Tüm alıştırma soruları

5556 soru

Soru 581Soru

During the nineteenth century, Japanese art exerted a profound influence on European Impressionists. The artist who created *The Great Wave off Kanagawa*, Katsushika Hokusai, lived a modest life despite his widespread fame. His innovative use of perspective and color transformed how Western artists depicted the natural world.

Which of the following options represents the correct punctuation for the underlined portion of the sentence?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: NO CHANGE

Cevap

The correct option is the one that leaves the sentence unchanged, correctly setting off only the nonessential appositive name with a pair of commas while keeping the restrictive clause integrated without commas.
The correct option maintains the proper punctuation: the restrictive clause is not set off by commas, and the nonessential appositive is enclosed by a pair of commas.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Determine if the relative clause is essential or nonessential.
The clause 'who created *The Great Wave off Kanagawa*' is essential (restrictive) because it specifies which particular artist is being discussed. Therefore, no comma should precede it.
Restrictive clauses are necessary for the sentence's meaning and should not be set off with commas.
2
Identify the role of the name following the relative clause.
The name 'Katsushika Hokusai' acts as an appositive. Since the preceding clause has already identified a unique artist, the name is nonessential (parenthetical) and must be enclosed in a pair of commas.
Nonessential appositives require commas both before and after them when they appear in the middle of a sentence.

Anahtar Kavram

Distinguishing between restrictive (essential) and nonrestrictive (nonessential) elements to apply commas correctly.
Soru 582Soru

The following sentences are from a draft of a paragraph about the farming behaviors of leafcutter ants. In what order should these sentences be arranged so that the paragraph's central claim is supported by a logical sequence of evidence and details?

Öğeleri doğru sıraya koymak için sürükleyin

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

The paragraph should begin with the claim that leafcutter ants operate underground farms, followed by the sentence describing the transport of cut leaves into their nests, then the sentence explaining how the leaves serve as fertilizer in these chambers, and end with the sentence describing how the colony feeds on the cultivated fungus.
The paragraph is structured logically by starting with the general claim that leafcutter ants operate underground farms. The subsequent sentences follow the process in order: harvesting leaves, decomposing them in chambers to grow fungus, and consuming the resulting crop.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the paragraph's central claim.
The sentence introducing the underground farms and cultivation of food is the topic sentence.
A logical paragraph starts with a general claim before supporting it with details.
2
Identify the next sentence in the sequence using transitional references.
The sentence beginning with 'To start this process...' is placed second.
The phrase 'this process' refers directly to the cultivation process established in the first sentence.
3
Determine the third sentence using spatial references.
The sentence beginning with 'In these chambers...' is placed third.
The phrase 'these chambers' refers back to the 'subterranean nests' mentioned in the second sentence.
4
Identify the concluding detail.
The sentence beginning with 'Finally...' is placed last.
The transition 'Finally' indicates the final outcome of the farming process, showing how the colony feeds on the fungus.

Anahtar Kavram

Supporting Claims with Evidence and Details
Tahmini Süre:1m 0s
Soru 583Soru

Translators of the Epic of Gilgamesh must navigate fragmented clay tablets; because many cuneiform signs have multiple meanings, they must frequently make subjective choices to reconstruct the narrative flow. Which of the following choices correctly punctuates the underlined portion of the sentence?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: tablets; because many cuneiform signs have multiple meanings, they

Cevap

The choice that uses a semicolon after 'tablets' and a comma after 'meanings' to correctly separate the independent clauses without creating a fragment or comma splice.
The correct option correctly uses a semicolon to separate two independent clauses: the first clause ('Translators of the Epic of Gilgamesh must navigate fragmented clay tablets') and the second clause ('because many cuneiform signs have multiple meanings, they must frequently make subjective choices to reconstruct the narrative flow'). The comma after 'meanings' is also correctly used to set off the introductory dependent clause within the second independent clause.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the main clauses in the sentence.
The sentence consists of two main independent clauses: 'Translators of the Epic of Gilgamesh must navigate fragmented clay tablets' and 'Because many cuneiform signs have multiple meanings, they must frequently make subjective choices to reconstruct the narrative flow.'
To determine the correct punctuation, we must analyze the grammatical completeness of each part of the sentence.
2
Select the appropriate punctuation to link these independent clauses.
Since there is no coordinating conjunction (like 'and', 'but', or 'so') between the two main clauses, they must be separated by either a period or a semicolon.
Joining independent clauses with only a comma creates a comma splice error.
3
Verify internal punctuation within the second independent clause.
The second clause begins with a dependent clause ('Because many cuneiform signs have multiple meanings'), which must be followed by a comma before introducing the main subject ('they').
Introductory dependent clauses must be set off by a comma, but separating them with a semicolon would incorrectly create a fragment.

