A shipping port recently installed automated inspection cranes at two of its primary terminals, resulting in a significant reduction in customs clearance delays at those locations. Based on this success, the port authority concludes that installing automated inspection cranes across all remaining terminals will eliminate customs processing backlogs port-wide. Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the port authority's conclusion?
- The remaining terminals exclusively process non-standard cargo that requires manual physical inspection regardless of crane automation.Cevap
- BCrane operators at the initial terminals reported a thirty percent increase in hourly container throughput after the automated equipment was installed.
- CCompeting ports in neighboring regions recently upgraded their customs software to accelerate clearance times.
- DThe initial acquisition cost of the automated cranes exceeded the port authority's original budget.
- ECustoms clearance delays contribute more to total container transit times than weather-related shipping delays do.
Cevap
The argument is most seriously weakened by the fact that the remaining terminals process non-standard cargo requiring manual inspection regardless of crane automation.
The author concludes that expanding automated crane installation to remaining terminals will eliminate backlogs, assuming those terminals will experience the same benefits as the first two. The correct option reveals that the remaining terminals handle cargo requiring manual physical inspection regardless of crane automation. Because automated cranes cannot bypass manual inspection requirements, installing them will not eliminate backlogs at those terminals, directly undermining the conclusion.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
Weakening a generalization by demonstrating unrepresentative sample conditions