Number Properties and Integer Constraints in Data Sufficiency

40 soru

Soru 1Soru

Is xx an integer?

(1) 3x3x is an integer.
(2) 5x5x is an integer.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: BOTH statements TOGETHER are sufficient, but NEITHER statement ALONE is sufficient.

Cevap

BOTH statements TOGETHER are sufficient, but NEITHER statement ALONE is sufficient.
Evaluating Statement (1) alone shows xx could be 13\frac{1}{3} (not an integer) or 11 (an integer), so Statement (1) is insufficient. Evaluating Statement (2) alone shows xx could be 15\frac{1}{5} (not an integer) or 11 (an integer), so Statement (2) is insufficient. Taking both statements together, 3x=a3x = a and 5x=b5x = b for integers aa and bb. Subtracting 5x5x from 2(3x)2(3x) yields 6x5x=x=2ab6x - 5x = x = 2a - b. Because integers are closed under multiplication and subtraction, 2ab2a - b must be an integer, confirming that xx is definitively an integer.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Evaluate Statement (1) independently
If 3x=a3x = a where aa is an integer, then x=a3x = \frac{a}{3}. If a=1a = 1, x=13x = \frac{1}{3} (not an integer). If a=3a = 3, x=1x = 1 (an integer).
Since xx can be either an integer or a non-integer, Statement (1) alone is not sufficient.
2
Evaluate Statement (2) independently
If 5x=b5x = b where bb is an integer, then x=b5x = \frac{b}{5}. If b=1b = 1, x=15x = \frac{1}{5} (not an integer). If b=5b = 5, x=1x = 1 (an integer).
Since xx can be either an integer or a non-integer, Statement (2) alone is not sufficient.
3
Evaluate Statements (1) and (2) together
Since 3x3x and 5x5x are both integers, their linear combination 2(3x)5x=6x5x=x2(3x) - 5x = 6x - 5x = x must also be an integer.
The difference between two integers is always an integer, proving conclusively that xx is an integer.

Anahtar Kavram

Linear combinations of real numbers and integer constraints in Data Sufficiency
Tahmini Süre:1m 0s
Soru 2Soru

If xx is a positive real number, is xx an integer?

(1) x3x^3 is an integer.
(2) x5x^5 is an integer.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: BOTH statements TOGETHER are sufficient, but NEITHER statement ALONE is sufficient.

Cevap

BOTH statements TOGETHER are sufficient, but NEITHER statement ALONE is sufficient.
Evaluating each statement independently leaves open the possibility that xx is an irrational root like 23\sqrt[3]{2} or 25\sqrt[5]{2}, making neither statement alone sufficient. Combining both statements allows us to express xx as (x3)2x5\frac{(x^3)^2}{x^5}. Because both x3x^3 and x5x^5 are integers, xx must be a rational number. For any rational number whose cube is an integer, its denominator must equal 1, which proves conclusively that xx is an integer. Thus, both statements together are sufficient.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Evaluate Statement (1) independently.
Statement (1) is insufficient.
If x=2x = 2, then x3=8x^3 = 8 (an integer), so xx is an integer (Yes). However, if x=23x = \sqrt[3]{2}, then x3=2x^3 = 2 (an integer), but xx is not an integer (No). Since both Yes and No answers are possible, Statement (1) alone is not sufficient.
2
Evaluate Statement (2) independently.
Statement (2) is insufficient.
If x=2x = 2, then x5=32x^5 = 32 (an integer), so xx is an integer (Yes). However, if x=25x = \sqrt[5]{2}, then x5=2x^5 = 2 (an integer), but xx is not an integer (No). Since both Yes and No answers are possible, Statement (2) alone is not sufficient.
3
Combine Statement (1) and Statement (2).
The combined statements are sufficient.
Notice that (x3)2x5=x6x5=x\frac{(x^3)^2}{x^5} = \frac{x^6}{x^5} = x. Since x3x^3 is an integer, (x3)2(x^3)^2 is also an integer. Since x5x^5 is an integer, x=(x3)2x5x = \frac{(x^3)^2}{x^5} is the ratio of two integers, meaning xx must be a rational number. If x=abx = \frac{a}{b} in simplest form where aa and bb are positive integers with gcd(a,b)=1\gcd(a,b)=1, then x3=a3b3x^3 = \frac{a^3}{b^3} being an integer implies b3=1b^3 = 1, so b=1b = 1. Thus, x=ax = a, which means xx must be an integer. This yields a definitive 'Yes' answer.

Anahtar Kavram

Integer constraints versus real numbers in Data Sufficiency and quotient relationships of exponent powers
Soru 3Soru

If xx and yy are positive integers, is x3y3x^3 - y^3 divisible by 33?

(1) x+2yx + 2y is divisible by 33.
(2) x2y2x^2 - y^2 is divisible by 33.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (2) alone is not sufficient.

Cevap

Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (2) alone is not sufficient.
The question asks whether x3y3x^3 - y^3 is divisible by 3. By Fermat's Little Theorem or factoring a3a=a(a1)(a+1)a^3 - a = a(a-1)(a+1) (the product of three consecutive integers, always divisible by 3), any integer cubed has the same remainder when divided by 3 as the integer itself (a3a(mod3)a^3 \equiv a \pmod 3). Therefore, x3y3x^3 - y^3 is a multiple of 3 if and only if xyx - y is a multiple of 3. Statement (1) specifies that x+2yx + 2y is divisible by 3. We can rewrite x+2yx + 2y as (xy)+3y(x - y) + 3y. Because 3y3y is automatically a multiple of 3, (xy)(x - y) must also be divisible by 3. This yields a definitive 'Yes', so Statement (1) alone is sufficient. Statement (2) states that x2y2=(xy)(x+y)x^2 - y^2 = (x - y)(x + y) is divisible by 3. Because 3 is prime, this requires 3 to divide either (xy)(x - y) or (x+y)(x + y). If x=4,y=1x = 4, y = 1, 3 divides (xy)=3(x - y) = 3, giving a 'Yes'. If x=2,y=1x = 2, y = 1, 3 divides (x+y)=3(x + y) = 3 while (xy)=1(x - y) = 1, giving x3y3=7x^3 - y^3 = 7, which is a 'No'. Hence, Statement (2) alone is not sufficient.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Rephrase the question stem using algebraic modular properties.
Since a3a(mod3)a^3 \equiv a \pmod 3 for any integer aa, x3y3xy(mod3)x^3 - y^3 \equiv x - y \pmod 3. Thus, x3y3x^3 - y^3 is divisible by 3 if and only if xyx - y is divisible by 3.
Simplifying the target expression reduces the problem to determining whether 3 divides (xy)(x - y).
2
Evaluate Statement (1): x+2yx + 2y is divisible by 3.
x+2y=(xy)+3yx + 2y = (x - y) + 3y. Since 3y3y is always a multiple of 3, (x+2y)(x + 2y) is divisible by 3 if and only if (xy)(x - y) is divisible by 3.
This guarantees a definitive 'Yes' to the target question. Statement (1) alone is SUFFICIENT.
3
Evaluate Statement (2): x2y2x^2 - y^2 is divisible by 3.
x2y2=(xy)(x+y)x^2 - y^2 = (x - y)(x + y). Since 3 is prime, 3 must divide (xy)(x - y) or (x+y)(x + y). If x=4,y=1x = 4, y = 1, then x2y2=15x^2 - y^2 = 15 (divisible by 3) and x3y3=63x^3 - y^3 = 63 (divisible by 3) -> YES. If x=2,y=1x = 2, y = 1, then x2y2=3x^2 - y^2 = 3 (divisible by 3), but x3y3=7x^3 - y^3 = 7 (NOT divisible by 3) -> NO.
Statement (2) yields both 'Yes' and 'No' cases. Statement (2) alone is NOT SUFFICIENT.

