Question

Difficulty: MediumMedical Literature and Drug Advertisement Interpretation

A primary care clinic is conducting a journal club on a newly published, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. The trial evaluates a novel antiplatelet medication, 'Thrombo-Block', for the prevention of secondary ischemic stroke following a transient ischemic attack (TIA).

The study's promotional materials heavily emphasize a relative risk reduction of 50%50\% (p<0.01p < 0.01) for ischemic stroke.

A detailed review of the manuscript reveals the following:
- The absolute incidence of ischemic stroke over 33 years was 4%4\% in the placebo group and 2%2\% in the Thrombo-Block group.
- A subgroup analysis stratified patients by the presence of chronic kidney disease (CKD).
- In the CKD subgroup, the relative risk (RR) for stroke with Thrombo-Block versus placebo was 0.950.95 (95%95\% CI: 0.80−1.100.80 - 1.10).
- In the non-CKD subgroup, the RR was 0.250.25 (95%95\% CI: 0.10−0.400.10 - 0.40).

Following the presentation, the clinical team discusses a 6868-year-old male patient with a recent TIA, baseline CKD (stage 33), and a history of severe recurrent gastrointestinal hemorrhage.

Which of the following statements regarding the study results and their application is most accurate?

  1. A
    The stratified analysis indicates that chronic kidney disease acts as a confounding variable rather than an effect modifier in this trial.
  2. B
    The patient should be initiated on the medication immediately, as the 50%50\% overall relative risk reduction heavily outweighs any risks associated with his history of gastrointestinal hemorrhage.
  3. The number needed to treat to prevent one ischemic stroke over 33 years in the overall study population is 5050.Answer
  4. D
    If a new screening test for stroke risk is applied to the population taking the medication, the positive predictive value of the test will remain unchanged compared to the placebo group.
  5. E
    The attending physician's quick rejection of the drug due to a vivid memory of a single patient having a severe bleed on a similar drug last week is an example of anchoring bias.

Answer

The number needed to treat to prevent one ischemic stroke over 3 years in the overall study population is 50.
The correct answer accurately calculates the Number Needed to Treat (NNT) based on the absolute incidence rates provided in the manuscript. The Absolute Risk Reduction (ARR) is the placebo event rate minus the treatment event rate (4%−2%=2%4\% - 2\% = 2\%, or 0.020.02). The NNT is the inverse of the ARR (1/0.02=501 / 0.02 = 50). This signifies that 5050 patients must receive the medication for 33 years to prevent a single ischemic stroke.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the absolute incidence rates for both the treatment and placebo groups from the overall study data.
Placebo incidence = 4%4\%; Thrombo-Block incidence = 2%2\%.
These absolute rates are required to calculate the absolute risk reduction, which is a more clinically useful metric than relative risk reduction.
2
Calculate the Absolute Risk Reduction (ARR).
4%−2%=2%4\% - 2\% = 2\% (or 0.020.02).
The ARR represents the actual difference in risk between the two groups.
3
Calculate the Number Needed to Treat (NNT).
1/0.02=501 / 0.02 = 50.
The NNT is the reciprocal of the ARR and indicates how many patients need to be treated to prevent one additional adverse outcome.

Key Concept

Calculating Number Needed to Treat (NNT) and differentiating effect modification from confounding in clinical trials.
Estimated Time:1m 30s
Rate this question