Topic Development

357 soru

Soru 181Soru

A writer is editing an essay about the civil engineer John Smeaton.

In 1756, Smeaton took on the challenge of rebuilding the Eddystone Lighthouse, which had repeatedly been destroyed by the brutal waves of the English Channel. He realized that traditional wooden structures and standard mortar were insufficient to withstand the sea's relentless power. To solve this, Smeaton pioneered the use of interlocking granite blocks and developed a revolutionary hydraulic lime mortar that cured under water. This innovative combination of materials and design allowed the structure to withstand the constant pounding of the sea.

Given that all the choices are true, which choice provides the most specific, concrete evidence to support the claim that Smeaton's design was exceptionally durable?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: enabled the lighthouse to stand undamaged for over one hundred years until the rock beneath it began to wear away.

Cevap

enabled the lighthouse to stand undamaged for over one hundred years until the rock beneath it began to wear away.
The correct option provides concrete and specific historical details ('over one hundred years' and 'until the rock beneath it began to wear away') that directly demonstrate the exceptional durability of the lighthouse's design.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the prompt to identify the specific writing goal.
The prompt asks for a choice that provides the most specific, concrete evidence supporting the durability of the lighthouse's design.
Understanding the exact rhetorical goal ensures we select an option that answers the question directly rather than one that is simply true.
2
Evaluate the choices for specificity and relevance to the claim of durability.
The option about standing undamaged for over a century until the rock itself wore away provides concrete, measurable historical proof of durability. The option about Smeaton's fame is irrelevant to structural strength. The other options are either redundant or grammatically incorrect.
This step eliminates options that fail to provide specific evidence or contain errors.

Anahtar Kavram

Supporting claims with specific, concrete evidence and details
Tahmini Süre:1m 0s
Soru 182Soru

Passage Excerpt:
In 1938, chef Ruth Wakefield chopped up a bar of semi-sweet chocolate and added the pieces to her cookie dough. The chocolate pieces did not melt completely but instead held their shape, creating the first chocolate chip cookies.

The writer wants to add a sentence that emphasizes the immediate, nationwide popularity of this new dessert. Which choice best accomplishes this goal?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Within a few years, the recipe was printed on Nestlé chocolate packaging, making the cookie a favorite treat in households across America.

Cevap

Within a few years, the recipe was printed on Nestlé chocolate packaging, making the cookie a favorite treat in households across America.
The correct option directly addresses the requested rhetorical goal. It emphasizes the speed of the cookie's rise to fame ('Within a few years') and its widespread, countrywide appeal ('a favorite treat in households across America') while remaining grammatically correct.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the prompt's rhetorical goal.
The goal is to find a choice that emphasizes the immediate and nationwide popularity of the cookie.
The correct choice must satisfy these specific criteria: speed (immediate) and scope (nationwide).
2
Evaluate the choices based on the rhetorical goal.
The choice about the recipe being printed on packaging and becoming a favorite treat across America fits both the speed and scope criteria.
The other choices either talk about the inn (mismatch) or contain grammatical errors (comma splice and tense shift).

Anahtar Kavram

Meeting Specific Rhetorical Goals
Soru 183Soru

Honeybee colonies rely on a complex system of communication to thrive. [1] __________________________________________________ By performing this figure-eight movement, a successful foraging bee can communicate the direction and distance to a rich source of nectar or pollen to other members of the hive. This dance is so precise that it accounts for the angle of the sun and the distance from the hive, allowing other bees to locate food sources miles away with incredible accuracy.

Which choice most effectively introduces the paragraph by establishing its main focus?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Among these methods, the 'waggle dance' is a specialized movement that bees use to share details about food sources.

Cevap

The option stating that the 'waggle dance' is a specialized movement used to share details about food sources is correct because it introduces the specific topic of the paragraph.
The correct answer introduces the topic of the waggle dance, establishing a logical link between the colony's 'system of communication' mentioned in the first sentence and the 'figure-eight movement' described in the third sentence.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the context before and after the blank space.
The first sentence introduces the general concept of communication in bee colonies. The sentence after the blank refers to 'this figure-eight movement' and details how foraging bees communicate directions to food sources.
This identifies the specific topic that the missing sentence must introduce.
2
Evaluate the choices for relevance to the identified topic.
The correct choice must introduce the 'waggle dance' or a physical movement that represents the 'figure-eight movement' used for communication. Grammatical correctness must also be checked.
This filters out off-topic choices and choices with grammatical errors.
3
Identify the option that is both grammatically correct and logically fits the introduction.
The option stating 'Among these methods, the 'waggle dance' is a specialized movement that bees use to share details about food sources' is grammatically correct and directly sets up the explanation of the figure-eight movement.
This selects the best introduction according to the paragraph's flow and details.

Anahtar Kavram

Establishing Introductions and Thesis Statements
Tahmini Süre:1m 0s
Soru 184Soru

Early motion pictures were filmed on nitrate stock, a highly flammable material that decays rapidly over time if not stored in temperature-controlled vaults. To prevent the loss of these historical treasures, archivists work tirelessly to restore and digitize surviving reels. [1]

The writer wants to add a concluding sentence after sentence 2 (marked with [1]) that summarizes the main idea of the paragraph and emphasizes the importance of the preservation efforts. Which of the following options best accomplishes this goal?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Ultimately, these preservation efforts ensure that the foundational works of early cinema are saved for future audiences to experience.

