Tüm alıştırma soruları

5556 soru

Soru 1321Soru

To prepare for the long winter ahead, the busy squirrels gathered acorns and hickory nuts, storing them away for future use in the months to come.

Which of the following choices represents the most concise and grammatically correct option for the underlined portion of the sentence?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: storing them for future use

Cevap

The correct answer is the phrasing 'storing them for future use'.
The correct choice is 'storing them for future use' because it removes the redundant repetition of future time present in 'future use' and 'in the months to come' while maintaining a grammatically correct participial phrase.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify redundant words or phrases in the underlined text.
The expressions 'future use' and 'in the months to come' both refer to events happening in the future, making them redundant when used together.
Eliminating redundancy is a core rule of clear and concise writing.
2
Evaluate the choices to find the one that is grammatically correct and eliminates the redundancy.
The phrasing 'storing them for future use' removes the repetitive reference to the future while maintaining proper grammar as a participial phrase.
This selection ensures the sentence is clear, concise, and grammatically correct.

Anahtar Kavram

Eliminating Redundancy
Soru 1322Soru

As global temperatures rise, many alpine glaciers are retreating backward in a reverse direction, and this movement leaves behind barren valleys of exposed rock.

Which of the following choices is the best edit to the underlined portion of the sentence?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: retreating, leaving

Cevap

retreating, leaving
The correct option is the most concise choice because it removes the redundant synonyms 'backward' and 'in a reverse direction' (since 'retreating' already means moving back) and grammatically connects the clauses using the participle 'leaving' without creating a comma splice or fragment.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify any redundant expressions or unnecessary wordiness in the underlined portion of the sentence.
The words 'backward' and 'in a reverse direction' repeat the meaning already contained in the verb 'retreating' (which means to move back or withdraw).
Eliminating redundant synonyms is necessary to make the sentence concise and clear, which is a key requirement of the ACT English section.
2
Evaluate the remaining options for grammatical correctness and punctuation.
The option with the participial phrase 'leaving' is both concise and grammatically correct. The option that creates a comma splice and the option that creates an ungrammatical fragment are incorrect.
The correct choice must not only eliminate redundancy but also maintain proper sentence structure without introducing grammatical errors.

Anahtar Kavram

Eliminating Redundancy
Soru 1323Soru

Each autumn, millions of monarch butterflies embark on a long migration to central Mexico. During the time when they are flying on this journey, they rely on warm wind currents to glide through the air.

Which choice is the most concise and grammatically correct option for the underlined portion?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: While flying

Cevap

While flying
The option 'While flying' is correct because it is the most concise choice that preserves the temporal context and grammatical integrity of the sentence without adding redundant details.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Read the sentence and evaluate the underlined portion for unnecessary words, repetition, or passive structures.
The original phrase 'During the time when they are flying on this journey' is unnecessarily long and expresses an idea that can be stated much more directly.
ACT English rewards concise and direct phrasing that maintains the original meaning of the passage.
2
Evaluate the choices to find the one that is the most concise while remaining grammatically correct.
The option 'While flying' is short, direct, grammatically correct, and fits perfectly into the sentence. The option 'While flying, which' introduces a grammatical error that creates a fragment. The option using passive voice adds wordiness.
Identifying the option that is both grammatically correct and the most concise determines the correct answer.

Anahtar Kavram

Eliminating Wordiness
Soru 1324Soru

During a winter trip to New York City in 1903, Mary Anderson noticed that the streetcar driver had to open the front window pane constantly to wipe away the falling sleet. Upon returning to Alabama, she designed a manually operated swinging arm with a rubber blade [1]that was designed by her to clear away rain and snow from windshields in order to solve the visibility problem. Anderson was granted a patent for her device in 1903, but car manufacturers initially saw little commercial value in it.

Which choice most effectively and concisely replaces the underlined portion labeled [1]?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: to clear rain and snow from windshields

Cevap

to clear rain and snow from windshields
The correct option is the most concise and direct phrasing that preserves the original meaning and is grammatically correct. Using the active infinitive phrase 'to clear' avoids the wordiness and passive construction of the original phrasing.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the redundant and wordy parts of the underlined portion.
The phrase 'that was designed by her' is redundant because the sentence already starts with 'she designed.' The phrase 'in order to solve the visibility problem' is wordy and adds unnecessary detail.
Redundancy and wordiness must be eliminated to match the conciseness standards of the ACT.
2
Evaluate the grammatical correctness of the remaining options.
The option starting with '. Because' creates a sentence fragment. The option starting with ', this device' creates a comma splice. The option starting with 'to clear' is grammatically correct and concise.
The correct choice must be both grammatically correct and concise.

