Topic Development

357 soru

Soru 201Soru

In 1895, Harvard University’s new Fogg Art Museum opened to the public, but its lecture hall was immediately deemed an acoustic failure. The room’s curved walls and high plaster ceiling created an echo so persistent that speakers’ words remained suspended in the air, overlapping into an unintelligible din. Desperate for a solution, the university president turned to a young physics professor, Wallace Sabine. Sabine spent years conducting painstaking experiments, using organ pipes and cushions borrowed from nearby theaters to measure sound decay. His work culminated in the first mathematical relationship governing reverberation time, effectively establishing the field of architectural acoustics.

Sabine’s new scientific principles were put to the test when he was hired to design Boston’s Symphony Hall. Rather than copying the circular shapes that had ruined the Fogg museum’s hall, Sabine chose a rectangular, "shoebox" layout with deep balconies, high ceilings, and walls coffered with niches and statues. These features dispersed the sound waves evenly throughout the auditorium, preventing focused echoes. Even today, the venue remains a popular destination for tourists visiting the historic city of Boston.

Which choice most effectively concludes the paragraph by highlighting the successful application of Sabine’s new scientific field and its lasting impact?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: This triumph proved that exceptional acoustics could be scientifically engineered, cementing Sabine’s principles as the foundation of modern concert hall design.

Cevap

The option stating that the triumph proved acoustics could be scientifically engineered, cementing Sabine’s principles as the foundation of modern concert hall design, is the correct choice.
The correct option successfully connects the triumph of Boston's Symphony Hall to the broader theme of Sabine establishing the scientific field of architectural acoustics, highlighting its lasting legacy in modern design without introducing grammatical errors.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the passage to identify the central theme and the specific goal of the concluding sentence.
The passage focuses on Wallace Sabine establishing the scientific field of architectural acoustics. The prompt specifically asks for a conclusion that highlights the success of this new scientific field and its lasting impact.
Understanding the context and rhetorical goal is essential for evaluating concluding options on the ACT.
2
Evaluate each option against the rhetorical criteria and check for grammatical correctness.
The original sentence focuses on tourism, which is irrelevant. The option with 'Ultimately, Sabine's calculations...' is a comma splice. The option with 'Conversely, Sabine's formulas...' has a tense shift ('build... relied') and an incorrect transition word ('Conversely').
ACT English questions frequently test both rhetorical effectiveness and grammar within the same item.
3
Identify the option that is both grammatically correct and satisfies the rhetorical goal.
The option beginning with 'This triumph proved...' is grammatically sound and directly links the scientific engineering of acoustics to modern design (lasting impact).
This option is the only one that meets all criteria and contains no errors.

Anahtar Kavram

Selecting concluding sentences that align with a paragraph's purpose and maintain grammatical integrity.
Soru 202Soru

Sequoyah's Syllabary

[1]
In the early nineteenth century, a Cherokee silversmith named Sequoyah became convinced that the key to maintaining his people's independence lay in the power of the written word. Observing how European settlers shared information across great distances using what he termed "talking leaves," Sequoyah embarked on a decades-long quest to create a writing system for the Cherokee language. Despite facing initial skepticism and even accusations of witchcraft from his peers, he persisted in his work, recognizing that literacy would foster unity and preserve Cherokee culture in a rapidly changing world.

[2]
Sequoyah initially attempted to design a unique pictogram for every word in the Cherokee language. However, this approach quickly proved impractical, as the sheer number of symbols became impossible to memorize. Abandoning this method, he began to analyze the spoken language, breaking it down into distinct phonetic units. He realized that Cherokee is comprised of eighty-five recurring syllables. By assigning a distinct graphic symbol—some adapted from the Latin alphabet and others of his own invention—to each of these syllables, he established a complete and easily learnable writing system.

[3]
The impact of Sequoyah's invention was immediate and profound. Within a few years of its introduction in 1821, a majority of the Cherokee nation achieved literacy, outstripping the literacy rates of the surrounding European-American settlers. The syllabary enabled the publication of the *Cherokee Phoenix*, a bilingual newspaper, and allowed families separated by displacement to communicate. Sequoyah's achievement stands as a singular milestone: he is the only person in recorded history to single-handedly create an entire, functional writing system for an illiterate population.

Suppose the writer's goal had been to write an essay that details the grammatical rules and structural characteristics of the Cherokee language. This essay successfully fulfills that goal.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: False

Cevap

The statement is false.
The statement is false because the passage is a historical and biographical account of Sequoyah's invention of the Cherokee syllabary and its impact on literacy, rather than a technical analysis of Cherokee grammar or linguistic structure.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the hypothetical goal mentioned in the statement.
The hypothetical goal is to write an essay detailing the grammatical rules and structural characteristics of the Cherokee language.
To establish what criteria the essay needs to meet.
2
Read and summarize the actual content of the essay.
The essay narrates Sequoyah's development of the Cherokee syllabary and its cultural impacts, mentioning only briefly that the language has eighty-five recurring syllables.
To identify the main theme and scope of the passage.
3
Determine whether the essay fulfills the hypothetical goal.
The essay does not detail grammatical rules or structural characteristics of the language, meaning it fails to fulfill the hypothetical goal.
To decide the truth value of the statement.

Anahtar Kavram

Evaluating Whole-Essay Goals and Purpose
Soru 203Soru

Passage Excerpt:
In 1952, computer pioneer Grace Hopper developed the first compiler, a program that translated English-like commands into the binary code understood by computers. Before this invention, programming required writing tedious strings of ones and zeros, a task restricted to a small group of mathematicians. [1] Hopper’s compiler, known as the A-0, paved the way for modern software development.

Given that all the choices are true, which choice best accomplishes the writer's goal of emphasizing how Hopper’s compiler democratized the field of computer programming by making it accessible to those without advanced mathematical training?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: By allowing programmers to write instructions in plain English, the compiler opened the technology to individuals outside of advanced mathematics departments.