Cevap

Ultimately, these preservation efforts ensure that the foundational works of early cinema are saved for future audiences to experience.
The sentence emphasizing that preservation efforts save foundational works of early cinema for future audiences effectively concludes the paragraph. It summarizes the main idea of restoring and digitizing nitrate film without introducing unsupported details or grammatical errors.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the paragraph's main theme.
The paragraph discusses how early films were made on highly flammable, decaying nitrate stock and how archivists work to restore and digitize them.
Understanding the topic helps identify which details are relevant and which are unsupported.
2
Evaluate the choices for relevance and flow.
The correct concluding sentence must summarize the preservation efforts and their purpose without introducing new topics.
A good conclusion reinforces the main idea of the paragraph.
3
Check the remaining options for grammatical errors and logical transitions.
One option contains a comma splice, another shifts tenses inconsistently, and another introduces unrelated details.
ACT English questions require sentences to be both rhetorically effective and grammatically correct.

Anahtar Kavram

Selecting Concluding Sentences
Tahmini Süre:1m 0s
Soru 185Soru

Sourdough bread is made by fermenting dough using naturally occurring lactobacilli and yeast. To maintain a sourdough starter, a baker must regularly "feed" the mixture with fresh flour and water. If the starter is kept at room temperature, it must be fed daily to keep the wild yeast active and healthy.

The writer is considering adding the following sentence to the paragraph:

"Yeast is also used in the fermentation process to brew beer and produce biofuels."

Should the writer make this addition?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: No, because it interrupts the focus of the paragraph by introducing uses of yeast unrelated to maintaining a sourdough starter.

Cevap

The writer should not add the sentence because it interrupts the focus of the paragraph by introducing uses of yeast unrelated to maintaining a sourdough starter.
The correct decision is to exclude the sentence because the paragraph is narrowly focused on the maintenance of a sourdough starter. Mentioning the role of yeast in brewing beer and making biofuels shifts the focus away from baking sourdough, resulting in a minor distraction.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the main focus of the paragraph.
The paragraph explains the process of maintaining and feeding a sourdough starter.
Understanding the paragraph's main focus is essential to evaluating whether new information is relevant.
2
Evaluate the relevance of the proposed sentence.
The proposed sentence introduces the use of yeast in beer brewing and biofuel production, which deviates from the topic of baking and maintaining sourdough.
Determining if the proposed sentence supports the established focus helps make the keep/delete decision.
3
Choose the option that reflects the correct decision and logical justification.
The correct option is the one stating that the sentence should not be added because it introduces unrelated uses of yeast that distract from the sourdough focus.
Only one option correctly identifies both the decision to exclude the sentence and the correct rhetorical justification.

Anahtar Kavram

Evaluating Relevance for Adding or Deleting Content
Tahmini Süre:45s
Soru 186Soru

The sandwich is named after John Montagu, the 4th Earl of Sandwich. According to legend, Montagu was an avid gambler who did not want to leave the gaming table to eat. He ordered his valet to bring him meat tucked between two slices of bread, allowing him to play cards and eat at the same time. Playing cards first became popular in Europe during the late fourteenth century. This convenient meal option quickly grew in popularity among his peers, eventually becoming a staple of modern cuisine.

The writer is considering deleting the underlined sentence. Should the sentence be kept or deleted?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Deleted, because it interrupts the paragraph's focus on the origin of the sandwich with an unrelated detail about playing cards.

Cevap

Deleted, because it interrupts the paragraph's focus on the origin of the sandwich with an unrelated detail about playing cards.
The correct option is the one stating the sentence should be deleted because it interrupts the paragraph's focus on the sandwich with an unrelated detail. The paragraph is about the origin of the sandwich, and the historical timeline of playing cards is irrelevant to this topic.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Determine the primary focus of the paragraph.
The paragraph describes the origin of the sandwich, explaining how John Montagu's gambling habits led to the creation of a convenient food option.
Identifying the main idea helps evaluate whether the underlined sentence contributes to that idea.
2
Analyze the role and content of the underlined sentence.
The underlined sentence describes when playing cards became popular in Europe, which is a historical fact about cards rather than sandwiches.
This step evaluates if the sentence supports the main topic or introduces a distraction.
3
Evaluate the options to find the one with the correct decision and logical reasoning.
The sentence should be deleted because it introduces irrelevant information. The option stating that it interrupts the focus on the origin of the sandwich provides the correct rationale.
Both the correct action (deletion) and the correct reason must align.

Anahtar Kavram

Evaluating Relevance for Adding or Deleting Content
Tahmini Süre:45s
Soru 187Soru

The following passage is about the discovery of pulsars.

In 1967, astrophysicist Jocelyn Bell Burnell detected a series of anomalous, highly regular radio pulses while analyzing data from a newly constructed radio telescope. The signals were so precise, repeating every 1.33 seconds, that Bell Burnell and her advisor, Antony Hewish, jokingly designated the source 'LGM-1' (for 'Little Green Men'). Hewish was later awarded the 1974 Nobel Prize in Physics for the discovery, an honor that many astronomers believed Bell Burnell should have shared. However, as similar pulses were soon observed in other regions of the sky, the researchers concluded that the signals had a natural, celestial origin rather than an extraterrestrial one. These objects, named 'pulsars,' are now understood to be rapidly rotating neutron stars emitting beams of electromagnetic radiation.

