A network engineer is configuring OSPFv2 across a broadcast Ethernet network segment and verifying router behaviors. Which two statements regarding OSPFv2 Router ID determination and neighbor adjacency formation are correct?
- A router ID configured explicitly with the router-id command takes precedence over IP addresses assigned to loopback or physical interfaces.Cevap
- On a broadcast network segment, two neighboring routers with an OSPF interface priority of 0 will remain in the 2-WAY neighbor state with each other.Cevap
- CConfiguring a new loopback interface with a higher IP address immediately preempts and updates the active OSPF router ID without restarting the process.
- DTwo neighboring routers configured with different OSPF Area IDs on connecting interfaces will establish an adjacency if both interfaces use default Hello timers.
Cevap
The two correct statements are that an explicitly configured router ID takes precedence over interface IP addresses, and that two routers with an OSPF priority of 0 on a broadcast network will remain in the 2-WAY state with each other.
An explicitly configured router ID using the 'router-id' command always takes precedence over loopback and physical interface IP addresses. Furthermore, on broadcast multiaccess networks, routers configured with a priority of 0 cannot become DR or BDR; two such DROTHER routers establish bi-directional communication but remain in the 2-WAY state with each other, forming FULL adjacencies only with the elected DR and BDR.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
OSPFv2 Router ID election precedence and DROTHER 2-WAY neighbor relationship dynamics