All practice questions

4736 questions

Question 3821Question →

A 58-year-old woman is currently receiving treatment in the medical intensive care unit for severe sepsis secondary to pneumonia. She is mechanically ventilated and continuously sedated with propofol. On hospital day 4, the patient develops a new-onset tachyarrhythmia. The cross-covering night physician hastily reviews the electronic health record and orders an intravenous amiodarone bolus. However, the physician fails to notice that the patient is already receiving a continuous infusion of fluconazole, a medication known to prolong the QT interval. Shortly after the amiodarone is administered, the patient develops torsades de pointes requiring emergent electrical defibrillation. The patient is successfully stabilized, but her intensive care unit stay is significantly prolonged. The attending physician is made aware of the event the following morning. The patient's husband is present at the bedside.

Which of the following is the most appropriate next step in the management of this medical error?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Promptly inform the husband about the medication error, explain its clinical consequences, and offer a sincere apology on behalf of the care team.

Answer

The attending physician should promptly disclose the medical error to the patient's husband, explain the clinical consequences, and offer a sincere apology.
Medical ethics and professional guidelines mandate the full, honest, and immediate disclosure of any medical error that causes harm to a patient. When a patient lacks clinical decision-making capacity (e.g., due to sedation and intubation), this disclosure must be made to their designated surrogate decision-maker or next of kin. The discussion should include a clear explanation of what occurred, the potential clinical consequences, the steps taken to mitigate harm, and a sincere apology. Physicians must take professional responsibility during these conversations rather than inappropriately shifting blame to other staff members or waiting for administrative investigations to conclude.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the event as a medical error that reached the patient and caused harm (torsades de pointes requiring defibrillation and prolonged ICU stay).
Determine that ethical guidelines mandate disclosure of the error.
All medical errors resulting in patient harm must be fully disclosed to maintain trust and adhere to professional ethical standards.
2
Assess the patient's current ability to receive this information.
Recognize that the patient is sedated and lacks clinical decision-making capacity.
Disclosure must be directed to the appropriate individual. If the patient lacks capacity, the surrogate decision-maker (the husband) must be informed.
3
Determine the appropriate timeline and content for the disclosure conversation.
Conclude that the disclosure should happen promptly and include an apology, without blaming other staff or delaying for administrative reviews.
Immediate, honest communication prevents the appearance of a cover-up and fulfills the physician's fiduciary duty to the patient and their family.

Key Concept

Disclosure of Medical Errors and Harms
Question 3822Question →

A 54-year-old man is evaluated in the ambulatory care clinic two weeks after hospitalization for a non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. His medical history includes hypertension and hyperlipidemia. His prescribed medications include aspirin, ticagrelor, atorvastatin, and metoprolol. During the encounter, the patient expresses frustration, stating, "I stopped taking the atorvastatin and the blood pressure pill three days ago. I read on several alternative health websites that statins cause permanent muscle damage and liver failure. Honestly, I feel fine right now. Instead, I started drinking a large glass of grapefruit juice every morning and taking a high-dose garlic supplement that my brother recommended to naturally clean my arteries. I do not want to put artificial chemicals in my body."

Which of the following is the most appropriate initial response by the physician?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: I understand that taking multiple new medications can be overwhelming. Could you share more about the specific concerns you read regarding the statin?

Answer

The physician should validate the patient's feelings and ask an open-ended question to explore their specific concerns about the medication.
The most appropriate initial step when a patient expresses reluctance to take prescribed medications or exhibits nonadherence is to explore their underlying beliefs and concerns using a nonjudgmental, patient-centered approach. Motivational interviewing techniques, such as validating the patient's emotions and asking open-ended questions, help build therapeutic rapport. By understanding the root of the patient's fears regarding statins, the physician can then provide targeted education to address those specific misconceptions. Correcting factual errors, using scare tactics, or dictating care without first understanding the patient's perspective often leads to defensiveness and further nonadherence.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the patient's statement and current clinical situation.
The patient has inappropriately stopped secondary prevention medications shortly after a myocardial infarction due to fears fueled by internet misinformation.
Identifying the core issue (medication nonadherence driven by health beliefs) dictates the appropriate counseling strategy.
2
Determine the most effective initial communication strategy.
The physician must use a patient-centered approach, starting with validation and open-ended exploration of the patient's concerns.
Confrontation, lecturing, or prematurely correcting medical facts typically increases patient defensiveness and resistance. Understanding the specific fears allows for targeted, effective education subsequently.

Key Concept

Patient-centered communication and motivational interviewing principles in addressing medication nonadherence.
Estimated Time:1m 30s
Question 3823Question →

Match each clinical incident summary to the correct classification of human error or violation according to the patient safety error taxonomy.

Click a left item, then click its matching right item

Items

Slip
Lapse
Rule-based mistake
Knowledge-based mistake
Routine violation

Matches

Show answer & explanation

Answer

Slip matches with the inadvertent button press. Lapse matches with forgetting the order after an interruption. Rule-based mistake matches with failing to adjust the dose for renal impairment. Knowledge-based mistake matches with prescribing contraindicated therapy due to lack of knowledge about a rare disorder. Routine violation matches with the habitual shortening of the mandatory surgical scrub.
Medical errors are classified by their cognitive mechanism. Slips are attentional failures during execution (wrong button). Lapses are memory failures causing omission (forgotten order). Rule-based mistakes occur when a good rule is misapplied or a necessary exception is ignored (missing renal dosing). Knowledge-based mistakes stem from inadequate knowledge in novel situations (rare diseases). Routine violations are deliberate, normalized deviations from protocol (shortened scrubs).

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze skill-based execution failures (Slips vs. Lapses).
Identify the button press as a slip (action failure) and the forgotten order as a lapse (memory omission).
Skill-based errors happen during routine tasks. Slips are observable actions gone wrong, while lapses are internal memory failures.
2
Analyze cognitive planning failures (Rule-based vs. Knowledge-based mistakes).
Identify the missed renal adjustment as a rule-based mistake and the incorrect treatment of the rare disorder as a knowledge-based mistake.
Rule-based mistakes involve applying the wrong 'if-then' rule to a known situation, whereas knowledge-based mistakes arise from a complete lack of information in a novel scenario.
3
Identify deliberate procedural deviations (Violations).
Identify the shortened hand scrub as a routine violation.
Unlike errors, violations are intentional acts. Because this shortcut has become normalized in the unit to save time, it classifies as a routine violation.

