In recent years, several urban planning analysts have argued that converting vacant downtown office buildings into residential apartments is the most effective strategy for reviving struggling commercial districts. Proponents claim that increasing the number of downtown residents will automatically boost revenue for local retail businesses and restaurants. However, this claim assumes that downtown residents will spend their discretionary income at local establishments.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the proponents' claim about the financial impact on local retail businesses?
- Most retail businesses in commercial districts depend far more heavily on daytime office workers than on nighttime residents for their primary revenue.Cevap
- BConverting commercial buildings into residential apartments creates construction jobs that temporarily increase local spending.
- CCity officials in neighboring jurisdictions have recently increased property taxes on commercial real estate.
- DSome downtown residential conversion projects encounter minor delays due to municipal permitting procedures.
- EEvery single retail business located in a downtown area is guaranteed to fail unless office space is completely eliminated.
Cevap
The argument is most weakened by the finding that local retail businesses depend primarily on daytime office workers rather than downtown residents for revenue.
The correct option demonstrates that local retail businesses rely predominantly on daytime office workers for revenue rather than evening residents. If office workers are replaced by residents who do not generate equivalent sales volume, the main benefit claimed by proponents will fail to materialize, thereby weakening the claim.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
Evaluating argument validity by identifying evidence that weakens a causal assertion
Tahmini Süre:1m 0s