Tüm alıştırma soruları

2195 soru

Soru 1861Soru

In the early 1970s, marine geologists investigating oceanic spreading centers discovered hydrothermal vents, ecosystems operating entirely independent of solar energy. Primary production in these abyssal zones relies not on photosynthesis, but on chemosynthesis performed by sulfur-oxidizing endosymbiotic bacteria. These microbes inhabit the specialized trophosome tissue of giant tube worms (*Riftia pachyptila*), which lack a mouth, gut, or digestive tract. To sustain these organisms, the worms utilize specialized hemoglobin that simultaneously binds hydrogen sulfide and oxygen from seawater, transporting both toxic gases through their circulatory fluid without precipitating sulfur or poisoning cellular respiration. Consequently, the physiological survival of the host species depends strictly on facilitating the metabolic requirements of its microscopic symbionts. Although early researchers hypothesized that such metabolic adaptations represented primitive evolutionary precursors to photosynthetic pathways, contemporary phylogenomic analysis suggests they are actually highly derived specializations. Ultimately, the intricate exchange between the worm and its internal inhabitants demonstrates how extreme environmental selective pressures can drive radical morphological simplification in macroorganisms alongside complex biochemical co-evolution.

Based on the passage, the pronoun "they" in the penultimate sentence refers to which of the following?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: the metabolic adaptations of the hydrothermal vent organisms

Cevap

The pronoun 'they' refers to the metabolic adaptations of the hydrothermal vent organisms.
The correct option accurately identifies 'metabolic adaptations' as the antecedent of the pronoun 'they'. Grammatically, 'they' is a plural pronoun that refers back to the plural subject 'such metabolic adaptations' introduced in the preceding dependent clause. Logically, the sentence contrasts what early researchers thought those adaptations were (primitive precursors) with what contemporary analysis suggests those same adaptations are (highly derived specializations).

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Locate the targeted pronoun in the penultimate sentence.
The target sentence reads: 'Although early researchers hypothesized that such metabolic adaptations represented primitive evolutionary precursors to photosynthetic pathways, contemporary phylogenomic analysis suggests they are actually highly derived specializations.'
Identifying the target sentence provides the immediate grammatical context.
2
Analyze the clause structure and agreement constraints.
The pronoun 'they' is third-person plural and functions as the subject of the that-clause following 'suggests'. It requires a plural noun antecedent.
Grammatical number and syntactical position restrict the possible referents.
3
Trace back to the logical plural noun phrase evaluated in the comparison.
The early researchers hypothesized that 'such metabolic adaptations' were precursors; the contrastive clause states that modern analysis suggests 'they' (the metabolic adaptations) are actually highly derived specializations.
The contrast between early hypotheses and contemporary findings centers on the evolutionary nature of the metabolic adaptations.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying pronoun antecedents using syntactical alignment and logical contrast in dense complex sentences.
Soru 1862Soru

Passage:
In ecological conservation, the phenomenon of "trophic phenological mismatch" describes a systemic failure mode occurring when two historically synchronized mutualistic species rely on divergent environmental cues. For example, in certain temperate woodland ecosystems, migratory songbirds initiate spring nesting based strictly on photoperiodic cues (day length), whereas the herbivorous caterpillars that constitute their primary nestling food source emerge in response to cumulative thermal degree-days (ambient temperature). Under trend-line atmospheric warming, thermal thresholds are reached earlier in the season, causing caterpillar populations to peak and decline weeks prior to bird clutch hatching. Lacking adequate nutritional density during the critical brood window, avian reproductive output drops precipitously, ultimately causing a collapse in caterpillar predation later in the season. Ecologists observe, however, that when an opportunistic, secondary insect species responds dynamically to ambient thermal shifts and provides an alternative food source, it serves as a "trophic bridge," stabilizing the avian population until photoperiodic cues align with long-term ecosystem equilibrium.

Which of the following scenarios in a non-biological domain is most structurally analogous to the interaction between the songbirds, caterpillars, and secondary insect species described in the passage?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: A cloud computing service spins up data-processing nodes based on fixed time-of-day schedules, whereas incoming client data streams are dispatched based on network traffic volume. When a sudden traffic spike causes client data to arrive and dissipate before processing nodes initiate, data tasks fail; however, routing early data through a dynamic buffer cache that scales with traffic volume sustains data availability until scheduled processing nodes activate.

Cevap

The scenario describing a cloud computing service using a dynamic buffer cache to preserve early data streams until scheduled processing nodes activate.
The passage describes a system with four key structural features: (1) a primary actor operating on a fixed/photoperiodic schedule, (2) a primary dependent resource operating on a variable/thermal trigger, (3) a breakdown caused when the variable trigger fires prematurely, causing the resource to peak and vanish before the primary actor activates, and (4) a flexible secondary resource responding to the premature trigger that temporarily sustains the primary actor. The correct choice perfectly mirrors all four elements in a cloud computing context: processing nodes operate on a fixed time schedule, data streams arrive based on variable traffic volume, premature traffic spikes cause data loss, and a dynamic buffer cache acts as the temporary bridge sustaining data until processing nodes spin up.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Deconstruct the core functional relationship in the passage into abstract components.
Component A (songbirds) relies on Trigger 1 (photoperiod/fixed schedule). Component B (caterpillars) relies on Trigger 2 (thermal degree-days/variable condition). An environmental anomaly causes Trigger 2 to fire early, leading to Component B emerging and dissipating before Component A activates, causing system failure. Component C (secondary insect) responds flexibly to Trigger 2 and provides a temporary substitute resource, sustaining Component A until the overall system stabilizes.
Mapping the passage concept to an abstract logical framework is required before evaluating parallel domain scenarios.
2
Evaluate the option choices against the abstract framework.
The cloud computing scenario features: (1) Data-processing nodes acting on fixed schedules (Trigger 1), (2) Client data streams dispatched on traffic volume (Trigger 2), (3) Data arriving early and failing due to missing nodes, and (4) A dynamic buffer cache responding to traffic volume to hold data until processing nodes activate.
Direct 1-to-1 structural alignment across all four systemic conditions confirms the parallel logic.

Anahtar Kavram

Structural Transfer of Dual-Trigger Desynchronization and Temporal Bridging
Soru 1863Soru

Consider the following argument:

Over the past decade, several coastal municipalities implemented stringent limits on commercial groundwater extraction to prevent saltwater intrusion into local aquifers. Recently, agricultural yields in these regions dropped by fifteen percent, prompting farmers to demand a repeal of the extraction limits. However, regional climate records show that the area experienced its most severe drought in recorded history during this same period. Because local crop yields are overwhelmingly dependent on seasonal precipitation rather than supplementary irrigation alone, the yield decline cannot be primarily attributed to the extraction limits. Therefore, repealing the groundwater restrictions will fail to restore agricultural productivity.