Key Concept

The human factors classification of medical errors distinguishes between skill-based errors (slips and lapses), cognitive mistakes (rule-based and knowledge-based), and intentional deviations (violations).
Question 3824Question →

During morning rounds on an inpatient hematology-oncology service, a senior resident observes concerning behavior from the attending physician. The attending, who has practiced for over thirty years, appears profoundly disoriented. She repeatedly confuses a patient admitted for a sickle cell vaso-occlusive crisis with another patient receiving induction chemotherapy for leukemia. Furthermore, she attempts to order a contraindicated intrathecal medication for a patient with a deep vein thrombosis. When the resident gently questions the orders, the attending becomes combative and states she has no memory of writing them. The attending is scheduled to perform several invasive procedures, including bone marrow biopsies, later this morning. Which of the following is the most appropriate next step for the resident?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Contact the departmental chair or chief medical officer immediately to intervene.

Answer

The resident must immediately notify the departmental chair, chief medical officer, or other appropriate institutional leadership to intervene and prevent the attending from performing patient care.
The correct answer accurately identifies that the primary ethical duty when encountering an impaired colleague is the immediate protection of patients. Because the attending physician is scheduled to perform invasive procedures shortly and exhibits profound cognitive deficits, there is an imminent threat to patient safety. Institutional leadership, such as a departmental chair or chief medical officer, has the immediate administrative authority to relieve the impaired physician of their clinical duties. Bypassing local leadership or attempting to handle the issue privately fails to guarantee patient safety.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the immediate threat to patient safety.
The attending physician is exhibiting severe cognitive impairment and is scheduled to perform invasive procedures.
Patient safety is the absolute highest priority in any case of suspected physician impairment.
2
Determine the appropriate reporting channel for acute impairment.
The resident must report the impairment to local institutional leadership (e.g., department chair, chief medical officer).
Local leadership has the immediate administrative authority to suspend clinical privileges and prevent imminent harm, whereas state boards or health programs take time to investigate.

Key Concept

When a physician exhibits signs of impairment that pose an immediate threat to patient safety, colleagues must prioritize immediate patient protection by reporting the behavior to institutional leadership (e.g., Chief Medical Officer, Department Chair) who can instantly remove the physician from clinical duties.
Question 3825Question →

A core competency in outpatient management is tailoring health education and behavioral counseling to the patient's readiness to change. Based on the Transtheoretical Model of Change, match each patient statement to the most appropriate, stage-matched physician counseling response.

Click a left item, then click its matching right item

Items

"I am not concerned about my weight. My joints ache because I am getting older, not because of what I eat."
"I know my drinking is causing issues with my liver enzymes, but I just do not know how I would socialize with my friends without it."
"I have thrown away all my ashtrays and plan to stop smoking this weekend, but I am nervous about the withdrawal symptoms."
"I have been walking for 30 minutes every morning for the past month, but I struggle to keep it up when it rains."

Matches

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The statements correctly match to responses that follow the Transtheoretical Model of Change: Precontemplation matches with asking permission to share information; Contemplation matches with weighing pros and cons; Preparation matches with actionable planning; and Action matches with relapse prevention.
Effective health behavior counseling requires identifying the patient's current stage of readiness and tailoring the intervention accordingly. Precontemplation requires raising awareness with permission; contemplation requires resolving ambivalence; preparation requires concrete action planning; and action requires relapse prevention strategies.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the first patient statement.
Identified as Precontemplation stage.
The patient does not recognize their diet or weight as a problem and attributes symptoms to age.
2
Select the appropriate response for precontemplation.
Matched to the response asking for permission to share information about joint stress.
Direct confrontation causes resistance; asking permission fosters autonomy and openness to new information.
3
Analyze the second patient statement.
Identified as Contemplation stage.
The patient recognizes the health issue but is highly ambivalent about changing due to social barriers.
4
Select the appropriate response for contemplation.
Matched to the response discussing pros and cons of a typical evening.
Exploring ambivalence and building decisional balance helps tip the scales toward a commitment to change.
5
Analyze the third patient statement.
Identified as Preparation stage.
The patient has taken initial steps (removing ashtrays) and intends to take full action in the immediate future.
6
Select the appropriate response for preparation.
Matched to the response reviewing medications and behavioral strategies.
The decision has been made; the physician's role is to facilitate a concrete, actionable plan to manage withdrawal.
7
Analyze the fourth patient statement.
Identified as Action stage.
The patient has made specific overt modifications in their lifestyle (walking daily) for the past month.
8
Select the appropriate response for action.
Matched to the response brainstorming indoor activities for bad weather.
The focus is strictly on relapse prevention and maintaining the new behavior through challenging situations.

Key Concept

Stage-matched behavioral counseling using the Transtheoretical Model of Change
Question 3826Question →

A 32-year-old male construction worker is brought to a freestanding urgent care center by his brother. The patient has a bleeding wound on his right lateral thigh. He initially states that he accidentally impaled his leg on a piece of rebar at a construction site. On physical examination, the physician notes a circular puncture wound with a central defect and surrounding powder burns on the lateral thigh, along with a larger, irregular, stellate laceration on the medial thigh. Vital signs are stable. Upon further questioning about the inconsistent wound characteristics, the patient tearfully admits that his brother accidentally shot him with a handgun while they were cleaning firearms. The patient adamantly requests that the incident not be reported to the police, fearing his brother will face criminal charges and lose his job. Which of the following is the most appropriate next step in managing this patient's situation?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Notify local law enforcement regarding the gunshot wound

Answer

Notify local law enforcement regarding the gunshot wound.
All states have mandatory reporting laws requiring healthcare professionals to notify law enforcement when treating injuries caused by firearms. This legal obligation supersedes patient confidentiality and does not require the patient's consent. The physician must report the incident even if the shooting was accidental and the patient explicitly requests confidentiality to protect a family member.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the physical examination findings against the patient's initial history.
The presence of powder burns and distinct entry/exit wounds confirms a gunshot wound, contradicting the rebar injury story.
Accurate identification of the injury mechanism is necessary for appropriate medical and legal triage.
2
Identify the legal obligations associated with treating a gunshot wound.
All states mandate that healthcare providers report injuries caused by firearms to law enforcement.
Statutory reporting laws are designed to protect public safety and investigate potential crimes.
3
Weigh the patient's request for confidentiality against statutory reporting laws.
The physician must report the incident to the police, overriding the patient's request.
Mandatory reporting statutes provide a legal exception to HIPAA and standard patient confidentiality rules, requiring compliance regardless of patient consent or the accidental nature of the event.