Cevap

The correct option is the one stating that by allowing programmers to write instructions in plain English, the compiler opened the technology to individuals outside of advanced mathematics departments.
The correct choice explains how the compiler functioned (translating instructions into plain English) and directly connects this to making programming accessible to those outside of advanced mathematics, thereby democratizing the field.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the prompt to identify the specific rhetorical goal requested by the writer.
The goal is to show how the compiler democratized programming by making it accessible to individuals without advanced mathematical training.
Understanding the precise criteria of the goal is essential to filtering out irrelevant details.
2
Evaluate each option for grammatical correctness.
The option starting with 'Translating commands' contains a comma splice, making it grammatically incorrect. The other three options are grammatically correct.
ACT English questions require the correct answer to be both grammatically correct and rhetorically appropriate.
3
Evaluate the remaining grammatically correct options against the identified rhetorical goal.
The option starting with 'By allowing programmers' mentions writing instructions in plain English and opening the technology to individuals outside of advanced mathematics, which perfectly aligns with the goal. The options starting with 'The compiler was a major' and 'Hopper's work on the A-0' focus on unrelated details (future achievements and employer details).
Matching the remaining grammatically correct choices to the specific criteria in the prompt reveals the single best answer.

Anahtar Kavram

Meeting Specific Rhetorical Goals
Tahmini Süre:1m 0s
Soru 204Soru

In 1943, mechanical engineer Richard James was working in a Philadelphia shipyard, attempting to develop springs that could support and stabilize sensitive marine instruments. During his experiments, he accidentally knocked a tension spring off a shelf. Instead of simply falling to the ground, the spring stepped down from a stack of books, onto a table, and coiled itself upright on the floor. James spent the next two years determining the perfect steel wire tension to turn this accidental movement into a children's toy, which his wife, Betty, named the "Slinky." [1]

The writer wants to conclude the paragraph with a sentence that highlights how a simple accident in a shipyard led to a successful, enduring commercial product. Which choice best accomplishes this goal?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Ultimately, this simple shipyard accident launched one of the most popular and enduring toys in history.

Cevap

Ultimately, this simple shipyard accident launched one of the most popular and enduring toys in history.
The correct option perfectly aligns with the prompt's instructions by identifying both the initial event (the simple shipyard accident) and the long-term success (one of the most popular and enduring toys in history) without grammatical errors.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the question stem to identify the specific rhetorical goal.
The goal is to conclude the paragraph by showing how a simple accident in a shipyard resulted in a successful, enduring commercial product.
Understanding the precise criteria of the prompt is essential for evaluating concluding options on the ACT.
2
Evaluate the choices for both thematic relevance to the goal and grammatical correctness.
The option focusing on Betty James's later life introduces irrelevant details. The option mentioning millions of units sold contains a comma splice. The option placing commas around the restrictive clause 'that occurred in the shipyard' contains a punctuation error. The option mentioning the simple shipyard accident and the popular, enduring toy is both grammatically correct and directly relevant.
Correct answers on the ACT English section must be both grammatically correct and rhetorically appropriate.

Anahtar Kavram

Selecting Concluding Sentences and Transitions
Soru 205Soru

In 1856, eighteen-year-old chemistry student William Henry Perkin was attempting to synthesize quinine, a treatment for malaria, in his home laboratory. Instead of obtaining the clear drug, his experiments yielded a dark, sticky sludge. Rather than discarding the failed mixture, Perkin investigated its properties and discovered that when diluted with alcohol, it produced a vibrant, long-lasting purple color. Historically, purple dye was harvested from the mucus of thousands of marine snails, rendering it so expensive that only royalty could afford it. Recognizing the commercial potential of his accidental creation, Perkin patented the substance as mauveine, the world's first synthetic dye, and opened a factory to mass-produce it.

The writer wants to add a concluding sentence to the paragraph that reinforces the significance of Perkin's transition from an accidental discovery to a commercial success. Which choice best accomplishes this goal?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: By making a once-exclusive color widely accessible, Perkin not only revolutionized the textile industry but also launched the modern chemical manufacturing sector.

Cevap

By making a once-exclusive color widely accessible, Perkin not only revolutionized the textile industry but also launched the modern chemical manufacturing sector.
The correct answer effectively concludes the paragraph by highlighting the transition of purple dye from an exclusive luxury to an accessible commodity, which reinforces the paragraph's discussion of Perkin's commercialization of mauveine and its industry-wide impact.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the paragraph's main theme and flow.
The paragraph describes Perkin's accidental creation of a synthetic purple dye, its historical context as a rare and expensive luxury, and his effort to commercialize and mass-produce it.
Understanding the paragraph's primary focus is essential to selecting a concluding sentence that summarizes or extends the main ideas without introducing off-topic points.
2
Evaluate the choices for relevance and correct transition of ideas.
The option focusing on making the color accessible and launching the chemical industry directly resolves the narrative arc. Other options either introduce irrelevant details about quinine, contain grammatical errors, or contradict the success of the factory.
Eliminating options with irrelevant content or incorrect logical transitions ensures the conclusion is both supportive and cohesive.
3
Check the remaining option for grammatical correctness.
The correct option is grammatically sound, avoiding the comma splice present in the option describing Perkin's retirement.
ACT English questions require that the correct choice not only fit rhetorically but also adhere strictly to standard English grammar conventions.

Anahtar Kavram

Selecting Concluding Sentences and Transitions
Tahmini Süre:1m 15s
Soru 206Soru

A writer is editing an essay about the discovery of the coelacanth and has drafted the following paragraph:

In 1938, Marjorie Courtenay-Latimer, a curator at a small museum in South Africa, received a call from Hendrick Goosen, a local fishing captain. Goosen was known for his skilled navigation of the challenging waters of the Indian Ocean. Courtenay-Latimer frequently searched Goosen’s catches for interesting marine specimens. On this particular day, she found a bright blue, five-foot-long creature with fleshy, limb-like fins that she could not identify.