The writer is considering deleting the underlined sentence from the passage. Should the writer make this deletion?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Delete it, because it interrupts the explanation of how pulsars were discovered and identified with details about the subsequent recognition of the researchers.

Cevap

The correct answer states that the sentence should be deleted because it interrupts the explanation of how pulsars were discovered and identified with details about the subsequent recognition of the researchers.
The correct option correctly determines that the sentence should be deleted because it interrupts the paragraph's focus. The paragraph describes the scientific sequence of events in the discovery of pulsars, explaining how the signals were detected, initially hypothesized to be extraterrestrial, and eventually identified as rapidly rotating neutron stars. The underlined sentence, which discusses the 1974 Nobel Prize award and controversy, shifts the focus from the scientific process of discovery to post-discovery recognition, thereby disrupting the logical flow of the passage.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the main focus of the paragraph.
The paragraph describes the scientific process of discovering pulsars, from the initial detection of regular pulses to the conclusion that they are rotating neutron stars.
Understanding the paragraph's specific focus is necessary to evaluate the relevance of any single sentence.
2
Analyze the content of the underlined sentence.
The underlined sentence discusses the 1974 Nobel Prize in Physics, Hewish's receipt of the award, and the controversy surrounding Bell Burnell's exclusion.
This step determines whether the sentence's content directly supports the main focus of the paragraph.
3
Determine whether the underlined sentence should be kept or deleted by comparing its content to the paragraph's focus.
The sentence should be deleted because it introduces historical/award controversy that interrupts the narrative of the scientific discovery and identification of pulsars.
Irrelevant information that disrupts the flow and focus of a paragraph should be deleted.
4
Match this decision and reasoning to the correct option.
The option stating that the sentence should be deleted because it interrupts the explanation of the discovery and identification of pulsars is correct.
This option correctly identifies both the correct edit (delete) and the correct rhetorical justification.

Anahtar Kavram

Evaluating Relevance for Adding or Deleting Content
Tahmini Süre:1m 30s
Soru 188Soru

[1]
In 1947, Marjory Stoneman Douglas published *The Everglades: River of Grass*, a book that fundamentally redefined how the public viewed the vast wetlands of southern Florida. For decades prior, developers and politicians had viewed the Everglades as a useless swamp to be drained for agriculture and real estate. Douglas, however, argued that the Everglades was a dynamic, slow-flowing river vital to the state's ecological health.

[2]
Her book combined scientific detail with poetic prose to describe the unique ecosystems of the region, from the sawgrass marshes to the mangrove forests. She explained how the flow of fresh water from Lake Okeechobee sustained a rich array of wildlife. More importantly, she warned that disrupting this delicate balance would threaten the region’s fresh water supply, which millions of residents depended upon.

[3]
Following the publication of the book, Douglas spent the remaining decades of her life campaigning for the protection of the Everglades. She founded the organization Friends of the Everglades in 1969 to mobilize public opposition to a proposed jetport in the Big Cypress Swamp. Her tireless advocacy helped shift national policy toward restoration, cementing her legacy as a pioneering figure of the modern environmental movement.

Suppose the writer's goal had been to write an essay that details the specific legislative policies enacted by the United States Congress to fund the ecological restoration of the Florida Everglades. This goal is successfully achieved by the essay.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: False

Cevap

The statement is false because the essay focuses on Marjory Stoneman Douglas's advocacy, her book, and her impact on public perception, rather than detailing specific legislative policies enacted by Congress.
The statement is false because the essay focuses on Marjory Stoneman Douglas's book, her activism, and the public's perception of the Everglades, and does not provide details about specific acts of Congress or federal funding policies.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the hypothetical goal presented in the statement.
The goal is to detail specific legislative policies enacted by the United States Congress to fund the restoration of the Florida Everglades.
This establishes the target criteria for evaluating the passage.
2
Analyze the passage to see if it contains information about congressional legislation and funding.
The passage discusses Marjory Stoneman Douglas's book, her activism, and a general shift in national policy, but it contains no details about specific congressional acts, laws, or funding.
Determining what information is actually present in the text is necessary to see if the goal is met.
3
Compare the essay's contents with the hypothetical goal and evaluate the statement.
Because the essay does not cover specific legislative policies, the goal is not met, meaning the statement is false.
This yields the correct truth value for the statement.

Anahtar Kavram

Evaluating Whole-Essay Goals and Purpose
Tahmini Süre:1m 30s
Soru 189Soru

[1] Every autumn, millions of monarch butterflies in eastern North America embark on a remarkable journey to their overwintering sites in the mountain forests of central Mexico. [2] Traveling up to 3,000 miles, these delicate insects rely on thermal air currents and a sophisticated internal compass to navigate. [3] The destination of this migration was a mystery to scientists until 1975, when researchers finally located the specific oyamel fir forests where the monarchs cluster. [4] These forests provide a unique microclimate that protects the butterflies from freezing temperatures and wet weather. [5] Oyamel firs, also known as sacred firs, are native to the high-altitude mountains of central and southern Mexico.

