Examkin

Soru

Zorluk: ZorOttoman-Safavid Conflict and the Sunni-Shi'a Split

"The Persian people are of the sect of Ali, which is followed by all the subjects of the Shah, while the Grand Turk [the Ottoman Sultan] is of the sect of Omar. This difference of religion is the primary cause of the perpetual hatred and war between these two great empires. The Shah is revered by his people not only as a temporal king but as a holy leader, and they believe that he is a direct descendant of the Prophet's son-in-law. Because of this devotion, his soldiers go into battle with immense zeal, though they often lack the heavy artillery and firearms that their western neighbors possess in abundance."

— Vincenzo d'Alessandri, Venetian envoy to Persia, report to the Venetian Senate, 1571

Based on the passage, the sectarian division between the Ottoman and Safavid empires was most directly used by both states to achieve which of the following goals?

  1. A
    Establish direct military and economic control over maritime trade networks in the Indian Ocean
  2. B
    Re-establish the unified political and spiritual authority of the early Abbasid Caliphate
  3. Legitimize the ruler's political authority and foster state centralizationCevap
  4. D
    Justify the creation of military recruitment systems based on the conscription of Christian youth

Cevap

The correct answer explains that early modern land-based empires used sectarian differences and religious devotion to legitimize the ruler's political authority and foster state centralization.
The correct answer is correct because early modern land-based empires (such as the Safavids and Ottomans) actively promoted religious orthodoxies and sectarian differences to establish a uniform identity, justify warfare against rivals, and legitimize the ruler's divine or political authority.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the historical context and the argument presented in the primary source.
The Venetian observer describes how the Safavid Shah uses Twelver Shi'ism ('sect of Ali') and claims of sacred lineage to inspire absolute devotion among his subjects and soldiers, contrasting them with the Sunni Ottomans ('sect of Omar').
Understanding the connection between religious doctrine, royal legitimacy, and state-building is crucial for evaluating the options.
2
Connect the stimulus to broader political developments in the period 1450 to 1750.
During this era, gunpowder empires consolidated their power by adopting state religions (like Safavid Shi'ism or Ottoman Sunni Islam) to establish uniform laws, bureaucratic loyalty, and central control.
AP World History assessments require linking specific text references to global historical processes like state centralization.
3
Evaluate the choices to identify the correct political motivation.
The option highlighting political legitimacy and state centralization is the only choice that fits the historical reality of imperial consolidation during this period.
This step rules out incorrect claims regarding Indian Ocean geography, caliphate restoration, and the Devshirme system.

Anahtar Kavram

Ottoman-Safavid Conflict and Sunni-Shi'a Split
Bu soruyu puanla

Konular

Ottoman-Safavid Conflict and the Sunni-Shi'a Split

Bu konudan daha fazla soru