Should the writer delete the underlined sentence?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Yes, because the sentence interrupts the paragraph's focus on Courtenay-Latimer’s discovery with irrelevant details about Goosen’s navigation skills.

Cevap

Yes, because the sentence interrupts the paragraph's focus on Courtenay-Latimer’s discovery with irrelevant details about Goosen’s navigation skills.
The correct option correctly identifies that the sentence should be deleted because it interrupts the narrative focus on Courtenay-Latimer’s discovery of the strange fish with irrelevant details about Goosen’s navigation skills.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the main focus of the paragraph.
The paragraph describes how Marjorie Courtenay-Latimer went to inspect Hendrick Goosen's catch in 1938 and found an unidentified, unusual fish.
Understanding the paragraph's primary focus is essential for evaluating whether a sentence is relevant or tangential.
2
Evaluate the relevance of the underlined sentence to this main focus.
The underlined sentence describes Goosen's navigation skills in the Indian Ocean. This detail is not necessary to understand the meeting or the discovery of the fish.
This determines if the sentence should be deleted or kept based on relevance.
3
Match the decision to delete the sentence with the correct rhetorical reason.
The sentence should be deleted because it interrupts the focus of the paragraph with irrelevant details about Goosen's navigation skills.
This allows us to select the option that has both the correct decision (Yes) and the correct logical justification.

Anahtar Kavram

Evaluating Relevance for Adding or Deleting Content
Tahmini Süre:1m 0s
Soru 207Soru

Originating in ancient Mesopotamia and later refined in India by the mathematician Brahmagupta, the concept of zero revolutionized mathematics by functioning as both a placeholder and a number in its own right. Prior to this innovation, mathematicians struggled to perform complex calculations without confusing notation. _Brahmagupta also wrote several influential treatises on astronomy, detailing the movements of the planets and the stars._ By defining zero’s mathematical properties—such as the rule that subtracting a number from itself yields zero—ancient scholars paved the way for modern algebra and calculus.

The writer is considering deleting the underlined sentence from the passage. Should the writer make this deletion?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Yes, because it introduces a detail about astronomy that is tangential to the paragraph’s focus on the mathematical significance and development of zero.

Cevap

The correct answer states that the sentence should be deleted because it introduces a detail about astronomy that is tangential to the paragraph’s focus on the mathematical significance and development of zero.
The correct answer is correct because the paragraph focuses on the mathematical significance and development of zero. The underlined sentence introduces Brahmagupta's unrelated work in astronomy, which diverges from this focus. Deleting it maintains paragraph unity.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the main focus of the paragraph.
The paragraph focus is the historical and mathematical development of the concept of zero.
Evaluating relevance requires knowing the core topic of the text.
2
Analyze the content and purpose of the underlined sentence.
The underlined sentence describes Brahmagupta's contributions to astronomy.
Determining if the sentence aligns with or diverges from the paragraph focus.
3
Evaluate whether the sentence should be kept or deleted, and select the correct justification.
The sentence should be deleted because astronomy is tangential to the mathematical focus of the paragraph.
Aligning the decision with the correct rhetorical reason.

Anahtar Kavram

Evaluating Relevance for Adding or Deleting Content
Tahmini Süre:1m 15s
Soru 208Soru

In the winter of 1903, Mary Anderson was riding a streetcar in New York City when she noticed the driver struggling to see through the falling sleet. To clear the windshield, the driver had to open the window, reach outside, and wipe the glass by hand, which let freezing air and wet snow into the vehicle. Upon returning home to Alabama, Anderson designed a swinging arm with a rubber blade that could be operated by a lever from inside the cab. Patented in 1903, her device became the first functional windshield wiper.

The writer wants to conclude the paragraph with a sentence that emphasizes the lasting impact of Anderson's invention. Which choice best accomplishes this goal?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Today, variations of Anderson's basic design are standard safety features on vehicles worldwide.

Cevap

Today, variations of Anderson's basic design are standard safety features on vehicles worldwide.
The correct answer effectively concludes the paragraph by linking the historical origin of the windshield wiper to its universal presence on modern vehicles. This successfully fulfills the goal of highlighting the lasting impact of the invention.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the writer's goal, which is to select a concluding sentence that highlights the long-term, lasting impact of Anderson's invention.
The correct sentence must connect the 1903 invention of the windshield wiper to its modern significance or legacy.
Understanding the specific rhetorical goal is necessary to evaluate the suitability of each option.
2
Examine the choices for grammatical correctness and relevance to the goal.
The option about Anderson's travels introduces new off-topic details. The option about driver appreciation has a comma splice. The option about streetcars uses an incorrect transition.
Eliminating distractors based on grammatical errors and relevance leaves only the logically correct response.
3
Verify that the remaining choice fits the context and fulfills the goal.
The sentence explaining that variations of Anderson's design are standard on vehicles today effectively shows the lasting impact of her invention.
The correct answer must satisfy the writing prompt while remaining grammatically correct.

Anahtar Kavram

Selecting Concluding Sentences and Transitions
Soru 209Soru

The Echo of the Wolf

[1] In 1995, after a seventy-year absence, gray wolves were reintroduced to Yellowstone National Park. The decision was highly controversial, sparking intense debates between conservationists and local ranchers. Ranchers feared that the predators would devastate livestock populations, while biologists argued that the absence of a keystone predator had severely damaged the park's ecosystem.

[2] In the decades following the wolves' return, biologists witnessed a phenomenon known as a trophic cascade. Without wolves to hunt them, the park's elk population had ballooned, overgrazing young willow, aspen, and cottonwood trees along stream banks. With wolves back on the landscape, elk behavior changed; they spent less time lingering in open valleys where they were vulnerable. Consequently, the vegetation began to recover.