True or False: The statement that 'several coastal municipalities implemented stringent limits on commercial groundwater extraction' functions as a premise offering supporting evidence for the author's main conclusion.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: False

Cevap

False. The targeted statement provides introductory background context rather than serving as a supporting premise for the main conclusion.
The statement is False. In GMAT Critical Reasoning, a premise must supply logical evidence supporting the conclusion. The targeted sentence merely provides historical background context regarding the regulation being disputed. The evidence actually supporting the author's conclusion consists of the drought metrics and precipitation dependency data.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the main conclusion of the argument.
The main conclusion is 'repealing the groundwater restrictions will fail to restore agricultural productivity.'
This is the central claim the author argues for, signaled by the structural conclusion indicator 'Therefore'.
2
Identify the premises (evidence) supporting this conclusion.
The supporting premises are: (1) regional climate records show a severe drought occurred during the same period, and (2) crop yields depend overwhelmingly on seasonal precipitation rather than supplementary irrigation.
These claims provide the direct factual basis explaining why lifting groundwater limits will not solve the yield problem.
3
Evaluate the functional role of the targeted sentence.
The sentence 'several coastal municipalities implemented stringent limits on commercial groundwater extraction' introduces the subject matter and policy background.
While necessary to understand what policy is under discussion, this statement does not offer logical proof or evidence that repealing the policy will be ineffective.

Anahtar Kavram

Distinguishing Background Context from Supporting Premises
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
Soru 1864Soru

Read the passage below regarding eighteenth-century Scottish banking history and fill in the missing terms in the analytical statements that follow.

Aşağıdaki boşlukları doldurun

Passage:
In eighteenth-century Scotland, the introduction of the 'option clause' by chartered banks allowed them to defer the immediate cash redemption of banknotes in exchange for interest accrual. Proponents maintained that this device protected institutions against sudden liquidity runs; critics, however, asserted that it rendered banknote conversion conditional. In his 1767 treatise, economist Sir James Steuart noted that such measures insulated banks from their own overextension, arguing that it ultimately shifted monetary risk to local merchants. Furthermore, Steuart warned that the clause functioned merely as a temporary stay against insolvency.

Analytical Statements:
1. In the context of the passage, the word 'stay' most nearly means
.
2. In the sentence regarding Sir James Steuart's argument, the pronoun 'it' refers to
.
Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

In this context, the term 'stay' means a temporary suspension, postponement, or reprieve, and the pronoun 'it' refers to the option clause.
In the passage, 'stay' functions in a legal and financial sense to mean a temporary suspension or postponement of an outcome (insolvency). The pronoun 'it' in the third sentence refers to the option clause, which is the institutional policy that transferred monetary risk from the banks to the merchants.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the contextual meaning of the term 'stay' within the final sentence.
The phrase 'temporary stay against insolvency' describes delaying or pausing a financial collapse rather than providing physical bracing or remaining in one place. Thus, 'stay' means a temporary suspension, postponement, or reprieve.
Determining contextual vocabulary requires interpreting how the word operates in a financial or legal context.
2
Identify the logical antecedent of the pronoun 'it' in Steuart's argument.
'it' refers back to 'the option clause' (or the usage of 'such measures' implementing the clause), which is the active mechanism that shifted monetary risk onto merchants.
Pronoun antecedent identification requires selecting the noun phrase that agrees syntactically and aligns logically with the action of shifting monetary risk.

Anahtar Kavram

Contextual Vocabulary and Pronoun Reference
Tahmini Süre:1m 30s
Soru 1865Soru

In cognitive archaeology, researchers have long debated the origins of human symbolic thought. Proponents of the "cognitive leap" model contend that the sudden proliferation of symbolic artifacts—such as engraved ochre and shell beads—in Southern Africa approximately 75,000 years ago points to a rapid genetic mutation that reorganized the human brain for complex recursive language. They argue that the virtual absence of earlier symbolic material culture constitutes definitive evidence that earlier hominins lacked symbolic cognitive capacity. However, critics of this model point to isolated discoveries of pigment processing and long-distance raw material transport dating back nearly 300,000 years, arguing instead for a gradual, mosaic accumulation of behavioral modernity. These critics maintain that the apparent absence of widespread symbolic artifacts prior to 75,000 years ago is an artifact of taphonomic decay—environmental conditions such as humidity decomposing fragile organic goods—and low demographic density. Because small, fragmented populations frequently innovate practices but lack the interconnected social networks needed to transmit them across generations, cultural innovations often vanish locally. Thus, critics conclude that the apparent "explosion" of symbolic culture 75,000 years ago reflects rising population density and favorable preservation conditions rather than a sudden biological restructuring of the human mind.

Which of the following is an unstated assumption upon which the critics' argument against the "cognitive leap" model depends?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The isolated instances of pigment processing dating back 300,000 years served functions that possessed at least some symbolic significance rather than being exclusively utilitarian.

Cevap

The critics' argument depends on the assumption that the 300,000-year-old pigment processing instances had at least some symbolic meaning rather than being purely utilitarian.
The critics base their argument for a gradual emergence of symbolic thought on early evidence such as pigment processing dating back 300,000 years. For this evidence to effectively counter the 'cognitive leap' theory, those early activities must actually reflect symbolic cognitive capacity. If the pigment processing was purely utilitarian (for instance, used strictly as a structural adhesive without cognitive symbolic meaning), the evidence fails to demonstrate early symbolic thought, and the critics' argument collapses. Thus, assuming a non-utilitarian, symbolic aspect to these early practices is necessary.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Deconstruct the passage's argument structure.
Proponents claim symbolic culture appeared abruptly 75,000 years ago due to a biological mutation, citing a lack of earlier artifacts. Critics counter that earlier isolated findings (300,000 years old) prove gradual cognitive development, and the gap in artifacts is explained by preservation decay and low population density.
Identifying the premises and conclusion of the target argument is essential prior to applying assumption tests.
2
Isolate the critics' core evidence against the 'cognitive leap' theory.
The critics rely on 300,000-year-old evidence of pigment processing and material transport as early markers of behavioral modernity.
An unstated assumption must bridge the gap between this evidence and the conclusion that symbolic thought developed gradually long before 75,000 years ago.
3
Apply the Negation Test to the target assumption.
Negate the statement: 'The isolated instances of pigment processing served exclusively non-symbolic, utilitarian purposes (e.g., purely functional hide tanning or tool gluing).' If negated, these 300,000-year-old artifacts cease to serve as evidence of early symbolic mind, invalidating the critics' contention that symbolic thought evolved gradually.
A necessary assumption, when negated, must shatter the validity of the argument's conclusion.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying Unstated Assumptions via the Negation Test
Soru 1866Soru

Consider the following critical reasoning argument:

To prevent catastrophic power outages during peak summer heatwaves, the regional energy board plans to mandate utility-scale battery storage installations. Critics argue that the current high cost of battery storage makes this mandate financially unfeasible for smaller utility providers. However, recent supply chain developments have dramatically lowered the production cost of sodium-ion battery alternatives, which perform comparably in stationary applications. Because sodium-ion technology provides a viable, cost-effective substitute, smaller utilities can comply with the storage mandate without incurring ruinous debt. Therefore, the energy board's planned mandate will not force smaller utility providers into bankruptcy.