Anahtar Kavram

Divisibility and Modular Congruences in Integer Properties
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
Soru 4Soru

If xx is a non-zero real number, is xx an integer?

(1) x+6xx + \frac{6}{x} is an integer.

(2) x2+36x2x^2 + \frac{36}{x^2} is an integer.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Statements (1) and (2) TOGETHER are NOT sufficient.

Cevap

Statements (1) and (2) TOGETHER are NOT sufficient.
The correct response establishes that neither statement individually nor both statements combined are sufficient to determine whether the real number is an integer. Testing specific real numbers demonstrates that integer values such as 2 and irrational values such as 3 plus the square root of 3 satisfy both algebraic conditions, producing affirmative and negative answers to the question.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze Statement (1): x+6x=kx + \frac{6}{x} = k for some integer kk.
If x=2x = 2, then 2+62=52 + \frac{6}{2} = 5 (an integer), and xx IS an integer. If x=3+3x = 3 + \sqrt{3}, then x+6x=3+3+6(33)6=6x + \frac{6}{x} = 3 + \sqrt{3} + \frac{6(3 - \sqrt{3})}{6} = 6 (an integer), but xx is NOT an integer.
Since Statement (1) yields both a 'Yes' and a 'No' answer, it is not sufficient.
2
Analyze Statement (2): x2+36x2=mx^2 + \frac{36}{x^2} = m for some integer mm.
If x=2x = 2, then 22+3622=4+9=132^2 + \frac{36}{2^2} = 4 + 9 = 13 (an integer), so xx IS an integer. If x=2x = \sqrt{2}, then (2)2+36(2)2=2+18=20(\sqrt{2})^2 + \frac{36}{(\sqrt{2})^2} = 2 + 18 = 20 (an integer), but xx is NOT an integer.
Since Statement (2) yields both a 'Yes' and a 'No' answer, it is not sufficient.
3
Analyze Statements (1) and (2) combined.
Note that (x+6x)2=x2+12+36x2\left(x + \frac{6}{x}\right)^2 = x^2 + 12 + \frac{36}{x^2}. Thus x2+36x2=(x+6x)212x^2 + \frac{36}{x^2} = \left(x + \frac{6}{x}\right)^2 - 12. Whenever x+6xx + \frac{6}{x} is an integer kk, x2+36x2=k212x^2 + \frac{36}{x^2} = k^2 - 12 is automatically an integer. Therefore, Statement (2) provides no extra constraints.
Both x=2x = 2 (integer) and x=3+3x = 3 + \sqrt{3} (non-integer) satisfy both statements simultaneously, so the combined statements remain insufficient.

Anahtar Kavram

Evaluating algebraic expressions for non-integer real number solutions in Data Sufficiency
Soru 5Soru

If kk is a non-zero real number, is kk an integer?

(1) 12k\frac{12}{k} is an integer.

(2) k23kk^2 - 3k is an integer.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: BOTH statements TOGETHER are sufficient, but NEITHER statement ALONE is sufficient.

Cevap

Both statements together are sufficient to answer the question, but neither statement alone is sufficient.
The correct response demonstrates that neither statement individually restricts kk exclusively to integer values, but combining them enforces that kk is rational (from the reciprocal condition) and has a denominator of 1 (from the quadratic condition), proving conclusively that kk must be an integer.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Evaluate Statement (1) independently.
Statement (1) states that 12k=m\frac{12}{k} = m for some non-zero integer mm, so k=12mk = \frac{12}{m}. If m=1m = 1, k=12k = 12 (an integer). If m=24m = 24, k=0.5k = 0.5 (not an integer). Since kk can be either an integer or a non-integer, Statement (1) is NOT sufficient.
Testing specific values reveals that kk can be fractional while fulfilling the condition.
2
Evaluate Statement (2) independently.
Statement (2) states that k23k=nk^2 - 3k = n for some integer nn. If k=4k = 4, k23k=4k^2 - 3k = 4 (an integer). However, if k=3+132k = \frac{3 + \sqrt{13}}{2}, k23k=1k^2 - 3k = 1 (an integer), but kk is irrational. Since kk can be an integer or irrational, Statement (2) is NOT sufficient.
Quadratic expressions with integer outputs can have irrational inputs.
3
Evaluate Statements (1) and (2) together.
From Statement (1), kk must be rational. Let k=pqk = \frac{p}{q} in lowest terms, where pp and qq are coprimes (gcd(p,q)=1\gcd(p, q) = 1) and q1q \ge 1. Substitute k=pqk = \frac{p}{q} into Statement (2): k23k=p23pqq2k^2 - 3k = \frac{p^2 - 3pq}{q^2}. For this expression to be an integer, q2q^2 must divide p(p3q)p(p - 3q). Since gcd(p,q)=1\gcd(p, q) = 1, qq shares no common prime factors with pp or p3qp - 3q. Thus gcd(p23pq,q2)=1\gcd(p^2 - 3pq, q^2) = 1, which means q2q^2 can divide p23pqp^2 - 3pq if and only if q2=1q^2 = 1, so q=1q = 1. Since q=1q = 1, k=pk = p, which guarantees kk is an integer. Thus, the combined statements yield a definitive 'Yes'.
Combining rationality from the first condition with the algebraic divisibility constraint of the second condition eliminates all non-integer possibilities.

Anahtar Kavram

Data Sufficiency logic with integer constraints and rational number representations
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
Soru 6Soru

If xx and yy are positive integers, is the product xyxy divisible by 4?

(1) xx is divisible by 4.
(2) x+yx + y is an odd integer.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (2) alone is not sufficient.