[3] This resurgence of flora triggered a chain reaction. Rebounding trees stabilized riverbanks, reducing erosion and cooling the water, which benefited fish. Beavers returned to build dams, creating wetlands that supported insects, birds, and amphibians. The wolf reintroduction proved that the health of an ecosystem depends on the intricate connections among all its inhabitants.

Statement: Suppose the writer's goal had been to write an essay explaining how the reintroduction of a predator species can trigger a series of environmental changes that benefit other wildlife. This essay successfully achieves that goal.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: True

Cevap

True
The statement is true because the essay details the positive ecological consequences of the wolf reintroduction. It systematically traces the cause-and-effect pathway from the presence of the predator to changes in elk grazing habits, the subsequent recovery of streamside trees, and the ultimate benefits to other animal species such as fish, beavers, insects, birds, and amphibians.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the proposed writing goal in the statement.
The goal is to explain how reintroducing a predator triggers environmental changes that benefit other wildlife.
This establishes the criteria for evaluating the essay's success.
2
Check if the essay describes the reintroduction of a predator.
Yes, Paragraph 1 introduces the reintroduction of gray wolves, which are predators.
This confirms the starting point of the writer's goal is present.
3
Check if the essay details environmental changes resulting from this reintroduction.
Yes, Paragraph 2 details the trophic cascade, specifically the recovery of streamside vegetation due to changes in elk behavior.
This confirms the intermediate mechanism of environmental change is explained.
4
Check if the essay shows these changes benefit other wildlife.
Yes, Paragraph 3 describes how these changes benefited fish and led to the return of beavers, who created wetlands supporting insects, birds, and amphibians.
This confirms that the final requirement of the goal (benefiting other wildlife) is fulfilled.

Anahtar Kavram

Evaluating Whole-Essay Goals and Purpose
Soru 210Soru

A writer is editing a draft of a scientific essay about forest ecosystems.

[1] Beneath the forest floor, a complex network of fungal threads known as mycorrhizae connects the roots of individual trees, allowing them to share resources.
[2] Larger, older "hub trees" occupy central nodes in this network, distributing excess sugars to younger seedlings that would otherwise struggle to survive.
[3] Recent experiments show that trees can even use these fungal pathways to transmit warning signals about insect attacks to nearby vegetation.
[4] Fungi benefit from this relationship as well, absorbing carbon produced by the trees through photosynthesis.

The writer wants to add a sentence after Sentence 3 that provides specific, concrete details to support the claim that trees use the network to transmit warning signals. Which of the following sentences would best achieve this goal?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: For example, when a Douglas fir is attacked by budworms, it sends signals through the network that prompt neighboring pines to produce insect-repelling chemicals.

Cevap

The option stating that a Douglas fir attacked by budworms sends signals prompting neighboring pines to produce insect-repelling chemicals is correct.
The correct option provides highly specific, concrete details (Douglas fir, budworms, neighboring pines, insect-repelling chemicals) that directly support the claim in Sentence 3 about how trees transmit warning signals about insect attacks.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the prompt to identify the specific claim that needs support and the required type of detail.
The claim is that trees use the fungal network to transmit warning signals about insect attacks, and the writer requires specific, concrete details to support this.
Understanding the precise goal prevents choosing options that support the wrong claim or lack sufficient detail.
2
Evaluate each option to see if it directly supports the warning signals claim and provides specific, concrete detail without grammatical errors.
The option about the Douglas fir and budworms provides specific details. The option about hub tree size does not support the signals claim. The option about general sharing is too vague. The option starting with 'Upon receiving' has a dangling modifier.
This filters out options that are off-topic, grammatically incorrect, or too general.
3
Confirm that the chosen option is grammatically correct and directly answers the question.
The sentence about the Douglas fir is grammatically sound, specific, and supports the warning signals claim.
Verifying grammar and rhetorical alignment ensures the final selection is completely correct.

Anahtar Kavram

Supporting Claims with Evidence and Details
Soru 211Soru

Tatiana Proskouriakoff, an illustrator-turned-archaeologist, revolutionized the field of Mayan decipherment in the mid-twentieth century. For decades, prevailing scholarly consensus held that Mayan hieroglyphs represented exclusively astronomical calculations and abstract religious concepts, completely detached from historical events. However, while analyzing carved stone monuments called stelae at the ancient city of Piedras Negras, Proskouriakoff identified recurring patterns of dates that corresponded to the average lifespans of human beings. She hypothesized that these monuments did not depict nameless gods, but rather documented the actual biographies of Mayan rulers.

The writer wants to conclude the passage by emphasizing how Proskouriakoff’s discovery permanently transformed the understanding of Mayan history. Which choice best accomplishes this goal?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Ultimately, her realization changed Mayan history from a blank slate into a written narrative, bridging the gap between prehistoric myth and documented history.

Cevap

Ultimately, her realization changed Mayan history from a blank slate into a written narrative, bridging the gap between prehistoric myth and documented history.
The correct option effectively wraps up the discussion of Mayan decipherment by summarizing how Proskouriakoff’s work transformed the understanding of Mayan history from a blank slate to a documented narrative. It maintains a logical flow and is grammatically correct.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the prompt's specific rhetorical goal, which is to find a concluding sentence that emphasizes how Proskouriakoff's discovery permanently transformed the understanding of Mayan history.
Identify that the correct sentence must connect her decipherment breakthrough directly to a fundamental change in how Mayan history is recorded or understood, without introducing new, unrelated topics.
The prompt explicitly directs the reader to focus on the long-term impact on the understanding of Mayan history.
2
Evaluate the choices for grammatical correctness and logical transitions.
Identify that the option containing 'Therefore, her work proved... it allowed...' is a comma splice, and the option containing 'In contrast, her breakthrough will inspire...' contains both an inappropriate transition and an unnecessary tense shift.
ACT English questions test grammatical conventions alongside rhetorical goals; incorrect grammar or punctuation automatically disqualifies an option.
3
Assess the remaining options for focus and relevance.
Recognize that the option discussing 'watercolor reconstructions' introduces new, unsupported details that distract from the main topic of historical text decipherment, whereas the option starting with 'Ultimately, her realization' accurately summarizes the historical transformation.
An effective conclusion must stay on topic and tie back to the passage's main thesis rather than bringing in new details.