Key Concept

Physicians are legally mandated to report certain injuries, such as gunshot wounds, to law enforcement. This statutory requirement supersedes the physician's duty to maintain patient confidentiality and cannot be waived by the patient.
Question 3827Question →

A 34-year-old primigravida at 34 weeks gestation comes to the clinic in early November for a routine prenatal visit. Her pregnancy has been uncomplicated. Her past medical history is notable only for a severe egg allergy; she experienced anaphylaxis requiring epinephrine and a brief intensive care unit admission after eating eggs at age 10, and she has strictly avoided eggs since. She has not received any vaccinations during the current pregnancy. Her only medication is a daily prenatal vitamin. Vital signs are within normal limits. Which of the following is the most appropriate immunization management for this patient today?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Administer Tdap, standard inactivated influenza vaccine, and maternal respiratory syncytial virus vaccine

Answer

The correct answer is to administer Tdap, the standard inactivated influenza vaccine, and the maternal respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccine during today's visit.
The correct approach is to administer all three vaccines during this visit. Tdap is recommended during every pregnancy between 27 and 36 weeks gestation to provide the newborn with passive immunity against pertussis. The maternal respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccine is recommended for pregnant individuals between 32 and 36 weeks gestation specifically during the RSV season (September through January). Finally, the influenza vaccine is recommended for all pregnant individuals. Notably, current guidelines emphasize that a history of egg allergy, even anaphylaxis, is no longer a contraindication to receiving any licensed, age-appropriate influenza vaccine, including standard egg-based inactivated vaccines.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Evaluate the patient's gestational age and current season to determine vaccine eligibility.
The patient is at 34 weeks gestation in early November.
Gestational age and season are critical for determining the timing of time-sensitive maternal vaccines like Tdap and RSV.
2
Assess the indication for the respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccine.
The maternal RSV vaccine is indicated today.
The maternal RSV vaccine is recommended strictly between 32 and 36 weeks gestation during the months of September through January.
3
Assess the indication for the Tdap vaccine.
The Tdap vaccine is indicated today.
Tdap is universally recommended during every pregnancy, optimally between 27 and 36 weeks gestation, to maximize transplacental transfer of pertussis antibodies.
4
Evaluate the influenza vaccine indication in the context of the patient's severe egg allergy.
The standard inactivated influenza vaccine is indicated without any additional precautions.
Current guidelines state that an egg allergy of any severity is no longer a contraindication to standard egg-based influenza vaccines; pregnancy is a strong indication for the flu shot.

Key Concept

Immunization schedules and exact gestational timing for pregnant patients, specifically the concurrent administration of Tdap, seasonal influenza, and seasonal maternal RSV vaccines.
Question 3828Question →

A 67-year-old man comes to the clinic for a routine health maintenance examination. His past medical history is significant for essential hypertension and mild osteoarthritis of the right knee. His current medications include lisinopril and as-needed acetaminophen. He reports feeling well, walking two miles daily, and having no chest pain, shortness of breath, changes in bowel habits, or weight loss.

The patient has a 40 pack-year smoking history but successfully quit smoking at age 51. He had a normal screening colonoscopy at age 62. Review of his medical record indicates he has received the recombinant zoster vaccine series, an updated 20-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine, a Tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis (Tdap) booster 4 years ago, and completed one-time screening for hepatitis C and HIV at age 60. He has no family history of cancer, cardiovascular disease, or aortic aneurysms.

Vital signs show a blood pressure of 122/78 mmHg, heart rate of 72/min, and respiratory rate of 14/min. His body mass index is 26 kg/m². Physical examination reveals a normal cardiovascular exam with no murmurs, normal lung sounds, and a non-tender abdomen without pulsatile masses.

Which of the following is the most appropriate next step in preventive screening for this patient?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Ultrasonography of the abdomen

Answer

The most appropriate next step is ultrasonography of the abdomen to screen for an abdominal aortic aneurysm.
Ultrasonography of the abdomen is the correct choice because the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommends one-time screening for an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in men aged 65 to 75 years who have ever smoked. This patient is 67 years old and has a significant smoking history, making him a prime candidate for this Grade B recommendation. He has no record of having this one-time screening completed yet.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Evaluate the patient's demographic risk factors and smoking history.
The patient is a 67-year-old male with a 40 pack-year smoking history who quit 16 years ago.
Age and smoking history are the primary determinants for several major screening guidelines, including abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) and lung cancer.
2
Determine eligibility for lung cancer screening.
The patient does not qualify for low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) of the chest.
Although he meets the age (50-80) and pack-year (>=20) criteria, he quit smoking 16 years ago. Guidelines state screening should stop once a person has not smoked for 15 years.
3
Determine eligibility for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) screening.
The patient qualifies for one-time abdominal ultrasonography.
The USPSTF recommends one-time screening for AAA with ultrasonography in men aged 65 to 75 years who have ever smoked (>=100 cigarettes in a lifetime).
4
Review the status of other routine screenings (colorectal, prostate, cardiac).
Colorectal screening is up to date (next due at 72). Cardiac screening is not indicated. Prostate screening is preference-sensitive.
Ruling out other options ensures that AAA screening is the single most appropriate, guideline-mandated next step.