Anahtar Kavram

Eliminating Wordiness
Tahmini Süre:45s
Soru 1325Soru

The paragraph below contains an underlined portion in brackets.

In 1964, radio astronomers Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson detected a persistent background noise that they could not explain. This mysterious [hum, later identified as the cosmic microwave background radiation, the thermal echo of the Big Bang—was] coming from all directions in the sky. To rule out local interference, they even cleaned the horn antenna of pigeon droppings, but the signal remained.

Which of the following options is the correct punctuation for the underlined portion in brackets?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: hum—later identified as the cosmic microwave background radiation, the thermal echo of the Big Bang—was

Cevap

The option that uses consistent dashes ('hum—later identified as the cosmic microwave background radiation, the thermal echo of the Big Bang—was') is correct.
A pair of dashes is used to set off non-essential parenthetical information. In this sentence, the phrase beginning with 'later identified' and ending with 'Big Bang' is non-essential and contains internal commas. To set this phrase off cleanly and consistently, matching dashes must be used at both the beginning and the end of the phrase.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the parenthetical, non-essential nature of the phrase inside the brackets.
The phrase 'later identified as the cosmic microwave background radiation, the thermal echo of the Big Bang' is non-essential because the main sentence ('This mysterious hum was coming from all directions in the sky') remains grammatically complete without it.
Determining whether the phrase is non-essential helps establish which punctuation rules apply.
2
Check the punctuation marking the boundaries of the non-essential phrase for consistency.
Because the phrase contains internal commas, setting it off with a consistent pair of dashes is the clearest and most grammatical choice. The original text mismatches a comma at the beginning with a dash at the end.
Non-essential phrases must be enclosed by matching punctuation marks (either two commas or two dashes), and mismatching them is incorrect.

Anahtar Kavram

Using matching punctuation (such as a pair of dashes) to consistently set off parenthetical or non-essential information within a sentence.
Soru 1326Soru

[1] In the winter of 1902, during a visit to New York City, Mary Anderson observed a trolley driver struggling to see through the falling sleet. [2] The driver had to keep opening the front window pane, letting the freezing rain into the vehicle, just to clear the glass by hand. [3] Shocked by the discomfort and danger this caused, Anderson set out to find a solution. [4] New York City's trolley system was one of the largest in the country at the time, utilizing electric streetcars to transport thousands of commuters daily. [5] Upon returning to her home in Alabama, she designed a wooden lever connected to a rubber blade that could be operated from inside the vehicle.

The writer is considering deleting Sentence 4 from the paragraph. Should this sentence be kept or deleted?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Deleted, because it shifts the focus of the paragraph from Anderson’s invention process to tangential details about New York City's transit system.

Cevap

Deleted, because it shifts the focus of the paragraph from Anderson’s invention process to tangential details about New York City's transit system.
The correct answer correctly identifies that the sentence should be deleted because it introduces irrelevant details about the New York City trolley system. The paragraph's primary focus is Mary Anderson's invention of the windshield wiper, tracking her process from observation to design. Sentence 4 disrupts this narrative flow by shifting the focus to general details about transit infrastructure.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the primary topic and focus of the paragraph.
The paragraph describes Mary Anderson's invention of the windshield wiper, beginning with her observation of a problem (Sentences 1 and 2), her motivation (Sentence 3), and her prototype design (Sentence 5).
Establishing the main narrative focus is necessary to evaluate if Sentence 4 supports or disrupts the coherence of the paragraph.
2
Evaluate the relevance of Sentence 4 to this primary topic.
Sentence 4 introduces information about the size and operation of New York City's trolley system. This information is tangential because the paragraph is focused on Anderson's design process, not the history or scale of the city's transit infrastructure.
Determining whether a sentence contains crucial or distracting details helps decide if it should be added or deleted.
3
Evaluate the options to find the correct decision and explanation.
The option advising that the sentence should be deleted because it introduces tangential details about the transit system is correct.
This accurately reflects the paragraph's shift in focus and follows standard ACT guidelines for unity and cohesion.