The writer is considering deleting Sentence 5 from the passage. Which of the following decisions and justifications is most appropriate regarding this potential deletion?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Delete it, because it interrupts the explanation of how the oyamel fir forest microclimate protects the butterflies with unrelated botanical details.

Cevap

Delete the sentence because it interrupts the explanation of how the oyamel fir forest microclimate protects the butterflies with unrelated botanical details.
The paragraph focuses on the monarch butterfly migration and the protective microclimate of the oyamel fir forests. Sentence 5 introduces botanical details (alternative names and native range) of the oyamel fir that are irrelevant to this focus, so it should be deleted. The correct decision and justification are to delete the sentence because it interrupts the explanation of the forest microclimate with unrelated botanical details.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the main focus of the paragraph.
The paragraph describes the monarch butterfly migration to Mexico, the discovery of their overwintering site in oyamel fir forests, and how the forest microclimate protects them.
Understanding the paragraph's theme is necessary to determine the relevance of any single sentence.
2
Evaluate the content of the sentence being considered for deletion (Sentence 5).
Sentence 5 provides alternative names and the native range of oyamel firs.
Comparing the sentence's content to the paragraph's theme reveals whether the sentence adds value or introduces a distraction.
3
Determine if the sentence is relevant and choose the correct decision and reason.
The sentence is not relevant because it shifts the focus to botanical properties of the trees. Therefore, it should be deleted because it interrupts the discussion of the butterflies' protective habitat.
Only one option contains both the correct decision (delete) and the correct justification (relevance shift).

Anahtar Kavram

Evaluating Relevance for Adding or Deleting Content
Tahmini Süre:1m 0s
Soru 190Soru

Ada Lovelace was a visionary mathematician who is widely celebrated today for her work on Charles Babbage’s mechanical computer.

[1] __________________________________________________ She appended a set of notes that was longer than the article itself. These notes included what is now recognized as the first computer program: an algorithm designed to calculate Bernoulli numbers. Lovelace saw that Babbage’s machine could do more than just compute numbers; she envisioned it processing symbols, music, and art, laying the conceptual groundwork for modern computing.

Which choice most effectively introduces the paragraph?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: In 1843, Lovelace published an influential translation of an article about the Analytical Engine.

Cevap

The statement introducing Lovelace's 1843 publication of her translation of an article on the Analytical Engine is the correct choice, as it is grammatically correct and logically sets up the paragraph.
The correct answer provides a grammatically complete and logically fitting sentence that introduces the main topic of the paragraph. By establishing that Lovelace published a translation of an article about the Analytical Engine, it sets up the transition to the subsequent sentence, which refers to the notes she appended to that translation.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Read the paragraph to understand the topic and find the logical connection between the missing sentence and the sentence that follows.
The sentence following the blank says 'She appended a set of notes...', which implies the preceding sentence must mention a document or publication she produced.
Establishing context is necessary to select an introduction that flows smoothly into the paragraph's details.
2
Evaluate the choices for grammatical correctness.
The option beginning with 'Although' is a fragment. The option with 'were published' has a subject-verb agreement error. The option with the semicolon contains a punctuation error.
An effective introductory sentence must be grammatically correct.
3
Choose the grammatically correct option that provides the logical transition.
The option starting 'In 1843, Lovelace published an influential translation...' is a complete sentence and introduces the translation referenced in the next sentence.
This option satisfies both the grammatical and rhetorical requirements of the paragraph.

Anahtar Kavram

Establishing Introductions and Thesis Statements
Soru 191Soru

[1] In 1858, Hymen Lipman patented the first pencil with an attached eraser. [2] Before this invention, writers had to carry separate pieces of rubber or use breadcrumbs to erase mistakes. [3] Rubber trees are native to South America and produce latex when their bark is cut. [4] Lipman’s design made writing far more convenient by combining two essential tools into one.

The writer is considering deleting Sentence 3 from the paragraph. Should this sentence be deleted?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Yes, because it introduces a detail about rubber trees that is irrelevant to the paragraph's focus on Lipman’s invention.

Cevap

Yes, because it introduces a detail about rubber trees that is irrelevant to the paragraph's focus on Lipman’s invention.
The correct option correctly identifies that the sentence should be deleted because the biological origin of rubber trees is irrelevant to the paragraph's focus on the history and convenience of the pencil-eraser invention.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the main topic of the paragraph by reading the surrounding sentences.
Sentences 1, 2, and 4 establish that the paragraph is about Hymen Lipman's invention of the pencil eraser and how it made writing more convenient.
To evaluate relevance, you must first establish the main focus of the passage.
2
Analyze Sentence 3 to see if it supports the main topic.
Sentence 3 describes the biological origin and harvesting of rubber from rubber trees.
This determines whether the information in the sentence directly contributes to the topic of the invention.
3
Decide whether to keep or delete the sentence based on its relevance.
Because the biological origin of rubber is irrelevant to the history of the pencil-eraser invention, the sentence should be deleted.
Irrelevant information disrupts the flow and unity of the paragraph.
4
Evaluate the reasons in the options to find the correct justification for deletion.
The correct option correctly states that the sentence should be deleted because it introduces an irrelevant detail about rubber trees.
In add/delete questions, the correct option must contain both the correct decision (yes/no) and the correct rhetorical reasoning.