Key Concept

USPSTF guidelines mandate one-time abdominal aortic aneurysm screening for men 65-75 who have ever smoked, while lung cancer screening is strictly limited to those who currently smoke or quit within the past 15 years.
Estimated Time:1m 30s
Question 3829Question →

A 78-year-old woman with metastatic pancreatic cancer is receiving home hospice care. Over the past 24 hours, her level of consciousness has progressively declined, and she is now unresponsive to verbal or tactile stimuli. Her daughter, who is the designated healthcare surrogate, calls the on-call physician in severe distress. She reports that for the last two hours, the patient has been making loud, gurgling sounds with every breath. The daughter is worried her mother is 'drowning in her own fluids' and urgently asks if she should use an oral suction machine to clear deep into the patient's throat. The patient's respiratory rate is 22/min. She appears relaxed with no grimacing, accessory muscle use, or restlessness. Which of the following is the most appropriate next step in management?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Advise against deep suctioning, reposition the patient, and administer sublingual glycopyrrolate

Answer

Advise against deep suctioning, reposition the patient, and administer sublingual glycopyrrolate.
The correct approach involves advising against deep suctioning, repositioning the patient, and administering sublingual glycopyrrolate. The patient is experiencing terminal secretions, colloquially known as the 'death rattle.' This occurs in the final hours to days of life due to the accumulation of salivary and bronchial secretions in the oropharynx as the swallowing reflex diminishes. Because the patient shows no signs of respiratory distress (no grimacing, restlessness, or accessory muscle use), these secretions are not bothering her, though they are highly distressing to the family. Management focuses on educating and reassuring the family, repositioning the patient (e.g., turning her on her side) to facilitate drainage, and administering an anticholinergic agent (such as glycopyrrolate, hyoscyamine, or atropine drops) to reduce further secretion production.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Assess the clinical scenario and the patient's level of comfort.
The patient is actively dying, unresponsive, and exhibits loud, gurgling breathing (terminal secretions), but shows no signs of respiratory distress (no grimacing or accessory muscle use).
Determining if a symptom is causing distress to the patient versus the family is the critical first step in palliative symptom management.
2
Evaluate the daughter's request for deep suctioning.
Deep suctioning is recognized as an inappropriate and potentially harmful intervention.
Invasive suctioning can cause mucosal trauma, stimulate further secretion production, and induce discomfort or gagging.
3
Formulate a management plan aligned with comfort care principles.
Select repositioning (to allow gravity drainage) and an anticholinergic medication like glycopyrrolate (to dry up secretions).
These interventions effectively reduce the distressing noise without subjecting the dying patient to invasive or uncomfortable procedures.

Key Concept

Management of terminal secretions ('death rattle') prioritizes non-invasive measures (repositioning, family reassurance) and anticholinergic medications, strictly avoiding deep suctioning or hydration.
Question 3830Question →

High-reliability healthcare organizations employ specific communication strategies to prevent adverse events during critical care delivery, transitions of care, and interprofessional disagreements. For each of the following patient safety vignettes, select the corresponding interprofessional communication strategy that best addresses the situation described or was critically omitted.

Click a left item, then click its matching right item

Items

A neurocritical care attending verbally orders 'Start nimodipine 60 milligrams' during a subarachnoid hemorrhage admission. The bedside nurse immediately accesses the medication Pyxis without a verbal read-back, ultimately administering nicardipine by mistake.
A surgical resident identifies a breach in sterile technique by the attending surgeon during a central line placement. After stating 'I am uncomfortable with the field contamination' and being ignored, the resident steps between the attending and the patient to halt the procedure.
During a maternal cardiac arrest in the labor and delivery unit, the primary anesthesiologist loudly announces 'We have lost the maternal pulse, initiating chest compressions now!' to instantly align the multidisciplinary team's situational awareness.
An oncology fellow contacts the acute care surgery team regarding a patient with neutropenic enterocolitis, explicitly structuring the phone call to deliver the patient's vital instability, acute abdominal findings, working diagnosis, and a direct request for surgical exploration.

Matches

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The nimodipine/nicardipine error demonstrates a failure of Check-Back; the sterile field intervention demonstrates the Two-Challenge Rule; the cardiac arrest broadcast demonstrates Call-Out; and the structured surgical consultation demonstrates SBAR.
Each scenario maps to a distinct, standardized TeamSTEPPS communication tool designed to mitigate specific types of human error. Point-of-care verbal orders require Check-Back to catch sound-alike drug errors. Hierarchical safety conflicts require the Two-Challenge Rule to empower staff to 'stop the line'. Rapidly evolving codes require Call-Outs to maintain team situational awareness. Consultations and handoffs require SBAR to ensure no critical background or clinical assessment data is omitted.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the nimodipine/nicardipine medication error vignette.
Identify that the error was caused by a lack of verbal read-back and verification of a spoken order.
Point-of-care verbal orders require the receiver to repeat the order back to the sender for confirmation, known as Check-Back or closed-loop communication.
2
Analyze the sterile technique breach vignette.
Identify that a subordinate team member voiced a safety concern and then took definitive action when ignored.
This is the classic application of the Two-Challenge Rule, which empowers any team member to halt a process if two assertive challenges are unheeded.
3
Analyze the maternal cardiac arrest vignette.
Identify that a critical status update was broadcast to the entire room without being directed at a specific receiver.
Broadcasting critical changes during an emergency to update the team's shared mental model is defined as a Call-Out.
4
Analyze the oncology fellow's consultation vignette.
Identify a structured, four-part communication sequence for a patient handover/consultation.
Structuring a call by stating the current issue, background, clinical assessment, and specific request is the definition of SBAR.

Key Concept

High-reliability teams utilize standardized communication tools (TeamSTEPPS) such as Check-Back for order verification, Call-Out for emergent situational awareness, the Two-Challenge Rule for conflict/safety resolution, and SBAR for structured transitions of care.
Question 3831Question →

A 58-year-old man is hospitalized for an acute pulmonary embolism and is started on a therapeutic heparin infusion. His past medical history is significant for severe, recurrent peptic ulcer disease. At 6:00 PM, the primary daytime physician transitions care to the night-shift cross-cover physician. The verbal and written sign-out provided is: "58-year-old man with a pulmonary embolism on a heparin drip. Stable for the floor. Follow up on the evening partial thromboplastin time (PTT); target is 60 to 80 seconds. Call if there are any issues."