Match each claim from the passage with its exact structural role in the argument.

Soldaki öğeye tıklayın, sonra eşleşen sağdaki öğeye tıklayın

Öğeler

Recent supply chain developments have dramatically lowered the production cost of sodium-ion battery alternatives.
Smaller utilities can comply with the storage mandate without incurring ruinous debt.
The energy board's planned mandate will not force smaller utility providers into bankruptcy.
The current high cost of battery storage makes this mandate financially unfeasible for smaller utility providers.

Eşleşmeler

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

The claims match their structural roles as follows: the sodium-ion cost statement is a factual supporting premise; the statement that smaller utilities can comply without ruinous debt is the intermediate conclusion; the statement that the mandate will not force smaller utilities into bankruptcy is the main conclusion; and the critics' objection about current costs is a counterargument.
The correct pairings accurately reflect the logical flow of the argument: the statement about lowered sodium-ion costs serves as a factual premise; this premise leads to the subsidiary conclusion that smaller utilities can comply without ruinous debt; this subsidiary conclusion directly supports the main conclusion that the mandate will not cause bankruptcy; and the critics' stance represents an opposing counterargument.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the main conclusion of the argument
The final sentence ('Therefore, the energy board's planned mandate will not force smaller utility providers into bankruptcy') is introduced by the conclusion indicator 'Therefore' and represents the primary claim the author defends.
Determining the final claim helps establish the direction of logical support.
2
Locate the intermediate (subsidiary) conclusion
The sentence 'Because sodium-ion technology provides a viable, cost-effective substitute, smaller utilities can comply with the storage mandate without incurring ruinous debt' contains a claim supported by premise evidence, which in turn directly supports the main conclusion.
An intermediate conclusion receives support from factual premises and provides logical support to the final main conclusion.
3
Classify the remaining supporting premise and opposing claim
The statement about recent supply chain developments lowering sodium-ion costs acts as a foundational factual premise. The critics' claim about high costs represents an opposing counterargument.
Distinguishing background/opposing views and observational facts from inferred claims ensures accurate structural role mapping.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying Intermediate and Subsidiary Conclusions
Soru 1867Soru

Passage:
In high-technology industries, early-stage startups frequently seek equity financing from both independent venture capital (IVC) firms and corporate venture capital (CVC) arms of established conglomerates. Standard financial theory suggests that IVC investors prioritize direct financial returns through timely liquidity events, whereas CVC investors primarily pursue strategic alignment with their parent corporations' core business units. Consequently, corporate investors often provide portfolio companies with valuable access to proprietary distribution channels and specialized research infrastructure, resources that independent financial investors typically lack.

However, recent empirical analyses reveal a nuanced dynamic in co-invested ventures. While early-stage co-investment by CVCs accelerates a startup’s initial product development phase, it simultaneously introduces operational friction during later-stage funding rounds. Because parent corporations frequently retain preemptive rights to evaluate intellectual property developed by portfolio firms, competing IVCs hesitate to lead subsequent financing rounds, fearing that the corporate investor will exploit asymmetric information to acquire the startup’s technology below market value.

Interestingly, this reluctance diminishes significantly when the initial CVC agreement explicitly restricts the parent firm’s rights of first refusal regarding intellectual property licensing. In such structurally constrained syndicates, portfolio companies achieve commercialization milestones at rates comparable to those funded exclusively by IVCs, while retaining higher overall valuations prior to initial public offerings. Thus, the influence of corporate capital is governed less by its strategic intent than by the contractual architecture governing information access.

Which of the following can be inferred from the passage regarding early-stage startups that receive corporate venture capital under contracts that restrict the parent firm's rights of first refusal?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: They can leverage specialized corporate resources while avoiding the valuation penalties typically incurred when corporate investors retain unrestricted rights to intellectual property.

Cevap

Early-stage startups receiving corporate venture capital under contracts that restrict the parent firm's rights of first refusal can leverage specialized corporate resources while avoiding the valuation penalties typically incurred when corporate investors retain unrestricted rights to intellectual property.
The correct answer synthesizes details from paragraph 1 and paragraph 3. Paragraph 1 establishes that corporate venture capital brings unique assets such as specialized research infrastructure and distribution channels. Paragraph 3 explains that when CVC agreements restrict the parent company's preemptive rights to intellectual property, the hesitation of independent venture capital firms dissipates, allowing the startup to avoid valuation penalties in later funding rounds while retaining pre-IPO value. Combining these non-contiguous premises confirms that these startups enjoy corporate resource access without suffering the valuation drawbacks of unrestricted CVC deals.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the key attributes of Corporate Venture Capital (CVC) funding stated in the first paragraph.
CVC investors provide access to proprietary distribution channels and specialized research infrastructure that independent venture capital (IVC) firms lack.
Establishing what advantages CVC funding inherently offers.
2
Analyze the problem introduced in the second paragraph regarding standard CVC deals.
Standard CVC deals allow parent firms preemptive IP rights, creating fears of asymmetric information exploitation among IVCs during subsequent rounds, which suppresses valuations.
Understanding why standard CVC funding leads to later-stage financing friction.
3
Synthesize the findings from paragraph 1 and paragraph 3 regarding structurally constrained CVC deals.
When IP rights of first refusal are restricted, IVC reluctance diminishes and startups retain higher pre-IPO valuations while still benefiting from the specialized corporate resources noted in paragraph 1.
Combining separate premises across non-contiguous paragraphs to form a valid deduction.

Anahtar Kavram

Multi-Sentence Synthesis Inferences
Soru 1868Soru

Passage:
In deep-sea microbial ecology, the 'viral shunt' refers to the process by which viral lysis of marine microorganisms diverts organic carbon from higher trophic levels back into dissolved organic matter. Early oceanographic models assumed that viral lysis in abyssal benthic sediments primarily inhibited long-term carbon sequestration by preventing organic matter from being buried in sub-seafloor strata. However, recent sediment-core analyses reveal a more intricate dynamic: while viral destruction of prokaryotic biomass releases labile nutrients into benthic porewater, it simultaneously stimulates the abiotic polymerization of refractory organic compounds. These recalcitrant complexes resist enzymatic decomposition by benthic bacteria and bind tightly to clay minerals. Consequently, in sediment layers characterized by high viral activity, the rate of persistent organic carbon immobilization is substantially elevated relative to layers dominated by protistan grazing, despite a localized reduction in net microbial biomass creation.