Anahtar Kavram

Evaluating Relevance for Adding or Deleting Content
Tahmini Süre:45s
Soru 192Soru

Passage Excerpt:

In 1964, radio astronomers Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson were troubled by a persistent, low-frequency hum emanating from their Holmdel horn antenna. Seeking to isolate the source of this background noise, they systematically dismantled and cleaned the equipment, even going so far as to scrub away what they dryly referred to as a "white dielectric material" left by nesting pigeons. Despite these meticulous efforts, the static remained, [eventually leading to their realization that they had detected the cosmic microwave background radiation—the thermal echo of the Big Bang].

Question:

The writer wants to choose a concluding phrase for the sentence (replacing the underlined portion in brackets) that emphasizes the contrast between the mundane, domestic nature of the troubleshooting tasks and the vast, cosmic scale of their discovery. Given that all the choices are true, which one best accomplishes this goal?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: eventually leading to their realization that they had detected the cosmic microwave background radiation—the thermal echo of the Big Bang.

Cevap

The original phrasing (NO CHANGE) is the correct choice because it is grammatically correct and successfully highlights the contrast between the domestic task of scrubbing pigeon droppings and the grand scale of the cosmic microwave background radiation.
The original phrasing (NO CHANGE) best accomplishes the writer's goal because it contrasts the domestic, mundane nature of cleaning pigeon nests with the vast, ancient origin of the signal ('cosmic microwave background radiation—the thermal echo of the Big Bang'). This phrasing highlights the shift from a small-scale, ordinary chore to a discovery of universal significance.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the writer's specific rhetorical goal in the prompt.
The goal is to emphasize the contrast between the mundane troubleshooting tasks (like cleaning pigeon droppings) and the vast, cosmic scale of the discovery.
This establishes the criteria for evaluating the choices.
2
Evaluate the choices against the rhetorical goal.
The options focusing on the antenna's functionality and the cleaning failure do not mention the cosmic discovery, so they are eliminated. The option stating 'they realized...' and the original phrasing both mention the Big Bang, which represents the cosmic scale.
This narrows down the choices to those that address the rhetorical requirements.
3
Assess the remaining options for grammatical correctness.
The option stating 'they realized...' creates a comma splice because it introduces a new independent clause after a comma. The original phrasing (NO CHANGE) uses a participial modifier ('eventually leading to...') that connects grammatically and logically.
This determines the final correct choice based on both grammar and rhetoric.

Anahtar Kavram

Meeting Specific Rhetorical Goals
Soru 193Soru

The Light Fantastic

[1]
For decades, light-emitting diodes (LEDs) were familiar but limited fixtures of modern technology. Introduced in the 1960s, red and green LEDs quickly found their way into indicator lights, digital clocks, and calculator displays. However, one color remained conspicuously absent from the spectrum. To produce white light—which is essential for general household illumination—scientists needed to combine red, green, and blue light. While red and green were easily manufactured, the blue LED proved to be an elusive "holy grail" of semiconductor physics, frustrating researchers worldwide.

[2]
The primary challenge lay in finding a suitable semiconductor material. Most researchers focused on zinc selenide, which was easier to work with but yielded unstable, short-lived diodes. A few determined scientists, however, turned their attention to gallium nitride (GaNGaN), despite widespread consensus that it was too difficult to grow in high-quality crystal form. In the late 1980s, researchers Isamu Akasaki and Hiroshi Amano at Nagoya University made a breakthrough by using a thin layer of aluminum nitride on a sapphire substrate to grow the elusive GaNGaN crystals. Soon after, Shuji Nakamura, working independently at a small chemical company, developed a novel thermal annealing process that vastly improved the material's electrical properties.

[3]
By 1993, Nakamura had demonstrated the first high-brightness blue LED, completing the trio of primary colors. By combining the blue LED with existing red and green ones, or by coating a blue LED with a yellow phosphor layer, engineers could finally produce bright, energy-efficient white light. Today, this technology powers everything from smartphone screens to streetlights, dramatically reducing global energy consumption and earning the inventors the 2014 Nobel Prize in Physics.

Suppose the writer's goal had been to write an essay that evaluates the specific physical mechanisms of semiconductor doping in gallium nitride crystals. Is the statement that the essay successfully achieves this goal true or false?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: False

Cevap

False
The correct answer is False because the essay focuses on the historical progression and general technological impact of the blue LED rather than explaining the scientific mechanisms of semiconductor doping.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the essay's actual content and focus.
The essay provides a historical narrative of the development of blue LEDs, discussing the history of red and green LEDs, the material challenge of growing gallium nitride (GaNGaN) crystals, the researchers involved, and the global impact of energy-efficient white light.
This establishes the actual scope and focus of the passage.
2
Analyze the proposed writing goal.
The proposed goal is to evaluate the specific physical mechanisms of semiconductor doping in gallium nitride crystals.
This identifies the target criteria that the essay must meet.
3
Compare the essay's content against the proposed writing goal.
While the essay mentions the challenge of growing gallium nitride crystals and improvements to electrical properties, it does not explain or evaluate the physical mechanisms of semiconductor doping (such as how dopants create charge carriers or change band structures).
This determines whether the goal is achieved.