At 9:00 PM, the patient complains of a severe tension-type headache. The cross-cover physician, who is managing multiple urgent issues on the ward, quickly reviews the sign-out note and prescribes intravenous ketorolac for pain relief. Two hours later, the patient develops massive hematemesis and hemorrhagic shock.

Which of the following components of a structured handoff protocol (e.g., I-PASS) was most critically deficient in the daytime physician's sign-out, directly contributing to this adverse event?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Patient summary detailing active comorbidities and baseline risk factors

Answer

The most critically deficient component was the patient summary detailing active comorbidities and baseline risk factors.
The correct answer correctly identifies that the patient summary was the critical deficiency. In standardized handoff frameworks like I-PASS, the 'Patient Summary' is designed to convey the hospital course, active issues, and critical baseline comorbidities. The daytime physician failed to include the patient's history of severe peptic ulcer disease. When the patient developed an unanticipated issue (headache), the cross-cover physician, relying on this incomplete summary, prescribed ketorolac. The combination of an NSAID, therapeutic heparin, and underlying peptic ulcer disease led to life-threatening hemorrhage. A complete patient summary would have prevented this error.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the adverse event to determine the root cause.
The patient developed a massive gastrointestinal hemorrhage because the cross-cover physician prescribed ketorolac (an NSAID) to a patient on a heparin infusion who had a history of peptic ulcer disease.
Identifying the mechanism of injury isolates the exact failure point in the clinical workflow.
2
Evaluate the provided sign-out communication against standard handoff frameworks.
The sign-out included an illness severity assessment ('Stable for the floor'), an action list ('Follow up on evening PTT'), and a weak contingency plan ('Call if any issues'). It completely omitted the patient's critical past medical history of severe peptic ulcer disease.
Comparing the actual handoff to a gold standard (like I-PASS) reveals missing elements.
3
Correlate the omitted information with the specific components of a structured handoff.
The patient's past medical history and active comorbidities fall under the 'Patient Summary' component. Its omission directly caused the covering physician to unknowingly prescribe a contraindicated medication.
This confirms which systemic countermeasure was deficient.

Key Concept

In structured handoff protocols (e.g., I-PASS), the 'Patient Summary' must include a synthesis of the patient's active medical issues, baseline risk factors, and critical past medical history to prevent adverse events during unanticipated clinical scenarios.
Question 3832Question →

A 45-year-old man visits the primary care clinic for a routine wellness examination. During the review of systems, the physician notes that the patient has a history of smoking one pack of cigarettes per day for the last 20 years. The physician decides to implement the evidence-based '5 A's' behavioral counseling framework for tobacco cessation. Arrange the following physician actions in the correct chronological sequence according to this established protocol.

Drag items to arrange them in the correct order

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The correct chronological sequence follows the 5 A's framework: Ask about tobacco use, Advise the patient to quit, Assess willingness to make a quit attempt, Assist in the quit attempt with counseling and medications, and Arrange for follow-up.
The '5 A's' model is a sequential, evidence-based framework for behavioral counseling, universally recommended by the USPSTF. The chronological sequence consists of Ask, Advise, Assess, Assist, and Arrange. This specific flow ensures that the physician first systematically identifies the risk factor, provides clear medical advice regarding the behavior, gauges the patient's intrinsic readiness to change, offers appropriate support (only if the patient is ready), and finally ensures continuity of care to prevent relapse.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify and document the behavior (Ask).
The physician establishes the patient's current smoking status.
Identifying the risk behavior is the necessary fundamental step before any intervention can occur.
2
Provide a strong, personalized recommendation to quit (Advise).
The patient receives clear medical advice regarding their health and the risks of smoking.
Direct, personalized physician advice significantly increases quit rates and must logically precede assessing the patient's readiness to act on that advice.
3
Evaluate the patient's readiness to change (Assess).
The physician understands whether the patient is in the precontemplation, contemplation, or preparation stage of change.
Counseling strategies and treatment plans must be tailored to the patient's current willingness to make a behavioral change.
4
Provide treatment and actionable support (Assist).
The patient receives behavioral strategies and prescriptions (e.g., nicotine replacement therapy) to support the quit attempt.
Actionable support is necessary for patients who are ready to quit in order to maximize their chances of success.
5
Ensure continuity of care (Arrange).
A follow-up is scheduled within the first week of the target quit date.
Ongoing support provides accountability and helps manage cravings and relapses during the critical early days of behavior change.

Key Concept

The '5 A's' behavioral counseling framework (Ask, Advise, Assess, Assist, Arrange) is the standard evidence-based sequence for tobacco cessation and other health behavior interventions.
Question 3833Question →

A physician is transferring care of a 45-year-old woman recovering from diabetic ketoacidosis from the intensive care unit to the general medical floor. The transferring physician utilizes the evidence-based I-PASS handoff protocol to ensure a safe transition and minimize communication errors. Arrange the following components of this handoff communication in the correct chronological sequence according to the standardized I-PASS framework.

Drag items to arrange them in the correct order

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The correct chronological sequence follows the I-PASS mnemonic: Illness severity, Patient summary, Action list, Situation awareness and contingency planning, and Synthesis by receiver.
The correct sequence precisely mirrors the I-PASS handoff framework, which is designed to minimize communication errors during transitions of care. The framework requires starting with Illness severity to focus attention, followed by a Patient summary for context, an Action list for required tasks, Situation awareness for anticipatory guidance, and concluding with a Synthesis by the receiver to ensure closed-loop communication.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the initial step designed to immediately establish patient acuity.
The statement declaring the patient as a 'watcher' is placed first.
Stating the Illness Severity upfront ensures the receiving physician allocates the appropriate cognitive bandwidth for the subsequent information.
2
Identify the clinical context and hospital course.
The summary of the 45-year-old woman with diabetic ketoacidosis is placed second.
The Patient Summary provides the background necessary to understand why specific actions will be required.
3
Locate the specific tasks to be completed by the receiving physician.
The request to check the 06:00 basic metabolic panel and administer insulin is placed third.
The Action List translates the patient's current status into explicit clinical to-do items for the covering provider.
4
Identify the 'if-then' anticipatory guidance.
The instruction regarding hypoglycemia management is placed fourth.
Situation Awareness and Contingency Planning prepares the receiver for potential complications and provides a clear plan of action.
5
Identify the closed-loop communication step.
The receiving physician's restatement of the plan is placed last.
Synthesis by the Receiver ensures the information was correctly understood and allows for final clarifications before the handoff concludes.