Based on the passage, evaluate whether the following statement is true or false:

Sediment layers in abyssal environments where viral lysis is prevalent retain a higher proportion of carbon in long-term, decomposition-resistant mineral complexes than layers where protistan grazing predominates.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: True

Cevap

True
The claim is directly supported by combining two distinct sentences in the second half of the passage. The author states that viral lysis generates recalcitrant complexes that resist enzymatic breakdown and bind to clay minerals, and then synthesizes this with the comparative conclusion that carbon immobilization is higher in these layers than in those dominated by protistan grazing.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the early oceanographic assumption versus the recent empirical finding.
Early models assumed viral lysis hindered carbon sequestration, but recent evidence shows viral lysis stimulates abiotic polymerization of refractory compounds.
Tracking the passage's structural pivot ('However...') is essential to locate the authoritative factual claims.
2
Synthesize the properties of refractory compounds with the comparative impact on sediment layers.
The refractory compounds resist decomposition and bind to clay minerals, leading to elevated persistent organic carbon immobilization in high viral activity layers compared to protistan grazing layers.
Connecting sentence 4 (chemical mechanisms) with sentence 5 (relative immobilization rates) provides the multi-sentence foundation for the statement.
3
Evaluate the statement against the synthesized evidence.
The statement accurately reflects that viral lysis layers retain a higher proportion of carbon in decomposition-resistant mineral-bound forms than protistan grazing layers.
Direct alignment between synthesized passage facts and the claim confirms its truth.

Anahtar Kavram

Multi-Sentence Synthesis Inferences
Soru 1869Soru

Analysis of polar ice cores has provided unprecedented chronological resolution regarding industrial emissions prior to the modern era. Specifically, high-resolution measurements of lead concentration and isotopic ratios in Greenland ice archives reveal prominent surges in atmospheric lead deposition coinciding with major historical silver mining operations. During the height of the Roman Republic and early Empire—from roughly the second century BCE through the second century CE—silver extraction in the Iberian Peninsula relied heavily on cupellation, a high-temperature metallurgical process that volatilized significant quantities of lead alongside silver.

While atmospheric currents carried a fraction of these aerosolized heavy metals northward to settle onto the Greenland ice sheet, the magnitude of these signals was initially underestimated. Early ice-core studies lacked the analytical precision required to differentiate atmospheric lead derived from silver smelting from lead produced by natural soil dust or volcanic eruptions. It was not until the refinement of thermal ionization mass spectrometry (TIMS) that researchers could isolate lead isotope ratios (207Pb/206Pb^{207}\text{Pb}/^{206}\text{Pb}) unique to Iberian galena ores.

Crucially, TIMS analysis demonstrated that Roman-era lead deposition peaked between 150 BCE and 50 CE, declining sharply during the Antonine Plague and subsequent political instabilities of the late second century CE. This isotopic evidence confirmed that regional monetary expansion, driven by silver coinage production, directly modulated hemispheric atmospheric pollution over two millennia ago.

According to the passage, early ice-core studies initially underestimated the lead deposition signals from Roman silver smelting because these studies:

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: lacked the technological resolution to isolate smelting-generated lead emissions from non-industrial background sources like volcanic eruptions and soil dust

Cevap

Early ice-core studies underestimated lead deposition signals because they lacked the analytical precision needed to distinguish lead emissions caused by smelting from lead produced by natural sources such as volcanic eruptions and soil dust.
The passage explicitly attributes the initial underestimation of lead signals to a lack of analytical precision in early studies, which prevented researchers from separating lead produced by silver smelting from lead produced by natural sources such as soil dust or volcanic eruptions. The choice stating that early studies lacked technological resolution to isolate smelting-generated lead from non-industrial background sources accurately paraphrases this factual detail.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Locate the targeted keywords in the passage
Found reference to initial underestimation in Paragraph 2: 'While atmospheric currents carried a fraction of these aerosolized heavy metals northward to settle onto the Greenland ice sheet, the magnitude of these signals was initially underestimated.'
Direct factual retrieval requires identifying the specific sentence addressing the prompt's condition.
2
Analyze the explicit cause provided in the text
The text states: 'Early ice-core studies lacked the analytical precision required to differentiate atmospheric lead derived from silver smelting from lead produced by natural soil dust or volcanic eruptions.'
The question asks why the underestimation occurred.
3
Match the explicit passage detail to a semantic paraphrase
The option stating that early studies 'lacked the technological resolution to isolate smelting-generated lead emissions from non-industrial background sources like volcanic eruptions and soil dust' directly rephrases the passage evidence.
Correct GMAT Reading Comprehension answers reframe explicit passage facts using equivalent vocabulary.

Anahtar Kavram

Direct Factual Retrieval
Soru 1870Soru

To comply with new international maritime emissions targets, fleet operators are considering retrofitting existing bulk carriers with rigid wind-assisted propulsion sails. Sea trials demonstrate that installing these rigid sails reduces overall diesel fuel consumption on long-distance routes by up to twenty percent. Because of these fuel savings, shipping companies will fully recover the capital costs of retrofitting within three years of operation. Therefore, investing in rigid wind-assisted sail retrofits represents a more financially prudent strategy for fleet operators than transitioning immediately to experimental ammonia-fueled vessels.

In the argument presented, the boldfaced statement plays which of the following roles?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: It is an intermediate conclusion that is derived from evidence about fuel reduction and is used to support the argument's main conclusion.

Cevap

The boldfaced claim functions as an intermediate conclusion, inferred from fuel consumption data and utilized as support for the main conclusion.
The correct answer accurately identifies the boldfaced statement as a subsidiary or intermediate conclusion. It is logically inferred from the empirical premise regarding twenty percent fuel savings, and it serves as the key intermediate reason supporting the author's ultimate conclusion that retrofitting bulk carriers is a more financially prudent strategy than adopting ammonia-fueled vessels.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the structural role of each statement in the passage.
Statement 1 introduces background context regarding emissions targets. Statement 2 provides a factual premise: rigid sails cut fuel consumption by up to 20%. Statement 3 (boldfaced) asserts that capital costs will be recovered within 3 years due to those savings. Statement 4 presents the final main conclusion that investing in wind-assisted retrofits is more prudent than transitioning to ammonia vessels.
Deconstructing the argument structure clarifies how claims depend on one another.
2
Determine the relationship of the boldfaced statement to preceding and succeeding claims.
The boldfaced statement is derived from the factual premise in Statement 2 ('Because of these fuel savings...'). It then serves as logical support for the main conclusion in Statement 4 ('Therefore...').
A claim that is supported by premises and in turn supports a further main conclusion is by definition an intermediate (or subsidiary) conclusion.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying Intermediate and Subsidiary Conclusions
Tahmini Süre:1m 45s
Soru 1871Soru

