Tüm alıştırma soruları

5556 soru

Soru 881Soru

The conservator examined the ancient medieval manuscript under ultraviolet light; she discovered hidden layers of text that had been scraped away centuries ago.

Which choice represents the most effective punctuation for the underlined portion of the sentence?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: NO CHANGE

Cevap

NO CHANGE
The correct option correctly uses a semicolon to separate two closely related independent clauses. Since both parts of the sentence have their own subjects and verbs and form complete thoughts, a semicolon is a grammatically correct way to link them without adding a coordinating conjunction.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the grammatical structure of the clauses before and after the punctuation mark.
The clause before ('The conservator examined the ancient medieval manuscript under ultraviolet light') and the clause after ('she discovered hidden layers of text that had been scraped away centuries ago') are both independent clauses.
Each clause contains a subject and a verb and can stand alone as a complete sentence.
2
Determine the acceptable methods for joining two independent clauses.
Two independent clauses can be joined by either a semicolon alone, or a comma followed by a coordinating conjunction (such as 'and').
A semicolon is used here because there is no coordinating conjunction joining the two related, complete thoughts.

Anahtar Kavram

Semicolons are used to link two independent clauses that are closely related in thought when no coordinating conjunction is present.
Soru 882Soru

In the winter of 1903, Mary Anderson was riding a streetcar in New York City when she noticed the driver struggling to see through the falling sleet. To clear the windshield, the driver had to open the window, reach outside, and wipe the glass by hand, which let freezing air and wet snow into the vehicle. Upon returning home to Alabama, Anderson designed a swinging arm with a rubber blade that could be operated by a lever from inside the cab. Patented in 1903, her device became the first functional windshield wiper.

The writer wants to conclude the paragraph with a sentence that emphasizes the lasting impact of Anderson's invention. Which choice best accomplishes this goal?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Today, variations of Anderson's basic design are standard safety features on vehicles worldwide.

Cevap

Today, variations of Anderson's basic design are standard safety features on vehicles worldwide.
The correct answer effectively concludes the paragraph by linking the historical origin of the windshield wiper to its universal presence on modern vehicles. This successfully fulfills the goal of highlighting the lasting impact of the invention.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the writer's goal, which is to select a concluding sentence that highlights the long-term, lasting impact of Anderson's invention.
The correct sentence must connect the 1903 invention of the windshield wiper to its modern significance or legacy.
Understanding the specific rhetorical goal is necessary to evaluate the suitability of each option.
2
Examine the choices for grammatical correctness and relevance to the goal.
The option about Anderson's travels introduces new off-topic details. The option about driver appreciation has a comma splice. The option about streetcars uses an incorrect transition.
Eliminating distractors based on grammatical errors and relevance leaves only the logically correct response.
3
Verify that the remaining choice fits the context and fulfills the goal.
The sentence explaining that variations of Anderson's design are standard on vehicles today effectively shows the lasting impact of her invention.
The correct answer must satisfy the writing prompt while remaining grammatically correct.

Anahtar Kavram

Selecting Concluding Sentences and Transitions
Soru 883Soru

The following passage is an excerpt from a science article about deep-sea marine biology.

Deep-ocean hydrothermal vents support thriving ecosystems in some of the most hostile environments on Earth. Organisms living near these vents—such as the giant tube worm, which lacks a mouth and digestive tract, rely on symbiotic bacteria for survival. These bacteria convert toxic chemicals from the vents into usable energy.

Which choice is the best replacement for the underlined portion of the sentence?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: tract—rely

Cevap

The correct choice is the option that replaces the underlined text with 'tract—rely', using a dash to match the opening dash and properly close the nonessential phrase.
The sentence contains a nonessential parenthetical phrase ('such as the giant tube worm, which lacks a mouth and digestive tract') that is introduced by a dash. To maintain punctuation consistency, the phrase must also close with a dash. The correct choice provides this closing dash, properly separating the parenthetical information from the main verb 'rely'.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the nonessential parenthetical phrase within the sentence.
The phrase is 'such as the giant tube worm, which lacks a mouth and digestive tract'.
Determining where the parenthetical information begins and ends helps identify the punctuation needed to set it off.
2
Locate the punctuation mark used to introduce the parenthetical phrase.
A dash is used right before the phrase ('vents—such').
Standard punctuation rules require that parenthetical elements be set off by matching punctuation marks: either two commas or two dashes.
3
Evaluate the choices to find the punctuation mark that matches the opening dash.
A closing dash ('tract—rely') is required to maintain consistency and correctly connect the subject to the main verb.
Using a comma, semicolon, or period disrupts the sentence structure and violates punctuation consistency rules.

Anahtar Kavram

Punctuation consistency with parenthetical dashes
Soru 884Soru

The Echo of the Wolf

[1] In 1995, after a seventy-year absence, gray wolves were reintroduced to Yellowstone National Park. The decision was highly controversial, sparking intense debates between conservationists and local ranchers. Ranchers feared that the predators would devastate livestock populations, while biologists argued that the absence of a keystone predator had severely damaged the park's ecosystem.