Anahtar Kavram

Semicolons are used to link two independent clauses that are closely related in thought, even when the second independent clause begins with a dependent clause.
Soru 584Soru

Although the two research vessels collected data on different whale migration routes, each crews' findings depended on it's sonar array.

Which of the following choices represents the correct punctuation and usage for the underlined portion of the sentence?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: crew's findings depended on its

Cevap

crew's findings depended on its
The correct option correctly pairs the singular determiner 'each' with the singular possessive 'crew's' and uses the possessive pronoun 'its' to modify 'sonar array'.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Determine whether the noun 'crew' should be singular or plural.
The noun must be singular ('crew') because it is modified by the singular determiner 'each'.
The determiner 'each' always precedes singular countable nouns in this context.
2
Determine the correct possessive form for the singular noun 'crew'.
The correct form is 'crew's'.
Singular possessive nouns are formed by adding an apostrophe followed by 's'.
3
Determine whether to use the possessive pronoun 'its' or the contraction 'it's' to modify 'sonar array'.
The correct word is the possessive pronoun 'its'.
The sentence requires a possessive relationship for the sonar array. The contraction 'it's' stands for 'it is' or 'it has' and is grammatically incorrect here.

Anahtar Kavram

Apostrophes for Possessives and Contractions
Tahmini Süre:45s
Soru 585Soru

For decades, scholars believed that the Bronze Age clay tablets discovered in Crete could never be translated. The self-taught linguist and architect, who deciphered the script, Michael Ventris, was not a professional academic. His successful translation of Linear B in 1952 proved that the language of ancient Mycenae was actually an early form of Greek.

Which of the following choices is the best punctuation for the underlined portion of the sentence?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: architect who deciphered the script, Michael Ventris, was

Cevap

The correct punctuation is 'architect who deciphered the script, Michael Ventris, was'.
The correct choice removes the comma before the relative clause 'who deciphered the script' because it is restrictive, and keeps both commas around the name 'Michael Ventris' because it is a nonessential appositive.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the role of the relative clause 'who deciphered the script'.
The clause is restrictive (essential) because it defines which specific linguist and architect is being discussed.
Restrictive clauses should not be separated from their referent by commas.
2
Identify the role of the name 'Michael Ventris'.
The name is a nonessential appositive because the preceding phrase 'The self-taught linguist and architect who deciphered the script' already uniquely identifies him.
Nonessential appositives must be set off by a pair of commas (one before and one after).
3
Evaluate the options to find the one that removes the comma before 'who' and includes both commas around 'Michael Ventris'.
The option containing 'architect who deciphered the script, Michael Ventris, was' is correct.
It satisfies both punctuation rules and avoids fragments or misplaced punctuation.

Anahtar Kavram

Commas with Nonessential and Parenthetical Elements
Soru 586Soru

The following sentence contains two blanks. Which words from the commonly confused pair 'tortuous' and 'torturous' correctly fill the blanks to maintain the proper meaning of the sentence?

Aşağıdaki boşlukları doldurun

The hikers spent hours winding along the trail that hugged the cliffside, a journey that became a test of endurance in the blistering heat.
Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

The first blank should be filled with 'tortuous' and the second blank should be filled with 'torturous'.
The word 'tortuous' means full of twists and turns, which correctly describes the physical path of the winding trail. The word 'torturous' means involving or causing severe pain or suffering, which fits the context of a grueling test of endurance in the blistering heat.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the context of the first blank, which describes a path that is 'winding along the... trail'.
The word must mean full of twists, turns, or bends.
The trail is described as winding, which corresponds to the definition of 'tortuous' (full of twists and turns).
2
Analyze the context of the second blank, which describes 'a... test of endurance in the blistering heat'.
The word must mean causing intense pain, suffering, or hardship.
A grueling hike in extreme heat causes physical suffering, which corresponds to the definition of 'torturous' (involving or causing torture or severe pain).