Passage:
In the mid-nineteenth century, the expansion of global telegraphy faced a severe material bottleneck: existing subterranean and submarine cables degraded rapidly when exposed to moisture and soil acids. The discovery of gutta-percha—a natural latex derived from the sap of Palaquium trees native to Southeast Asia—revolutionized electrical insulation. Chemical analysis conducted in the 1840s by Werner von Siemens demonstrated that gutta-percha possessed extraordinary dielectric properties and impermeability to water, rendering it vastly superior to resin-impregnated hemp and india-rubber for submerged applications. Consequently, the Submarine Telegraph Company adopted gutta-percha for the 1851 Dover-to-Calais cable line. However, the initial enthusiastic adoption obscured significant environmental and structural vulnerabilities. When subjected to direct sunlight or ambient temperatures exceeding 30 degrees Celsius, unvulcanized gutta-percha underwent rapid oxidative degradation, becoming brittle and prone to micro-cracking. Furthermore, despite its moisture resistance, the material offered minimal mechanical defense against marine borers such as Teredo navalis. To mitigate these structural failures without compromising the polymer's inductive capacity, engineers in the 1860s developed composite armoring techniques, wrapping gutta-percha-insulated conductors in spiraled galvanized iron wires coated with tarred hemp. This innovation extended cable operational lifespans from months to decades, establishing gutta-percha as the indispensable insulation standard until synthetic polyethylene emerged in the twentieth century.

According to the passage, Werner von Siemens's chemical analysis in the 1840s indicated that gutta-percha was superior to alternative insulating materials because of its

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: exceptional dielectric qualities combined with water impermeability.

Cevap

The passage explicitly identifies gutta-percha's extraordinary dielectric properties and impermeability to water as the findings from Werner von Siemens's 1840s chemical analysis that proved its superiority over resin-impregnated hemp and india-rubber.
The passage explicitly notes in the third sentence that Werner von Siemens's chemical testing in the 1840s showed gutta-percha had extraordinary dielectric properties and was impermeable to water, which made it superior to existing insulation like resin-impregnated hemp.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Locate the key entity and timeframe in the passage.
Identify the sentence detailing Werner von Siemens and the 1840s chemical analysis in the third sentence of the passage.
Direct factual retrieval questions require locating the exact reference target in the text.
2
Extract the explicit facts provided about Siemens's findings.
The text states Siemens demonstrated that gutta-percha 'possessed extraordinary dielectric properties and impermeability to water, rendering it vastly superior to resin-impregnated hemp'.
Match the target detail directly without introducing external assumptions or synthesis across unrelated sentences.
3
Compare the extracted evidence with the answer options.
The phrase 'exceptional dielectric qualities combined with water impermeability' accurately paraphrases 'extraordinary dielectric properties and impermeability to water'.
Correct GMAT detail choices use semantic equivalents rather than verbatim quotes.

Anahtar Kavram

Direct Factual Retrieval
Soru 1872Soru

For decades, plant evolutionary biologists predominantly attributed rapid phenotypic adaptation in isolated plant populations strictly to structural genetic mutations accumulated over multiple generations. Under this classical framework, environmental stressors were viewed as passive selective filters operating exclusively on pre-existing DNA sequence variations, meaning that adaptive traits could evolve only as fast as beneficial random mutations naturally occurred.

However, recent discoveries in ecological epigenetics have challenged this strict neo-Darwinian paradigm. Researchers demonstrated that acute environmental perturbations, such as severe heat stress, can induce heritable DNA methylation patterns that modify gene expression without altering the underlying nucleotide sequence. These epimutations allow plant lineages to rapidly adjust key physiological traits, such as heat-shock protein synthesis and stomatal regulation, across immediate successive generations.

Despite these compelling empirical findings, some evolutionary geneticists caution against overestimating the long-term evolutionary significance of epigenetic inheritance. They contend that most chromatin modifications are inherently transient, frequently resetting during meiotic reprogramming over extended generational timescales, which limits their capacity to drive permanent adaptation independent of genetic changes.

Nevertheless, an emerging theoretical synthesis reconciles these perspectives by proposing that transient epigenetic flexibility acts as a crucial evolutionary buffer. By enabling immediate population survival under sudden environmental shifts, epigenetic responses buy vital time for rarer, permanent structural mutations to arise and undergo natural selection, thereby integrating short-term plasticity with long-term evolutionary trajectory.

Which of the following best describes the overall logical organization of the passage?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: It presents an established scientific paradigm, introduces empirical findings that challenge it, outlines a counter-argument regarding the limitations of those findings, and concludes with a theoretical synthesis that reconciles both views.

Cevap

The passage presents an established scientific paradigm, introduces empirical findings that challenge it, outlines a counter-argument regarding the limitations of those findings, and concludes with a theoretical synthesis that reconciles both views.
The correct answer accurately reflects the four-stage rhetorical progression of the passage: Paragraph 1 outlines the classical mutation-driven paradigm; Paragraph 2 introduces recent epigenetic discoveries challenging that paradigm; Paragraph 3 presents counter-arguments regarding the transient nature of epigenetic modifications; Paragraph 4 concludes with an integrative synthesis combining short-term epigenetic flexibility with long-term genetic adaptation.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the structural function of Paragraph 1
Identifies the classical framework in plant evolutionary biology (adaptation driven solely by random genetic mutations over generations).
Establishes the initial baseline/traditional perspective.
2
Analyze the transition and structural function of Paragraph 2
The pivot word 'However' introduces new empirical findings from ecological epigenetics that challenge the classical paradigm.
Identifies the introduction of competing evidence/alternative mechanism.
3
Analyze Paragraph 3 for qualification or counter-argument
Presents a qualification from evolutionary geneticists noting that epigenetic changes are transient and limited in driving long-term evolution.
Recognizes the critique/limitation raised against the new findings.
4
Analyze Paragraph 4 for final resolution
The transition 'Nevertheless' introduces an emerging synthesis showing how transient epigenetic responses buffer populations until permanent mutations occur.
Determines how the passage reconciles the two seemingly opposing viewpoints into a unified framework.

