A network operations engineer is migrating a dual-core distribution block from VRRPv2 to HSRPv2. During the migration on Switch-1 (interface VLAN 50, IPv4 address 10.50.1.1/24), the engineer attempts to assign 10.50.1.1 as the HSRP virtual IP address using the command `standby 50 ip 10.50.1.1`. The IOS XE CLI immediately returns an error and rejects the configuration. Which statement correctly explains the protocol design difference causing this failure?
- HSRP requires the virtual IP address to be an unassigned IP address within the subnet, whereas VRRP allows a router interface physical IP address to serve as the virtual IP address.Cevap
- BHSRP allows assigning a physical interface IP address as the virtual IP only if the standby priority is configured to 255 prior to issuing the virtual IP command.
- CHSRPv2 requires the virtual IP address to reside in a separate, non-overlapping IPv4 subnet from the primary interface IP address assigned to the SVI.
- DThe router rejects the command because preemption must be explicitly disabled on the SVI before matching the virtual IP address to an existing physical address.
Cevap
HSRP requires the virtual IP address to be an unassigned IP address within the subnet, whereas VRRP allows a router interface physical IP address to serve as the virtual IP address.
In HSRP, the virtual IP address must be a distinct, unassigned address within the IP subnet shared by the participating routers. VRRP supports IP address ownership (where the virtual IP matches a physical interface IP address and gives that router priority 255), but HSRP strictly disallows assigning a router's physical interface IP address as the HSRP virtual IP address.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
First Hop Redundancy Protocols (HSRP vs. VRRP Virtual IP Assignment Rules)