Key Concept

Structured Handoff Protocols (I-PASS Framework)
Question 3834Question →

A primary care network utilizes its electronic health record registry to track the development of chronic kidney disease (CKD) among adult patients with essential hypertension. At the beginning of a 55-year observation period, 1,2001,200 patients with hypertension are identified. A baseline laboratory screening reveals that 100100 of these patients already have CKD; they are excluded from the at-risk cohort.

The remaining patients are followed prospectively for exactly 55 years. The registry data reveal the following:
- 100100 patients develop CKD exactly 22 years into the observation period.
- 100100 patients transfer their care to an out-of-network provider and are lost to follow-up exactly 33 years into the study (without a CKD diagnosis prior to transfer).
- The remaining 900900 patients complete the full 55-year follow-up without developing CKD.

Based on this registry data, what is the incidence rate of CKD in this cohort?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: 20.020.0 per 1,0001,000 person-years

Answer

The correct answer is 20.020.0 per 1,0001,000 person-years.
The incidence rate (incidence density) measures the number of new cases of a disease divided by the total person-time at risk. First, we determine the at-risk population by subtracting the 100100 prevalent cases from the 1,2001,200 initial patients, leaving 1,1001,100 at-risk patients. Next, we calculate the total person-years (PY): 100100 patients develop CKD at 22 years (200200 PY); 100100 patients are lost to follow-up at 33 years (300300 PY); and 900900 patients complete the 55 years disease-free (4,5004,500 PY). The total PY is 200+300+4,500=5,000200 + 300 + 4,500 = 5,000 PY. Finally, the incidence rate is 100100 new cases divided by 5,0005,000 PY, which equals 0.020.02 cases per PY, or 20.020.0 per 1,0001,000 person-years.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the true at-risk population at the start of the observation period.
1,2001,200 total patients - 100100 prevalent cases = 1,1001,100 at-risk patients.
Patients who already have the disease at baseline cannot become incident cases and must be excluded from the denominator.
2
Calculate the total person-years (PY) contributed by each subgroup during the study.
Incident cases: 100×2=200100 \times 2 = 200 PY. Lost to follow-up: 100×3=300100 \times 3 = 300 PY. Completers: 900×5=4,500900 \times 5 = 4,500 PY. Total = 5,0005,000 PY.
Incidence rate requires knowing the exact time each individual was at risk of developing the disease before either getting it, dropping out, or completing the study.
3
Calculate the incidence rate by dividing the number of new cases by the total person-years.
100100 new cases / 5,0005,000 PY = 0.020.02 cases per PY. Multiplying by 1,0001,000 gives 20.020.0 per 1,0001,000 person-years.
This formula provides the incidence density, reflecting the true rate at which new cases occur over time.

Key Concept

Calculating incidence rate (density) requires dividing the number of new disease cases by the exact person-time contributed by the at-risk population, excluding prevalent cases.
Question 3835Question →

A 62-year-old man is admitted to the telemetry unit for treatment of an acute pulmonary embolism and is currently receiving a continuous unfractionated heparin infusion. During the night shift, the cross-covering first-year internal medicine resident is urgently paged by the bedside nurse, who reports that the patient has developed acute-onset right-sided weakness and a facial droop over the past 20 minutes. The resident evaluates the patient, confirms the new focal neurological deficits, and suspects an acute ischemic stroke. The resident immediately contacts the on-call neurology attending physician. After hearing the presentation, the neurologist states, 'This is likely a recrudescence of an old deficit. Order a magnetic resonance imaging scan for tomorrow morning. I am not coming in for this.' The resident reviews the chart and finds no prior history of cerebrovascular accidents. The resident expresses concern, stating, 'I am concerned that this is a new acute stroke requiring immediate evaluation, as the patient has no prior neurological history.' The neurologist replies, 'My clinical judgment stands. Do not page me about this patient again tonight,' and hangs up the phone.

Which of the following is the most appropriate next step for the resident to ensure patient safety?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Contact the on-call internal medicine attending physician to escalate the clinical concern

Answer

The most appropriate next step is to contact the on-call internal medicine attending physician to escalate the clinical concern.
The correct action is to contact the on-call internal medicine attending physician. High-reliability organizations prioritize patient safety over hierarchical deference. When a team member voices a critical safety concern and it is dismissed or ignored, they must persist. The 'Two-Challenge Rule' dictates that a concern must be voiced at least twice. Because the neurologist explicitly forbade further contact, the resident is blocked from completing a direct challenge and must immediately utilize the formal chain of command. The resident's supervising attending is the appropriate person to mediate an attending-to-attending clinical dispute and secure emergent care for the patient.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the patient safety threat
The patient has signs of an acute ischemic stroke within the treatment window, but the required consultant is refusing to evaluate the patient.
Recognizing a time-sensitive emergency is the first step in advocating for patient safety.
2
Evaluate the status of interprofessional communication
The resident attempted to use advocacy and assertion (similar to the Two-Challenge Rule) by voicing clear concern, but the neurologist actively blocked further communication ('Do not page me').
Standard conflict resolution tools (like CUS or the Two-Challenge Rule) require an open channel. When the channel is closed by a superior, peer-to-peer or subordinate-to-superior communication has failed.
3
Determine the appropriate escalation pathway
The resident must activate the hospital's formal chain of command by contacting their direct supervisor (the internal medicine attending).
Escalation to the supervising attending ensures that a physician with equal hierarchical standing (attending-to-attending) can intervene to secure necessary patient care.

Key Concept

Chain of Command Escalation in Medical Conflicts
Question 3836Question →

Match each of the following interprofessional communication challenges with the most appropriate standardized high-reliability communication tool or conflict resolution framework.