Anahtar Kavram

Analyzing Overall Passage Logical Organization
Soru 1873Soru

Passage:
In the early twentieth century, American linguistic anthropology underwent a paradigm shift with Edward Sapir’s formulation of the psychological reality of the phoneme. Prior to Sapir’s 1925 paper, physical phoneticians viewed speech sound variations strictly as continuous physical phenomena measurable by acoustic instruments. Sapir argued instead that native speakers possess unconscious cognitive patterns—mental idealizations of sound units—that override physical acoustic variations. To demonstrate this, Sapir cited instances where native speakers insisted two acoustically distinct sounds were identical, or conversely, perceived an acoustic silence as a distinct structural element based on grammatical symmetry.

While Nikolai Trubetzkoy and the Prague School of Structuralism simultaneously developed phonological theories in Europe, their methodology differed fundamentally from Sapir’s ethnographic approach. European structuralists focused on abstract functional oppositions within a formal linguistic system, treating language as an autonomous structural matrix independent of the speaker’s mental state. Sapir, deeply influenced by Gestalt psychology, insisted that linguistic structures could not be analyzed in isolation from individual cognitive processing and cultural context.

Subsequent mid-century Bloomfieldian behaviorists rejected Sapir’s mentalistic framework, favoring strict distributional analysis of observable acoustic data and dismissing internal speaker intuition as unscientific. It was not until the generative revolution of the late 1950s that linguistics formally readopted Sapir’s premise that linguistic models must account for internal cognitive structures. Nevertheless, contemporary historians of linguistics note that early generative theorists rarely credited Sapir's ethnographic field methods, preferring formal mathematical derivations over qualitative native-speaker interviews.

According to the passage, all of the following are true regarding Edward Sapir's linguistic theories or their historical reception EXCEPT:

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Physical phoneticians prior to 1925 incorporated principles of Gestalt psychology into their measurements of acoustic phenomena.

Cevap

The statement claiming that physical phoneticians prior to 1925 incorporated principles of Gestalt psychology into their measurements is NOT supported by the passage and is therefore the correct choice.
The passage explicitly states that physical phoneticians prior to 1925 viewed speech sound variations strictly as continuous physical phenomena measurable by acoustic instruments. It was Sapir—not the early physical phoneticians—who was deeply influenced by Gestalt psychology. Because the assertion attributing Gestalt psychology to early physical phoneticians directly misattributes passage details, it is unsupported and represents the correct answer to this EXCEPT question.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the stem requirements
Identified that the task requires finding the single statement among the five choices that is NOT supported or is directly contradicted by the text.
Negative factual / EXCEPT questions require eliminating the four options that are explicitly validated by passage details.
2
Scan the passage to verify each option
Verified that statements regarding native speaker perception, European structuralism, Bloomfieldian behaviorism, and generative linguistics are all directly stated in the text.
Direct textual scanning confirms which four claims represent factual passage details.
3
Isolate the unsupported/contradicted claim
Found that Gestalt psychology was associated with Sapir in paragraph 2, not with pre-1925 physical phoneticians (who relied solely on acoustic instruments).
Attribute misassociation creates a false statement, making it the correct target for an EXCEPT question.

Anahtar Kavram

Negative Factual and EXCEPT Textual Verification
Soru 1874Soru

Passage:
Historians examining the financial innovations of the seventeenth-century Dutch Republic frequently attribute the stability of the Amsterdam grain market to the introduction of early maritime insurance contracts. These contracts, which shifted risk from individual merchant-captains to syndicates of wealthy investors, are presumed to have cushioned grain importers against catastrophic shipwrecks during the tumultuous Baltic trade voyages. However, an analysis of contemporary shipping manifests and merchant ledgers reveals that less than ten percent of grain-carrying vessels sailing from Danzig to Amsterdam were actually insured under these contracts. Instead, the overwhelming majority of grain merchants relied on informal credit networks and diversified consignment shipping—distributing a single grain cargo across multiple vessels—to hedge against loss. Consequently, the assertion that formal maritime insurance was the primary structural pillar stabilizing Amsterdam's grain supply during this period overstates its historical efficacy, as the market's resilience was predominantly maintained through informal risk-dispersion practices rather than institutionalized financial instruments.

Statement:
The author's argument that formal maritime insurance was not the primary structural pillar of Amsterdam's grain market stability relies on the unstated assumption that informal risk-dispersion practices were not themselves dependent on or structurally facilitated by the existence of formal insurance markets.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: True

Cevap

The statement is True. The author's conclusion that formal maritime insurance was not the primary pillar of market stability depends on the necessary unstated assumption that informal risk-dispersion mechanisms operated independently of formal insurance systems.
The statement is True because the author's inference from low direct contract adoption to lack of primary structural role is valid only if informal risk-dispersion practices did not rely on formal insurance systems. Utilizing the GMAT Negation Test demonstrates that if informal practices were dependent on formal insurance infrastructure, the author's thesis would collapse.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Deconstruct the author's core argument into premises and conclusion.
Premise: Less than 10% of grain ships used formal insurance; instead, merchants used informal risk dispersion (credit networks and split consignments). Conclusion: Formal insurance was not the primary structural pillar of market stability.
Identifying the explicit logical bridge is necessary to isolate implicit gaps.
2
Identify potential logical gaps between the evidence of low direct policy usage and the broader claim regarding structural importance.
Low direct usage of formal insurance only proves lack of primary importance if the alternative mechanism (informal risk dispersion) is not itself anchored by or dependent on formal insurance.
An underlying mechanism can act as a primary pillar indirectly by supporting secondary practices.
3
Apply the Negation Test to the statement.
Negated Statement: 'Informal risk-dispersion practices WERE dependent on or structurally facilitated by formal insurance markets.' If true, formal insurance remains the ultimate primary pillar, directly undermining the author's conclusion.
If negating a statement invalidates the argument, that statement is a strictly necessary assumption.

Anahtar Kavram

Applying the Negation Test to Identify Necessary Unstated Assumptions in Passage Arguments
Tahmini Süre:2m 30s
Soru 1875Soru

To reduce the severity of summer wildfires, a municipal forestry board plans to replace mechanical brush-clearing with controlled goat grazing along park perimeters. Mechanical clearing leaves behind dry, shredded plant residue that remains combustible on the forest floor for several months. In contrast, goats consume underbrush completely, eliminating ground residue. The board concludes that substituting goat grazing for mechanical clearing will significantly decrease the overall intensity of wildfires in these perimeters during the dry season.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the forestry board's argument depends?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The goats used for controlled grazing will not preferentially avoid the most flammable shrub species in favor of fire-resistant vegetation.