Cevap

Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (2) alone is not sufficient.
The correct answer is that Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (2) alone is not sufficient. Statement (1) establishes that xx is a multiple of 4, so any integer product xyxy must also be a multiple of 4. Statement (2) only guarantees that one of xx or yy is even, which is not enough to determine if the product has two factors of 2.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the question stem target
We need to determine whether xyxy is divisible by 4, given that xx and yy are positive integers.
Establishing integer constraints ensures we evaluate divisibility conditions properly.
2
Evaluate Statement (1) independently
If xx is divisible by 4, then x=4kx = 4k for some positive integer kk. Then xy=(4k)y=4(ky)xy = (4k)y = 4(ky), which is divisible by 4. This gives a definitive YES.
Multiplying any multiple of 4 by an integer results in a multiple of 4. Therefore, Statement (1) alone is sufficient.
3
Evaluate Statement (2) independently
If x+yx + y is odd, one integer is even and the other is odd. Case 1: If x=4x = 4 and y=1y = 1, x+y=5x+y=5 (odd) and xy=4xy = 4 (divisible by 4 -> YES). Case 2: If x=2x = 2 and y=3y = 3, x+y=5x+y=5 (odd) and xy=6xy = 6 (not divisible by 4 -> NO).
Since Statement (2) yields both YES and NO outcomes, it alone is not sufficient.

Anahtar Kavram

Divisibility and Parity Rules in Data Sufficiency
Soru 7Soru

If mm is a real number, is mm an even integer?

(1) 2m2m is an even integer.
(2) m+1m + 1 is an odd integer.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Statement (2) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (1) alone is not sufficient.

Cevap

Statement (2) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (1) alone is not sufficient.
Statement (1) allows mm to be any integer because multiplying any integer by 22 results in an even integer. Therefore, mm could be 33 (odd) or 44 (even), making Statement (1) insufficient. Statement (2) specifies that m+1m + 1 is an odd integer. Subtracting 11 from an odd integer always yields an even integer, so mm must be an even integer. This provides a single, definitive 'Yes' answer, making Statement (2) alone sufficient.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the target question stem.
We need to determine whether mm is an even integer, given that mm is a real number.
Rephrasing the question clarifies that a definitive 'Yes' or definitive 'No' answer is required.
2
Evaluate Statement (1): 2m2m is an even integer.
If m=4m = 4, then 2m=82m = 8 (even integer), and mm is an even integer (Yes). If m=3m = 3, then 2m=62m = 6 (even integer), but mm is an odd integer (No).
Since Statement (1) yields both 'Yes' and 'No' answers, Statement (1) is NOT sufficient.
3
Evaluate Statement (2): m+1m + 1 is an odd integer.
If m+1m + 1 is an odd integer, then m=(m+1)1m = (m + 1) - 1. An odd integer minus 11 is always an even integer.
This guarantees that mm is an even integer, providing a definitive 'Yes'. Thus, Statement (2) ALONE is sufficient.

Anahtar Kavram

Parity and Integer Properties in Data Sufficiency
Soru 8Soru

If nn is a real number, is nn an integer?

(1) n23nn^2 - 3n is an integer.
(2) n2+5nn^2 + 5n is an integer.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: BOTH statements TOGETHER are sufficient, but NEITHER statement ALONE is sufficient.

Cevap

Both statements together are sufficient to answer definitively that nn is an integer, but neither statement alone is sufficient.
Neither statement alone is sufficient because quadratic equations of the form n23n=kn^2 - 3n = k and n2+5n=mn^2 + 5n = m have non-integer real roots for certain integer values of kk and mm. When both statements are combined, subtracting the two equations reveals that 8n8n is equal to an integer pp, so n=p8n = \frac{p}{8}. Substituting n=p8n = \frac{p}{8} into n23nn^2 - 3n requires p(p24)64\frac{p(p-24)}{64} to be an integer. Examining the power of 2 in p(p24)p(p-24) proves that pp must be divisible by 8, which guarantees that nn is an integer. Thus, the two statements together provide a definitive 'Yes' answer.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Evaluate Statement (1) independently.
Statement (1) is NOT sufficient.
If n23n=1n^2 - 3n = -1 (an integer), then n23n+1=0n^2 - 3n + 1 = 0, giving n=3+52n = \frac{3 + \sqrt{5}}{2}, which is not an integer. However, if n=3n = 3, n23n=0n^2 - 3n = 0, which is an integer. Thus, nn can be an integer or a non-integer.
2
Evaluate Statement (2) independently.
Statement (2) is NOT sufficient.
If n2+5n=1n^2 + 5n = 1 (an integer), then n2+5n1=0n^2 + 5n - 1 = 0, giving n=5+292n = \frac{-5 + \sqrt{29}}{2}, which is not an integer. However, if n=1n = 1, n2+5n=6n^2 + 5n = 6, which is an integer. Thus, nn can be an integer or a non-integer.
3
Combine Statement (1) and Statement (2).
Deduce that 8n8n must be an integer.
Let n23n=kn^2 - 3n = k and n2+5n=mn^2 + 5n = m, where kk and mm are integers. Subtracting the first equation from the second yields (n2+5n)(n23n)=mk    8n=mk(n^2 + 5n) - (n^2 - 3n) = m - k \implies 8n = m - k. Since mkm - k is an integer, let 8n=p8n = p for some integer pp. Hence, n=p8n = \frac{p}{8}.
4
Analyze whether n=p8n = \frac{p}{8} can be a non-integer fraction.
nn MUST be an integer, making BOTH statements TOGETHER sufficient.
Substitute n=p8n = \frac{p}{8} back into Statement (1): n23n=p2643p8=p224p64n^2 - 3n = \frac{p^2}{64} - \frac{3p}{8} = \frac{p^2 - 24p}{64}. For this value to be an integer, p224p=p(p24)p^2 - 24p = p(p - 24) must be divisible by 64=2664 = 2^6. If pp is odd, p24p - 24 is odd, so p(p24)p(p-24) is odd and not divisible by 64. If pp is a multiple of 2 but not 4 (p=2bp = 2b with bb odd), p(p24)=4b(b12)p(p-24) = 4b(b-12), containing only 222^2 factors of 2. If pp is a multiple of 4 but not 8 (p=4bp = 4b with bb odd), p(p24)=16b(b6)p(p-24) = 16b(b-6), containing only 242^4 factors of 2. Thus, for p(p24)p(p-24) to contain 262^6, pp must be a multiple of 8. If pp is a multiple of 8, then n=p8n = \frac{p}{8} must be an integer.

Anahtar Kavram

Evaluating integer constraints vs. real numbers in Data Sufficiency through algebraic elimination and prime factorization of rational expressions.
Soru 9Soru

If xx is a real number, is xx an integer?

