtunded, opens his eyes only to painful stimuli, and makes incomprehensible sounds. Vital signs are temperature 36.5°C (97.7°F), blood pressure 75/45 mm Hg, pulse 135/min, and respirations 28/min. Pulse oximetry shows 88% on high-flow oxygen. Physical examination reveals copious blood in the oropharynx with audible gurgling. There are absent breath sounds and dullness to percussion over the right hemithorax. The abdomen is grossly distended and rigid. Arrange the following management steps in the most appropriate sequential order according to the Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) protocol.

Drag items to arrange them in the correct order

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The correct sequence follows the ATLS primary survey (ABCDE): Airway management (intubation), Breathing (tube thoracostomy), Circulation (blood products), Adjunct evaluation (FAST), and finally Definitive care (laparotomy).
The Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) protocol mandates a strict primary survey sequence: Airway, Breathing, Circulation, Disability, and Exposure. This algorithm ensures that the most imminent threats to life are identified and treated first. In this patient, the obstructed airway (gurgling, GCS 8) must be secured first. Next, the breathing compromise from a hemothorax must be treated with a chest tube. Only then is circulation addressed with blood products. Following stabilization of the ABCs, a FAST exam is used as an adjunct to identify the source of abdominal shock, culminating in definitive surgical management via laparotomy.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Assess and secure the airway.
The patient undergoes oropharyngeal suctioning and endotracheal intubation.
Airway compromise (gurgling, blood, GCS 8) is the most immediate threat to life and must be addressed first.
2
Assess breathing and ventilation.
A right-sided tube thoracostomy is placed.
The patient has absent breath sounds and dullness to percussion, indicating a massive hemothorax that must be drained to allow lung expansion.
3
Assess and manage circulation.
Intravenous access is obtained and uncrossmatched blood products are administered.
The patient is in hemorrhagic shock (hypotension, tachycardia) and requires immediate volume resuscitation following airway and breathing stabilization.
4
Perform diagnostic adjuncts.
A bedside FAST examination is performed.
With the ABCs addressed, an ultrasound is used to rapidly identify the source of intra-abdominal hemorrhage causing the rigid, distended abdomen.
5
Provide definitive care.
The patient is transferred to the operating room.
An unstable trauma patient with a surgical abdomen requires emergent exploratory laparotomy to definitively control the bleeding.

Key Concept

Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) primary survey sequence prioritizing Airway, Breathing, and Circulation before diagnostic adjuncts and definitive surgical care.
Question 996Question →

A 45-year-old male construction worker arrives at the emergency department triage desk complaining of an abrupt onset of excruciating epigastric pain that began 2 hours ago. The pain has now spread throughout his entire abdomen. He appears acutely ill, diaphoretic, and lies completely still on the gurney. Vital signs show a temperature of 38.2°C (100.8°F), blood pressure of 100/60 mm Hg, heart rate of 115/min, and respiratory rate of 22/min. Physical examination demonstrates a rigid, board-like abdomen with severe, diffuse rebound tenderness and involuntary guarding. Arrange the following steps in the most appropriate chronological sequence for the initial evaluation and management of this patient.

Drag items to arrange them in the correct order

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The correct sequence is to first establish intravenous access for fluid resuscitation, followed by performing an upright chest radiograph to confirm the diagnosis. Next, administer preoperative broad-spectrum antibiotics and proton pump inhibitors, and finally proceed with an emergency exploratory laparotomy.
The correct chronological sequence aligns with the fundamental principles of trauma and acute care surgery: first prioritize physiological stability (resuscitation), second obtain a rapid diagnosis (imaging), third provide preoperative medical optimization (antibiotics), and finally perform definitive intervention (surgery).

