Examkin

Question

Difficulty: Very hardEnd-of-Life Care Ethics

Pair each clinical decision-making scenario regarding terminal care with the specific bioethical doctrine or legal standard that provides its fundamental justification.

  • A healthcare proxy authorizes the withdrawal of vasopressors, extrapolating from the encephalopathic patient's long-held philosophical views on autonomy and dignity, despite the patient having never explicitly discussed life support.Substituted judgment standard
  • An intensivist initiates a high-dose continuous opioid infusion to manage refractory dyspnea during a terminal extubation, anticipating that the medication may concurrently hasten respiratory arrest.Principle of double effect
  • A medical team declines a family's demand to initiate cardiopulmonary resuscitation on an asystolic patient with overwhelming multi-organ failure, concluding the intervention cannot reverse the dying process.Quantitative (physiologic) futility
  • A hospital ethics board sanctions the removal of a feeding tube for an adult patient with profound congenital intellectual disability, concluding that the burdens of the intervention heavily outweigh any potential benefits.Best interests standard

Answer

The correct pairings align surrogate decisions based on known values with substituted judgment, symptom control hastening death with double effect, physiologically impossible treatments with quantitative futility, and decisions for those lacking prior capacity with the best interests standard.
Each scenario perfectly illustrates a distinct bioethical doctrine: extrapolating a capacitated patient's wishes is substituted judgment; accepting a foreseen bad outcome for a primary good intent is the rule of double effect; refusing physiologically impossible treatments is quantitative futility; and weighing objective burdens/benefits for someone without prior capacity is the best interests standard.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the proxy decision for the encephalopathic patient.
The proxy uses the patient's prior philosophical views to deduce their wishes.
This defines the substituted judgment standard, where a surrogate infers the incapacitated patient's choice based on known values.
2
Evaluate the intensivist's administration of high-dose opioids.
The intent is symptom relief, though respiratory arrest is a foreseen consequence.
This satisfies the principle of double effect, which permits a harmful side effect if the primary action and intent are directed at achieving a good outcome.
3
Assess the refusal to perform CPR on the asystolic patient.
CPR is withheld because it cannot achieve its physiologic goal.
This is the definition of quantitative (physiologic) futility, granting physicians the ethical authority to refuse non-beneficial interventions.
4
Examine the decision for the patient with profound congenital intellectual disability.
The decision is based on weighing burdens against benefits.
Because the patient never had capacity, substituted judgment is impossible; the best interests standard must be applied.

Key Concept

The precise legal and ethical doctrines governing medical decision-making at the end of life vary depending on patient capacity history, medical feasibility, and physician intent.
Estimated Time:2m 0s
Rate this question

Topics

End-of-Life Care Ethics

More questions from this topic