Two directly connected Cisco routers are configured with OSPFv2 on their connecting interfaces. Router R1 has its interface assigned to OSPF Area 0, while Router R2 has its connecting interface assigned to OSPF Area 1. Assuming all other OSPF parameters are left at default settings, what is the result of this configuration?
- The routers fail to form an OSPF neighbor adjacency because the Area IDs do not match.Cevap
- BThe routers progress to the 2-WAY state but remain in that state without exchanging link-state database information.
- CThe routers form a FULL adjacency, but routes learned from Area 1 are filtered from the Area 0 routing table.
- DThe routers become stuck in the ExStart state due to an inability to negotiate master/slave roles.
Cevap
The routers fail to form an OSPF neighbor adjacency because the Area IDs do not match.
For two OSPFv2 routers to establish a neighbor adjacency, several interface parameters exchanged in Hello packets must match exactly. One mandatory parameter is the Area ID. Because one router's interface is configured in Area 0 and the other in Area 1, the routers reject each other's Hello packets and fail to form an adjacency.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
OSPFv2 Neighbor Adjacency Requirements