(1) x2+xx^2 + x is an integer.
(2) x3+x2x^3 + x^2 is an integer.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: BOTH statements TOGETHER are sufficient, but NEITHER statement ALONE is sufficient.

Cevap

Both statements together are sufficient to determine that xx is an integer, but neither statement alone is sufficient.
Evaluating each statement independently reveals that non-integer real numbers can produce integer values for x2+xx^2 + x or x3+x2x^3 + x^2. However, combining both statements allows us to factor x3+x2x^3 + x^2 as x(x2+x)x(x^2 + x). Setting x2+x=mx^2 + x = m and x3+x2=kx^3 + x^2 = k for integers mm and kk, we find xm=kx \cdot m = k. If m=0m = 0, xx is 0 or -1 (integers). If m0m \neq 0, x=kmx = \frac{k}{m} is a rational number. Writing x=abx = \frac{a}{b} in lowest terms and substituting it back into x2+x=mx^2 + x = m shows that bb must divide a2a^2, forcing b=1b = 1. Thus, xx must be an integer, providing a definitive affirmative answer.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Evaluate Statement (1) independently.
Statement (1) is INSUFFICIENT.
If x=2x = 2, then x2+x=6x^2 + x = 6, which is an integer (YES). However, if x=1+52x = \frac{-1 + \sqrt{5}}{2}, then x2+x1=0    x2+x=1x^2 + x - 1 = 0 \implies x^2 + x = 1, which is an integer, but xx is not an integer (NO). Thus, Statement (1) alone is insufficient.
2
Evaluate Statement (2) independently.
Statement (2) is INSUFFICIENT.
If x=2x = 2, then x3+x2=12x^3 + x^2 = 12, an integer (YES). If xx is the real root of x3+x2=1x^3 + x^2 = 1 (where x0.755x \approx 0.755), x3+x2x^3 + x^2 is an integer, but xx is not an integer (NO). Thus, Statement (2) alone is insufficient.
3
Evaluate Statements (1) and (2) together.
Statements (1) and (2) together are SUFFICIENT.
Let x2+x=mx^2 + x = m where mZm \in \mathbb{Z}, and x3+x2=kx^3 + x^2 = k where kZk \in \mathbb{Z}. Notice that x3+x2=x(x2+x)=xm=kx^3 + x^2 = x(x^2 + x) = x \cdot m = k. If m=0m = 0, then x2+x=0    x=0x^2 + x = 0 \implies x = 0 or x=1x = -1, both of which are integers. If m0m \neq 0, then x=kmx = \frac{k}{m}, meaning xx must be a rational number. Express x=abx = \frac{a}{b} in lowest terms, where a,bZa, b \in \mathbb{Z}, b>0b > 0, and gcd(a,b)=1\gcd(a, b) = 1. Substituting x=abx = \frac{a}{b} into x2+x=mx^2 + x = m yields a2+abb2=m    a2+ab=mb2    a2=b(mba)\frac{a^2 + ab}{b^2} = m \implies a^2 + ab = m b^2 \implies a^2 = b(mb - a). This implies that bb must divide a2a^2. Since gcd(a,b)=1\gcd(a, b) = 1, bb can only divide a2a^2 if b=1b = 1. Therefore, x=a1=ax = \frac{a}{1} = a, which means xx MUST be an integer. The answer to the question is a definitive YES.

Anahtar Kavram

Testing real vs. integer constraints and applying rational root divisibility properties in Data Sufficiency.
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
Soru 10Soru

If xx and yy are positive real numbers, is xx an integer?

(1) x+yx + y is an integer, and x2+xyx^2 + xy is an integer.
(2) xyx - y is an integer, and x2y2x^2 - y^2 is an integer.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Statements (1) and (2) TOGETHER are NOT sufficient.

Cevap

Statements (1) and (2) together are not sufficient to determine whether xx is an integer.
The correct option identifies that statements (1) and (2) together are not sufficient. Testing half-integers such as x=2.5x = 2.5 and y=1.5y = 1.5 shows that all given conditions (x+y=4x+y=4, x2+xy=10x^2+xy=10, xy=1x-y=1, x2y2=4x^2-y^2=4) are integers while xx is not an integer. Conversely, x=3x = 3 and y=1y = 1 satisfies all conditions with an integer xx. Thus, a definitive Yes/No answer cannot be determined.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze Statement (1) independently.
Statement (1) states that x+y=kx + y = k (where kk is an integer) and x2+xy=x(x+y)=mx^2 + xy = x(x+y) = m (where mm is an integer). Thus, xk=m    x=mkx \cdot k = m \implies x = \frac{m}{k}. Since mm and kk are integers, xx is rational, but not necessarily an integer. For example, if x=1.5x = 1.5 and y=0.5y = 0.5, then x+y=2x + y = 2 (integer) and x2+xy=1.5(2)=3x^2 + xy = 1.5(2) = 3 (integer), but x=1.5x = 1.5 is not an integer. If x=2x = 2 and y=1y = 1, then x+y=3x + y = 3 and x2+xy=6x^2 + xy = 6, and x=2x = 2 is an integer. Thus, Statement (1) alone is INSUFFICIENT.
Variable xx is only constrained to be a rational number mk\frac{m}{k}, which may or may not be an integer.
2
Analyze Statement (2) independently.
Statement (2) states that xy=dx - y = d (where dd is an integer) and x2y2=(xy)(x+y)=px^2 - y^2 = (x-y)(x+y) = p (where pp is an integer). Thus d(x+y)=p    x+y=pdd(x+y) = p \implies x+y = \frac{p}{d}. Then 2x=(x+y)+(xy)=pd+d=p+d2d    x=p+d22d2x = (x+y) + (x-y) = \frac{p}{d} + d = \frac{p + d^2}{d} \implies x = \frac{p + d^2}{2d}. If x=2.5x = 2.5 and y=1.5y = 1.5, then xy=1x - y = 1 (integer) and x2y2=6.252.25=4x^2 - y^2 = 6.25 - 2.25 = 4 (integer), but x=2.5x = 2.5 is not an integer. If x=2x = 2 and y=1y = 1, xy=1x - y = 1 and x2y2=3x^2 - y^2 = 3, and x=2x = 2 is an integer. Thus, Statement (2) alone is INSUFFICIENT.
Variable xx is constrained to a rational form with denominator 2d2d, which allows non-integer values.
3
Analyze Statements (1) and (2) combined.
Combining both statements gives x+y=kx + y = k (integer) and xy=dx - y = d (integer). Adding these yields 2x=k+d2x = k + d, so 2x2x must be an integer. This means xx can be an integer or a half-integer (e.g., 2.52.5). Testing x=2.5x = 2.5 and y=1.5y = 1.5: both are positive real numbers; x+y=4x + y = 4 (integer); x2+xy=2.5(4)=10x^2 + xy = 2.5(4) = 10 (integer); xy=1x - y = 1 (integer); and x2y2=6.252.25=4x^2 - y^2 = 6.25 - 2.25 = 4 (integer). Here xx is NOT an integer. Testing x=3x = 3 and y=1y = 1: both are positive real numbers; x+y=4x + y = 4 (integer); x2+xy=3(4)=12x^2 + xy = 3(4) = 12 (integer); xy=2x - y = 2 (integer); and x2y2=91=8x^2 - y^2 = 9 - 1 = 8 (integer). Here xx IS an integer. Because both 'Yes' and 'No' answers are possible under all conditions, Statements (1) and (2) together are INSUFFICIENT.
The system of equations allows xx to be a half-integer (such as 2.52.5), satisfying all integer conditions of both statements without requiring xx itself to be an integer.