Anahtar Kavram

Evaluating whether a sentence should be kept or deleted based on its relevance to the paragraph's specific focus.
Soru 1327Soru

Prior to 1931, maps of the London Underground plotted subway routes geographically, overlaying them onto a standard city map. This method resulted in congested center sections and sprawling, hard-to-read outer lines. An engineering draftsman named Harry Beck realized that passengers riding underground only needed to know the sequence of stations and where to transfer, rather than their exact geographical coordinates. His solution was a diagrammatic layout that resembled an electrical circuit, using only horizontal, vertical, and 45-degree diagonal lines. By ignoring geographical accuracy, Beck created a clean, legible map that became a design classic and the model for transit systems worldwide.

The writer is considering adding the following sentence to the paragraph:

"Beck was temporarily laid off from his job at the Signals Office during a period of staff reductions, though he continued working on the map design in his spare time."

Should the writer make this addition?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: No, because it introduces biographical details that are irrelevant to the paragraph's discussion of the map's design and functionality.

Cevap

No, because it introduces biographical details that are irrelevant to the paragraph's discussion of the map's design and functionality.
The correct option correctly states that the sentence should not be added. The paragraph's sole focus is the design transition of the London Underground map from a geographic layout to a clean, schematic design. Adding details about Beck's layoff introduces irrelevant biographical information that distracts from this main point.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the main focus of the paragraph.
The paragraph describes how Harry Beck innovated the London Underground map by replacing a geographically accurate map with a simplified, circuit-like diagram to improve readability for passengers.
Before deciding whether to add or delete a sentence, the writer must establish the central topic and purpose of the paragraph.
2
Evaluate the relevance of the proposed sentence.
The proposed sentence mentions that Beck was temporarily laid off from the Signals Office during staff reductions. While this is a biographical fact about Beck, it does not relate to the visual layout, readability, or design principles of the map.
Every sentence in a well-written paragraph must support the main idea. Irrelevant details should be excluded to maintain unity.
3
Select the option that correctly identifies the decision and provides the correct rhetorical reason.
The correct decision is not to add the sentence ('No') because it introduces irrelevant biographical information, which matches the option explaining that it interrupts the discussion of the map's design and functionality.
Only one option correctly pairs the negative decision with the logical justification of paragraph unity.

Anahtar Kavram

Evaluating Relevance for Adding or Deleting Content
Tahmini Süre:1m 15s
Soru 1328Soru

To understand the migration patterns of monarch butterflies, scientists track the insects' movements using lightweight radio transmitters. The research team collaborated together in joint cooperation to map the specific routes across North America.

Which of the following options, when substituted for the underlined portion, makes the sentence grammatically correct and free of unnecessary redundancy?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: collaborated

Cevap

collaborated
The correct choice is the single word 'collaborated'. It successfully communicates that the research team worked together without using repetitive synonyms like 'together' or 'joint cooperation'. In English, 'collaborate' inherently means to work together, making any additional words expressing collaboration redundant.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the underlined portion and analyze it for redundant phrasing.
The phrase 'collaborated together in joint cooperation' is identified as containing multiple words with identical meanings ('collaborated', 'together', 'joint', 'cooperation').
Eliminating redundant words is necessary to make the sentence concise and clear, which is a primary focus of ACT English.
2
Evaluate the choices to find the one that is grammatically correct and removes all redundant elements.
The single word 'collaborated' conveys the full intended meaning without any repetition.
Choosing the most concise, grammatically correct option ensures the sentence is clear and direct.

Anahtar Kavram

Eliminating Redundancy
Soru 1329Soru

The following is an excerpt from a draft of an essay about the cosmic microwave background radiation.

[1]
__________________________________________________. In 1964, radio astronomers Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson were troubled by a persistent, low-frequency hum coming from their Holmdel horn antenna in New Jersey. They tried everything to eliminate the noise: pointing the antenna in different directions, cleaning out nesting pigeons, and cooling the receiver to near absolute zero. Yet, the hiss remained constant, day and night. Ultimately, they realized that this background noise was actually the cosmic microwave background radiation—the leftover thermal echo of the Big Bang. Their accidental discovery provided the first definitive observational evidence for the Big Bang theory, transforming our understanding of the universe’s origins.