[2] In the decades following the wolves' return, biologists witnessed a phenomenon known as a trophic cascade. Without wolves to hunt them, the park's elk population had ballooned, overgrazing young willow, aspen, and cottonwood trees along stream banks. With wolves back on the landscape, elk behavior changed; they spent less time lingering in open valleys where they were vulnerable. Consequently, the vegetation began to recover.

[3] This resurgence of flora triggered a chain reaction. Rebounding trees stabilized riverbanks, reducing erosion and cooling the water, which benefited fish. Beavers returned to build dams, creating wetlands that supported insects, birds, and amphibians. The wolf reintroduction proved that the health of an ecosystem depends on the intricate connections among all its inhabitants.

Statement: Suppose the writer's goal had been to write an essay explaining how the reintroduction of a predator species can trigger a series of environmental changes that benefit other wildlife. This essay successfully achieves that goal.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: True

Cevap

True
The statement is true because the essay details the positive ecological consequences of the wolf reintroduction. It systematically traces the cause-and-effect pathway from the presence of the predator to changes in elk grazing habits, the subsequent recovery of streamside trees, and the ultimate benefits to other animal species such as fish, beavers, insects, birds, and amphibians.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the proposed writing goal in the statement.
The goal is to explain how reintroducing a predator triggers environmental changes that benefit other wildlife.
This establishes the criteria for evaluating the essay's success.
2
Check if the essay describes the reintroduction of a predator.
Yes, Paragraph 1 introduces the reintroduction of gray wolves, which are predators.
This confirms the starting point of the writer's goal is present.
3
Check if the essay details environmental changes resulting from this reintroduction.
Yes, Paragraph 2 details the trophic cascade, specifically the recovery of streamside vegetation due to changes in elk behavior.
This confirms the intermediate mechanism of environmental change is explained.
4
Check if the essay shows these changes benefit other wildlife.
Yes, Paragraph 3 describes how these changes benefited fish and led to the return of beavers, who created wetlands supporting insects, birds, and amphibians.
This confirms that the final requirement of the goal (benefiting other wildlife) is fulfilled.

Anahtar Kavram

Evaluating Whole-Essay Goals and Purpose
Soru 885Soru

Because the regional agricultural board wanted to protect local crops from the unpredictable, destructive, insect pests, they recommended a combination of biological controls and crop rotation.

Which of the following choices best punctuates the underlined portion of the sentence?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: unpredictable, destructive insect pests, they recommended

Cevap

The correct option is the one that reads 'unpredictable, destructive insect pests, they recommended'. This choice correctly punctuates the coordinate adjectives and sets off the introductory clause.
The correct choice properly identifies that 'unpredictable' and 'destructive' are coordinate adjectives modifying 'pests' and therefore require a comma, whereas 'insect' is a cumulative adjective (functioning as a noun adjunct) that should not be separated by a comma. Additionally, because the sentence starts with the subordinating conjunction 'Because', the introductory clause is dependent and must be separated from the main clause by a comma after 'pests'.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Determine if the adjectives modifying 'pests' are coordinate or cumulative.
'Unpredictable' and 'destructive' are coordinate because they can be reversed and joined by 'and'. However, 'insect' is cumulative because it directly modifies 'pests' as a single unit ('insect pests').
Coordinate adjectives require a comma between them, while cumulative adjectives must not be separated by a comma.
2
Identify the clause boundary and determine the appropriate punctuation.
The sentence begins with the subordinating conjunction 'Because', making 'Because the regional agricultural board wanted to protect local crops from the unpredictable, destructive insect pests' a dependent clause.
An introductory dependent clause must be followed by a comma when it precedes an independent clause.
3
Evaluate the choices to find the one that applies both rules correctly.
The choice containing 'unpredictable, destructive insect pests, they recommended' is the only option that correctly includes the coordinate comma, excludes the cumulative comma, and uses a comma to separate the clauses.
This correctly resolves both the adjective punctuation and the clause boundary punctuation.

Anahtar Kavram

Punctuation of coordinate vs. cumulative adjectives and introductory dependent clauses
Tahmini Süre:1m 0s
Soru 886Soru

A writer is editing a draft of a scientific essay about forest ecosystems.

[1] Beneath the forest floor, a complex network of fungal threads known as mycorrhizae connects the roots of individual trees, allowing them to share resources.
[2] Larger, older "hub trees" occupy central nodes in this network, distributing excess sugars to younger seedlings that would otherwise struggle to survive.
[3] Recent experiments show that trees can even use these fungal pathways to transmit warning signals about insect attacks to nearby vegetation.
[4] Fungi benefit from this relationship as well, absorbing carbon produced by the trees through photosynthesis.

The writer wants to add a sentence after Sentence 3 that provides specific, concrete details to support the claim that trees use the network to transmit warning signals. Which of the following sentences would best achieve this goal?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: For example, when a Douglas fir is attacked by budworms, it sends signals through the network that prompt neighboring pines to produce insect-repelling chemicals.

