A media company runs a transcoding application that generates output files of approximately MB each. These files are accessed frequently by downstream users for exactly days, after which they are deleted. The company wants to minimize its storage costs on Amazon S3. Which storage strategy is the most cost-effective for these output files?
- AKeep the files in Amazon S3 Standard and route all internal transcoding traffic to the S3 bucket through a NAT Gateway to optimize retrieval costs.
- BTransition the files to Amazon S3 Standard-Infrequent Access (Standard-IA) after day, and delete them at day .
- Keep the files in Amazon S3 Standard for the entire days, and then delete them using an S3 Lifecycle expiration rule.Cevap
- DTransition the files to Amazon S3 Glacier Flexible Retrieval immediately, and configure expedited retrievals for the -day active window.
Cevap
Keep the files in Amazon S3 Standard for the entire days, and then delete them using an S3 Lifecycle expiration rule.
Keeping the files in Amazon S3 Standard for the entire duration and deleting them via lifecycle policies is the most cost-effective option. Amazon S3 Standard does not charge retrieval fees and has no minimum storage duration. Since the files are deleted after days, any transition to S3 Standard-IA or Glacier classes would trigger minimum storage charges ( days for Standard-IA, days for Glacier), resulting in higher costs.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
Amazon S3 Storage Classes and Minimum Storage Durations
Tahmini Süre:50s