Anahtar Kavram

Evaluating implicit non-integer constraints and system degree in Data Sufficiency questions.
Soru 11Soru

If kk is a positive real number, is kk an integer?

(1) k\sqrt{k} is an integer.
(2) k24kk^2 - 4k is an integer.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (2) alone is not sufficient.

Cevap

Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (2) alone is not sufficient.
Statement (1) alone is sufficient because if the square root of kk is an integer mm, then k=m2k = m^2, which is guaranteed to be an integer. Statement (2) alone is not sufficient because k24kk^2 - 4k can equal an integer when k=4k = 4 (an integer) or when k=2+5k = 2 + \sqrt{5} (a non-integer). Therefore, only Statement (1) is sufficient.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Evaluate Statement (1) independently.
If k=m\sqrt{k} = m where mm is an integer, then k=m2k = m^2. Since mm is an integer, m2m^2 must also be an integer. Thus, kk is definitely an integer (Yes).
The square of any integer is always an integer, so Statement (1) is sufficient.
2
Evaluate Statement (2) independently.
Let k24k=nk^2 - 4k = n, where nn is an integer. If n=0n = 0, then k(k4)=0    k=4k(k - 4) = 0 \implies k = 4 (an integer). If n=1n = 1, then k24k1=0    k=2+5k^2 - 4k - 1 = 0 \implies k = 2 + \sqrt{5} (not an integer).
Since kk can be either an integer or a non-integer, Statement (2) does not provide a definitive Yes/No answer and is not sufficient.

Anahtar Kavram

Algebraic definitions of integers versus real numbers in Data Sufficiency
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
Soru 12Soru

If kk is a positive integer, is kk divisible by 6?

(1) kk is a multiple of 2.
(2) kk is a multiple of 3.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: BOTH statements TOGETHER are sufficient, but NEITHER statement ALONE is sufficient.

Cevap

Both statements together are sufficient, but neither statement alone is sufficient.
To determine whether an integer is divisible by 6, it must be divisible by both prime factors of 6, which are 2 and 3. Statement (1) indicates kk is divisible by 2, and Statement (2) indicates kk is divisible by 3. Neither statement alone is sufficient because a number can be a multiple of 2 without being a multiple of 3 (e.g., 2, 4) or a multiple of 3 without being a multiple of 2 (e.g., 3, 9). Taking both statements together ensures kk is a multiple of both 2 and 3, which means kk is a multiple of 6. Therefore, both statements together are sufficient.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Rephrase the question target.
For a positive integer kk to be divisible by 6, it must be divisible by both 2 and 3 because lcm(2,3)=6\text{lcm}(2,3) = 6.
6 is the product of the prime numbers 2 and 3.
2
Evaluate Statement (1) independently.
If k=2k = 2, it is divisible by 2 but not by 6 (No). If k=6k = 6, it is divisible by 2 and by 6 (Yes). Insufficient.
Statement (1) alone allows multiple outcomes for divisibility by 6.
3
Evaluate Statement (2) independently.
If k=3k = 3, it is divisible by 3 but not by 6 (No). If k=6k = 6, it is divisible by 3 and by 6 (Yes). Insufficient.
Statement (2) alone allows multiple outcomes for divisibility by 6.
4
Combine Statement (1) and Statement (2).
Since kk is divisible by 2 and divisible by 3, kk must be a multiple of lcm(2,3)=6\text{lcm}(2,3) = 6. Thus, kk is definitely divisible by 6 (Definitive Yes).
Both conditions combined uniquely answer the question with a definitive Yes.

Anahtar Kavram

Divisibility Rules and Prime Factorization
Soru 13Soru

Is the real number pp negative?

(1) p2>0p^2 > 0
(2) p3<0p^3 < 0

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Statement (2) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (1) alone is not sufficient.

Cevap

Statement (2) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (1) alone is not sufficient.
Statement (1) tells us that p2>0p^2 > 0, which means pp can be any real number except 0. Since pp could be positive (e.g., p=5p = 5) or negative (e.g., p=5p = -5), Statement (1) alone cannot answer whether pp is negative.

Statement (2) tells us that p3<0p^3 < 0. Because taking an odd power of a real number preserves its sign, p3<0p^3 < 0 implies pp must be negative. This provides a definitive 'Yes' answer to the question stem, making Statement (2) sufficient alone.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Evaluate Statement (1): p2>0p^2 > 0
pp can be any non-zero real number (e.g., p=2p = 2 or p=2p = -2).
Squaring any non-zero real number yields a positive value. Thus, pp could be positive or negative, so Statement (1) is not sufficient.
2
Evaluate Statement (2): p3<0p^3 < 0
pp must be negative.
An odd exponent preserves the sign of the base. If p3<0p^3 < 0, then pp must be negative. This provides a definitive 'Yes' answer to whether pp is negative, so Statement (2) is sufficient.

Anahtar Kavram

Properties of real numbers under even and odd exponents
Tahmini Süre:1m 0s
Soru 14Soru

If rr and ss are positive integers, is the sum r+sr + s an odd integer?

(1) rsr \cdot s is an odd integer.
(2) rr is an even integer.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (2) alone is not sufficient.