Cevap

The option stating that a Douglas fir attacked by budworms sends signals prompting neighboring pines to produce insect-repelling chemicals is correct.
The correct option provides highly specific, concrete details (Douglas fir, budworms, neighboring pines, insect-repelling chemicals) that directly support the claim in Sentence 3 about how trees transmit warning signals about insect attacks.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the prompt to identify the specific claim that needs support and the required type of detail.
The claim is that trees use the fungal network to transmit warning signals about insect attacks, and the writer requires specific, concrete details to support this.
Understanding the precise goal prevents choosing options that support the wrong claim or lack sufficient detail.
2
Evaluate each option to see if it directly supports the warning signals claim and provides specific, concrete detail without grammatical errors.
The option about the Douglas fir and budworms provides specific details. The option about hub tree size does not support the signals claim. The option about general sharing is too vague. The option starting with 'Upon receiving' has a dangling modifier.
This filters out options that are off-topic, grammatically incorrect, or too general.
3
Confirm that the chosen option is grammatically correct and directly answers the question.
The sentence about the Douglas fir is grammatically sound, specific, and supports the warning signals claim.
Verifying grammar and rhetorical alignment ensures the final selection is completely correct.

Anahtar Kavram

Supporting Claims with Evidence and Details
Soru 887Soru

Tatiana Proskouriakoff, an illustrator-turned-archaeologist, revolutionized the field of Mayan decipherment in the mid-twentieth century. For decades, prevailing scholarly consensus held that Mayan hieroglyphs represented exclusively astronomical calculations and abstract religious concepts, completely detached from historical events. However, while analyzing carved stone monuments called stelae at the ancient city of Piedras Negras, Proskouriakoff identified recurring patterns of dates that corresponded to the average lifespans of human beings. She hypothesized that these monuments did not depict nameless gods, but rather documented the actual biographies of Mayan rulers.

The writer wants to conclude the passage by emphasizing how Proskouriakoff’s discovery permanently transformed the understanding of Mayan history. Which choice best accomplishes this goal?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Ultimately, her realization changed Mayan history from a blank slate into a written narrative, bridging the gap between prehistoric myth and documented history.

Cevap

Ultimately, her realization changed Mayan history from a blank slate into a written narrative, bridging the gap between prehistoric myth and documented history.
The correct option effectively wraps up the discussion of Mayan decipherment by summarizing how Proskouriakoff’s work transformed the understanding of Mayan history from a blank slate to a documented narrative. It maintains a logical flow and is grammatically correct.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the prompt's specific rhetorical goal, which is to find a concluding sentence that emphasizes how Proskouriakoff's discovery permanently transformed the understanding of Mayan history.
Identify that the correct sentence must connect her decipherment breakthrough directly to a fundamental change in how Mayan history is recorded or understood, without introducing new, unrelated topics.
The prompt explicitly directs the reader to focus on the long-term impact on the understanding of Mayan history.
2
Evaluate the choices for grammatical correctness and logical transitions.
Identify that the option containing 'Therefore, her work proved... it allowed...' is a comma splice, and the option containing 'In contrast, her breakthrough will inspire...' contains both an inappropriate transition and an unnecessary tense shift.
ACT English questions test grammatical conventions alongside rhetorical goals; incorrect grammar or punctuation automatically disqualifies an option.
3
Assess the remaining options for focus and relevance.
Recognize that the option discussing 'watercolor reconstructions' introduces new, unsupported details that distract from the main topic of historical text decipherment, whereas the option starting with 'Ultimately, her realization' accurately summarizes the historical transformation.
An effective conclusion must stay on topic and tie back to the passage's main thesis rather than bringing in new details.

Anahtar Kavram

Selecting Concluding Sentences and Transitions
Tahmini Süre:1m 30s
Soru 888Soru

The following passage is an essay about Sequoyah and the development of the Cherokee writing system.

[1]
In the early nineteenth century, Sequoyah, a Cherokee silversmith who spoke no English, became convinced that the security and independence of his people depended on their mastering the "talking leaves"—the written language used by white settlers. While many of his contemporaries regarded these texts with skepticism or awe, viewing literacy as either a threat or a form of magic, Sequoyah recognized it as a practical tool of self-determination. He set out to create a written form of Cherokee, believing it would allow his nation to navigate the pressures of colonial expansion without losing their cultural identity.

[2]
His initial efforts were met with ridicule. Sequoyah spent years attempting to design a logographic system, creating a distinct character for every individual word. This approach proved unsustainable; the sheer volume of symbols was impossible for a reader to memorize. Recognizing the limits of this methodology, he began listening to spoken Cherokee with a new ear, isolating the recurring sound units that formed words. He identified eighty-five distinct syllables, pairing each with a character—some borrowed from English spelling books and Greek texts, though modified to represent entirely unrelated Cherokee sounds.

[3]
The resulting syllabary, completed in 1821, transformed Cherokee society almost overnight. Because the system was based on phonetics rather than complex spelling rules, Cherokee speakers could learn to read and write in a matter of days. The Cherokee National Council adopted the system, and soon, a bilingual newspaper, the *Cherokee Phoenix*, was circulating throughout the nation. Through the power of their new written language, the Cherokee drafted a constitution, codified their legal system, and recorded history on their own terms, establishing a literate infrastructure that served as a powerful defense against forced assimilation.