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Establish intravenous access and begin aggressive crystalloid fluid resuscitation.
Hemodynamic stabilization and restoration of intravascular volume.
In any acute surgical patient presenting with signs of peritonitis and tachycardia, initial management must prioritize the ABCs, specifically circulatory support with intravenous fluids to prevent cardiovascular collapse.
2
Perform an upright chest radiograph to identify subdiaphragmatic free air.
Diagnostic confirmation of a perforated viscus.
Once resuscitation is underway, a rapid diagnostic test is needed to confirm the presence of pneumoperitoneum before committing the patient to surgery.
3
Administer preoperative broad-spectrum intravenous antibiotics and proton pump inhibitors.
Medical optimization and treatment of intra-abdominal sepsis prior to surgical incision.
Following confirmation of a perforated viscus, antibiotics are required to control intra-abdominal contamination and prevent worsening sepsis, while proton pump inhibitors help reduce further gastric acid leakage.
4
Proceed with an emergency exploratory laparotomy and omental patch repair.
Definitive surgical treatment of the underlying pathology.
The ultimate treatment for a perforated peptic ulcer with generalized peritonitis is surgical exploration and repair, performed after the patient is adequately resuscitated and diagnosed.

Key Concept

Initial evaluation and sequential management of a suspected perforated viscus.
Question 997Question →

On postoperative day 8 following an exploratory laparotomy and right salpingo-oophorectomy for a ruptured ectopic pregnancy, a 42-year-old woman requires urgent evaluation for sudden, severe abdominal pain. She had previously been recovering appropriately, with a return of bowel function and tolerance of a soft diet by day 4. However, over the past 12 hours, she has developed colicky pain and recurrent bilious vomiting, and she has not passed flatus or stool. Her temperature is 38.7°C (101.7°F), blood pressure is 100/65 mmHg, pulse is 122/min, and respirations are 22/min. On examination, the patient is in obvious distress. Her abdomen is markedly distended. Palpation elicits diffuse tenderness, involuntary guarding, and severe rebound tenderness. Bowel sounds are absent. Laboratory results indicate a leukocyte count of 16,800/mm³ with 12% bands and a serum lactate level of 3.8 mmol/L. An upright abdominal radiograph demonstrates multiple air-fluid levels within dilated loops of small intestine and a paucity of colonic gas. Which of the following is the most appropriate next step in management?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Urgent exploratory laparotomy

Answer

Urgent exploratory laparotomy is the appropriate intervention due to signs of strangulation and bowel ischemia.
The correct answer identifies that this patient has a mechanical small bowel obstruction (SBO) complicated by bowel strangulation. Adhesions from her recent laparotomy are the most likely cause of the obstruction. While many cases of postoperative SBO can be managed conservatively with bowel rest and nasogastric tube decompression, the development of fever, significant tachycardia, leukocytosis, elevated serum lactate, and peritoneal signs (guarding, rebound tenderness) are hallmark indicators of bowel ischemia or necrosis. In the presence of these 'red flag' signs, the obstruction is considered a surgical emergency, and urgent exploratory laparotomy is required to relieve the obstruction and resect any non-viable intestine.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the patient's clinical and radiographic presentation.
The patient has dilated small bowel loops with air-fluid levels, absent distal gas, colicky pain, and vomiting, confirming a diagnosis of mechanical Small Bowel Obstruction (SBO).
Establishing the primary diagnosis is necessary before risk stratifying the patient's condition.
2
Evaluate for signs of complications, specifically bowel strangulation or ischemia.
The patient exhibits fever, tachycardia, leukocytosis with a left shift, lactic acidosis, guarding, and rebound tenderness.
Differentiating between simple and complicated (strangulated) SBO dictates whether medical or surgical management is indicated.
3
Determine the definitive next step in management based on the presence of peritoneal signs.
The presence of peritonitis and ischemia mandates immediate surgical exploration rather than conservative management or further imaging.
Delaying surgery in a patient with an ischemic or necrotic bowel significantly increases morbidity and mortality.

Key Concept

Patients presenting with a postoperative small bowel obstruction and signs of clinical deterioration, peritonitis, or bowel ischemia (fever, tachycardia, leukocytosis, metabolic acidosis) require immediate surgical exploration.
Question 998Question →

Match each clinical presentation of peptic ulcer disease complications with its most appropriate definitive surgical management.

