Examkin

Soru

Zorluk: OrtaIdentifying Argumentative Strategies and Methods of Reasoning

Dr. Kaelen: To increase overall workplace productivity, our company should implement mandatory 20-minute mid-afternoon meditation sessions for all employees. Studies confirm that workers who practice structured meditation experience diminished stress levels and sharper focus during working hours.

Elena: Although meditation reduces stress, imposing a fixed daily schedule forces staff to break away from high-concentration tasks mid-workflow. Company activity logs show that such forced task switching introduces cognitive disruption costs that outweigh the focus gained.

Which of the following best describes Elena's method of responding to Dr. Kaelen's argument?

  1. She refutes the recommendation by demonstrating that an unstated assumption necessary for the proposed policy's effectiveness does not hold.Cevap
  2. B
    She rejects the proposal by contending that an intermediate supporting premise functions instead as the main conclusion.
  3. C
    She challenges the recommendation by arguing that an underlying analogy between corporate employees and research study subjects fails at a critical point.
  4. D
    She undermines the argument by ignoring the explicit qualification provided in support of the initial evidence.
  5. E
    She attacks the argument by treating a structural pivot word as an indication of a change in speaker stance.

Cevap

Elena responds by showing that an unstated assumption required for the proposal's success is invalid because the mandatory implementation causes disruptive context-switching costs that negate the intended benefits.
The correct option accurately captures Elena's rhetorical strategy. Dr. Kaelen assumes that implementing mandatory meditation sessions will boost net workplace productivity. Elena counters by accepting that stress decreases, but demonstrating that mandatory breaks cause context-switching disruptions that reduce overall output. Thus, she refutes the proposal by undermining the unstated assumption that mandatory scheduling would produce a net gain in productivity.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze Dr. Kaelen's argument structure.
Dr. Kaelen concludes that mandatory meditation sessions will increase overall workplace productivity because meditation reduces stress and sharpens focus.
Identifying the premise and conclusion clarifies the core mechanism of the recommendation.
2
Identify the unstated assumption in Dr. Kaelen's plan.
Dr. Kaelen assumes that mandating these sessions will not create unintended negative operational side effects that diminish overall output.
A policy proposal relies on the implicit assumption that its positive effects will not be canceled out by implementation friction.
3
Analyze Elena's counterargument strategy.
Elena concedes that stress is reduced, but introduces evidence showing that mandatory timing causes task-switching disruptions that reduce net productivity.
This directly attacks the unstated assumption that the intervention can be mandated without net negative workflow consequences.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying Methods of Reasoning: Undermining an Unstated Assumption
Bu soruyu puanla

Konular

Identifying Argumentative Strategies and Methods of Reasoning

Bu konudan daha fazla soru