Cevap

The argument assumes that the goats will not selectively avoid consuming the specific shrub species that contribute most to fire intensity.
The conclusion asserts that replacing mechanical clearing with goat grazing will decrease wildfire intensity because goats consume underbrush without leaving flammable ground residue. For this plan to succeed, the goats must actually eat the vegetation that creates the high fire risk. If the goats preferentially avoid the most flammable plants, those hazardous fuels will remain in the forest perimeter, rendering goat grazing ineffective at reducing fire intensity. Therefore, the argument depends on the assumption that goats will not selectively bypass the most flammable plants.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Deconstruct the argument structure
Premise 1: Mechanical clearing leaves combustible shredded residue. Premise 2: Goats consume underbrush completely without leaving ground residue. Conclusion: Goat grazing will significantly decrease overall wildfire intensity compared to mechanical clearing.
Identifying premises and conclusion exposes the logical leap between total plant consumption and effective fire mitigation.
2
Identify the logical gap
The author assumes that goat grazing effectively removes the key combustible vegetation without introducing new vulnerabilities (such as leaving highly flammable plant species untouched).
The conclusion relies on the physical reduction of wildfire fuel.
3
Apply the Negation Test to the correct option
Negated statement: Goats WILL preferentially avoid the most flammable shrub species and consume fire-resistant vegetation instead. If true, the primary fire hazards remain standing, which destroys the conclusion that fire intensity will decrease.
A valid unstated assumption must be essential; its negation shatters the author's reasoning.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying Unstated Assumptions via the Negation Test
Soru 1876Soru

Consider the following argument regarding industrial manufacturing supply chains:

Due to recent geopolitical tariffs on imported rare-earth elements, domestic semiconductor manufacturers face unpredictable supply bottlenecks. To insulate production against future supply shocks, semiconductor firms must invest heavily in local e-waste recycling infrastructure. Although building these recycling facilities requires substantial initial capital outlays, doing so ultimately secures a steady domestic supply of critical raw materials. Consequently, investing in local recycling infrastructure will lower long-term material procurement expenses, thereby ensuring that semiconductor manufacturers maintain their profit margins even during global trade disruptions.

Match each claim from the argument listed on the left with its correct structural role on the right.

Soldaki öğeye tıklayın, sonra eşleşen sağdaki öğeye tıklayın

Öğeler

Domestic semiconductor manufacturers face unpredictable supply bottlenecks due to recent geopolitical tariffs.
Building local e-waste recycling facilities requires substantial initial capital outlays.
Investing in local recycling infrastructure will lower long-term material procurement expenses.
Semiconductor manufacturers will maintain their profit margins even during global trade disruptions.

Eşleşmeler

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

The statement regarding tariffs establishing bottlenecks matches the background premise. The statement regarding substantial initial capital outlays matches the concession statement. The statement regarding lowering long-term procurement expenses matches the intermediate conclusion. The statement regarding maintaining profit margins matches the main conclusion.
The statement about domestic semiconductor manufacturers facing bottlenecks provides background context establishing the operational environment. The statement noting that building facilities requires substantial capital outlays serves as a concession, introduced by 'Although', acknowledging an opposing point. The statement regarding lowering long-term material procurement expenses is an intermediate conclusion because it is inferred from securing a steady domestic supply of materials, and it in turn directly supports the main conclusion. The statement that manufacturers will maintain profit margins is the main conclusion, introduced by 'thereby ensuring that', representing the ultimate claim of the passage.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the logical flow and transition signals of the argument.
Identified the problem statement (tariffs/bottlenecks), a concession ('Although...'), evidence of raw material security, a intermediate inference ('Consequently...'), and a final overall inference ('thereby ensuring that...').
Tracking structural signal words ('Although', 'Consequently', 'thereby') helps determine how each claim functions relative to others.
2
Evaluate the statement regarding long-term material procurement expenses.
Recognized that 'Consequently, investing in local recycling infrastructure will lower long-term material procurement expenses' receives support from securing raw materials, but also acts as evidence for maintaining profit margins.
A claim that acts as both a conclusion drawn from premises and a premise supporting a further claim is an intermediate (subsidiary) conclusion.
3
Distinguish the intermediate conclusion from the main conclusion.
The final clause ('thereby ensuring that semiconductor manufacturers maintain profit margins...') is the ultimate destination of the argument, making it the main conclusion, whereas lowering procurement expenses is the subsidiary step leading to it.
The main conclusion is the primary point that all other claims and intermediate steps collectively aim to prove.

Anahtar Kavram

An intermediate (subsidiary) conclusion is a claim that is logically supported by foundational premises and, in turn, provides direct support for the argument's main conclusion.
Soru 1877Soru

In his 1840 treatise on organic chemistry applied to agriculture, Justus von Liebig posited that plant growth is limited not by the abundance of organic humus in the soil, but by the relative scarcity of specific inorganic minerals. To address soil degradation, Liebig advocated the application of artificial mineral fertilizers to replace depleted salts. However, when early field trials of his synthesized manures yielded disappointing results, contemporary agronomists attributed the failure to the insolubility of the chemical preparations, which prevented crop roots from absorbing the essential nutrients. In responding to these critiques, Liebig argued that the apparent failure stemmed not from chemical defects in the fertilizers themselves, but rather from the improper cultivation practices of farmers who neglected soil aeration. He asserted that without adequate tillage, the mineral salts could not react effectively with soil moisture, rendering them inert. This oversight, Liebig maintained, perpetuated the very exhaustion that his mineral formulation was engineered to reverse.

In the passage, the phrase "This oversight" in the final sentence refers to which of the following?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The failure of farmers to perform adequate tillage and ensure proper soil aeration

Cevap

The phrase 'This oversight' refers to the failure of farmers to perform adequate tillage and ensure proper soil aeration.
In the penultimate sentence, Liebig explains that the failure of his fertilizer was caused by 'improper cultivation practices of farmers who neglected soil aeration' and notes that 'without adequate tillage, the mineral salts could not react effectively.' The demonstrative phrase 'This oversight' at the start of the final sentence directly refers to this failure of farmers to properly till the soil and aerate it.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Locate the target phrase in the passage context
The phrase 'This oversight' appears at the beginning of the final sentence.
Demonstrative references ('this' + noun) refer back to a specific concept or action introduced in the immediately preceding text.
2
Analyze the immediate preceding sentence for potential noun antecedents
The preceding sentence states that 'without adequate tillage, the mineral salts could not react effectively with soil moisture, rendering them inert,' building on the point that farmers 'neglected soil aeration.'
An 'oversight' denotes an act of omission or failure to take proper care, matching the description of farmers neglecting aeration and failing to till adequately.
3
Evaluate the option choices against the identified antecedent
The choice describing the failure of farmers to perform adequate tillage and ensure proper soil aeration accurately encapsulates the antecedent.
This choice reflects Liebig's precise attribution of procedural neglect without introducing external or misattributed claims.