Anahtar Kavram

Evaluating Whole-Essay Goals and Purpose
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
Soru 194Soru

The Nitrogen Dilemma

[1]
In the early twentieth century, the world faced a looming Malthusian catastrophe. The natural deposits of sodium nitrate in Chile, the primary source of agricultural fertilizer, were rapidly depleting. Without a new source of nitrogen, global agriculture could not support the growing human population. The challenge was that atmospheric nitrogen (N2N_2), though abundant, is chemically inert and cannot be directly utilized by plants.

[2]
In 1909, German chemist Fritz Haber successfully demonstrated a high-pressure chemical reaction that synthesized ammonia (NH3NH_3) directly from atmospheric nitrogen and hydrogen gas. Shortly thereafter, chemical engineer Carl Bosch scaled this laboratory breakthrough into an industrial process. By utilizing iron-based catalysts at extreme temperatures and pressures, the Haber-Bosch process allowed for the mass production of synthetic fertilizer, effectively lifting the ecological limit on crop yields and sustaining billions of lives.

[3]
However, this scientific triumph carried a dark legacy. The very same ammonia production facilities were quickly repurposed during World War I to manufacture nitric acid, a precursor for explosives. Haber himself actively pioneered the development of chemical weapons, leading to the deployment of chlorine gas on the battlefield. Thus, a process created to nourish humanity also facilitated unprecedented devastation, illustrating the profound ethical ambivalence of modern scientific advancement.

Suppose the writer's goal had been to write an essay that analyzes how a single scientific innovation can both avert a global humanitarian crisis and generate new forms of warfare. Would this essay fulfill that goal?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Yes, because it describes how the synthesis of ammonia resolved the agricultural nitrogen shortage while explaining how the process was also used to manufacture explosives and chemical weapons.

Cevap

Yes, because it describes how the synthesis of ammonia resolved the agricultural nitrogen shortage while explaining how the process was also used to manufacture explosives and chemical weapons.
The correct answer shows how the synthesis of ammonia resolved the agricultural nitrogen shortage while explaining how the process was also used to manufacture explosives and chemical warfare. This directly matches both components of the writer's goal—preventing a humanitarian crisis and generating new forms of warfare.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the writer's stated goal: to write an essay that analyzes how a single scientific innovation can both avert a global humanitarian crisis and generate new forms of warfare.
Identify the two required elements: (1) averting a global crisis, and (2) generating new forms of warfare.
This establishes the criteria for evaluating the essay-wide purpose.
2
Evaluate the passage content paragraph by paragraph against the identified criteria.
Paragraph 1 and 2 detail the Malthusian agricultural crisis and how the Haber-Bosch process resolved it (averting the crisis). Paragraph 3 details the repurposing of the process to manufacture explosives and chemical weapons (generating new forms of warfare).
Determining whether both components of the writing goal are actively discussed in the text.
3
Formulate the final evaluation and match it with the correct option.
Since both elements are present, the answer must be 'Yes'. The option explaining both the resolution of the agricultural crisis and the development of explosives/weapons is the correct match.
Selecting the option that offers the correct direction and complete justification.

Anahtar Kavram

Evaluating Whole-Essay Goals and Purpose
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
Soru 195Soru

Passage Excerpt:

In 1931, engineering draftsman Harry Beck designed a new map for the London Underground. Rather than drawing the routes to geographic scale, Beck created a diagrammatic layout that resembled an electrical circuit, prioritizing readability over physical distance.

Which choice provides the most direct and specific explanation of how Beck's map design benefited passengers?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: passengers could easily plan their journeys without being confused by overlapping, geographically accurate lines.

Cevap

passengers could easily plan their journeys without being confused by overlapping, geographically accurate lines.
The correct option directly addresses the prompt's requirement by explaining that the new map design helped passengers plan their journeys more easily and avoided the confusion caused by geographic scale lines. It is also grammatically correct.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the prompt to identify the specific rhetorical goal.
The goal is to find a choice that provides a direct and specific explanation of how Beck's map design benefited passengers.
This establishes the criteria that the correct answer must meet.
2
Evaluate the grammatical correctness of the choices.
The option containing 'will find' and 'helped' has an incorrect tense shift, and the option containing 'commuters loved the simplified grid, they were...' contains a comma splice. Both are grammatically incorrect.
Eliminating grammatically incorrect choices narrows down the options.
3
Evaluate the remaining grammatically correct choices against the rhetorical goal.
The option concerning the publicity department's rejection fails the rhetorical criteria because it does not discuss a passenger benefit. The option stating that passengers could easily plan journeys directly explains the functional benefit of the map design.
This confirms the correct choice that satisfies both grammar rules and the prompt's rhetorical goal.

Anahtar Kavram

Meeting Specific Rhetorical Goals
Tahmini Süre:1m 0s
Soru 196Soru

The following sentences are from a draft of an essay about dendrochronology. To ensure that the paragraph logically builds its claim that tree-ring dating is a highly precise historical tool, in what order should the sentences be placed?