Anahtar Kavram

Distinguishing between the homophones 'tortuous' (winding, crooked) and 'torturous' (painful, agonizing).
Soru 587Soru

During Napoleon’s military campaign in Egypt, French soldiers uncovered a large stone slab near the town of Rashid. The artifact , which featured the same decree written in three different scripts, eventually allowed scholars to decipher ancient Egyptian hieroglyphs. This breakthrough opened a window into a civilization that had been silent for centuries.

Which of the following choices is the best punctuation for the underlined portion of the passage?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: NO CHANGE

Cevap

The option containing the relative pronoun 'which' enclosed by a pair of commas
The clause 'which featured the same decree written in three different scripts' is nonessential because the sentence remains grammatically complete and clear without it. Nonessential elements in the middle of a sentence must be set off by a pair of commas. The original phrasing correctly starts the clause with a comma before 'which' and closes it with a comma after 'scripts'.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Determine if the underlined clause is essential or nonessential to the meaning of the sentence.
The clause 'which featured the same decree written in three different scripts' provides optional descriptive details about the Rosetta Stone artifact. Because the identity of the artifact is already established, the clause is nonessential.
Nonessential clauses must be set off from the rest of the sentence using punctuation.
2
Choose the punctuation pattern that correctly isolates the nonessential clause.
A pair of commas (one before the relative pronoun 'which' and one after the noun phrase 'three different scripts') must enclose the clause. The relative pronoun 'which' is standard for nonessential relative clauses.
Omitting one of the commas, using the restrictive pronoun 'that' with commas, or using a semicolon to separate the clause all violate standard grammatical conventions.

Anahtar Kavram

Commas with Nonessential and Parenthetical Elements
Tahmini Süre:45s
Soru 588Soru

Deep-sea hydrothermal vents support thriving ecosystems in the darkest depths of the ocean, they rely on chemosynthesis rather than photosynthesis to produce energy.

Which of the following options represents the correct punctuation for the underlined portion of the sentence?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: ocean; they

Cevap

The correct choice is the option that replaces the comma with a semicolon to separate the two independent clauses without any coordinating conjunctions.
The correct choice uses a semicolon to connect two independent clauses that are closely related in thought. Since both 'Deep-sea hydrothermal vents support thriving ecosystems in the darkest depths of the ocean' and 'they rely on chemosynthesis rather than photosynthesis to produce energy' are complete thoughts that can stand alone as sentences, a semicolon is the appropriate punctuation mark to link them without a coordinating conjunction.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the two clauses in the sentence and determine if they are independent or dependent.
The first clause ('Deep-sea hydrothermal vents support thriving ecosystems in the darkest depths of the ocean') and the second clause ('they rely on chemosynthesis rather than photosynthesis to produce energy') are both independent clauses because they can stand alone as complete sentences.
Correct punctuation depends on the structural relationship of the clauses being joined.
2
Evaluate the current punctuation and the available options to join the independent clauses correctly.
The original sentence uses a comma to join the clauses, which is a comma splice. A semicolon alone can join two independent clauses without a coordinating conjunction. Therefore, the option with the semicolon is the correct choice.
To fix a comma splice, you can use a semicolon, or a comma paired with a coordinating conjunction.

Anahtar Kavram

Using semicolons to link independent clauses
Soru 589Soru

Despite the fact that the two sister cities share a single watershed, each municipality's citizens are responsible for it's preservation.

