Question

Difficulty: HardMedical Literature and Drug Advertisement Interpretation

A 58-year-old man with hypertension and stage 3a chronic kidney disease brings a pharmaceutical advertisement to his primary care physician. The advertisement promotes a newly approved medication, "Renalox," highlighting that it "reduces the risk of progressing to end-stage renal disease (ESRD) by 44%!" The patient asks if this medication would be beneficial for him over the next several years.

The physician reviews the phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial cited in the advertisement. In this trial, patients with similar baseline characteristics to this patient were randomized 1:1 to receive either Renalox or a placebo. Because participants were followed for variable durations, the study reported event incidence utilizing person-years of follow-up.

The trial results are summarized in the table below:

OutcomePlacebo Arm (N = 2000)Renalox Arm (N = 2000)
Total Follow-up8,000 person-years8,000 person-years
Progression to ESRD360 events200 events
All-Cause Mortality160 events120 events

Assuming the incidence rate of ESRD remains constant over time, what is the number of patients who need to be treated with Renalox for exactly 5 years to prevent one additional case of progression to ESRD?

Answer: 10 patients

Answer

10
To calculate the Number Needed to Treat (NNT) over a specific timeframe from person-year data, you must first determine the annual absolute rate reduction. The placebo group incidence is 360 events/8000 person-years=0.045 events/person-year360 \text{ events} / 8000 \text{ person-years} = 0.045 \text{ events/person-year}. The treatment group incidence is 200 events/8000 person-years=0.025 events/person-year200 \text{ events} / 8000 \text{ person-years} = 0.025 \text{ events/person-year}. The absolute difference is 0.020 events/person-year0.020 \text{ events/person-year}. Since the physician wants to know the NNT for a 5-year period, the cumulative absolute risk reduction over 5 years is 0.020×5=0.100.020 \times 5 = 0.10. The NNT is the reciprocal of the absolute risk reduction: 1/0.10=101 / 0.10 = 10. Therefore, 10 patients must be treated for 5 years to prevent one case of ESRD.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Select the correct data row for the targeted outcome.
Progression to ESRD: Placebo = 360 events / 8,000 person-years; Renalox = 200 events / 8,000 person-years.
The question specifically asks for the NNT to prevent ESRD, making the 'All-Cause Mortality' row a distractor.
2
Calculate the annual incidence rate for both groups.
Placebo rate = 360 / 8,000 = 0.045 events/person-year. Renalox rate = 200 / 8,000 = 0.025 events/person-year.
Person-year data must be converted into a standardized annual incidence rate to calculate absolute differences.
3
Determine the Absolute Rate Reduction (ARR) per year.
ARR per year = 0.045 - 0.025 = 0.020 events/person-year.
The absolute rate reduction represents the fraction of an event prevented by treating one patient for one year.
4
Scale the ARR to the specific time horizon requested (5 years).
5-year ARR = 0.020 * 5 = 0.10 (or 10%).
Because the clinical question asks for the NNT over a 5-year treatment period, the cumulative absolute risk reduction over that exact timeframe must be determined.
5
Calculate the Number Needed to Treat (NNT).
NNT = 1 / 0.10 = 10.
NNT is the inverse of the absolute risk reduction. Treating 10 patients for 5 years will prevent exactly one progression to ESRD.

Key Concept

Converting person-time incidence rates to time-adjusted absolute risk reductions for Number Needed to Treat (NNT) calculations.
Rate this question