Examkin

Question

Difficulty: EasyEnd-of-Life Care Ethics

A 65-year-old man with metastatic pancreatic cancer is admitted to the hospital with severe pneumonia. He is awake, alert, and oriented to person, place, and time. The attending physician explains that his respiratory status is rapidly declining and that without endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation, he will likely die within a few days. The patient demonstrates a clear understanding of his prognosis, the proposed intervention, and the consequences of his decision. He explicitly states that he does not want to be intubated and wishes to receive comfort measures only. Shortly after this conversation, his adult daughter, who is his legally designated healthcare proxy, arrives at the hospital. She is extremely distressed and demands that the medical team intubate her father immediately to save his life. Which of the following is the most appropriate next step in management?

  1. Withhold intubation and initiate comfort measures as requested by the patientAnswer
  2. B
    Intubate the patient because the daughter is the legally designated healthcare proxy
  3. C
    Consult psychiatry to formally assess the patient's legal competence to refuse life-saving treatment
  4. D
    Intubate the patient temporarily because acute respiratory failure constitutes an emergency exception to informed consent
  5. E
    Discharge the patient immediately to a hospice facility to avoid conflict on the inpatient ward

Answer

Withhold intubation and initiate comfort measures as requested by the patient.
The most appropriate step is to honor the patient's wishes to withhold intubation and provide comfort measures. The patient in this vignette is awake, alert, and demonstrates a clear understanding of his condition, the proposed treatment, and the fatal consequences of refusing it. This establishes that he has intact clinical decision-making capacity. In medical ethics, the principle of respect for autonomy dictates that a capacitated adult has the right to refuse any medical intervention, even if that refusal will directly result in death. While the patient has a legally designated healthcare proxy, a proxy or surrogate decision-maker only gains the authority to make medical decisions if the patient loses decision-making capacity. Because this patient currently has capacity, his daughter's demands cannot override his autonomous choice.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Assess the patient's decision-making capacity.
The patient is awake, oriented, and understands his prognosis, the proposed treatment, and the consequences of refusing it, meaning he has full clinical capacity.
Decision-making capacity is required for a patient to make autonomous medical choices regarding end-of-life care.
2
Evaluate the role and authority of the healthcare proxy.
The daughter's demands cannot override the patient's decision.
A designated healthcare proxy or surrogate decision-maker only gains authority to make medical decisions if and when the patient loses clinical capacity.
3
Determine the appropriate management plan.
The medical team must follow the patient's autonomous refusal of intubation.
The ethical principle of respect for autonomy dictates that a capacitated adult has the right to refuse any medical intervention.

Key Concept

Patient autonomy and the activation of surrogate decision-making authority
Rate this question

Topics

End-of-Life Care Ethics

More questions from this topic