Anahtar Kavram

Selecting Concluding Sentences and Transitions
Tahmini Süre:1m 30s
Soru 212Soru

The following passage is an essay about Sequoyah and the development of the Cherokee writing system.

[1]
In the early nineteenth century, Sequoyah, a Cherokee silversmith who spoke no English, became convinced that the security and independence of his people depended on their mastering the "talking leaves"—the written language used by white settlers. While many of his contemporaries regarded these texts with skepticism or awe, viewing literacy as either a threat or a form of magic, Sequoyah recognized it as a practical tool of self-determination. He set out to create a written form of Cherokee, believing it would allow his nation to navigate the pressures of colonial expansion without losing their cultural identity.

[2]
His initial efforts were met with ridicule. Sequoyah spent years attempting to design a logographic system, creating a distinct character for every individual word. This approach proved unsustainable; the sheer volume of symbols was impossible for a reader to memorize. Recognizing the limits of this methodology, he began listening to spoken Cherokee with a new ear, isolating the recurring sound units that formed words. He identified eighty-five distinct syllables, pairing each with a character—some borrowed from English spelling books and Greek texts, though modified to represent entirely unrelated Cherokee sounds.

[3]
The resulting syllabary, completed in 1821, transformed Cherokee society almost overnight. Because the system was based on phonetics rather than complex spelling rules, Cherokee speakers could learn to read and write in a matter of days. The Cherokee National Council adopted the system, and soon, a bilingual newspaper, the *Cherokee Phoenix*, was circulating throughout the nation. Through the power of their new written language, the Cherokee drafted a constitution, codified their legal system, and recorded history on their own terms, establishing a literate infrastructure that served as a powerful defense against forced assimilation.

Suppose the writer's goal had been to write an essay demonstrating how the creation of a written language was essential to the legal recognition of Native American land rights by colonial governments. Would this essay accomplish this goal?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: No, because the essay focuses on how the syllabary promoted internal literacy and cultural autonomy rather than documenting its impact on land negotiations or colonial legal recognition.

Cevap

No, because the essay focuses on how the syllabary promoted internal literacy and cultural autonomy rather than documenting its impact on land negotiations or colonial legal recognition.
The correct answer is correct because the proposed goal requires the essay to demonstrate how written language was essential to securing legal recognition of land rights from colonial governments. While the essay notes that the Cherokee drafted a constitution and codified laws, it does not mention land negotiations or legal recognition by outside powers. Thus, the essay fails to meet the goal because its focus remains on internal literacy and cultural autonomy.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the proposed writing goal stated in the question stem.
The goal is to demonstrate how the creation of a written language was essential to the legal recognition of Native American land rights by colonial governments.
Understanding the precise parameters of the proposed goal is necessary to evaluate the entire passage against it.
2
Analyze the passage to determine its actual main themes and details.
The passage details Sequoyah's historical journey, the linguistic transition from a word-based system to an 85-character syllabary, the rise of literacy, and internal developments like drafting a constitution, codifying laws, and publishing a newspaper.
This establishes what content is actually present in the text to compare it with the proposed goal.
3
Evaluate whether the actual content meets the proposed goal and identify the reason.
The essay does not contain information about external legal battles, land negotiations, or recognition of territory by colonial governments. It focuses on internal Cherokee literacy, governance, and cultural resilience. Therefore, the goal is not met.
This determines that the correct response must start with 'No' and explains the mismatch between the essay's actual scope and the proposed goal.

Anahtar Kavram

Evaluating Whole-Essay Goals and Purpose
Soru 213Soru

In 1957, engineers Alfred Fielding and Marc Chavannes sealed two plastic shower curtains together, creating a sheet of trapped air bubbles. They initially attempted to market this textured material as a fashionable wallpaper, but the product did not sell. Next, they pitched it as insulation for greenhouses, which also proved unsuccessful. [1] Greenhouses are typically constructed of glass or plastic to allow sunlight to heat the plants inside. Finally, in 1960, IBM began using the material—now trademarked as Bubble Wrap—to protect its new computers during shipping, establishing its success as packaging material.

The writer is considering deleting Sentence 1 from the passage. Should this sentence be deleted?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Yes, because it provides an unnecessary definition of a greenhouse that is irrelevant to the paragraph's focus on the development and marketing of Bubble Wrap.

Cevap

Yes, because it provides an unnecessary definition of a greenhouse that is irrelevant to the paragraph's focus on the development and marketing of Bubble Wrap.
The correct option correctly states that Sentence 1 should be deleted because it introduces an unnecessary definition of a greenhouse that is irrelevant to the paragraph's focus on the development and marketing of Bubble Wrap. The passage details the history of Bubble Wrap, and a general definition of what a greenhouse is does not support this narrative.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the main focus of the paragraph.
The paragraph describes the history of Bubble Wrap, specifically how it was invented and the different ways it was marketed before finding success as a packaging material.
To determine if Sentence 1 is relevant, we must first understand the primary topic of the surrounding text.
2
Evaluate the function of Sentence 1 in the context of the paragraph.
Sentence 1 provides a general definition of a greenhouse. It does not add any information about the history, development, or marketing of Bubble Wrap.
This helps us decide whether the sentence supports the main topic or functions as a distraction.
3
Determine whether the sentence should be kept or deleted, and select the option with the correct reasoning.
The sentence should be deleted because it is irrelevant. The option stating that it provides an unnecessary definition of a greenhouse that is irrelevant to the paragraph's focus correctly identifies this rationale.
This matches both the decision (Yes, it should be deleted) and the rhetorical justification.