Which choice most clearly and correctly punctuates the underlined portion of the sentence?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: municipality's citizens are responsible for its

Cevap

The correct choice is the one that uses the singular possessive noun 'municipality's' and the possessive pronoun 'its'.
The correct option correctly uses the singular possessive noun 'municipality's' and the possessive pronoun 'its'. Since the distributor 'each' is singular, the noun it modifies must be the singular possessive 'municipality's' (not the plural possessive 'municipalities''). To show possession for the singular noun 'watershed', the possessive pronoun 'its' must be used without an apostrophe, as 'it's' is a contraction for 'it is' or 'it has'.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Determine if the noun preceding the citizens should be singular or plural.
The distributor 'each' is grammatically singular and must modify a singular noun. Therefore, we must use the singular form 'municipality' rather than the plural 'municipalities'.
This establishes the correct grammatical number for the noun.
2
Determine the correct possessive punctuation for the singular noun 'municipality'.
To show that the citizens belong to the municipality, we add an apostrophe and 's' to the singular noun, resulting in 'municipality's'.
This applies the standard rule for singular noun possession.
3
Determine the correct pronoun form to indicate possession of the watershed.
The sentence requires a possessive pronoun referring to the singular 'watershed'. The correct possessive pronoun is 'its'. We must avoid the contraction 'it's' (it is) and the non-existent form 'its'.
This ensures the pronoun conveys possession rather than a contraction.

Anahtar Kavram

Apostrophes for Possessives and Contractions
Tahmini Süre:45s
Soru 590Soru

The Sticky Note Solution

[1]
In 1968, a chemist named Spencer Silver was working at the 3M company, trying to develop a super-strong adhesive for the aerospace industry. Instead, he accidentally created something quite different: a weak adhesive that stuck lightly to surfaces, could be peeled off easily, and left no residue behind. For several years, Silver promoted his unusual adhesive within the company, but no one could think of a practical use for it.

[2]
The breakthrough came in 1974, when another 3M scientist, Art Fry, attended a seminar where Silver was explaining his adhesive. Fry sang in his church choir and was frustrated that the scraps of paper he used as bookmarks kept falling out of his hymnal. He remembered Silver’s adhesive and realized it would be perfect for making sticky bookmarks that could hold their place without damaging the pages of the hymnal.

[3]
Fry and Silver worked together to develop the product, and 3M eventually launched it in 1980 under the name "Post-it Notes." The yellow square notes quickly became an indispensable office staple worldwide, proving that a failed scientific experiment could lead to a highly successful commercial product.

Suppose the writer's goal had been to write an essay detailing the step-by-step invention and commercial release of the Post-it Note. Would this essay accomplish that goal?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Yes, because it describes the accidental creation of the adhesive, how it was applied to paper bookmarks, and its eventual release as a successful product.

Cevap

The essay successfully meets the goal because it details how the adhesive was created, how it was adapted into bookmarks, and how it was launched as a successful commercial product.
The correct answer is correct because the essay describes the key phases of the Post-it Note's history: Spencer Silver's accidental invention of the adhesive, Art Fry's realization of its utility as a bookmark, and 3M's successful commercial release of the product in 1980.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Read the passage to determine its main focus and supporting details.
The passage details the accidental creation of a weak adhesive by Spencer Silver, Art Fry's discovery of a practical bookmark application for it, and the successful product launch by 3M.
To establish what information the passage actually contains.
2
Compare the actual content of the passage to the hypothetical writing goal.
The passage successfully covers both the invention and the commercial success of the product, confirming a 'Yes' answer.
To determine whether the essay fulfills the specified goal.
3
Analyze the reasons provided in the 'Yes' options to select the correct one.
The option stating the essay describes the accidental creation, the bookmark application, and the product release is accurate. The option mentioning chemical formulas and manufacturing equipment is factually unsupported by the text.
To identify the correct response and rule out distractors.

Anahtar Kavram

Evaluating whether a passage meets a specific rhetorical goal by comparing the goal to the actual content of the text.
Soru 591Soru

Read the sentence and choose the best replacement for the underlined portion.

During the excavation of the ancient Roman villa, when the three archaeologists uncovered a detailed mosaic, the archaeologists' primary goal was to protect it's delicate glass tiles from environmental damage.