Öğeleri doğru sıraya koymak için sürükleyin

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

The sentences should be ordered starting with the introduction to dendrochronology, followed by the explanation of how precision is achieved through ring growth, then the methodology of comparing patterns to build timelines, and finally the concrete example of the dated shipwreck.
The paragraph flows logically from a general definition and claim about precision, to the biological mechanism enabling that precision, to the archaeological application of the mechanism, and finally to a specific historical example demonstrating that precision in practice.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the introductory sentence.
The sentence introducing dendrochronology and claiming it provides a precise timeline must come first.
It establishes the subject matter and key claim of the paragraph.
2
Connect the claim of precision to its scientific cause.
The sentence explaining how 'This high level of precision is achieved' via annual ring growth must come second.
The demonstrative pronoun 'this' directly links to the 'incredibly precise' claim in the first sentence.
3
Identify the logical link to larger scale applications.
The sentence describing how 'these distinctive patterns' are compared to wood samples to build regional timelines must come third.
It refers back to the patterns mentioned in the second sentence and explains how researchers use them to construct timelines.
4
Find the concrete supporting evidence.
The sentence starting with 'For example' about the shipwreck must come last.
It provides a specific real-world example that supports the general claims of precision and archaeological timeline construction established in the first three sentences.

Anahtar Kavram

Supporting Claims with Evidence and Details
Soru 197Soru

When Mount Vesuvius erupted in 79 CE, it buried the Roman town of Herculaneum under volcanic ash, carbonizing hundreds of papyrus scrolls in a lavish villa. For centuries, these scrolls remained unreadable, reduced to fragile lumps of carbon that crumbled at the slightest touch. Recently, however, scientists have begun using advanced X-ray imaging techniques to read the scrolls without unrolling them. By detecting the tiny differences in how X-rays pass through the charred papyrus versus the ancient ink, researchers can reconstruct the writing three-dimensionally. [1]

Which of the following concluding sentences, if added at [1], would best support the paragraph's main focus on the role of modern technology in uncovering historical texts?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: This non-invasive method allows scholars to read the fragile texts without physically damaging them, preserving their contents for future generations.

Cevap

This non-invasive method allows scholars to read the fragile texts without physically damaging them, preserving their contents for future generations.
The correct option starting with 'This non-invasive method' logically wraps up the paragraph by summarizing how the X-ray technology successfully addresses the problem of the fragile, unreadable scrolls without causing physical damage. This reinforces the main focus on the technological solution and its impact.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the main idea of the passage.
The passage describes how volcanic ash carbonized ancient scrolls, making them too fragile to open, and how modern X-ray imaging technology now allows researchers to read the texts three-dimensionally without unrolling them.
Understanding the paragraph's core focus is necessary to select a concluding sentence that reinforces this focus without introducing unrelated details.
2
Evaluate the choices to determine which one logically wraps up the passage and is grammatically correct.
The choice emphasizing that the non-invasive method preserves the contents for future generations without damaging them directly summarizes the main benefit of the technology discussed. Other choices introduce unrelated details (like a specific philosopher), contain grammatical errors like comma splices, or shift tenses inappropriately.
A good conclusion must tie back to the main thesis, flow logically, and be free of grammatical errors.

Anahtar Kavram

Selecting an effective concluding sentence requires identifying the main thesis of the paragraph and choosing an option that reinforces that focus while maintaining grammatical correctness and logical flow.
Tahmini Süre:1m 0s
Soru 198Soru

Passage Excerpt:
During a freezing winter trip to New York City in 1903, Mary Anderson observed a trolley driver struggle to see through the falling sleet. At the time, [underlined portion]. Anderson immediately began sketching a solution: a rubber blade attached to a lever inside the cab, allowing the driver to clear the window without being exposed to the elements.

Which choice most vividly emphasizes the harsh weather conditions that the trolley drivers had to endure?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: drivers had to stand in the biting wind and freezing rain to scrape ice off the windshields

Cevap

The choice describing drivers standing in the biting wind and freezing rain to scrape ice off the windshields is correct because it uses strong descriptive language to convey the harshness of the weather, fulfilling the specified rhetorical goal.
The option that mentions drivers standing in the biting wind and freezing rain to scrape ice off the windshields is correct because it uses descriptive vocabulary ('biting wind,' 'freezing rain') to illustrate the severe weather conditions directly, thereby satisfying the prompt's goal.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the prompt to determine the exact rhetorical goal.
The goal is to find the choice that most vividly emphasizes the harsh weather conditions that the trolley drivers faced.
Identifying the target criteria helps narrow down the acceptable choices.
2
Evaluate the choices for grammatical correctness.
The option containing a comma splice ('drivers had to open their windows, they wiped...') is grammatically incorrect and must be eliminated.
An answer choice on the ACT English exam must be grammatically correct to be the right answer.
3
Compare the remaining grammatically correct options against the rhetorical goal.
The options focusing on shift length or multitasking do not describe the weather. Only the option describing the 'biting wind and freezing rain' details the harsh weather conditions.
Selecting the option that contains specific sensory details of severe weather satisfies the precise rhetorical criteria.