Anahtar Kavram

Evaluating Relevance for Adding or Deleting Content
Soru 214Soru

The following passage is an essay about Maya decipherment.

[1]
For centuries, the intricate carvings on Maya stelae—large stone slabs erected in ancient Mesoamerican cities—were regarded as purely mystical and astronomical symbols. Early scholars believed the Maya were a peaceful people preoccupied almost exclusively with time, calendar calculations, and the stars. The glyphs, they argued, did not record actual human history or the details of earthly rulers. This view dominated the field of Maya archaeology, leaving the historical realities of this civilization obscured.

[2]
Tatiana Proskouriakoff, a Russian-born American architect, would single-handedly overturn this paradigm. In the 1930s, Proskouriakoff was hired as an illustrator for archaeological excavations at Piedras Negras in Guatemala. Possessing an artist's eye and an architect's spatial precision, she produced vivid, historically accurate reconstructions of ancient Maya cities. Her drawings brought the ruins to life, but it was her close, systematic observation of the monuments themselves that led to her most profound breakthrough.

[3]
Analyzing a series of stelae at Piedras Negras, Proskouriakoff noticed a curious pattern. The stelae were erected in distinct chronological clusters, and each group spanned a timeframe no longer than a typical human lifespan—about sixty years. Moreover, the first stela in each group always depicted a figure seated in a niche, accompanied by a specific glyph indicating accession. Proskouriakoff hypothesized that this scene represented the inauguration of a new ruler, and that the accompanying dates marked significant events in that ruler's life. By mapping these patterns, she demonstrated that the glyphs recorded the births, accessions, and military victories of historical individuals. The stelae were not celestial almanacs; they were royal biographies.

Suppose the writer's goal had been to write an essay explaining how a major archaeological paradigm was overturned by a researcher's close observation of historical monuments. Would this essay accomplish that goal?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Yes, because it describes how Proskouriakoff's close observation of chronological patterns on Maya monuments led to the realization that the glyphs recorded historical events.

Cevap

The essay would accomplish the goal because it describes how Proskouriakoff's close observation of chronological patterns on Maya monuments led to the realization that the glyphs recorded historical events.
The essay successfully accomplishes the goal because it describes the shift from the old belief (that Maya glyphs were purely astronomical and mystical) to the new paradigm established by Tatiana Proskouriakoff's close, chronological analysis of Piedras Negras stelae, proving they recorded historical events such as births, accessions, and military victories.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the hypothetical writing goal presented in the prompt.
The goal is to explain how a major archaeological paradigm was overturned by a researcher's close observation of historical monuments.
Understanding the target goal allows comparison against the actual content of the passage.
2
Evaluate the passage content against the hypothetical goal.
The passage details the transition from the old paradigm (that Maya glyphs were purely astronomical) to the new paradigm (that glyphs recorded historical biography) via Proskouriakoff's careful chronological mapping of the stelae.
This confirms that the essay's narrative aligns with the stated goal.
3
Determine if the essay accomplished the goal (Yes or No) and select the correct supporting reason.
The answer is 'Yes' because the essay details Proskouriakoff's systematic observation of the stelae chronological clusters and the resulting paradigm shift.
Evaluating both the direction (Yes/No) and the reasoning eliminates distractors that offer incorrect facts or mismatched focus.

Anahtar Kavram

Evaluating Whole-Essay Goals and Purpose
Soru 215Soru

In the early eighteenth century, navigating the open seas remained a perilous endeavor. While sailors could easily determine their latitude by measuring the angle of the sun or stars relative to the horizon, determining longitude was an unresolved challenge. Without an accurate way to calculate east-west position, ships frequently drifted off course, leading to disastrous shipwrecks. The British Parliament, desperate for a solution, passed the Longitude Act of 17141714, offering a massive cash prize to anyone who could develop a method to determine longitude within half a degree. Most prominent scientists of the era believed the answer lay in the stars, advocating for complex astronomical calculations that required clear night skies. [1]

John Harrison, a self-taught English clockmaker, rejected this celestial approach. Instead, he proposed a mechanical solution: a highly precise clock called a marine chronometer that could keep accurate time at sea despite the motion of the ship and changes in temperature.

Which choice, placed at [1], best concludes the first paragraph and transitions to the second paragraph?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: This celestial bias, however, did not prevent other innovators from seeking ground-based solutions.

Cevap

The correct option is the sentence stating that the celestial bias did not prevent other innovators from seeking ground-based solutions.
The correct choice successfully sums up the first paragraph's focus on the astronomical approach ('celestial bias') while setting up the contrast ('however') and introducing the alternative ('ground-based solutions') that leads directly to John Harrison's clock in the following paragraph. It is grammatically correct and maintains the established past-tense narrative.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the role of the target sentence.
The target sentence must conclude the first paragraph (focusing on the astronomical bias for solving the longitude problem) and transition to the second paragraph (focusing on John Harrison, a clockmaker who proposed a mechanical solution).
Concluding sentences must tie back to the main thesis without introducing unsupported details, while transition sentences must bridge adjacent paragraphs.
2
Evaluate the transition logic of the correct option.
The phrase 'This celestial bias' sums up the astronomical focus of the first paragraph, and 'seeking ground-based solutions' directly introduces Harrison's clockmaking method in the second paragraph.
This establishes a clear, logical, and coherent transition between the two distinct approaches to solving longitude.
3
Identify grammatical errors in the distractors.
One option contains a comma splice; another contains an incorrect shift to the future tense; the third introduces irrelevant historical details.
ACT English tests both rhetorical skills (transitions) and grammatical conventions simultaneously.

