Examkin

Soru

Zorluk: OrtaIdentifying Logical Flaws and Reasoning Vulnerabilities

A regional healthcare network analyzed performance data from its twenty member hospitals over a two-year period. The network found that the five hospitals that voluntarily installed automated self-service check-in kiosks experienced a 20 percent decrease in average emergency room wait times. Based on this observation, the executive board concluded that installing these kiosks across the remaining fifteen hospitals will lead to a comparable decrease in patient wait times across the entire network.

The executive board's reasoning is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it

  1. fails to account for the possibility that the hospitals that voluntarily installed the kiosks possessed other structural or administrative advantages that contributed to the shorter wait times.Cevap
  2. B
    confuses a condition that is necessary for decreasing patient wait times with one that is sufficient to achieve that decrease.
  3. C
    mistakenly presumes that shorter patient wait times caused hospital administrators to install automated check-in kiosks.
  4. D
    assumes without justification that overall patient medical outcomes will improve as a direct result of installing check-in kiosks.
  5. E
    compares hospitals based on check-in technology while ignoring unrelated operational metrics such as surgical success rates.

Cevap

The argument is vulnerable because it fails to consider that hospitals voluntarily adopting self-service kiosks may have had other preexisting operational efficiencies that led to reduced wait times.
The correct answer identifies a classic self-selection flaw. Because the five hospitals voluntarily chose to install the kiosks, they may differ systematically from the remaining fifteen hospitals—for example, possessing better administrative workflow, updated triage software, or more flexible staffing. Thus, the observed reduction in wait times cannot be definitively attributed solely to the kiosks, nor can one guarantee identical results when mandating kiosks across non-adopting facilities.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the argument's premise and conclusion.
Premise: Five hospitals that voluntarily installed check-in kiosks saw a 20% drop in wait times. Conclusion: Installing kiosks in the remaining fifteen hospitals will cause a similar drop in wait times.
Understanding the gap between premise data and executive conclusion is essential to finding the flaw.
2
Evaluate the leap in logic for sampling bias or confounding variables.
The five initial hospitals voluntarily chose to adopt kiosks, suggesting they might be better managed, more technologically integrated, or less crowded than the non-adopting hospitals.
Assuming that a result observed in a self-selected group will automatically replicate in a general population overlooks confounding differences.
3
Match the identified vulnerability to the option describing self-selection bias.
The correct response accurately states that voluntary adopters might possess other advantages responsible for shorter wait times.
This directly undermines the board's assumption that kiosks alone caused the reduced wait times and will produce identical results elsewhere.

Anahtar Kavram

Confounding Variables and Self-Selection Bias in Inductive Generalization
Bu soruyu puanla

Konular

Identifying Logical Flaws and Reasoning Vulnerabilities

Bu konudan daha fazla soru