Click a left item, then click its matching right item

Items

Hemodynamically unstable patient with massive hematemesis from a posterior duodenal ulcer; endoscopic hemostasis fails.
Acute-onset severe abdominal pain and rigidity; upright chest imaging reveals free subdiaphragmatic air due to an anterior duodenal ulcer.
Early satiety, severe non-bilious vomiting, and significant weight loss caused by stricturing and fibrosis of a prepyloric ulcer.
Intractable, non-bleeding duodenal ulcer disease in a patient who is refractory to maximal medical therapy and is H. pylori negative.

Matches

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The correct matches are: Massive hematemesis from posterior ulcer pairs with Duodenotomy with three-point vessel ligation. Acute-onset pain with free air from anterior ulcer pairs with Omental (Graham) patch closure. Gastric outlet obstruction from stricturing pairs with Antrectomy with gastroenteric reconstruction. Intractable non-bleeding ulcer pairs with Highly selective (parietal cell) vagotomy.
The definitive surgical management of peptic ulcer disease is strictly tailored to the presenting complication. Perforations (typically anterior) are sealed with an omental patch. Refractory bleeding (typically posterior) requires direct vessel ligation via duodenotomy. Chronic obstruction due to fibrosis requires resection (antrectomy). Intractable disease without structural complication is managed with acid-reduction via a highly selective vagotomy.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze each clinical vignette to identify the specific complication of the peptic ulcer.
Identified complications are: refractory hemorrhage, acute perforation, mechanical obstruction, and medical intractability.
The precise nature of the complication determines the definitive surgical approach.
2
Recall the anatomical relationship and standard of care for posterior versus anterior duodenal ulcers.
Posterior ulcers bleed (gastroduodenal artery), while anterior ulcers perforate.
This anatomical distinction directly dictates whether vessel ligation or a patch closure is indicated.
3
Determine the appropriate procedures for mechanical obstruction and isolated intractability.
Obstruction requires removal of the stricture (antrectomy), while pure intractability requires acid reduction without disrupting anatomy (highly selective vagotomy).
Resection treats the physical blockage, whereas vagotomy addresses the physiological acid hypersecretion causing refractory disease.

Key Concept

Surgical management of specific peptic ulcer disease complications (hemorrhage, perforation, obstruction, and intractability).
Estimated Time:1m 30s
Question 999Question →

Emergency medical services via helicopter transport a 22-year-old male to the trauma center following a high-speed motorcycle crash. Upon arrival, he has a traumatic partial amputation of the left lower leg. Bright red blood is spurting profusely through the prehospital bandages despite direct pressure. The patient is unresponsive, with a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 6, and is making gurgling respiratory sounds. His abdomen is markedly distended and rigid to palpation. Vital signs are temperature 35.2∘C35.2^\circ\text{C} (95.4∘F95.4^\circ\text{F}), heart rate 148/min148/\text{min}, blood pressure 70/40 mm Hg70/40 \text{ mm Hg}, and respiratory rate 8/min8/\text{min}. Large-bore intravenous access is currently being established. Arrange the following management steps in the most appropriate chronological order according to current Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) and damage control surgery principles.