Anahtar Kavram

Selecting Concluding Sentences and Transitions
Soru 216Soru

[1] For decades, scholars believed that Mayan hieroglyphs recorded only astronomical data and calendar dates, reflecting a peaceful society obsessed with time. [2] In the 1950s, however, art historian Tatiana Proskouriakoff began analyzing stelae—carved stone slabs—at the ancient city of Piedras Negras. [3] She noticed that the dates on a series of stelae fell within the span of a normal human lifetime. [4] Proskouriakoff hypothesized that the glyphs actually recorded the historical lives of Mayan rulers, including their births, accessions to the throne, and military victories. [5] Mayan architecture also featured steep limestone pyramids that served as temples and tombs. [6] Her breakthrough revolutionized Mayan studies, shifting the academic consensus from viewing the Maya as abstract mystics to recognizing them as historical record-keepers.

The writer is considering deleting Sentence 5 from the paragraph. Should the sentence be kept or deleted?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Deleted, because it deviates from the paragraph’s focus on the shift in scholarly understanding of Mayan hieroglyphs.

Cevap

Deleted, because it deviates from the paragraph’s focus on the shift in scholarly understanding of Mayan hieroglyphs.
The correct answer is the option stating that the sentence should be deleted because it deviates from the paragraph’s focus on the shift in scholarly understanding of Mayan hieroglyphs. The paragraph outlines a specific shift in historical scholarship—moving from the belief that Mayan glyphs were purely astronomical to understanding them as records of historical lives. Mentioning pyramids and temples introduces a tangential topic about architecture, which disrupts the development of this single, coherent idea.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the primary topic and focus of the paragraph.
The paragraph focuses on how scholars traditionally viewed Mayan hieroglyphs and how Tatiana Proskouriakoff's discovery changed that view by demonstrating that glyphs recorded historical human lives.
Understanding the paragraph's primary focus is essential for determining whether a sentence is relevant or tangential.
2
Analyze Sentence 5 to determine its content and purpose.
Sentence 5 provides information about Mayan architecture, specifically the steep limestone pyramids that served as temples and tombs.
This step evaluates how the content of the target sentence aligns with the primary focus identified in Step 1.
3
Evaluate the relevance of Sentence 5 to the paragraph as a whole.
Although the sentence is about the Maya, its focus on architecture and temples is tangential to the paragraph's narrow focus on hieroglyphic translation and the historical records of Mayan rulers. Therefore, the sentence should be deleted.
Determining that the sentence is irrelevant leads to the decision to delete it.
4
Select the option that provides the correct decision and logical justification.
The correct option states that the sentence should be deleted because it deviates from the paragraph's focus on the shift in scholarly understanding of Mayan hieroglyphs.
This matches the logical analysis and provides the only correct combination of decision and reason.

Anahtar Kavram

Evaluating Relevance for Adding or Deleting Content
Soru 217Soru

Passage Excerpt:

In the heart of the city, volunteers transformed a vacant lot into a vibrant community garden. This year, the garden produced [blank].

Which choice most directly emphasizes the diversity of the crops grown in the garden?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: a wide variety of vegetables, herbs, and fruits

Cevap

a wide variety of vegetables, herbs, and fruits
The phrase 'a wide variety of vegetables, herbs, and fruits' is correct because it explicitly describes multiple distinct types of produce (vegetables, herbs, and fruits) and states there is a 'wide variety,' directly fulfilling the rhetorical goal of emphasizing crop diversity.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the specific rhetorical goal requested in the prompt.
The prompt asks for a choice that emphasizes the diversity of the crops grown.
Understanding the precise criteria is necessary to evaluate which option fits best.
2
Evaluate the choices to eliminate grammatically incorrect options.
The option mentioning 'healthy produce, it was grown organically' is eliminated because it contains a comma splice.
ACT English questions require the correct option to be grammatically correct.
3
Evaluate the remaining choices against the specific rhetorical goal.
The option 'a wide variety of vegetables, herbs, and fruits' directly emphasizes crop diversity, unlike the choices focusing on quantity ('an abundance of tomatoes') or harvest frequency ('fresh vegetables, which were harvested daily').
Only one grammatically correct option satisfies the specific goal of showing diversity.

Anahtar Kavram

Meeting Specific Rhetorical Goals
Soru 218Soru

Paragraph 1

Completed in 2012, the Tokyo Skytree stands as one of the tallest structures in the world, rising 634 meters above a city prone to frequent earthquakes. To prevent the tower from collapsing during seismic activity, engineers turned to traditional Japanese architecture for inspiration. Specifically, they analyzed the design of ancient five-story pagodas, which have withstood centuries of tremors. Pagodas feature a central pillar, known as a *shinbashira*, that is structurally independent of the surrounding stories. During an earthquake, the pillar and the outer frame sway out of phase with one another, effectively canceling out much of the seismic energy.

Paragraph 2

The Skytree incorporates a modern version of this system: a massive central concrete column that is connected to the outer steel truss only by fluid dampers. When seismic waves strike, the outer frame sways while the central column resists the motion, absorbing the energy through the dampers. Under extreme conditions, this system can reduce the overall movement of the tower by up to 50 percent. ___________

The writer wants to conclude the passage by emphasizing how the combination of ancient design and modern technology ensures the safety of the Skytree. Which choice best accomplishes this goal?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: By adapting the timeless mechanics of the pagoda's central pillar to contemporary construction, this design ensures that the Skytree remains safe during major earthquakes.

Cevap

The option that begins with 'By adapting the timeless mechanics...' is the correct choice because it logically connects ancient pagoda principles with contemporary engineering to explain how the Skytree is kept safe.
The correct option successfully fulfills the writer's goal of demonstrating how ancient design (the pagoda's central pillar) combined with modern technology (contemporary construction) ensures the Skytree's safety (remains safe during major earthquakes). It is also grammatically correct.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the prompt's rhetorical goal.
The final sentence must emphasize the combination of ancient design, modern technology, and the resulting safety of the Skytree.
Understanding the specific parameters of the concluding sentence helps eliminate choices that introduce irrelevant details or omit necessary components.
2
Evaluate the grammar of each option.
Three options contain grammatical errors: a comma splice, an illogical tense shift, and misplaced commas around a restrictive relative clause.
ACT English questions require sentences to be both rhetorically effective and grammatically correct.
3
Compare the remaining grammatically correct option against the rhetorical goal.
The sentence combining the 'timeless mechanics of the pagoda' with 'contemporary construction' to ensure the Skytree 'remains safe' satisfies all criteria.
This confirms the correct option logically wraps up the passage's themes while maintaining grammatical precision.