Cevap

Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (2) alone is not sufficient.
Statement (1) gives enough information to determine that r+sr + s must be even, resulting in a definitive 'No' answer to the question. In Data Sufficiency, a definitive 'No' indicates sufficiency. Statement (2) does not fix the parity of ss, so r+sr + s could be either even or odd, making it insufficient.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the question stem
We are given that rr and ss are positive integers and need to answer the Yes/No question: Is r+sr + s odd?
Establishing the target question and constraints is essential before evaluating the statements.
2
Evaluate Statement (1): rsr \cdot s is an odd integer
The product of two integers is odd if and only if both integers are odd. Therefore, rr is odd and ss is odd. The sum of two odd integers is always an even integer (odd + odd = even). Thus, r+sr + s is definitely not odd.
A definitive 'No' answer to a Yes/No Data Sufficiency question means the statement is SUFFICIENT.
3
Evaluate Statement (2): rr is an even integer
If r=2r = 2 and s=1s = 1, then r+s=3r + s = 3 (odd, answer is Yes). If r=2r = 2 and s=2s = 2, then r+s=4r + s = 4 (even, answer is No). Because both Yes and No are possible, Statement (2) is INSUFFICIENT.
Since Statement (2) allows multiple outcomes for the target question, it does not provide sufficient information.

Anahtar Kavram

Parity rules for addition and multiplication of integers in Data Sufficiency Yes/No decision logic.
Soru 15Soru

If xx and yy are positive real numbers, is xx an integer?

(1) x+yx + y is an integer and xy=12xy = 12.
(2) xyx - y is an integer and x2+y2=25x^2 + y^2 = 25.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: BOTH statements TOGETHER are sufficient, but NEITHER statement ALONE is sufficient.

Cevap

Both statements together are sufficient to determine that xx must be an integer, but neither statement alone is sufficient.
Evaluating both statements together establishes that (x+y)2=x2+y2+2xy=25+2(12)=49(x+y)^2 = x^2 + y^2 + 2xy = 25 + 2(12) = 49, meaning x+y=7x+y=7. The system x+y=7x+y=7 and xy=12xy=12 yields solutions x=3,y=4x=3, y=4 or x=4,y=3x=4, y=3. In both outcomes, xx is guaranteed to be an integer, yielding a definitive 'Yes' answer.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Evaluate Statement (1) independently.
Statement (1) gives x+y=kx + y = k for some integer kk, and xy=12xy = 12. If k=7k = 7, the quadratic equation t27t+12=0t^2 - 7t + 12 = 0 gives roots t=3t = 3 and t=4t = 4, which are integers. However, if k=9k = 9, the quadratic equation t29t+12=0t^2 - 9t + 12 = 0 gives roots t=9±332t = \frac{9 \pm \sqrt{33}}{2}. Here x=9+332x = \frac{9 + \sqrt{33}}{2} is a positive real number, y=9332>0y = \frac{9 - \sqrt{33}}{2} > 0, x+y=9x+y = 9 (integer), and xy=12xy = 12, but xx is NOT an integer. Thus, xx can be an integer or a non-integer.
Demonstrate that positive real numbers whose sum and product are integers do not necessarily have to be integers themselves.
2
Evaluate Statement (2) independently.
Statement (2) gives xy=mx - y = m for some integer mm, and x2+y2=25x^2 + y^2 = 25. If m=1m = 1, we can have x=4x = 4 and y=3y = 3, so xx is an integer. If m=2m = 2, then (xy)2=x22xy+y2    4=252xy    2xy=21(x-y)^2 = x^2 - 2xy + y^2 \implies 4 = 25 - 2xy \implies 2xy = 21. Then (x+y)2=x2+y2+2xy=25+21=46    x+y=46(x+y)^2 = x^2 + y^2 + 2xy = 25 + 21 = 46 \implies x+y = \sqrt{46}. Thus x=46+22x = \frac{\sqrt{46} + 2}{2}, which is positive and real, but NOT an integer. Thus, Statement (2) alone is not sufficient.
Test whether integer difference and fixed sum of squares guarantees integer values.
3
Evaluate Statements (1) and (2) together.
From Statement (1), xy=12xy = 12 and x+y=kx + y = k (where kk is an integer). From Statement (2), x2+y2=25x^2 + y^2 = 25. Using the algebraic identity x2+y2=(x+y)22xyx^2 + y^2 = (x+y)^2 - 2xy, we substitute the known values: 25=k22(12)    25=k224    k2=4925 = k^2 - 2(12) \implies 25 = k^2 - 24 \implies k^2 = 49. Since x>0x > 0 and y>0y > 0, x+y=k>0x + y = k > 0, so k=7k = 7. Now we have x+y=7x + y = 7 and xy=12xy = 12. The possible values for xx and yy are the solutions to t27t+12=0    (t3)(t4)=0    t{3,4}t^2 - 7t + 12 = 0 \implies (t-3)(t-4) = 0 \implies t \in \{3, 4\}. Therefore, xx must be either 3 or 4. In both cases, xx is definitively an integer.
Combine the conditions to solve for x+yx+y and prove xx must be an integer.

Anahtar Kavram

Integer constraints vs. real number assumptions in Data Sufficiency algebraic systems
Soru 16Soru

For a real number pp, is pp an integer?

(1) p3pp^3 - p is a positive prime number.
(2) p2p^2 is an integer.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (2) alone is not sufficient.

Cevap

Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (2) alone is not sufficient.
Statement (1) is sufficient because factoring p3pp^3 - p gives (p1)p(p+1)(p-1)p(p+1), which represents the product of three consecutive integers whenever pp is an integer. The product of any three consecutive integers must be divisible by 6. Since no prime number is a multiple of 6, pp cannot be an integer if p3pp^3 - p is prime. This provides a definitive 'No' answer to the question 'Is pp an integer?', establishing sufficiency. Statement (2) is insufficient because pp could be an integer like 3 (yielding 'Yes') or an irrational number like 3\sqrt{3} (yielding 'No').

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze Statement (1): p3pp^3 - p is a positive prime number.
pp cannot be an integer, yielding a definitive 'No' to the question stem.
Factor p3pp^3 - p as (p1)p(p+1)(p-1)p(p+1). If pp were an integer, this product would represent three consecutive integers. Any three consecutive integers contain at least one even factor and exactly one multiple of 3, making their product divisible by 6. A prime number is a positive integer greater than 1 with no positive divisors other than 1 and itself, so no prime number can be a multiple of 6. Thus, no integer pp can make p3pp^3 - p a prime number. Since p3pp^3 - p is given to be a positive prime, pp must be a non-integer real number. A definitive 'No' answer establishes that Statement (1) alone is sufficient.
2
Analyze Statement (2): p2p^2 is an integer.
pp could be an integer or a non-integer, so the question cannot be answered uniquely.
If p=3p = 3, p2=9p^2 = 9 (an integer), and pp is an integer (Yes). If p=3p = \sqrt{3}, p2=3p^2 = 3 (an integer), but pp is not an integer (No). Because both 'Yes' and 'No' outcomes are possible, Statement (2) alone is not sufficient.
3
Determine the overall Data Sufficiency choice.
Statement (1) alone is sufficient, but Statement (2) alone is not sufficient.
Statement (1) provides a conclusive answer on its own, whereas Statement (2) remains ambiguous.