Drag items to arrange them in the correct order

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The correct sequence begins with catastrophic hemorrhage control, followed by securing the airway, identifying the internal bleeding source via FAST, performing a damage control exploratory laparotomy, and finally temporarily closing the abdomen for ICU resuscitation.
The sequence perfectly follows the modern Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) paradigm and damage control surgery principles. It begins with <C> (catastrophic hemorrhage control via tourniquet) before A (airway management via intubation). This is followed by a primary survey adjunct (FAST exam) to locate the source of internal bleeding contributing to the patient's profound shock. Because the patient is hemodynamically unstable with a rigid abdomen, an immediate exploratory laparotomy is prioritized to control truncal hemorrhage. Finally, damage control principles dictate that due to the patient's severe physiologic derangement (temperature 35.2∘C35.2^\circ\text{C}, shock), the surgeon must perform a temporary abdominal closure and transfer the patient to the surgical ICU to correct the lethal triad (hypothermia, acidosis, coagulopathy) prior to any definitive orthopedic or abdominal reconstructive procedures.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Apply a tourniquet to the amputated leg.
Arterial spurting is halted.
Exsanguinating external hemorrhage kills faster than airway compromise; it must be addressed first in the modern <C>ABCDE trauma protocol.
2
Perform endotracheal intubation.
The airway is secured and oxygenation is supported.
The patient is comatose (GCS 6) with an unprotected airway (gurgling), requiring immediate definitive airway management with cervical spine precautions.
3
Perform a FAST examination.
Intra-abdominal fluid is rapidly identified.
As an adjunct to the primary survey, FAST identifies the source of non-compressible internal hemorrhage causing the profound shock (BP 70/40).
4
Transfer to the OR for exploratory laparotomy.
Truncal hemorrhage and gross contamination are controlled.
Hemodynamically unstable patients with intra-abdominal bleeding require immediate surgical hemorrhage control, precluding CT scans or definitive orthopedic interventions.
5
Perform temporary abdominal closure and transfer to the ICU.
The surgery is abbreviated, allowing for physiologic recovery.
The patient exhibits the lethal triad (hypothermia, coagulopathy, acidosis). Damage control surgery requires abandoning definitive repairs until the physiology is corrected in the ICU.

Key Concept

The <C>ABCDE primary survey algorithm and damage control surgery principles in hemodynamically unstable trauma patients.
Question 1000Question →

A 62-year-old man is brought to the emergency department complaining of severe abdominal pain. He reports a two-day history of crampy abdominal discomfort, accompanied by multiple episodes of bilious emesis and an inability to pass flatus. His surgical history is significant for an open appendectomy at age 25. Earlier today, the pain acutely transitioned from intermittent cramps to a constant, sharp pain. His temperature is 38.8°C (101.8°F), blood pressure is 92/60 mmHg, and heart rate is 122/min. On physical examination, the abdomen is distended, rigid, and exhibits diffuse rebound tenderness and involuntary guarding. Which of the following is the most appropriate next step in the management of this patient?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Urgent operative intervention

Answer

Urgent operative intervention
This patient presents with a classic history for a small bowel obstruction, likely secondary to adhesions from his previous appendectomy. However, the acute change to severe, constant pain, combined with fever, hemodynamic instability (hypotension, tachycardia), and peritonitis (rigidity, rebound tenderness), strongly suggests bowel ischemia, necrosis, or perforation. The presence of peritonitis in the setting of an obstruction is an absolute indication for immediate surgical exploration. Delaying surgery for further imaging or attempting nonoperative management significantly increases mortality.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the primary clinical syndrome based on the patient's history.
The patient has a history of prior abdominal surgery, crampy abdominal pain, bilious emesis, and obstipation, which is highly consistent with a mechanical small bowel obstruction (SBO) secondary to adhesions.
Establishing the baseline diagnosis is necessary to evaluate the significance of acute changes in the patient's presentation.
2
Evaluate vital signs and physical examination findings for signs of complications.
The patient exhibits fever, tachycardia, hypotension, and a rigid abdomen with diffuse rebound tenderness.
These findings are red flags that differentiate a simple obstruction from a complicated one.
3
Synthesize the findings to determine the pathophysiologic state.
The transition to constant severe pain combined with peritonitis and hemodynamic instability indicates that the bowel has become ischemic, necrotic, or perforated (strangulated SBO).
Strangulation represents a life-threatening surgical emergency.
4
Select the definitive management step based on the established clinical state.
The patient requires immediate surgical exploration to resect ischemic bowel and restore continuity.
Conservative management or delaying for advanced imaging is contraindicated when overt peritonitis is present.

Key Concept

Recognition and surgical management of complicated (strangulated) small bowel obstruction
PreviousPage 50 / 68Next