Suppose the writer's goal had been to write an essay demonstrating how the creation of a written language was essential to the legal recognition of Native American land rights by colonial governments. Would this essay accomplish this goal?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: No, because the essay focuses on how the syllabary promoted internal literacy and cultural autonomy rather than documenting its impact on land negotiations or colonial legal recognition.

Cevap

No, because the essay focuses on how the syllabary promoted internal literacy and cultural autonomy rather than documenting its impact on land negotiations or colonial legal recognition.
The correct answer is correct because the proposed goal requires the essay to demonstrate how written language was essential to securing legal recognition of land rights from colonial governments. While the essay notes that the Cherokee drafted a constitution and codified laws, it does not mention land negotiations or legal recognition by outside powers. Thus, the essay fails to meet the goal because its focus remains on internal literacy and cultural autonomy.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the proposed writing goal stated in the question stem.
The goal is to demonstrate how the creation of a written language was essential to the legal recognition of Native American land rights by colonial governments.
Understanding the precise parameters of the proposed goal is necessary to evaluate the entire passage against it.
2
Analyze the passage to determine its actual main themes and details.
The passage details Sequoyah's historical journey, the linguistic transition from a word-based system to an 85-character syllabary, the rise of literacy, and internal developments like drafting a constitution, codifying laws, and publishing a newspaper.
This establishes what content is actually present in the text to compare it with the proposed goal.
3
Evaluate whether the actual content meets the proposed goal and identify the reason.
The essay does not contain information about external legal battles, land negotiations, or recognition of territory by colonial governments. It focuses on internal Cherokee literacy, governance, and cultural resilience. Therefore, the goal is not met.
This determines that the correct response must start with 'No' and explains the mismatch between the essay's actual scope and the proposed goal.

Anahtar Kavram

Evaluating Whole-Essay Goals and Purpose
Soru 889Soru

Dorothy Hodgkin, a pioneer in X-ray crystallography, determined the structures of important biochemical substances. Her most famous breakthrough—the structure of penicillin, was resolved in 1945 after years of meticulous analysis.

Which of the following options is the best alternative to the underlined portion of the sentence?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: breakthrough—the structure of penicillin—was

Cevap

breakthrough—the structure of penicillin—was
The correct answer properly utilizes matching em dashes to enclose the non-essential appositive phrase 'the structure of penicillin'. In standardized English grammar, non-essential elements must be set off with identical punctuation marks on both sides. Since an em dash is used to open the phrase, a second em dash must close it before the sentence's main verb.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the non-essential phrase in the sentence that provides additional, parenthetical information.
The phrase 'the structure of penicillin' is a non-essential appositive that clarifies what the 'most famous breakthrough' refers to.
Identifying the non-essential phrase helps determine that it must be set off from the rest of the sentence using consistent punctuation marks at both its start and end.
2
Evaluate the punctuation surrounding the non-essential phrase to ensure consistency.
An em dash is used immediately before the phrase. To maintain punctuation consistency, a matching em dash must be used immediately after the phrase before the main verb.
ACT grammar rules state that parenthetical elements must be enclosed by matching punctuation marks: either two commas, two parentheses, or two em dashes. Mixing an em dash with a comma is incorrect.

Anahtar Kavram

Using matching pairs of dashes to set off non-essential parenthetical information.
Tahmini Süre:45s
Soru 890Soru

In 1957, engineers Alfred Fielding and Marc Chavannes sealed two plastic shower curtains together, creating a sheet of trapped air bubbles. They initially attempted to market this textured material as a fashionable wallpaper, but the product did not sell. Next, they pitched it as insulation for greenhouses, which also proved unsuccessful. [1] Greenhouses are typically constructed of glass or plastic to allow sunlight to heat the plants inside. Finally, in 1960, IBM began using the material—now trademarked as Bubble Wrap—to protect its new computers during shipping, establishing its success as packaging material.

The writer is considering deleting Sentence 1 from the passage. Should this sentence be deleted?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Yes, because it provides an unnecessary definition of a greenhouse that is irrelevant to the paragraph's focus on the development and marketing of Bubble Wrap.

Cevap

Yes, because it provides an unnecessary definition of a greenhouse that is irrelevant to the paragraph's focus on the development and marketing of Bubble Wrap.
The correct option correctly states that Sentence 1 should be deleted because it introduces an unnecessary definition of a greenhouse that is irrelevant to the paragraph's focus on the development and marketing of Bubble Wrap. The passage details the history of Bubble Wrap, and a general definition of what a greenhouse is does not support this narrative.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the main focus of the paragraph.
The paragraph describes the history of Bubble Wrap, specifically how it was invented and the different ways it was marketed before finding success as a packaging material.
To determine if Sentence 1 is relevant, we must first understand the primary topic of the surrounding text.
2
Evaluate the function of Sentence 1 in the context of the paragraph.
Sentence 1 provides a general definition of a greenhouse. It does not add any information about the history, development, or marketing of Bubble Wrap.
This helps us decide whether the sentence supports the main topic or functions as a distraction.
3
Determine whether the sentence should be kept or deleted, and select the option with the correct reasoning.
The sentence should be deleted because it is irrelevant. The option stating that it provides an unnecessary definition of a greenhouse that is irrelevant to the paragraph's focus correctly identifies this rationale.
This matches both the decision (Yes, it should be deleted) and the rhetorical justification.