Which choice best establishes the main topic and serves as an effective introduction to the essay?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: A search for a clean communications channel unexpectedly yielded the most crucial evidence for the origins of our universe.

Cevap

The statement that describes a search for a clean communications channel leading to crucial evidence for the origins of the universe is the correct choice.
The statement describing how a search for a clean communications channel led to evidence for the origins of the universe is correct. It is grammatically correct and successfully introduces the dual nature of the passage: the practical context of Penzias and Wilson's research and the ultimate scientific breakthrough concerning the Big Bang.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the passage to determine its main focus and theme.
The passage discusses how Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson accidentally discovered cosmic microwave background radiation (the thermal echo of the Big Bang) while trying to clean up radio noise on their antenna.
An effective introduction must establish the main topic, linking the search for clean radio communications to the monumental cosmological discovery.
2
Evaluate the grammar and structure of each option to eliminate grammatically incorrect options.
One option contains a comma splice, and another is a sentence fragment. These are eliminated from contention.
ACT English questions require the correct choice to be grammatically correct.
3
Compare the remaining grammatically correct options for relevance and scope.
The option about antenna maintenance is too narrow and misses the main point of the essay. The option linking the clean communications channel search to the origins of the universe sets up the narrative and thesis perfectly.
The correct introduction must match the rhetorical goal of the passage as a whole.

Anahtar Kavram

Establishing Introductions and Thesis Statements
Soru 1330Soru

Passage

In 19471947, computer pioneer Grace Hopper recorded the first computer "bug" when she found a moth trapped in a relay of the Harvard Mark II. [1] Consequently, her most significant contribution to computer science was the invention of the compiler, a program that translated written English commands into machine code.

Which choice provides the most logical transition from the preceding sentence?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: However,

Cevap

However,
The correct option uses the transition 'However,' which establishes a contrast between the first sentence (a famous, lighthearted anecdote about finding a moth) and the second sentence (which describes her most significant and serious technical contribution, the compiler).

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the relationship between the two sentences.
The first sentence describes a famous but minor historical anecdote (Grace Hopper finding a moth in a computer relay). The second sentence describes her most significant technical achievement (inventing the compiler).
Understanding the context and logical connection is necessary to choose the correct transition.
2
Evaluate the relationship type.
The transition needs to signal a shift or contrast between a minor, humorous event and a major, serious breakthrough.
This helps narrow down the category of transition words to search for (contrast).
3
Test the available options against this relationship.
'However' fits the contrast relationship perfectly. 'Consequently' (cause-effect), 'Moreover' (addition), and 'For example' (illustration) do not fit.
Selecting the option that correctly represents the contrast relationship ensures logical cohesion in the passage.

Anahtar Kavram

Selecting the correct transition word to establish the logical relationship between consecutive sentences.
Tahmini Süre:1m 0s
Soru 1331Soru

Many literary historians regard the author's diary to be a crucial resource for understanding the social dynamics of the era. Which choice is the best replacement for the underlined portion?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: regard the author's diary as

Cevap

regard the author's diary as
The correct option correctly uses the idiomatic construction 'regard [something] as [something else]'. In English, the verb 'regard' is idiomatically paired with 'as' to show how something is perceived, rather than using 'to be' or 'like'.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the verb and the relationship being established in the sentence.
The verb is 'regard', which is used to express how literary historians perceive the author's diary.
Recognizing the core verb helps determine the appropriate idiomatic preposition or structure that must follow it.
2
Evaluate the idiom required by the verb 'regard'.
The standard English idiom is 'regard [noun] as [noun/adjective]'. Using 'to be', 'like', or 'to being' is unidiomatic.
Applying standard idiomatic conventions allows us to select the correct phrasing.

Anahtar Kavram

Idiomatic word choice involving the verb 'regard'
Tahmini Süre:45s
Soru 1332Soru

Determined to find a more efficient catalyst, the chemists adjusted the temperature of the reaction vessel; consequently, the subsequent outcome resulted in a significant yield increase.

