“For us, agriculture is not just an industry to be measured by market efficiency or tariff rates. It is the foundation of our culture, our community, and our food sovereignty. The World Trade Organization (WTO) forces open our markets to multinational agribusinesses, flooding our country with cheap, subsidized foreign imports that destroy the livelihoods of smallholder peasants. We demand that agriculture be excluded from WTO trade liberalization agreements.”
— Korean Peasants League, declaration issued during protests against the World Trade Organization, early 2000s
The arguments of the Korean Peasants League in the passage are best understood as a response to which of the following global economic developments?
- AA general shift toward mercantilist economic policies that restricted trade to accumulate precious metals.
- The spread of neoliberal economic policies that promoted free-trade agreements and international deregulation.Cevap
- CThe complete homogenization of global culture and the absolute elimination of local agricultural traditions.
- DThe re-establishment of direct colonial administration and territorial annexation by Western imperial powers.
Cevap
The spread of neoliberal economic policies that promoted free-trade agreements and international deregulation.
The correct answer is correct because the declaration by the Korean Peasants League directly opposes the rules of the World Trade Organization (WTO) and the opening of domestic markets to multinational agribusinesses. These policies are central tenets of neoliberalism, which promoted free trade, reduced tariffs, and economic deregulation globally after 1900. Protests by agricultural and labor groups, particularly in developing and industrializing nations, represented a major form of economic and cultural resistance to these globalizing forces.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
Economic resistance to globalization and neoliberalism after 1900