Click a left item, then click its matching right item

Items

A cross-covering hospitalist must rapidly convey a patient's acute respiratory decline, complex recent surgical history, and a request for immediate transfer to the intensivist over the telephone.
During a bedside procedure, a nurse notices the physician preparing to insert a needle on the incorrect side of the patient. The nurse points this out, but the physician mumbles, 'I checked the film,' and continues. The nurse must now act to definitively halt the procedure.
In a noisy emergency department resuscitation room, the team leader verbally orders 'give ten units of regular insulin IV.' The nurse preparing the medication must ensure the exact medication, dose, and route are verified before administration.
A ward nurse observes a patient's clinical status deteriorating subtly. The cross-covering intern previously dismissed an earlier page about the patient's status. The nurse needs a structured verbal framework to clearly escalate the severity of this clinical deterioration to the intern.

Matches

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The telephone transfer request matches with SBAR; the ignored warning during the bedside procedure matches with the Two-Challenge Rule; the verbal medication order matches with Check-Back; and the escalation of subtle deterioration after a dismissed page matches with the CUS tool.
Each clinical scenario uniquely demands a specific communication strategy. SBAR organizes complex data for handoffs. The Two-Challenge Rule dictates action when safety warnings are ignored. Check-Back prevents auditory errors in verbal orders. CUS provides a vocabulary for escalating concern when a patient is deteriorating.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the first scenario involving a telephone request for ICU transfer.
Identified the need for structured information transfer covering the patient's current state, history, and the requested plan.
SBAR provides the exact framework (Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation) required for this type of handoff.
2
Analyze the second scenario involving a wrong-site procedure where the first warning was ignored.
Identified a hierarchical conflict with an immediate, severe safety threat requiring a hard stop.
The Two-Challenge Rule mandates that if an initial safety concern is ignored, the team member must voice it a second time and take action to stop the procedure if necessary.
3
Analyze the third scenario involving a verbal medication order in a noisy environment.
Identified the risk of mishearing a critical medication dose, requiring immediate verification.
Check-Back (closed-loop communication) ensures the receiver heard the order correctly before administering the drug.
4
Analyze the fourth scenario involving a nurse needing to escalate a concern to a previously dismissive intern.
Identified the need for graded assertiveness to break through communication barriers without immediate open hostility.
The CUS tool provides structured language to signal escalating alarm regarding patient safety.

Key Concept

Application of standardized communication and conflict resolution frameworks (TeamSTEPPS) in varied clinical contexts.
Question 3837Question →

Healthcare economics encompasses several theoretical frameworks that explain the financial behaviors of patients, providers, and healthcare organizations within value-based and fee-for-service systems. Match each foundational healthcare economics concept to the clinical or administrative scenario that best exemplifies its application.

Click a left item, then click its matching right item

Items

Moral hazard
Adverse selection
Principal-agent problem
Cost-shifting
Cream-skimming (Cherry-picking)

Matches

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The correct pairings match each core healthcare economics concept with its defining real-world scenario: Moral hazard involves altered behavior due to insurance coverage; Adverse selection involves high-risk individuals disproportionately choosing comprehensive plans; the Principal-agent problem highlights asymmetric information and diverging incentives; Cost-shifting involves charging private payers more to cover undercompensated care; and Cream-skimming involves intentionally selecting healthier patients to minimize financial risk.
Each pairing correctly maps the theoretical economic principle to its real-world manifestation in healthcare administration and clinical practice. Understanding these dynamics is essential for navigating value-based care models, managing resource allocation, and addressing systemic inefficiencies in healthcare delivery.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the scenarios for patient behavior changes occurring after acquiring insurance.
Identifying the scenario where a patient demands expensive care because they lack a copayment matches the concept of moral hazard.
Moral hazard specifically refers to the post-contractual change in a consumer's behavior due to financial insulation.
2
Differentiate pre-enrollment behaviors from post-enrollment behaviors.
The scenario where high-risk individuals selectively enroll in a high-coverage plan matches adverse selection.
Adverse selection describes the pre-contractual asymmetry where those who know they are sick seek out more comprehensive insurance.
3
Evaluate provider-side behaviors involving asymmetric information.
A physician leveraging their expertise to recommend a self-benefiting procedure illustrates the principal-agent problem.
This highlights the conflict of interest when the agent (doctor) has more information than the principal (patient) and acts in their own financial interest.
4
Identify macro-level financial behaviors of healthcare systems and organizations.
A hospital raising commercial rates to offset uninsured losses represents cost-shifting, while an organization selectively targeting healthy populations represents cream-skimming.
These are distinct structural strategies used by institutions to manage financial viability and risk pools.

Key Concept

Economic Principles in Healthcare Delivery
Question 3838Question →

Match each of the following end-of-life clinical scenarios involving conflicts in decision-making to the most appropriate legal or ethical resolution.

Click a left item, then click its matching right item

Items

A 71-year-old man with advanced hepatic encephalopathy lacks capacity. His designated healthcare proxy (his brother) demands placement of a percutaneous feeding tube, but the patient's previously executed, legally valid living will explicitly declines artificial nutrition in a terminal state.
An 82-year-old woman with a massive ischemic stroke is comatose. She has no written advance directive and did not designate a proxy. Her husband of 40 years requests a transition to comfort measures, while her two adult daughters threaten a lawsuit if artificial nutrition is stopped.
A 68-year-old man with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis is hospitalized for acute respiratory failure. He is fully alert and clearly communicates via an eye-tracking device that he wishes to be extubated and declines further interventions, though his wife begs the team to keep him on the ventilator.
A 75-year-old man with severe Lewy body dementia presents with septic shock. He has no known family or friends, no advance directive, and no designated proxy. The clinical team determines that escalating vasopressor support is medically non-beneficial and wishes to transition to comfort care.

