A genomic research company runs a continuous, 24/7 data-ingestion pipeline on Amazon EC2 instances with a highly predictable baseline load. The company also runs containerized data analysis workloads on Amazon ECS using AWS Fargate that can tolerate interruptions and can be restarted from checkpoints. Finally, they maintain a persistent Multi-AZ Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL database instance. The company wants to implement a purchasing strategy to maximize cost savings across these workloads. Which combination of purchasing options meets these requirements most cost-effectively?
- APurchase a Compute Savings Plan to cover the EC2 instances, the Fargate tasks, and the RDS database.
- BPurchase a Compute Savings Plan to cover the EC2 instances and the RDS database, and run the Fargate tasks on Fargate Spot.
- Purchase a Compute Savings Plan for the EC2 instances, run the ECS tasks on Fargate Spot, and purchase an Amazon RDS Reserved DB Instance.Cevap
- DUse EC2 Spot Instances for the data-ingestion pipeline, run the ECS tasks on Fargate Spot, and purchase a Compute Savings Plan for the RDS database.
Cevap
Purchase a Compute Savings Plan for the EC2 instances, run the ECS tasks on Fargate Spot, and purchase an Amazon RDS Reserved DB Instance.
The correct option properly matches the workloads to their respective optimized purchasing models: the continuous EC2 instances are covered by a Compute Savings Plan, the interruptible ECS Fargate tasks run on Fargate Spot, and the persistent Amazon RDS database is covered by an RDS Reserved DB Instance.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
Selecting cost-optimized compute purchasing strategies based on workload predictability and service-specific savings plan boundaries.
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s