A healthcare provider stores two types of files in an Amazon S3 bucket for patient consultations: session audio recordings (average size ) and session text transcripts (average size ). The audio recordings are accessed frequently for the first , after which they are rarely accessed, but must be retained for a total of before deletion. The text transcripts are accessed frequently for the first , after which they are rarely accessed, but must be deleted after a total of . Which lifecycle configuration is the most cost-effective for this data?
- Transition the audio recordings to S3 Standard-Infrequent Access (S3 Standard-IA) after and delete them after . Keep the text transcripts in S3 Standard and delete them after .Cevap
- BTransition both the audio recordings and the text transcripts to S3 Standard-IA after , and delete all files after .
- CTransition the audio recordings to S3 Standard-IA after and the text transcripts to S3 Standard-IA after , deleting the audio recordings after and the text transcripts after .
- DTransition both the audio recordings and the text transcripts to S3 Intelligent-Tiering immediately, and delete them after and respectively.
Cevap
Transition the audio recordings to S3 Standard-IA after and delete them after . Keep the text transcripts in S3 Standard and delete them after .
The correct strategy transitions the audio recordings to S3 Standard-IA after and deletes them after . Since exceeds the minimum object size and the in S3 Standard-IA matches the minimum storage duration, no penalties are incurred. The text transcripts are kept in S3 Standard because their small size () and short post-frequent lifespan () would trigger both the minimum size charge and the minimum storage duration penalty if transitioned to S3 Standard-IA.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
Cost-effective Amazon S3 lifecycle transitions require analyzing object size thresholds and minimum storage duration limits.