Matches

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The correct pairings align the patient's specific clinical scenario with the governing ethical or legal principle: living wills override conflicting proxies; spouses outrank adult children in surrogate hierarchies; a capacitated patient's autonomy overrides family wishes; and unrepresented patients require institutional or legal safeguards before withdrawing care.
Each scenario illustrates a distinct, highly-tested conflict in end-of-life ethics. The correct pairings appropriately apply the hierarchy of decision-making: (1) Capacitated patient's current wishes, (2) Patient's prior written wishes (Living Will), (3) Designated Proxy using substituted judgment, (4) Default legal surrogate hierarchy (Spouse prioritized), and (5) Ethics/Court intervention for unrepresented patients.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Assess the patient's current decision-making capacity.
If the patient has capacity, their autonomous choice dictates care, overriding all other factors (resolves the ALS patient scenario).
Patient autonomy is the highest ethical principle in medical decision-making.
2
Evaluate the presence of advance directives or a designated healthcare proxy.
If a living will explicitly addresses the situation, it acts as the patient's voice and overrides a proxy exercising incorrect substituted judgment (resolves the encephalopathy scenario).
Proxies are legally bound to follow the patient's known wishes.
3
Apply the state's default legal surrogate hierarchy if no proxy is designated.
The spouse is recognized as the highest-priority decision-maker, rendering the daughters' threats legally secondary (resolves the comatose stroke scenario).
Hierarchies prevent legal paralysis when family members disagree.
4
Identify unrepresented patients lacking capacity, family, and directives.
Institutional safeguards (ethics committee) or legal safeguards (guardianship) must be engaged to withdraw life-sustaining care (resolves the dementia scenario).
Vulnerable populations without advocates require independent oversight to prevent inappropriate termination of care.

Key Concept

Ethical and Legal Frameworks in Surrogate Decision-Making
Question 3839Question →

An internal medicine physician is evaluating several outpatients who have suboptimally controlled chronic conditions due to medication nonadherence. For each patient statement describing their primary reason for nonadherence, select the most appropriate initial counseling or management strategy.

Click a left item, then click its matching right item

Items

"I usually skip my daily controller inhaler and just use the rescue one when I feel tight; the daily one is just too expensive to refill every month."
"I only take my prescribed diuretic on the days when my ankles look swollen. If they look fine, I figure my body doesn't need the medicine that day."
"I stopped taking my prescribed statin two weeks ago because a health blog I read said these drugs will eventually destroy my liver and cause dementia."
"I want to take my medications correctly, but keeping track of the morning pills, the ones I need to take with dinner, and the bedtime pills is overwhelming."

Matches

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The optimal approach requires matching the specific etiology of nonadherence (financial constraint, health literacy deficit, misinformation, or regimen complexity) with its corresponding targeted counseling intervention.
Medication nonadherence is a multifactorial problem. Effective patient counseling requires the physician to accurately diagnose the specific barrier (e.g., cost, health literacy, beliefs, regimen complexity) and deploy a targeted strategy. Mismatched interventions, such as extensively educating a patient who understands their disease but simply cannot afford the drug, are ineffective.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze each patient's statement to identify the root cause of their medication nonadherence.
The barriers identified are financial constraint, misunderstanding of drug mechanism, fear of side effects due to misinformation, and regimen complexity, respectively.
Effective counseling requires targeting the specific barrier rather than offering generic adherence advice.
2
Select the physician response that directly addresses the identified barrier for each patient.
Financial barriers require cost-reduction strategies; misunderstandings require 'teach-back' education; misinformation requires validating concerns followed by evidence-based reassurance; and complex regimens require schedule simplification.
Tailored interventions improve patient compliance, build trust, and optimize therapeutic outcomes.

Key Concept

Identifying specific barriers to medication adherence and tailoring communication and management strategies accordingly.

Alternative Method

For regimen complexity, prescribing fixed-dose combination pills (e.g., lisinopril/hydrochlorothiazide) is another highly effective alternative method to reduce overall pill burden.
Estimated Time:1m 30s
Question 3840Question →

Match each patient clinical profile with the single most appropriate next step in preventive care and screening according to current clinical guidelines.

Click a left item, then click its matching right item

Items

A 42-year-old man whose father was diagnosed with colon cancer at age 50. He has no chronic medical conditions, his adult vaccinations are up to date, and he has never undergone colorectal screening.
A 58-year-old woman with a 35 pack-year smoking history who quit 10 years ago. Her immunizations are up to date and she had a normal screening colonoscopy at age 52.
A 28-year-old woman presenting for a routine visit, reporting a new male sexual partner. She has no chronic conditions. Her last Pap smear with human papillomavirus (HPV) cotesting at age 26 was normal.
A 50-year-old man with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus. He does not smoke and had a normal colonoscopy last month. He has never received a pneumococcal vaccination.

Matches

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The 42-year-old man requires immediate colonoscopy repeated every 5 years; the 58-year-old former smoker requires annual LDCT; the 28-year-old woman requires STI screening; and the 50-year-old diabetic man requires the PCV20 vaccine.
Each match strictly aligns with USPSTF and ACIP recommendations. The man with early-onset family history of colon cancer requires a 5-year colonoscopy interval starting at age 40. The older former smoker falls within the 15-year cessation window for LDCT. The young woman with a new partner requires STI screening without disrupting her 5-year Pap/HPV interval. The diabetic man requires early pneumococcal vaccination due to his comorbid status.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the 42-year-old man's family history of early-onset colorectal cancer.
Determine he meets criteria for high-risk screening (start at age 40, or 10 years before the first-degree relative's diagnosis at age 50).
Standard screening at age 45 every 10 years is insufficient for high-risk patients, making immediate colonoscopy with a 5-year interval the required step.
2
Evaluate the 58-year-old woman's smoking history against lung cancer screening criteria.
Determine she falls within the 50-80 age range, exceeds the 20 pack-year minimum, and is within the 15-year cessation window.
This qualifies her for annual LDCT screening to reduce lung cancer mortality.
3
Differentiate between cervical cancer screening guidelines and STI screening guidelines for the 28-year-old woman.
Determine her Pap/HPV cotest is valid for 5 years (due at age 31), but her new sexual partner necessitates NAAT for chlamydia and gonorrhea.
It is a common error to prematurely repeat a Pap smear for a new partner; STI screening is the appropriate targeted intervention.
4
Identify vaccination indications for the 50-year-old diabetic man.
Determine that his diabetes places him in a high-risk group requiring pneumococcal vaccination prior to the universal age cutoff of 65.
PCV20 is indicated for adults aged 19-64 with immunocompromising conditions, chronic organ disease, or diabetes.

Key Concept

Application of evidence-based preventive screening and vaccination guidelines based on patient age, precise family history, behavioral risk factors, and comorbidities.
Estimated Time:2m 0s
PreviousPage 192 / 237Next
All practice questions — USMLE Step 3 | Examkin