Which of the following choices best replaces the underlined portion to make the sentence clear, concise, and grammatically correct?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: consequently, this change resulted in a

Cevap

The correct answer is the option that replaces the underlined text with 'consequently, this change resulted in a'.
The correct choice, 'consequently, this change resulted in a', resolves the redundancy by expressing the cause-and-effect relationship cleanly. Furthermore, it fulfills the punctuation requirement of the semicolon by forming a grammatically complete independent clause containing the subject 'this change' and the active verb 'resulted'.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the underlined portion for redundancy.
The words 'consequently' (as a result), 'subsequent' (following), and 'resulted in' (caused) all express the exact same causal link, making the phrase redundant.
Identifying redundancy helps eliminate wordy and repetitive options.
2
Check the surrounding grammatical structure, focusing on the semicolon.
The semicolon separates two independent clauses, meaning the replacement text must form a complete independent clause with a subject and a verb.
A semicolon requires complete thoughts on both sides to avoid fragments.
3
Evaluate the non-redundant options for grammatical correctness.
The shortest option 'resulting in a' creates a sentence fragment after the semicolon. The option 'consequently, this change, resulting in a' also forms a fragment due to the lack of a main verb. Only 'consequently, this change resulted in a' is both grammatically correct and concise.
Selecting the most concise option is only valid if the option remains grammatically correct.

Anahtar Kavram

Eliminating Redundancy with Punctuation Constraints
Tahmini Süre:45s
Soru 1333Soru

Early pencils were crude, consisting of graphite chunks wrapped in string. Later, Italian artisans pioneered the method of hollow-carving wooden sticks, and it was into these wooden sticks that they inserted the graphite. Today, pencils are manufactured worldwide using a blend of graphite and clay to create different levels of hardness.

Which of the following is the most effective edit to the underlined portion of the sentence?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: sticks, into which they inserted the graphite.

Cevap

sticks, into which they inserted the graphite.
The correct option is the most concise and direct phrasing that maintains the grammatical structure of the sentence. Using 'into which they inserted' avoids repeating 'wooden sticks' and correctly links the relative clause to the preceding noun.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the underlined portion for wordiness, redundancy, and grammatical errors.
The original phrasing 'and it was into these wooden sticks that they inserted the graphite' repeats 'wooden sticks' unnecessarily and uses an overly long structure.
Identifying redundancy and wordiness helps narrow down choices to the most concise option.
2
Evaluate the remaining options for grammatical correctness and conciseness.
The option ending in a comma splice and the option ending in a sentence fragment are grammatically incorrect. The relative pronoun option is correct and concise.
An answer choice on the ACT must be both grammatically correct and free of wordiness.

Anahtar Kavram

Eliminating Wordiness
Tahmini Süre:1m 0s
Soru 1334Soru

In the early twentieth century, the discovery of the Antikythera mechanism—an ancient Greek analog computer—challenged previous assumptions about historical technology. This unique artifact, which was one of a kind and unlike any other object from its era, demonstrated a level of mechanical sophistication that was not seen again for over a thousand years.

Which of the following alternatives to the underlined portion is the most concise and grammatically correct?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: This unique artifact

Cevap

This unique artifact
The correct option is 'This unique artifact' because it is the most concise and grammatically correct choice. The word 'unique' already means 'one of a kind' and 'unlike any other,' so including those phrases is redundant. Removing them preserves the intended meaning of the sentence without unnecessary repetition.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the redundancy in the underlined phrase.
The original phrase uses 'unique,' 'one of a kind,' and 'unlike any other object from its era' together. Since these terms all express the same basic idea, they are redundant.
Concision is a key grammatical standard on the ACT; redundant phrasing must be eliminated.
2
Evaluate the remaining options for grammatical correctness and sentence structure.
The option beginning with 'Although' creates a dependent clause fragment. The option containing 'unique, it' joins two independent clauses with only a comma, creating a comma splice. The option stating 'This unique artifact' is both concise and grammatically correct.
An answer choice must not only be concise but must also adhere to standard conventions of sentence structure and formation.

Anahtar Kavram

Eliminating Redundancy
Tahmini Süre:1m 0s
Soru 1335Soru

The following paragraph contains numbered sentences.

[1] When the Dutch merchant Antonie van Leeuwenhoek first looked through his hand-carved microscopes in the 1670s, he was astonished to find tiny organisms swimming in pond water. [2] He called these microscopic creatures "animalcules," which we now know as bacteria and protists. [3] Recognizing the significance of his findings, van Leeuwenhoek detailed them in letters to the Royal Society of London. [4] The esteemed members of the Society, initially skeptical of these bizarre reports, eventually dispatched observers to verify his claims.