Anahtar Kavram

Evaluating Relevance for Adding or Deleting Content
Soru 891Soru

In 1931, Harry Beck, a temporary draftsman for the London Underground, proposed a radical new design for the transit system's map. Previously, maps of the network had adhered to geographic reality, plotting stations according to their actual physical locations above ground. This approach resulted in cluttered diagrams where central stations were squeezed into an unreadable knot, while peripheral stations lay far apart on the margins. Beck realized that passengers riding in windowless train cars did not need to know the physical distances above ground. Instead, he recognized that they only needed to know how to navigate the connections between stations. Beck's layout was based on electrical diagrams, which he drew in his spare time.

The writer wants to replace the underlined portion with a sentence that introduces Beck's design solution and emphasizes how it resolved the legibility issues of the previous maps. Which choice most effectively accomplishes this goal?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: He proposed a simplified schematic layout that prioritized logical connections, resolving the central clutter of the older maps.

Cevap

He proposed a simplified schematic layout that prioritized logical connections, resolving the central clutter of the older maps.
The correct answer successfully introduces the design solution (a schematic layout) and states how it resolved the legibility issues of the old maps (resolving the central clutter). It is also grammatically correct, using a relative clause and a participial modifier to construct a complete, unified sentence.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the specific rhetorical goals requested in the prompt.
The prompt requires a sentence that does two things: introduces Beck's design solution and emphasizes how it resolved the legibility issues of the previous maps.
This establishes the criteria for evaluating the choices.
2
Evaluate the choices against the rhetorical goals.
The option proposing a simplified schematic layout that prioritized logical connections and resolved the central clutter directly matches both criteria. The option concerning his unemployment focuses on irrelevant details and fails the goal.
Eliminating options that do not meet the rhetorical goal narrows down the choices.
3
Check the remaining choices for grammatical correctness.
The option with 'He proposed a simplified schematic layout, it...' contains a comma splice. The option starting with 'Because he proposed...' is a fragment. The option beginning with 'He proposed a simplified schematic layout that...' is grammatically correct.
The correct answer must satisfy both the rhetorical criteria and the rules of standard written English.

Anahtar Kavram

Fulfilling Specific Rhetorical and Writing Goals
Soru 892Soru

The following passage is an essay about Maya decipherment.

[1]
For centuries, the intricate carvings on Maya stelae—large stone slabs erected in ancient Mesoamerican cities—were regarded as purely mystical and astronomical symbols. Early scholars believed the Maya were a peaceful people preoccupied almost exclusively with time, calendar calculations, and the stars. The glyphs, they argued, did not record actual human history or the details of earthly rulers. This view dominated the field of Maya archaeology, leaving the historical realities of this civilization obscured.

[2]
Tatiana Proskouriakoff, a Russian-born American architect, would single-handedly overturn this paradigm. In the 1930s, Proskouriakoff was hired as an illustrator for archaeological excavations at Piedras Negras in Guatemala. Possessing an artist's eye and an architect's spatial precision, she produced vivid, historically accurate reconstructions of ancient Maya cities. Her drawings brought the ruins to life, but it was her close, systematic observation of the monuments themselves that led to her most profound breakthrough.

[3]
Analyzing a series of stelae at Piedras Negras, Proskouriakoff noticed a curious pattern. The stelae were erected in distinct chronological clusters, and each group spanned a timeframe no longer than a typical human lifespan—about sixty years. Moreover, the first stela in each group always depicted a figure seated in a niche, accompanied by a specific glyph indicating accession. Proskouriakoff hypothesized that this scene represented the inauguration of a new ruler, and that the accompanying dates marked significant events in that ruler's life. By mapping these patterns, she demonstrated that the glyphs recorded the births, accessions, and military victories of historical individuals. The stelae were not celestial almanacs; they were royal biographies.

Suppose the writer's goal had been to write an essay explaining how a major archaeological paradigm was overturned by a researcher's close observation of historical monuments. Would this essay accomplish that goal?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Yes, because it describes how Proskouriakoff's close observation of chronological patterns on Maya monuments led to the realization that the glyphs recorded historical events.

Cevap

The essay would accomplish the goal because it describes how Proskouriakoff's close observation of chronological patterns on Maya monuments led to the realization that the glyphs recorded historical events.
The essay successfully accomplishes the goal because it describes the shift from the old belief (that Maya glyphs were purely astronomical and mystical) to the new paradigm established by Tatiana Proskouriakoff's close, chronological analysis of Piedras Negras stelae, proving they recorded historical events such as births, accessions, and military victories.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the hypothetical writing goal presented in the prompt.
The goal is to explain how a major archaeological paradigm was overturned by a researcher's close observation of historical monuments.
Understanding the target goal allows comparison against the actual content of the passage.
2
Evaluate the passage content against the hypothetical goal.
The passage details the transition from the old paradigm (that Maya glyphs were purely astronomical) to the new paradigm (that glyphs recorded historical biography) via Proskouriakoff's careful chronological mapping of the stelae.
This confirms that the essay's narrative aligns with the stated goal.
3
Determine if the essay accomplished the goal (Yes or No) and select the correct supporting reason.
The answer is 'Yes' because the essay details Proskouriakoff's systematic observation of the stelae chronological clusters and the resulting paradigm shift.
Evaluating both the direction (Yes/No) and the reasoning eliminates distractors that offer incorrect facts or mismatched focus.