Which of the following options represents the correct punctuation and usage for this sentence?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: archaeologists' primary goal was to protect its

Cevap

archaeologists' primary goal was to protect its
The correct option correctly uses the plural possessive noun 'archaeologists'' to modify 'primary goal' since there are three archaeologists. It also correctly uses the possessive pronoun 'its' to refer to the tiles belonging to the mosaic.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Determine if the noun 'archaeologists' should be singular or plural, and if it requires a possessive form.
The sentence mentions 'three archaeologists', which means the noun must be plural. The goal belongs to these archaeologists, so a plural possessive form is required: 'archaeologists'.
Plural nouns ending in -s form their possessives by adding an apostrophe after the -s.
2
Determine whether to use 'its' or 'it's' to modify 'delicate glass tiles'.
The tiles belong to the mosaic, so we need the possessive pronoun 'its'. The contraction 'it's' stands for 'it is' or 'it has' and does not fit grammatically in this context.
'Its' is the possessive form, whereas 'it's' is a contraction.
3
Combine the correct forms and select the matching option.
The correct phrase is 'archaeologists' primary goal was to protect its'.
This matches the option containing both the correct plural possessive and the correct possessive pronoun.

Anahtar Kavram

Distinguishing between singular and plural possessives, and between the possessive pronoun 'its' and the contraction 'it's'.
Soru 592Soru

In 1799, French soldiers in Egypt discovered the Rosetta Stone near the town of Rashid. The linguist who studied the inscriptions, a collection of ancient Egyptian hieroglyphs worked for months to decipher them. Finally, in 1822, Jean-François Champollion decoded the text and unlocked the secrets of ancient Egyptian writing.

Which of the following options represents the correct punctuation for the underlined portion of the sentence?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: who studied the inscriptions, a collection of ancient Egyptian hieroglyphs,

Cevap

The correct option is the one that adds a closing comma after the phrase 'a collection of ancient Egyptian hieroglyphs' while keeping the restrictive clause 'who studied the inscriptions' connected to 'The linguist' without an intervening comma.
The correct option correctly leaves the restrictive clause 'who studied the inscriptions' unpunctuated and inserts a closing comma after the nonessential appositive 'a collection of ancient Egyptian hieroglyphs' to balance the opening comma.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Determine if the clause 'who studied the inscriptions' is restrictive or nonrestrictive.
The clause is restrictive because it identifies which specific linguist is being discussed. Therefore, it should not be set off by a comma from the noun 'linguist'.
Restrictive clauses are essential to the meaning of the sentence and do not take commas.
2
Determine if the phrase 'a collection of ancient Egyptian hieroglyphs' is essential or nonessential.
The phrase is a nonessential appositive that adds extra information about 'the inscriptions'. It must be set off by a pair of commas.
Nonessential appositives require surrounding commas to separate them from the rest of the sentence.
3
Check the punctuation before and after the appositive phrase.
There is already an opening comma after 'inscriptions'. A closing comma is required after 'hieroglyphs' before the verb 'worked' to balance the punctuation.
Parenthetical elements must have matching punctuation at both the beginning and the end.

Anahtar Kavram

Commas with nonessential appositives and restrictive relative clauses.
Soru 593Soru

The committee faced numerous setbacks while revising the organization's charter. The document that the committee drafted after weeks of intense debate, which outlined the new bylaws was finally approved by the board of directors. This decision marked the beginning of a new era of governance for the institution.

Which of the following options represents the correct punctuation for the underlined portion?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: that the committee drafted after weeks of intense debate, which outlined the new bylaws, was

Cevap

The correct option is the one that leaves the restrictive clause without commas and sets off the nonessential relative clause with a pair of commas.
The correct option properly integrates the restrictive clause 'that the committee drafted after weeks of intense debate' without any commas, and correctly encloses the nonessential relative clause 'which outlined the new bylaws' in a pair of commas, placing one before 'which' and one after 'bylaws'.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the syntactic roles of the clauses modifying the noun 'document'.
The clause 'that the committee drafted after weeks of intense debate' is essential (restrictive) because it specifies which document was approved. The clause 'which outlined the new bylaws' is nonessential (nonrestrictive) because it merely adds descriptive detail about the document's contents.
Identifying the clause types dictates their punctuation: restrictive clauses must not have commas, whereas nonrestrictive clauses must be set off by commas.
2
Evaluate the punctuation needed around each clause.
No commas should precede or follow 'that the committee drafted after weeks of intense debate'. However, a pair of commas must enclose the nonessential clause 'which outlined the new bylaws' (one comma before 'which' and one after 'bylaws').
A pair of parenthetical commas must be used to enclose a nonessential element in the middle of a sentence, without interrupting the flow of essential modifiers.