For the sake of the logic and cohesion of the paragraph, where is the most logical placement for the following sentence?

"These documents, written in Dutch, included meticulous drawings of the tiny cells."

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: after Sentence 3

Cevap

after Sentence 3
The correct answer is the option that places the sentence after Sentence 3. The target sentence begins with the phrase 'These documents,' which requires a plural noun antecedent representing written materials. Sentence 3 ends by mentioning that van Leeuwenhoek detailed his findings in 'letters to the Royal Society of London.' Placing the target sentence after Sentence 3 allows 'These documents' to refer directly and logically to the 'letters.' Additionally, the target sentence introduces 'drawings' of the cells, which provides a logical bridge to Sentence 4, where the members of the Society are skeptical of 'these bizarre reports.'

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify key logical markers, pronouns, or transition words in the target sentence.
The pronoun phrase 'These documents' indicates that the preceding sentence must mention a plural noun referring to written records or papers.
Pronouns must have clear and nearby antecedents to maintain paragraph cohesion.
2
Analyze each sentence in the paragraph to find a logical noun antecedent for 'These documents'.
Sentence 3 contains the plural noun 'letters,' which logically fits as the antecedent for 'These documents.'
Verifying the pronoun-antecedent relationship ensures the sentence is placed in a position that makes sense.
3
Insert the target sentence after Sentence 3 and read the resulting paragraph to check the overall flow.
The flow is logical: van Leeuwenhoek details his findings in 'letters' (Sentence 3), 'These documents' include drawings (target sentence), and the Society is skeptical of 'these bizarre reports' (Sentence 4).
Reading the completed paragraph confirms that both the pronoun reference and the overall narrative progression are correct.

Anahtar Kavram

Sentence Reordering and Placement
Tahmini Süre:1m 0s
Soru 1336Soru

Although the artist's early paintings were dismissed by critics, her later masterpieces gained recognition and won widespread acclaim, being praised by many, they established her as a leading figure of the modernist movement.

Which of the following is the best way to write the underlined portion of the sentence?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: gained widespread acclaim, establishing

Cevap

gained widespread acclaim, establishing
The correct option is the most concise choice that avoids redundancy. It eliminates the repetitive phrases expressing positive recognition and correctly connects the main clause to the modifying participial phrase with a comma.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify any redundant or repetitive phrasing in the underlined portion.
The phrases 'gained recognition', 'won widespread acclaim', and 'being praised by many' all repeat the same core concept of receiving positive attention.
ACT English questions require eliminating redundant and wordy expressions to maintain conciseness.
2
Evaluate the remaining choices for conciseness while ensuring grammatical correctness.
The option containing 'gained widespread acclaim, establishing' is the most concise and is grammatically correct, using a comma followed by a present participle to modify the main clause.
The correct choice must not introduce new grammatical errors such as fragments or comma splices.
3
Check the other choices for grammatical issues.
The option with a semicolon before 'establishing' creates a sentence fragment because a semicolon must separate two independent clauses. The option with 'they established' after a comma creates a comma splice by joining two independent clauses without a coordinating conjunction.
This confirms that only the correct choice is both grammatically correct and free of redundancy.

Anahtar Kavram

Eliminating Redundancy
Soru 1337Soru

To prevent the spread of the virus, health officials recommended that individuals abbreviate their public gatherings and work from home whenever possible. Since crowded spaces facilitate transmission, reducing interpersonal contact is paramount. Consequently, local governments have also suspended large-scale events.

Which choice is the most precise and appropriate word to replace the bolded word in the passage?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: curtail

Cevap

curtail
The word 'curtail' is correct because it means to reduce in extent or quantity, or to impose a restriction on. It is the most precise and idiomatic word to describe limiting or reducing public gatherings.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the context of the sentence and the meaning of the bolded word.
The sentence describes reducing or limiting social gatherings. The bolded word 'abbreviate' specifically refers to shortening words or texts.
To determine if the original word is precise and correct in context.
2
Evaluate the alternative options for precision and grammatical correctness.
'Truncate' applies to physical ends, data, or mathematical series; 'desist' is intransitive and lacks the required preposition 'from'; 'curtail' means to restrict or reduce in extent or quantity.
To find the word that fits both the semantic and grammatical context of the passage.
3
Choose the most precise and grammatically correct option.
The word 'curtail' is selected because it is both semantically precise for gatherings and grammatically appropriate.
To ensure word precision and clarity in the passage.