Anahtar Kavram

Number Properties and Integer Constraints in Data Sufficiency
Soru 17Soru

If xx is a real number, is xx an integer?

(1) x2+2xx^2 + 2x is an integer.
(2) x3+2x2x^3 + 2x^2 is an integer.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: BOTH statements TOGETHER are sufficient, but NEITHER statement ALONE is sufficient.

Cevap

Both statements together are sufficient to determine that xx is an integer, but neither statement alone is sufficient.
The correct response is that both statements together are sufficient, but neither statement alone is sufficient. Statement (1) permits irrational values like x=1+2x = -1 + \sqrt{2}, making it insufficient on its own. Statement (2) permits irrational values like x=1+52x = \frac{-1 + \sqrt{5}}{2}, making it insufficient on its own. Combining both statements allows us to express xx as the quotient of two integers b/ab/a when x2+2x0x^2 + 2x \neq 0, which mathematically forces xx to be an integer.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Evaluate Statement (1) independently: x2+2xx^2 + 2x is an integer.
Statement (1) is NOT sufficient.
Let x2+2x=1x^2 + 2x = 1. Solving x2+2x1=0x^2 + 2x - 1 = 0 gives x=1+2x = -1 + \sqrt{2}, which is a real non-integer. However, if x=1x = 1, x2+2x=3x^2 + 2x = 3 is also an integer. Since xx could be an integer or a non-integer, Statement (1) alone is insufficient.
2
Evaluate Statement (2) independently: x3+2x2x^3 + 2x^2 is an integer.
Statement (2) is NOT sufficient.
Let x3+2x2=1x^3 + 2x^2 = 1. The equation x3+2x21=0x^3 + 2x^2 - 1 = 0 factors as (x+1)(x2+x1)=0(x + 1)(x^2 + x - 1) = 0. Setting x2+x1=0x^2 + x - 1 = 0 yields non-integer root x=1+52x = \frac{-1 + \sqrt{5}}{2}. For this non-integer value, x3+2x2=1x^3 + 2x^2 = 1, which is an integer. Since xx can also be the integer 1-1, Statement (2) alone is insufficient.
3
Evaluate Statements (1) and (2) together.
Both statements together are SUFFICIENT.
From Statement (1), let x2+2x=ax^2 + 2x = a, where aa is an integer. From Statement (2), let x3+2x2=bx^3 + 2x^2 = b, where bb is an integer. Notice that x3+2x2=x(x2+2x)=xa=bx^3 + 2x^2 = x(x^2 + 2x) = x \cdot a = b. Case 1: If a=0a = 0, then x2+2x=0    x(x+2)=0    x=0x^2 + 2x = 0 \implies x(x + 2) = 0 \implies x = 0 or x=2x = -2, both of which are integers. Case 2: If a0a \neq 0, then x=bax = \frac{b}{a}, meaning xx is a rational number. Let x=mnx = \frac{m}{n} in lowest terms where gcd(m,n)=1\gcd(m, n) = 1 and n>0n > 0. Substituting x=mnx = \frac{m}{n} into x2+2x=ax^2 + 2x = a gives m2n2+2mn=a    m2+2mn=an2    m(m+2n)=an2\frac{m^2}{n^2} + \frac{2m}{n} = a \implies m^2 + 2mn = a n^2 \implies m(m + 2n) = a n^2. If n>1n > 1, any prime factor pp of nn must divide m(m+2n)m(m + 2n), which implies pp divides m2m^2 and thus pp divides mm. This contradicts gcd(m,n)=1\gcd(m, n) = 1. Thus, nn must equal 11, proving xx is an integer.

Anahtar Kavram

Using algebraic combination of Data Sufficiency statements and integer polynomial constraints to establish sufficiency without assuming variables are integers.
Soru 18Soru

If nn is a positive real number, is nn an integer?

(1) n+6nn + \frac{6}{n} is an integer.
(2) n2+36n2n^2 + \frac{36}{n^2} is an integer.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Statements (1) and (2) TOGETHER are NOT sufficient.

Cevap

Statements (1) and (2) TOGETHER are NOT sufficient to determine whether nn is an integer.
The correct answer identifies that neither statement alone is sufficient, and combining them offers no additional constraint because the second statement is algebraically derived by squaring the first. Since non-integer real numbers such as n=3+3n = 3 + \sqrt{3} satisfy both statements, the statements together remain insufficient.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Evaluate Statement (1) by setting n+6n=kn + \frac{6}{n} = k, where kk is an integer.
Multiplying by nn gives n2kn+6=0n^2 - kn + 6 = 0, which yields n=k±k2242n = \frac{k \pm \sqrt{k^2 - 24}}{2}. For nn to be a real number, we need k224k^2 \ge 24, so k5k \ge 5.
We must test whether all positive real solutions for nn under this condition are integers.
2
Test specific integer values for kk in Statement (1).
If k=5k = 5, then n=5±12n = \frac{5 \pm 1}{2}, giving n=3n = 3 or n=2n = 2 (both are integers, yielding a YES answer). However, if k=6k = 6, then n=6±122=3±3n = \frac{6 \pm \sqrt{12}}{2} = 3 \pm \sqrt{3}, which is a positive real number but NOT an integer (yielding a NO answer).
Since Statement (1) permits both integer and non-integer values for nn, Statement (1) ALONE is NOT sufficient.
3
Evaluate Statement (2) independently and analyze its algebraic relationship to Statement (1).
If n+6n=kn + \frac{6}{n} = k, then squaring both sides gives (n+6n)2=n2+12+36n2=k2\left(n + \frac{6}{n}\right)^2 = n^2 + 12 + \frac{36}{n^2} = k^2, which implies n2+36n2=k212n^2 + \frac{36}{n^2} = k^2 - 12. If kk is an integer, k212k^2 - 12 is automatically an integer.
This shows Statement (2) is logically and algebraically implied by Statement (1).
4
Evaluate Statements (1) and (2) together.
Because Statement (2) provides zero new information beyond Statement (1), combining them does not eliminate the non-integer solution n=3+3n = 3 + \sqrt{3}. Thus, the question cannot be answered definitively.
Redundant statements cannot resolve insufficiency present in the individual statements.

Anahtar Kavram

Number Properties and Integer Constraints in Data Sufficiency
Tahmini Süre:2m 30s
Soru 19Soru

If kk is a real number, is kk an integer?

(1) k2kk^2 - k is an integer.
(2) k3kk^3 - k is an integer.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: BOTH statements TOGETHER are sufficient, but NEITHER statement ALONE is sufficient.