Anahtar Kavram

Distinguishing between restrictive (essential) and nonrestrictive (nonessential) relative clauses to apply correct comma punctuation.
Tahmini Süre:1m 0s
Soru 594Soru

In the passage below, a portion of the sentence is underlined. Which of the following options correctly punctuates the underlined portion?

Marine biologists have long studied the defensive mechanisms of the mimic octopus, they have found that this remarkable creature can dynamically alter its shape, color, and texture to imitate predatory fish.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: octopus; they have found that this

Cevap

octopus; they have found that this
The option using a semicolon is correct because it properly separates two closely related independent clauses without the addition of unnecessary conjunctions or creating fragments.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the grammatical structure of the clauses on either side of the underlined punctuation.
The clause preceding the punctuation ('Marine biologists have long studied the defensive mechanisms of the mimic octopus') is an independent clause because it contains a subject and a verb and can stand alone as a sentence. The clause following the punctuation ('they have found that this remarkable creature can dynamically alter its shape, color, and texture to imitate predatory fish') is also an independent clause.
Determining clause independence is the crucial first step to deciding whether a comma, semicolon, or other punctuation is required.
2
Evaluate the grammar rules for connecting two independent clauses.
Two independent clauses must be joined using a semicolon or a comma paired with a coordinating conjunction (such as 'and', 'but', or 'so'). They cannot be joined by a comma alone, nor can they be separated by a semicolon if one is converted into a dependent clause.
This step allows us to eliminate grammatically incorrect options.

Anahtar Kavram

Semicolons are used to link two independent clauses that are closely related in thought.
Soru 595Soru

Discovered in a shipwreck off the coast of a Greek island, the Antikythera mechanism has astonished historians of science; indeed, its complex gear systems suggest that ancient Greeks had achieved a level of technological sophistication previously thought impossible until the modern era.

Which choice represents the correct punctuation and phrasing for the underlined portion of the sentence?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: NO CHANGE

Cevap

The correct option is the original phrasing, which uses a semicolon and the conjunctive adverb 'indeed' followed by a comma and the possessive pronoun 'its'.
The correct option correctly uses a semicolon to separate two independent clauses linked by the conjunctive adverb 'indeed'. It also correctly uses the possessive pronoun 'its' rather than the contraction 'it's'.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the structure of the clauses surrounding the underlined portion.
The first clause ('Discovered in a shipwreck... historians of science') is independent. The second clause ('its complex gear systems suggest... modern era') is also independent.
To determine whether a semicolon is appropriate, we must verify that it separates two independent clauses that could stand alone as sentences.
2
Evaluate the joining punctuation and transitions.
A semicolon is required to join these two independent clauses when a conjunctive adverb like 'indeed' is used. The conjunctive adverb must be followed by a comma.
Joining two independent clauses with a comma and a conjunctive adverb without a semicolon creates a comma splice.
3
Check the spelling and usage of the possessive pronoun.
The possessive pronoun 'its' is required to modify 'complex gear systems'. The contraction 'it's' would translate to 'it is complex gear systems', which is incorrect.
This step eliminates choices that confuse the possessive pronoun with the contraction.

Anahtar Kavram

Semicolons are used to link two independent clauses, especially when the second clause begins with a conjunctive adverb or transitional phrase.
Tahmini Süre:1m 0s
Soru 596Soru

In 1967, postgraduate student Jocelyn Bell Burnell detected a series of anomalous, highly regular radio signals. Her supervisor initially dismissed the pulses as man-made interference. However, Burnell, who kept analyzing the data meticulously, soon realized that the signals that she recorded were originating from a rapidly spinning neutron star.