Anahtar Kavram

Meeting Specific Rhetorical Goals
Soru 199Soru

[1]
In December 1938, Marjorie Courtenay-Latimer, a curator at a museum in East London, South Africa, received a call from a local trawler captain who had brought in an unusual catch. Amidst the piles of sharks and rays, she noticed a strange, iridescent blue fish with fleshy, limb-like fins. Unable to identify the creature, she made sketches and sent them to J.L.B. Smith, a prominent South African ichthyologist, who recognized the fish as a coelacanth—a species believed to have gone extinct 66 million years ago.

[2]
This discovery was the biological equivalent of finding a living dinosaur. It challenged the scientific community's understanding of vertebrate evolution and prehistoric survival. The coelacanth’s unique anatomy provided a rare window into the transition of vertebrates from water to land. Its lobed fins, which contain bones arranged similarly to those in tetrapod limbs, suggested an evolutionary link to early land-dwelling animals.

[3]
While modern coelacanths live in deep-water environments, their prehistoric ancestors inhabited shallow waters, adapting over millions of years to survive in deep ocean caves. Over the next few decades, search efforts successfully located living populations of the coelacanth off the coast of the Comoro Islands and in Indonesia. These discoveries allowed scientists to study the creature's behavior in its natural habitat, proving that this "living fossil" had survived relatively unchanged for eons.

Suppose the writer’s goal had been to write an essay that traces the history of marine biology expeditions in South Africa. Would this essay successfully fulfill that goal?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: No, because the essay focuses on the discovery and evolutionary significance of a single fish species rather than providing a broad historical account of marine biology expeditions.

Cevap

No, because the essay focuses on the discovery and evolutionary significance of a single fish species rather than providing a broad historical account of marine biology expeditions.
The correct answer is the option stating that the essay does not fulfill the goal because it focuses on the discovery and evolutionary significance of a single fish species rather than providing a broad historical account of marine biology expeditions. The passage centers on the coelacanth, its anatomical traits, and its importance to understanding vertebrate evolution, which is far narrower than a history of South African marine expeditions.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the proposed writing goal.
The goal is to write an essay that traces the history of marine biology expeditions in South Africa.
Understanding the target goal is necessary to evaluate whether the passage fulfills it.
2
Analyze the actual content and primary focus of the passage.
The passage describes the 1938 discovery of the coelacanth, explains why it was scientifically significant (its lobe-like fins as an evolutionary link to land animals), and notes the subsequent discovery of living populations.
Determining the true focus of the text allows comparison with the proposed goal.
3
Compare the actual focus with the proposed goal and select the correct option.
The essay does not trace the history of marine biology expeditions in South Africa; it focuses narrowly on one evolutionary discovery. Therefore, the essay does not fulfill the goal.
This comparison identifies the correct 'No' direction and the accurate reasoning for it.

Anahtar Kavram

Evaluating Whole-Essay Goals and Purpose
Tahmini Süre:1m 30s
Soru 200Soru

The ancient Greek theater of Epidaurus, constructed in the fourth century BCE, is renowned for its extraordinary acoustics. Performers on the open-air stage can be heard clearly by spectators seated in the top rows, some sixty meters away. For decades, researchers debated the mechanism behind this phenomenon. In 2007, acoustic experts discovered that the secret lies in the theater’s limestone seats. The theater, which could accommodate up to 14,000 spectators, was designed by the architect Polykleitos the Younger. The researchers found that the corrugated surface of the seats acts as a natural sound filter, reflecting high-frequency sounds—such as the actors' voices—toward the audience while absorbing low-frequency background noise like the rustle of wind and the murmur of the crowd.

The writer is considering deleting the underlined sentence. Should the sentence be kept or deleted?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Delete it, because it interrupts the explanation of the theater's acoustics with details about its seating capacity and architect.

Cevap

Delete it, because it interrupts the explanation of the theater's acoustics with details about its seating capacity and architect.
The correct option is correct because the paragraph is focused entirely on the acoustic properties of the Epidaurus theater, explaining how researchers solved the mystery of how sound travels so well in the open air. The underlined sentence introduces unrelated historical and biographical facts about the theater's capacity and architect, which interrupts the explanation of how the limestone seats act as a sound filter.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the primary topic of the paragraph.
The paragraph explains the extraordinary acoustics of the Epidaurus theater and the scientific reason (limestone seats filtering sound) behind this phenomenon.
Understanding the paragraph's specific focus is necessary to evaluate if the sentence contributes to that focus.
2
Analyze the content and function of the underlined sentence.
The underlined sentence discusses the theater's seating capacity (14,000 spectators) and its architect (Polykleitos the Younger).
Determining what information the sentence adds helps evaluate its relevance.
3
Evaluate the relevance of the underlined sentence to the paragraph's topic.
The capacity and architect are unrelated to the acoustic mechanism. Placing this sentence between the discovery of the limestone seats and the explanation of their filtering effect breaks the paragraph's logical flow.
This establishes that the sentence should be deleted because it is irrelevant and disruptive.
4
Select the option that matches the decision to delete and provides the correct rhetorical reason.
The option suggesting deletion because it interrupts the explanation of acoustics with details about capacity and the architect is the correct choice.
Only one option correctly identifies the need for deletion and justifies it based on paragraph cohesion.

Anahtar Kavram

Evaluating Relevance for Adding or Deleting Content
ÖncekiSayfa 10 / 18Sonraki