Anahtar Kavram

Evaluating Whole-Essay Goals and Purpose
Soru 893Soru

Although the dance troupe performed several complex routines, the dancers' choreographer worried about its reception among the traditional judges.

Which of the following choices represents the correct punctuation for the underlined portion of the sentence?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: NO CHANGE

Cevap

NO CHANGE
The correct option correctly uses the plural possessive form 'dancers'' to describe the choreographer of the group of dancers within the troupe. It also correctly uses the possessive pronoun 'its' to refer to the reception of the troupe. Because the original phrasing is grammatically correct and appropriate in context, no changes are needed.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Determine if the noun modifying 'choreographer' should be singular or plural, and possessive or not.
The sentence mentions a 'dance troupe,' which is a collective noun indicating a group of multiple dancers. The choreographer belongs to the dancers, so a plural possessive form is required.
This establishes that the correct noun form is the plural possessive 'dancers''.
2
Evaluate whether the pronoun referring to the 'reception' of the troupe should be a contraction or a possessive pronoun.
The sentence refers to the reception of the troupe (possessive), so the possessive pronoun 'its' is correct.
This distinguishes between the possessive pronoun 'its' and the contraction 'it's' (meaning 'it is' or 'it has').
3
Compare the original underlined portion against the identified correct forms.
The original text ('dancers' choreographer worried about its') uses both the plural possessive 'dancers'' and the possessive pronoun 'its' correctly, which matches the required grammatical rules.
This confirms that no change is necessary.

Anahtar Kavram

Apostrophes for Possessives and Contractions
Tahmini Süre:1m 0s
Soru 894Soru

In the early eighteenth century, navigating the open seas remained a perilous endeavor. While sailors could easily determine their latitude by measuring the angle of the sun or stars relative to the horizon, determining longitude was an unresolved challenge. Without an accurate way to calculate east-west position, ships frequently drifted off course, leading to disastrous shipwrecks. The British Parliament, desperate for a solution, passed the Longitude Act of 17141714, offering a massive cash prize to anyone who could develop a method to determine longitude within half a degree. Most prominent scientists of the era believed the answer lay in the stars, advocating for complex astronomical calculations that required clear night skies. [1]

John Harrison, a self-taught English clockmaker, rejected this celestial approach. Instead, he proposed a mechanical solution: a highly precise clock called a marine chronometer that could keep accurate time at sea despite the motion of the ship and changes in temperature.

Which choice, placed at [1], best concludes the first paragraph and transitions to the second paragraph?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: This celestial bias, however, did not prevent other innovators from seeking ground-based solutions.

Cevap

The correct option is the sentence stating that the celestial bias did not prevent other innovators from seeking ground-based solutions.
The correct choice successfully sums up the first paragraph's focus on the astronomical approach ('celestial bias') while setting up the contrast ('however') and introducing the alternative ('ground-based solutions') that leads directly to John Harrison's clock in the following paragraph. It is grammatically correct and maintains the established past-tense narrative.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the role of the target sentence.
The target sentence must conclude the first paragraph (focusing on the astronomical bias for solving the longitude problem) and transition to the second paragraph (focusing on John Harrison, a clockmaker who proposed a mechanical solution).
Concluding sentences must tie back to the main thesis without introducing unsupported details, while transition sentences must bridge adjacent paragraphs.
2
Evaluate the transition logic of the correct option.
The phrase 'This celestial bias' sums up the astronomical focus of the first paragraph, and 'seeking ground-based solutions' directly introduces Harrison's clockmaking method in the second paragraph.
This establishes a clear, logical, and coherent transition between the two distinct approaches to solving longitude.
3
Identify grammatical errors in the distractors.
One option contains a comma splice; another contains an incorrect shift to the future tense; the third introduces irrelevant historical details.
ACT English tests both rhetorical skills (transitions) and grammatical conventions simultaneously.

Anahtar Kavram

Selecting Concluding Sentences and Transitions
Soru 895Soru

During their study of the nocturnal hunting habits of barn owls, researchers identified the birds' primary anatomical advantage; their asymmetric ear placement.

Which of the following is the best replacement for the underlined portion of the sentence?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: advantage: their

Cevap

The option that replaces the semicolon with a colon ('advantage: their')
The correct option correctly uses a colon because the clause preceding it is independent and can stand alone as a complete sentence, while the noun phrase following it directly clarifies the 'advantage' mentioned.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the clause preceding the punctuation mark to determine if it is independent.
The clause 'During their study of the nocturnal hunting habits of barn owls, researchers identified the birds' primary anatomical advantage' contains a subject ('researchers') and a verb ('identified') and functions as a complete sentence.
Both colons and semicolons require an independent clause before them.
2
Analyze the phrase following the punctuation mark to determine if it is independent.
The phrase 'their asymmetric ear placement' is a noun phrase without a verb and cannot stand alone as a complete sentence.
Since the second part is not an independent clause, a semicolon cannot be used.
3
Select the correct punctuation mark that links an independent clause to an explanatory noun phrase.
A colon is the appropriate mark because it is preceded by a complete sentence and followed by a phrase that explains the 'advantage'. Ensure the colon does not follow a verb directly.
This confirms that the choice placing a colon directly after the noun 'advantage' is grammatically correct.