Which choice most effectively punctuates the underlined portion of the sentence?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: NO CHANGE

Cevap

NO CHANGE
The correct answer maintains the proper punctuation for both clauses. The nonessential clause 'who kept analyzing the data meticulously' is correctly set off with a matched pair of commas, and the restrictive clause 'that she recorded' is correctly left without commas.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the nonessential elements and restrictive clauses in the underlined portion.
The clause 'who kept analyzing the data meticulously' is a nonessential relative clause modifying 'Burnell', while 'that she recorded' is a restrictive relative clause modifying 'signals'.
Relative clauses modifying proper nouns are nonessential because the referent is already unique. Relative clauses beginning with 'that' are restrictive.
2
Evaluate the choices based on standard punctuation rules for nonessential and restrictive elements.
A pair of commas must enclose 'who kept analyzing the data meticulously', whereas no commas should surround 'that she recorded'.
Nonessential elements must be fully set off with commas (parenthetical pair), and restrictive elements must never be separated from their referent with commas.

Anahtar Kavram

Commas with Nonessential and Parenthetical Elements
Soru 597Soru

Although the two local businesses shared a downtown office building, each company's employees were proud of its modern workspace.

Which of the following is the correct form of the underlined portion?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: company's employees were proud of its

Cevap

company's employees were proud of its
The noun modified by the word 'each' must be singular, so the singular possessive form 'company's' is correct. The pronoun referring back to 'each company' must be the possessive pronoun 'its' (without an apostrophe). The contraction 'it's' (meaning 'it is') is incorrect in this context.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Determine whether the noun following 'each' should be singular or plural.
The word 'each' requires a singular noun, so we must use 'company' instead of 'companies'.
Correct grammatical agreement with the modifier 'each'.
2
Determine the correct possessive form for the singular noun 'company'.
The singular possessive form is 'company's'.
To show ownership by a single company.
3
Determine whether to use the possessive pronoun 'its' or the contraction 'it's'.
The context requires the possessive pronoun 'its' to refer to the company's workspace.
'it's' is a contraction for 'it is', which does not make sense in the phrase 'it is modern workspace'.

Anahtar Kavram

Distinguishing between singular and plural possessives, and between the possessive pronoun 'its' and the contraction 'it's'.
Tahmini Süre:45s
Soru 598Soru

Because the three municipal clinics shared a digital archival system, the clinic's administrators were able to retrieve patient histories without compromising they're privacy.

Which choice represents the correct punctuation and word choice for the underlined portion of the sentence?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: clinics' administrators were able to retrieve patient histories without compromising their

Cevap

The choice containing 'clinics' administrators were able to retrieve patient histories without compromising their' is correct because it correctly uses the plural possessive noun 'clinics'' and the possessive pronoun 'their'.
The correct choice uses the plural possessive noun 'clinics'' because the introductory phrase establishes that there are multiple clinics ('three municipal clinics'). It also correctly uses the possessive pronoun 'their' to indicate the privacy belonging to the patients.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Determine if the noun 'clinic' should be singular or plural, and possessive or not.
The sentence refers to 'three municipal clinics', which means multiple clinics are involved. The administrators belong to these clinics, so we need the plural possessive form, which is 'clinics'.
Plural nouns ending in 's' form their possessive by adding an apostrophe after the 's'.
2
Determine if the pronoun modifying 'privacy' should be a possessive pronoun or a contraction.
The context requires a possessive pronoun to show that the privacy belongs to the patients. The possessive pronoun is 'their', not the contraction 'they're' (which stands for 'they are').
Substituting 'they are' into the sentence ('without compromising they are privacy') is grammatically incorrect.
3
Combine these findings to select the correct choice.
The correct option must contain both 'clinics'' and 'their'.
Only this combination satisfies both grammatical requirements.

Anahtar Kavram

Apostrophes for Possessives and Contractions
Soru 599Soru

The following passage is about the history of musical pitch standardization.

For centuries, musicians tuned their instruments to varying reference pitches. A performer traveling from Paris to London in the eighteenth century would find that what was considered "middle A" in one city might sound nearly a semitone higher or lower in another. This lack of standardization posed significant challenges, particularly as orchestras grew larger and instrument manufacturing became more globalized.

