A media company hosts a video rendering application on Amazon EC2 instances inside a private subnet of a VPC. Every month, the application transfers of rendered video files from the VPC to an on-premises storage repository. Currently, this transfer occurs over a AWS Site-to-Site VPN connection. The company wants to reduce the high data transfer out (DTO) charges associated with this replication. Which solution will minimize the monthly data transfer costs most effectively?
- ADeploy an AWS NAT Gateway in a public subnet of the VPC and route all replication traffic through it to the existing Site-to-Site VPN.
- BConfigure an AWS Transit Gateway and establish multiple Site-to-Site VPN connections using Equal-Cost Multi-Path (ECMP) routing to load balance the replication traffic.
- Establish an AWS Direct Connect connection and configure a Private Virtual Interface (VIF) to route the replication traffic directly to the on-premises network.Cevap
- DSet up a public virtual interface (VIF) on an AWS Direct Connect connection and route the replication traffic through a NAT Gateway deployed in the VPC.
Cevap
Establish an AWS Direct Connect connection and configure a Private Virtual Interface (VIF) to route the replication traffic directly to the on-premises network.
Establishing an AWS Direct Connect connection with a Private VIF is the most cost-effective solution. AWS Direct Connect significantly reduces the per-GB data transfer out (DTO) fee compared to standard internet-based egress (which VPN uses). A Private VIF allows private and direct connectivity from the VPC to the on-premises network without traversing the public internet or incurring additional intermediary data processing fees.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
AWS Direct Connect Private VIF provides the most cost-effective data transfer out (DTO) rates for replicating data from a VPC to on-premises environments, avoiding both high internet egress fees and additional NAT processing charges.
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s