A print article discusses a municipal initiative in San José, Costa Rica, to modernize public transit by expanding electric bus routes, highlighting cost efficiency and rider convenience. Meanwhile, an audio interview features an urban environmentalist who acknowledges the benefits of electric buses but argues that municipal authorities should prioritize building dedicated pedestrian walkways and protected bike paths to truly lower emissions and improve quality of life.
Based on these two sources, which of the following best describes the difference in perspective between the print article and the audio interview?
- AThe print article prioritizes non-motorized infrastructure like bicycle lanes, whereas the audio interview focuses primarily on the financial benefits of electric bus routes.
- The print article emphasizes the expansion of electric public transit fleets, whereas the audio interview advocates for broader urban mobility investments including pedestrian and cycling paths.Cevap
- CThe print article rejects government intervention in public transportation, whereas the audio interview demands complete state control over all transit initiatives.
- DBoth sources agree that electric buses are entirely ineffective and argue that all transit funding should be redirected exclusively to highway expansion.
Cevap
The print article emphasizes the expansion of electric public transit fleets, whereas the audio interview advocates for broader urban mobility investments including pedestrian and cycling paths.
The correct response accurately reflects the difference in focus: the print source centers on expanding motorized electric transit, whereas the audio source emphasizes active transportation infrastructure like walkways and bike lanes.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
Comparing and Contrasting Perspectives Across Print and Audio Sources
Tahmini Süre:50s