In 19391939, an international conference in London officially recommended that the note AA above middle CC be tuned to 440 Hz440 \text{ Hz}. This frequency, known as A440A440, was chosen as a compromise. It balanced the desires of singers, who preferred lower pitches to avoid vocal strain, with those of string players and instrument makers, who favored higher pitches for a brighter, more brilliant sound.

Today, A440A440 remains the standard reference pitch for tuning in most Western classical and popular music. Although some modern orchestras tune slightly higher—often to 442 Hz442 \text{ Hz} or 443 Hz443 \text{ Hz} to achieve a more piercing tone—the establishment of A440A440 was a milestone that facilitated global musical collaboration and standardized instrument production.

Suppose the writer's goal had been to write an essay that explains why a standardized musical pitch was established and how it was decided. Would this essay successfully fulfill that goal?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Yes, because it describes the practical difficulties caused by varying pitches and explains the compromise behind selecting 440 Hz440 \text{ Hz}.

Cevap

Yes, because it describes the practical difficulties caused by varying pitches and explains the compromise behind selecting 440 Hz440 \text{ Hz}.
The correct answer is the option stating that the essay succeeds because it describes the practical difficulties caused by varying pitches and explains the compromise behind selecting 440 Hz440 \text{ Hz}. This directly matches the passage's content, which explains the problems of variation in the first paragraph and the compromise of 440 Hz440 \text{ Hz} in the second paragraph.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the hypothetical goal in the prompt.
The goal is to explain why a standardized musical pitch was established and how it was decided.
Understanding the goal allows us to evaluate the text's success in meeting it.
2
Examine the passage to see if it addresses the 'why'.
The first paragraph describes how differing pitches caused difficulties for traveling musicians and growing orchestras, explaining the need (the 'why') for a standard.
We must verify if the first part of the goal is met.
3
Examine the passage to see if it addresses the 'how'.
The second paragraph explains that an international conference in 19391939 recommended 440 Hz440 \text{ Hz} as a compromise between singers and string players, explaining 'how' it was decided.
We must verify if the second part of the goal is met.
4
Select the option that correctly states the essay succeeds and provides the accurate reasons.
The option stating the essay succeeds because it describes the practical difficulties and the compromise behind 440 Hz440 \text{ Hz} is correct.
Fulfilling both parts of the writing goal means the essay is successful, and the explanation matches the text's contents.

Anahtar Kavram

Evaluating Whole-Essay Goals and Purpose
Soru 600Soru

Old Faithful, a famous geyser in Yellowstone National Park, erupts with remarkable predictability. Visitors from all over the world gather to watch the geyser shoot boiling water high into the air. [1] Early cameras required long exposure times to capture clear images of moving water. Many of these tourists wait patiently on the wooden boardwalk, cameras in hand, for the next eruption to begin.

Should the writer keep or delete Sentence 1?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Delete it, because it introduces details about photography history that distract from the paragraph's focus on watching the geyser erupt.

Cevap

Delete it, because it introduces details about photography history that distract from the paragraph's focus on watching the geyser erupt.
The correct answer is to delete the sentence because it introduces details about photography history that distract from the paragraph's focus on watching the geyser erupt. The paragraph is centered on tourists waiting for and watching the eruption of Old Faithful. Introducing historical details about camera exposure times deviates from this focus, making the sentence irrelevant.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the primary focus of the paragraph.
The paragraph describes tourists gathering at Yellowstone National Park to watch Old Faithful erupt.
Understanding the main topic of the paragraph is necessary to evaluate whether a sentence belongs in it.
2
Analyze the content of the sentence in question (Sentence 1).
Sentence 1 discusses the history of early cameras and their long exposure times.
This determines what specific information the sentence adds to the passage.
3
Evaluate the relevance of Sentence 1 to the paragraph's focus and choose the correct decision.
The detail about early photography history is irrelevant to the experience of modern tourists watching a geyser. Therefore, the sentence should be deleted.
Irrelevant sentences interrupt the flow of a passage and should be removed.

Anahtar Kavram

Evaluating Relevance for Adding or Deleting Content
ÖncekiSayfa 30 / 278Sonraki
Tüm alıştırma soruları — ACT | Examkin