Anahtar Kavram

A colon must be preceded by an independent clause and can be used to introduce an explanation, list, or clarifying noun phrase.
Tahmini Süre:45s
Soru 896Soru

[1] For decades, scholars believed that Mayan hieroglyphs recorded only astronomical data and calendar dates, reflecting a peaceful society obsessed with time. [2] In the 1950s, however, art historian Tatiana Proskouriakoff began analyzing stelae—carved stone slabs—at the ancient city of Piedras Negras. [3] She noticed that the dates on a series of stelae fell within the span of a normal human lifetime. [4] Proskouriakoff hypothesized that the glyphs actually recorded the historical lives of Mayan rulers, including their births, accessions to the throne, and military victories. [5] Mayan architecture also featured steep limestone pyramids that served as temples and tombs. [6] Her breakthrough revolutionized Mayan studies, shifting the academic consensus from viewing the Maya as abstract mystics to recognizing them as historical record-keepers.

The writer is considering deleting Sentence 5 from the paragraph. Should the sentence be kept or deleted?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Deleted, because it deviates from the paragraph’s focus on the shift in scholarly understanding of Mayan hieroglyphs.

Cevap

Deleted, because it deviates from the paragraph’s focus on the shift in scholarly understanding of Mayan hieroglyphs.
The correct answer is the option stating that the sentence should be deleted because it deviates from the paragraph’s focus on the shift in scholarly understanding of Mayan hieroglyphs. The paragraph outlines a specific shift in historical scholarship—moving from the belief that Mayan glyphs were purely astronomical to understanding them as records of historical lives. Mentioning pyramids and temples introduces a tangential topic about architecture, which disrupts the development of this single, coherent idea.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the primary topic and focus of the paragraph.
The paragraph focuses on how scholars traditionally viewed Mayan hieroglyphs and how Tatiana Proskouriakoff's discovery changed that view by demonstrating that glyphs recorded historical human lives.
Understanding the paragraph's primary focus is essential for determining whether a sentence is relevant or tangential.
2
Analyze Sentence 5 to determine its content and purpose.
Sentence 5 provides information about Mayan architecture, specifically the steep limestone pyramids that served as temples and tombs.
This step evaluates how the content of the target sentence aligns with the primary focus identified in Step 1.
3
Evaluate the relevance of Sentence 5 to the paragraph as a whole.
Although the sentence is about the Maya, its focus on architecture and temples is tangential to the paragraph's narrow focus on hieroglyphic translation and the historical records of Mayan rulers. Therefore, the sentence should be deleted.
Determining that the sentence is irrelevant leads to the decision to delete it.
4
Select the option that provides the correct decision and logical justification.
The correct option states that the sentence should be deleted because it deviates from the paragraph's focus on the shift in scholarly understanding of Mayan hieroglyphs.
This matches the logical analysis and provides the only correct combination of decision and reason.

Anahtar Kavram

Evaluating Relevance for Adding or Deleting Content
Soru 897Soru

Read the sentence below about a scientific expedition. Which single punctuation mark must be placed in the blank to correctly separate the items in this complex list?

Aşağıdaki boşlukları doldurun

The research vessel carried a diverse team of scientists: Dr. Sylvia Earle, a marine biologist specializing in deep-sea algae; Dr. Robert Ballard, an oceanographer famous for locating historic shipwrecks and Dr. Cindy Lee Van Dover, a pioneer in hydrothermal vent ecology.
Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

A semicolon must be placed in the blank to correctly separate the complex list items.
The sentence lists three scientists, each followed by an appositive phrase containing a comma. When list items contain internal commas, semicolons must be used to separate the items to prevent confusion. A semicolon correctly distinguishes where one scientist's description ends and the next scientist's name begins.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the structure of the list in the sentence.
The sentence contains a list of three distinct scientists along with their descriptive titles.
Understanding the elements of the list helps determine the appropriate level of punctuation needed to separate them.
2
Analyze the punctuation within each list item.
Each list item contains internal punctuation (commas separating the scientist's name from their description).
Internal commas within list items require a stronger punctuation mark than a standard comma to separate the items themselves, avoiding confusion.
3
Determine the correct punctuation mark to separate these complex list items.
A semicolon is needed to separate the items in a complex list.
Semicolons are the standard punctuation mark used to separate items in a list when one or more of those items already contain internal commas.

Anahtar Kavram

Semicolons in complex lists
Soru 898Soru

Passage Excerpt:

In the heart of the city, volunteers transformed a vacant lot into a vibrant community garden. This year, the garden produced [blank].