Anahtar Kavram

Word Precision and Clarity
Tahmini Süre:1m 0s
Soru 1338Soru

Although the talented young software engineer was eager to explore new career opportunities in the fast-paced tech industry, the strict terms of his initial employment contract precluded him to accept any position at a competing firm for at least one year. Consequently, he decided to focus his energy on developing his own independent mobile applications while waiting for the non-compete clause to expire. This strategic decision ultimately allowed him to launch a successful startup of his own.

Which choice is the most appropriate option to replace the underlined portion?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: precluded him from accepting

Cevap

precluded him from accepting
The correct choice is 'precluded him from accepting' because the verb 'preclude' idiomatically requires the preposition 'from' followed by a gerund (verb-ing). In the context of the sentence, the non-compete contract prevented the engineer from taking a new job, which is correctly expressed as 'precluded him from accepting' rather than using an infinitive or an incorrect preposition.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the main verb and its idiomatic requirements in the underlined portion.
The verb is 'precluded'.
Different verbs require specific prepositions and verb forms to be idiomatically correct.
2
Determine the correct preposition and grammatical structure that follows 'preclude'.
The verb 'preclude' must be paired with 'from' followed by a gerund (the -ing form of a verb).
Using an infinitive or incorrect prepositions violates standard English idiomatic usage.
3
Evaluate the options to find the one that matches this required structure.
The option 'precluded him from accepting' matches the correct idiomatic pattern.
This option corrects the preposition and verb form while maintaining standard grammar and context.

Anahtar Kavram

Idiomatic Prepositional Collocations with Verbs
Soru 1339Soru

The following sentence contains an underlined portion:

The librarians scanned each fragile page working in a way that was highly efficient and did not waste any time because they hoped to complete the project by Friday.

Which choice most effectively eliminates wordiness in the underlined portion?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: efficiently

Cevap

The correct answer is the single adverb 'efficiently' because it is the most concise way to express the manner in which the librarians scanned the pages while maintaining correct grammar.
The single adverb 'efficiently' successfully conveys the exact meaning of working quickly and without wasted effort, making it the most concise and direct option.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the wordy and redundant phrase in the underlined portion: 'working in a way that was highly efficient and did not waste any time'.
Recognized that the underlined phrase is ten words long and repeats similar ideas.
ACT English rewards conciseness, so we must look for a shorter way to express this idea.
2
Evaluate the choices to find the option that expresses this same meaning in the fewest words possible.
Identified 'efficiently' as the most concise candidate.
Comparing lengths helps eliminate wordy and redundant distractors.
3
Verify that the chosen option is grammatically correct and does not introduce new errors like redundancy or comma splices.
Confirmed that the single adverb fits the sentence structure perfectly.
An answer must be both concise and grammatically correct to be correct.

Anahtar Kavram

Eliminating Wordiness
Tahmini Süre:45s
Soru 1340Soru

Dr. Chen’s study of avian migration patterns provides valuable insight for how climate change shifts the seasonal behaviors of songbirds.

Which choice best replaces the underlined portion to ensure the sentence is grammatically and idiomatically correct?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: insight into

Cevap

The phrase 'insight into' is correct because the noun 'insight' idiomatically pairs with the preposition 'into' to express a deep understanding of a topic.
The noun 'insight' standardly pairs with the preposition 'into' to form the idiomatic expression 'insight into,' which means a clear and deep understanding of a subject. Therefore, the phrase 'insight into' is the correct choice.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the noun that requires a prepositional partner.
The target noun is 'insight'.
To correct the underlined portion, we must determine which preposition standardly collocates with the noun 'insight' in this context.
2
Evaluate the idiomatic preposition options.
In formal written English, the correct idiomatic phrase is 'insight into' a topic.
Other prepositions like 'for', 'on', and 'about' are either grammatically incorrect or informal in this context.

Anahtar Kavram

Idiomatic Preposition Collocation
ÖncekiSayfa 67 / 278Sonraki
Tüm alıştırma soruları — ACT | Examkin