Cevap

BOTH statements TOGETHER are sufficient, but NEITHER statement ALONE is sufficient.
Neither statement alone is sufficient because non-integer real numbers can produce integer outputs for k2kk^2 - k or k3kk^3 - k. However, when both statements are combined, expressing k3kk^3 - k as m(k+1)m(k + 1) proves that kk must be a rational number. For any rational number ab\frac{a}{b} in lowest terms, (ab)2ab\left(\frac{a}{b}\right)^2 - \frac{a}{b} can only be an integer if the denominator b=1b = 1, which proves definitively that kk must be an integer.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Evaluate Statement (1) independently.
Statement (1) is NOT sufficient.
We are given that k2k=mk^2 - k = m for some integer mm. If m=1m = 1, then k2k1=0k^2 - k - 1 = 0, which gives k=1+52k = \frac{1 + \sqrt{5}}{2}. Here, kk is not an integer, but k2k=1k^2 - k = 1 is an integer. Thus, Statement (1) alone does not determine whether kk is an integer.
2
Evaluate Statement (2) independently.
Statement (2) is NOT sufficient.
We are given that k3k=nk^3 - k = n for some integer nn. If n=1n = 1, then k3k1=0k^3 - k - 1 = 0. By the Intermediate Value Theorem, there exists a real number k(1,2)k \in (1, 2) satisfying this equation. Since 1<k<21 < k < 2, kk cannot be an integer, yet k3k=1k^3 - k = 1 is an integer. Thus, Statement (2) alone does not determine whether kk is an integer.
3
Evaluate Statements (1) and (2) combined.
The combined statements are SUFFICIENT.
Let k2k=mZk^2 - k = m \in \mathbb{Z} and k3k=nZk^3 - k = n \in \mathbb{Z}. Note that k3k=k(k21)=k(k2k+k1)=k(m+k1)=mk+k2k=mk+m=m(k+1)k^3 - k = k(k^2 - 1) = k(k^2 - k + k - 1) = k(m + k - 1) = mk + k^2 - k = mk + m = m(k + 1). Thus, n=m(k+1)n = m(k + 1). If m=0m = 0, then k2k=0    k=0k^2 - k = 0 \implies k = 0 or k=1k = 1, both of which are integers. If m0m \neq 0, then mk=nm    k=nmmmk = n - m \implies k = \frac{n - m}{m}. Since mm and nn are integers, kk must be a rational number. Let k=abk = \frac{a}{b} in reduced form with gcd(a,b)=1\gcd(a, b) = 1 and b1b \ge 1. Substituting into k2k=mk^2 - k = m yields a2abb2=m    a(ab)=mb2\frac{a^2 - ab}{b^2} = m \implies a(a - b) = m b^2. This means b2b^2 must divide a(ab)a(a - b). Since gcd(a,b2)=1\gcd(a, b^2) = 1, b2b^2 must divide aba - b, which implies b=1b = 1. Therefore, k=ak = a, so kk MUST be an integer.

Anahtar Kavram

Testing implicit real number constraints vs integer constraints using polynomial reduction and rational root properties.
Soru 20Soru

If rr is a positive real number, is rr an integer?

(1) r2+2rr^2 + 2r is an integer.
(2) r22rr^2 - 2r is an integer.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: BOTH statements TOGETHER are sufficient, but NEITHER statement ALONE is sufficient.

Cevap

BOTH statements TOGETHER are sufficient, but NEITHER statement ALONE is sufficient.
Neither statement alone is sufficient because irrational numbers like 21\sqrt{2}-1 and 2+1\sqrt{2}+1 can satisfy statements (1) and (2) respectively. However, combining both statements proves that 4r4r is an integer kk, and substituting r=k/4r = k/4 into the quadratic equation shows that kk must be a multiple of 4, forcing rr to be a positive integer.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Evaluate Statement (1) independently.
Statement (1) is INSUFFICIENT.
If r=1r = 1, then r2+2r=3r^2 + 2r = 3 (an integer), and rr is an integer (YES). If r=21r = \sqrt{2} - 1, then r2+2r=(322)+(222)=1r^2 + 2r = (3 - 2\sqrt{2}) + (2\sqrt{2} - 2) = 1 (an integer), but rr is NOT an integer (NO). Since rr can be an integer or a non-integer, Statement (1) alone is not sufficient.
2
Evaluate Statement (2) independently.
Statement (2) is INSUFFICIENT.
If r=3r = 3, then r22r=3r^2 - 2r = 3 (an integer), and rr is an integer (YES). If r=2+1r = \sqrt{2} + 1, then r22r=(3+22)(22+2)=1r^2 - 2r = (3 + 2\sqrt{2}) - (2\sqrt{2} + 2) = 1 (an integer), but rr is NOT an integer (NO). Since rr can be an integer or a non-integer, Statement (2) alone is not sufficient.
3
Evaluate Statement (1) and Statement (2) together.
Statements (1) and (2) together are SUFFICIENT.
Let r2+2r=ar^2 + 2r = a and r22r=br^2 - 2r = b, where aa and bb are integers. Subtracting Statement (2) from Statement (1) gives (r2+2r)(r22r)=ab    4r=ab(r^2 + 2r) - (r^2 - 2r) = a - b \implies 4r = a - b. Since aa and bb are integers, ab=ka - b = k for some integer kk. Thus, r=k4r = \frac{k}{4}. Now substitute r=k4r = \frac{k}{4} back into Statement (1): (k4)2+2(k4)=a    k216+k2=a    k2+8k16=a\left(\frac{k}{4}\right)^2 + 2\left(\frac{k}{4}\right) = a \implies \frac{k^2}{16} + \frac{k}{2} = a \implies \frac{k^2 + 8k}{16} = a. This means 1616 must divide k2+8k=k(k+8)k^2 + 8k = k(k+8). If kk were odd, k(k+8)k(k+8) would be odd and thus not divisible by 16. So kk must be even. Let k=2mk = 2m. Then k(k+8)=2m(2m+8)=4m(m+4)k(k+8) = 2m(2m+8) = 4m(m+4). For 1616 to divide 4m(m+4)4m(m+4), 44 must divide m(m+4)m(m+4). If mm were odd, m(m+4)m(m+4) would be odd, which is not divisible by 4. Thus, mm must be even. Let m=2pm = 2p. Then k=2m=4pk = 2m = 4p, which means kk is a multiple of 4. Therefore, r=k4=4p4=pr = \frac{k}{4} = \frac{4p}{4} = p, an integer. Thus, rr MUST be an integer.

Anahtar Kavram

Testing integer constraints in Data Sufficiency requires evaluating whether non-integer real numbers satisfy given equations, and combining equations to determine if rational and integer bounds strictly hold.
Sayfa 1 / 2Sonraki
Number Properties and Integer Constraints in Data Sufficiency Alıştırma Soruları — GMAT | Examkin