Which choice most directly emphasizes the diversity of the crops grown in the garden?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: a wide variety of vegetables, herbs, and fruits

Cevap

a wide variety of vegetables, herbs, and fruits
The phrase 'a wide variety of vegetables, herbs, and fruits' is correct because it explicitly describes multiple distinct types of produce (vegetables, herbs, and fruits) and states there is a 'wide variety,' directly fulfilling the rhetorical goal of emphasizing crop diversity.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the specific rhetorical goal requested in the prompt.
The prompt asks for a choice that emphasizes the diversity of the crops grown.
Understanding the precise criteria is necessary to evaluate which option fits best.
2
Evaluate the choices to eliminate grammatically incorrect options.
The option mentioning 'healthy produce, it was grown organically' is eliminated because it contains a comma splice.
ACT English questions require the correct option to be grammatically correct.
3
Evaluate the remaining choices against the specific rhetorical goal.
The option 'a wide variety of vegetables, herbs, and fruits' directly emphasizes crop diversity, unlike the choices focusing on quantity ('an abundance of tomatoes') or harvest frequency ('fresh vegetables, which were harvested daily').
Only one grammatically correct option satisfies the specific goal of showing diversity.

Anahtar Kavram

Meeting Specific Rhetorical Goals
Soru 899Soru

Astronomers studying the remote galaxy cluster observed a massive distortion in the surrounding space. The gravitational lens, which acts like a giant magnifying glass in space, allowed them to view stars from the early universe. This discovery could help researchers map the distribution of dark matter across the cosmos.

Which of the following is the best punctuation for the underlined portion of the passage?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: NO CHANGE

Cevap

The original phrasing, which uses a pair of commas to enclose the nonessential relative clause, is correct.
The original sentence is correct. The clause 'which acts like a giant magnifying glass in space' is nonessential and must be enclosed by a pair of commas. The commas correctly isolate this parenthetical information from the subject 'lens' and its verb 'allowed'.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify whether the underlined clause is essential or nonessential to the meaning of the sentence.
The clause 'which acts like a giant magnifying glass in space' provides descriptive detail about the gravitational lens but is not required to identify it or make the main clause complete. Therefore, it is a nonessential relative clause.
Determining the essentiality of a clause dictates how it should be punctuated.
2
Apply the punctuation rules for nonessential elements.
Nonessential elements must be set off from the rest of the sentence by a pair of commas (one before the clause and one after).
Properly enclosing parenthetical elements prevents grammatical errors like separating the subject from the verb.
3
Evaluate the choices to find the one that correctly implements the comma pair without introducing other errors.
The original sentence correctly places a comma before 'which' and a comma after 'space'.
This maintains the integrity of both the parenthetical information and the main clause.

Anahtar Kavram

Commas with Nonessential and Parenthetical Elements
Tahmini Süre:45s
Soru 900Soru

Paragraph 1

Completed in 2012, the Tokyo Skytree stands as one of the tallest structures in the world, rising 634 meters above a city prone to frequent earthquakes. To prevent the tower from collapsing during seismic activity, engineers turned to traditional Japanese architecture for inspiration. Specifically, they analyzed the design of ancient five-story pagodas, which have withstood centuries of tremors. Pagodas feature a central pillar, known as a *shinbashira*, that is structurally independent of the surrounding stories. During an earthquake, the pillar and the outer frame sway out of phase with one another, effectively canceling out much of the seismic energy.

Paragraph 2

The Skytree incorporates a modern version of this system: a massive central concrete column that is connected to the outer steel truss only by fluid dampers. When seismic waves strike, the outer frame sways while the central column resists the motion, absorbing the energy through the dampers. Under extreme conditions, this system can reduce the overall movement of the tower by up to 50 percent. ___________

The writer wants to conclude the passage by emphasizing how the combination of ancient design and modern technology ensures the safety of the Skytree. Which choice best accomplishes this goal?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: By adapting the timeless mechanics of the pagoda's central pillar to contemporary construction, this design ensures that the Skytree remains safe during major earthquakes.

Cevap

The option that begins with 'By adapting the timeless mechanics...' is the correct choice because it logically connects ancient pagoda principles with contemporary engineering to explain how the Skytree is kept safe.
The correct option successfully fulfills the writer's goal of demonstrating how ancient design (the pagoda's central pillar) combined with modern technology (contemporary construction) ensures the Skytree's safety (remains safe during major earthquakes). It is also grammatically correct.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the prompt's rhetorical goal.
The final sentence must emphasize the combination of ancient design, modern technology, and the resulting safety of the Skytree.
Understanding the specific parameters of the concluding sentence helps eliminate choices that introduce irrelevant details or omit necessary components.
2
Evaluate the grammar of each option.
Three options contain grammatical errors: a comma splice, an illogical tense shift, and misplaced commas around a restrictive relative clause.
ACT English questions require sentences to be both rhetorically effective and grammatically correct.
3
Compare the remaining grammatically correct option against the rhetorical goal.
The sentence combining the 'timeless mechanics of the pagoda' with 'contemporary construction' to ensure the Skytree 'remains safe' satisfies all criteria.
This confirms the correct option logically wraps up the passage's themes while maintaining grammatical precision.

Anahtar Kavram

Selecting concluding sentences that synthesize a passage's main themes while maintaining proper grammar.
ÖncekiSayfa 45 / 278Sonraki
Tüm alıştırma soruları — ACT | Examkin