Anahtar Kavram

Contextual Pronoun and Demonstrative Reference
Soru 1878Soru

Agricultural analyst: Drip irrigation systems deliver water directly to plant roots, significantly reducing water evaporation. However, installing such systems requires a heavy upfront capital investment that small-scale farms cannot easily recoup in the short term. Therefore, small-scale farms should delay purchasing drip irrigation equipment until regional grants become available.

In the analyst's argument, what is the relationship between the claim that drip irrigation reduces water evaporation and the claim that small-scale farms should delay purchasing drip irrigation equipment?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The first claim describes a positive feature of drip irrigation that is acknowledged but ultimately outweighed by a financial obstacle supporting the second claim.

Cevap

The statement that drip irrigation reduces evaporation highlights an advantageous property of the technology, but the author uses the contrastive transition 'However' to show that high upfront costs outweigh this advantage in the short term, leading to the conclusion that farms should delay purchasing.
The argument begins by acknowledging a factual advantage of drip irrigation (reducing water evaporation). The transition word 'However' introduces a competing consideration (high upfront cost), which directly supports the main recommendation (to delay purchasing). Thus, the first claim describes a positive feature that is acknowledged but ultimately overridden by a financial obstacle.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the structural role of the first claim
The claim 'drip irrigation systems... significantly reducing water evaporation' establishes a recognized benefit of the technology.
Understanding what each claim contributes to the argument is necessary before evaluating their logical connection.
2
Analyze the pivot and the second claim
The word 'However' shifts focus to upfront costs, which leads to 'Therefore, small-scale farms should delay purchasing...'
The main conclusion is the recommendation to delay purchasing based on high costs.
3
Synthesize the relationship between the two claims
The benefit in the first claim is conceded/acknowledged, but the financial constraint leads the author to recommend delaying adoption.
This matches the option describing the first claim as an acknowledged positive feature superseded by a financial barrier.

Anahtar Kavram

Evaluating Inter-Claim Relationships and Argument Flow
Soru 1879Soru

Dr. Aris: Many urban planners argue that expanding highway capacity in suburban areas consistently reduces overall traffic congestion. However, this general rule does not hold true in practice. For instance, when Metro City expanded the Westland Expressway from four lanes to eight lanes, traffic volume increased dramatically over the following two years as more commuters opted to drive, ultimately resulting in longer peak-hour travel delays than before the expansion.

Which of the following best describes the method of reasoning used by Dr. Aris?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Refuting a general claim by presenting a specific counterexample that contradicts it.

Cevap

The argument refutes a general claim by providing a specific counterexample that demonstrates the opposite outcome.
The correct answer accurately characterizes the argumentative strategy. The speaker introduces a general claim held by urban planners ('expanding highway capacity... consistently reduces overall traffic congestion') and disproves its universal applicability by presenting a concrete instance ('Metro City expanded the Westland Expressway... resulting in longer peak-hour travel delays').

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the main conclusion and the opposing position
The opposing view is the general claim that expanding highway capacity consistently reduces traffic congestion. The author's main conclusion is that this rule does not hold true in practice.
Understanding the core claim helps determine how the author structures the rebuttal.
2
Analyze the evidence provided by the author
The author cites the specific case of Metro City's Westland Expressway, where expanding capacity led to longer travel delays.
Evaluating the nature of the supporting evidence reveals the strategy used to dispute the opposing claim.
3
Match the strategy to abstract structural language
Citing a single real-world instance to disprove a universal or general assertion is the classic definition of refuting a general claim via a counterexample.
Method of reasoning questions require translating specific narrative details into abstract logical descriptions.

Anahtar Kavram

Method of Reasoning: Refutation via Counterexample
Soru 1880Soru

Passage:
In early nineteenth-century New England, country banks frequently issued banknotes that circulated in Boston at a discount due to the transaction costs of redeeming them for specie (gold or silver coin) at distant rural locations. In 1824, Boston’s Suffolk Bank established a centralized system requiring participating country banks to maintain permanent specie deposits in Boston to redeem their notes at par value. Economic historians have long debated whether Suffolk’s policy was primarily a predatory effort to eliminate rural competitors or an institutional innovation aimed at stabilizing regional currency. Dr. Elena Rostova contends that the system functioned chiefly as a benevolent private clearinghouse designed to reduce currency transaction costs and stabilize monetary circulation. Rostova emphasizes that by guaranteeing par redemption, Suffolk reduced information asymmetry among merchants, thereby lowering regional interest rates and spurring interstate trade.

However, critics point out that Suffolk routinely charged high maintenance fees to country banks that lacked political leverage while exempting major metropolitan institutions. Moreover, rural bank failures actually increased during the initial five years of Suffolk’s expansion, as country banks struggled to maintain required specie reserves during seasonal agricultural downturns. Nevertheless, Rostova maintains that the eventual homogenization of banknotes in New England created a unified monetary zone decades before the implementation of federal banking regulations.

Question:
Which of the following discovery findings, if true, would most seriously weaken Dr. Rostova's assertion regarding the primary function of the Suffolk Bank system?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Internal ledgers reveal that Suffolk Bank explicitly used its reserve requirements to force rural banks into insolvency so Boston directors could acquire their assets at depressed prices.

Cevap

The statement showing internal ledgers that document Suffolk Bank's explicit strategy to force rural banks into insolvency to acquire their assets at depressed prices most seriously weakens the author's assertion.
The correct option presents explicit historical evidence that the Suffolk Bank's actual strategy was predatory asset acquisition through intentional rural insolvencies. This directly contradicts Dr. Rostova's central assertion that the primary function of the Suffolk system was benevolent monetary stabilization and transaction cost reduction.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the author's core assertion being targeted.
Dr. Rostova contends that the Suffolk Bank system functioned chiefly as a benevolent clearinghouse aimed at reducing transaction costs and stabilizing regional monetary circulation.
To weaken an assertion, one must first isolate the precise claim and underlying assumption made by the researcher.
2
Evaluate potential counter-evidence that contradicts the primary intent or outcome of the claim.
Evidence demonstrating that Suffolk Bank deliberately engineered reserve requirements as a predatory mechanism to bankrupt rural competitors and acquire their assets directly refutes the 'benevolent stabilization' hypothesis.
Showing that the true primary objective was anticompetitive elimination of rural rivals shatters the assertion of currency stabilization as the primary function.
3
Eliminate distractors that strengthen the claim, rely on external extrapolation, or restate known critical opinions without providing factual counter-evidence.
Option A provides direct empirical evidence of predatory intent, whereas other options either support the claim, introduce irrelevant long-term regulatory facts, or restate already acknowledged criticisms.
GMAT weakening questions require finding the choice that most directly undermines the logical foundation of the author's argument.

Anahtar Kavram

Weakening Reading Comprehension Claims via Direct Counter-Evidence of Intent and Function
Tahmini Süre:2m 30s
ÖncekiSayfa 94 / 110Sonraki