Anahtar Kavram

Selecting concluding sentences that synthesize a passage's main themes while maintaining proper grammar.
Soru 219Soru

Marie Tharp's career in cartography began at a time when women were barred from conducting research aboard vessels. Staying behind at Columbia University, Tharp transformed raw sonar data collected by her colleague Bruce Heezen into detailed three-dimensional drawings of the ocean floor. By meticulously plotting these depth measurements, she discovered a massive V-shaped rift valley running down the center of the Mid-Atlantic Ridge. While Heezen initially dismissed her findings as "girl talk" that supported the then-controversial theory of continental drift, Tharp persisted, eventually convincing him that the valley was real.

The writer wants to add a sentence at the end of the passage to conclude the paragraph by summarizing the significance of Tharp's discovery. Which choice best accomplishes this goal?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: This detailed map provided the visual evidence needed to validate seafloor spreading, which ultimately established the foundation for the modern theory of plate tectonics.

Cevap

The choice that explains how Tharp's map provided the visual evidence needed to validate seafloor spreading and establish the foundation for plate tectonics.
The correct option successfully summarizes the significance of Tharp's work (the map) by connecting her discovery of the rift valley directly to the validation of seafloor spreading and plate tectonics, which were the central subjects of the passage. It remains grammatically correct and flows logically from the preceding sentence.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the primary topic and thesis of the paragraph.
The paragraph focuses on Marie Tharp's mapping work, specifically her discovery of the Mid-Atlantic Ridge's rift valley, and how it supported the controversial theory of continental drift.
An effective concluding sentence must tie directly back to the main thesis of the passage without introducing unsupported or peripheral details.
2
Evaluate the transitions and logical flow of the options.
The option starting with 'In spite of this' incorrectly uses a contrasting transition immediately after Tharp succeeds in convincing her colleague. The option starting with 'Consequently' uses a cause-and-effect transition but leads into an unrelated clause about awards. The option starting with 'This detailed map' logically continues the narrative flow by explaining the impact of the map.
Concluding sentences must transition logically from the preceding sentence.
3
Check the remaining options for grammatical errors and thematic relevance.
The option starting with 'Consequently' is a comma splice, joining two independent clauses with only a comma. The option starting with 'Furthermore' contains an inconsistent present-tense shift ('ensures') and shifts the paragraph's focus to general academic sexism. The option starting with 'This detailed map' is grammatically correct and directly summarizes the scientific significance of her work.
The correct choice must be grammatically correct and keep the focus on the main topic.

Anahtar Kavram

Selecting Concluding Sentences
Soru 220Soru

The following is an essay about a late-nineteenth-century invention:

[1]
In the late nineteenth century, the introduction of the safety bicycle revolutionized personal mobility. Unlike its predecessor, the "ordinary" or "penny-farthing"—which featured a massive front wheel, lacked brakes, and posed a constant threat of header crashes—the safety bicycle boasted two equal-sized wheels, a chain drive, and pneumatic tires. Cycling was no longer a dangerous stunt reserved for athletic young men; it became an accessible, comfortable activity for the general public.

[2]
Perhaps no group was more profoundly affected by this technological shift than women. For decades, societal norms restricted women's independence, confining their travel largely to distances they could walk or journeys chaperoned in carriages. The safety bicycle provided an unprecedented means of self-locomotion. Susan B. Anthony famously remarked that bicycling had "done more to emancipate women than anything else in the world," giving them a feeling of freedom and self-reliance.

[3]
The bicycle also drove significant changes in women's fashion. To ride comfortably, women abandoned heavy, restrictive Victorian corsets and voluminous skirts in favor of "rational dress," which included bloomers and shorter skirts. Although conservative critics decried these changes as scandalous, the practicality of the bicycle triumphed. In this way, the safety bicycle did not merely change how people traveled; it reshaped the social fabric of the era.

Suppose the writer’s goal had been to write an essay that traces the mechanical evolution of the bicycle from its earliest prototypes to modern designs. Would this essay accomplish that goal?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: No, because the essay focuses primarily on the social and cultural effects of the safety bicycle, particularly regarding women’s independence and clothing.

Cevap

No, because the essay focuses primarily on the social and cultural effects of the safety bicycle, particularly regarding women’s independence and clothing.
The essay does not accomplish the proposed goal. While the first paragraph touches on the mechanical differences between the penny-farthing and the safety bicycle, the majority of the essay is dedicated to explaining how the safety bicycle impacted women's social independence and fashion choices. Therefore, the correct choice is the option stating that the essay does not accomplish the goal because it focuses primarily on these social and cultural effects.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the proposed writing goal in the prompt.
The goal is to trace the mechanical evolution of the bicycle from earliest prototypes to modern designs.
Understanding the goal is necessary to evaluate the essay against it.
2
Analyze the main focus and contents of the provided essay.
The essay discusses the safety bicycle's introduction, its impact on women's independence, and the resulting changes in women's fashion.
Evaluating the actual content of the essay reveals whether the goal was met.
3
Compare the proposed goal with the actual content of the essay.
The essay does not trace mechanical evolution to modern designs; it focuses on social and cultural effects. Thus, the essay does not fulfill the goal.
Making this comparison allows for selecting the correct 'No' option with the accurate explanation.

Anahtar Kavram

Evaluating Whole-Essay Goals and Purpose
Tahmini Süre:1m 30s
ÖncekiSayfa 11 / 18Sonraki