Identifying Unstated Assumptions

34 soru

Soru 21Soru

Consider the following argument:

A regional port authority plans to replace all diesel-powered cargo cranes with hydrogen fuel-cell cranes to achieve a net reduction in total carbon emissions within its maritime operating region. Critics point out that producing hydrogen fuel requires substantial electrical energy, which can generate significant carbon emissions depending on the source.

Statement to evaluate: The port authority's argument relies on the unstated assumption that the electricity used to produce the hydrogen fuel will not generate carbon emissions equal to or greater than the emissions saved by eliminating the diesel cranes.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: True

Cevap

True. The statement represents a necessary unstated assumption required for the port authority's conclusion to hold logically.
The statement accurately identifies a necessary unstated assumption. For the port authority to conclude that switching fuel types yields a net overall reduction in atmospheric carbon emissions, the upstream emissions created during hydrogen fuel generation must not offset or surpass the downstream emissions saved at the dock. Negating this statement directly invalidates the claim of a net reduction.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Deconstruct the argument structure
Premise: Diesel cranes are being replaced with hydrogen fuel-cell cranes. Premise: Hydrogen production requires electricity that may emit carbon. Conclusion: The transition will achieve a net reduction in carbon emissions.
Identifying the explicit premises and conclusion isolates the gap between the action taken and the intended outcome.
2
Apply the Negation Test to the evaluated statement
Negated claim: Electricity generation for hydrogen fuel production will produce carbon emissions equal to or greater than the emissions eliminated from diesel cranes.
Logical negation of a valid underlying assumption must invalidate the argument's conclusion.
3
Evaluate the impact of the negated statement on the conclusion
If off-site hydrogen production emissions match or exceed on-site diesel savings, the overall regional carbon footprint does not decrease.
The conclusion of a net reduction becomes logically impossible, proving the original statement is a necessary assumption.

Anahtar Kavram

Negation Test for Unstated Assumptions
Soru 22Soru

To meet new regional environmental targets, Apex Airways plans to replace conventional jet fuel across its entire short-haul fleet with synthetic fuel manufactured from captured atmospheric carbon dioxide. The airline's executives claim that implementing this plan will reduce Apex Airways' overall annual net carbon emissions by at least 30 percent over the next two years. They point out that burning synthetic fuel releases only the carbon dioxide previously extracted from the atmosphere during its production. Which of the following is an assumption on which the executives' claim depends?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The electricity used in the synthesis of the new fuel does not generate carbon emissions that offset a substantial portion of the net emissions reduction achieved during flights.

Cevap

The argument depends on assuming that the electricity used to synthesize the fuel does not generate emissions that negate the expected carbon reduction.
The argument concludes that Apex Airways will achieve a 30 percent net reduction in carbon emissions by switching to synthetic fuel. The premise notes that burning synthetic fuel adds no net carbon because it releases only captured atmospheric carbon. However, if the manufacturing process itself relies on electricity generated from high-emissions sources (such as coal or natural gas), the overall carbon footprint across the lifecycle of the fuel could offset the flight-stage savings. Therefore, the executives must assume that energy used in production does not negate these savings.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the argument's premises and conclusion.
Premise: Synthetic fuel releases only previously captured CO2 when burned. Conclusion: Overall annual net carbon emissions of the airline will drop by at least 30%.
Understanding the precise leap from premise to conclusion highlights logical gaps.
2
Locate the logical gap in the lifecycle of the synthetic fuel.
The argument focuses strictly on the flight phase (combustion) and atmospheric extraction, but overlooks the energy inputs required during the fuel synthesis process.
If producing the fuel requires high-carbon energy, total net emissions could remain unchanged or increase.
3
Apply the Negation Test to the correct option.
Negating the statement yields: 'The electricity used in manufacturing DOES generate emissions that offset a substantial portion of the net emissions reduction.' This completely shatters the conclusion.
A required assumption must cause the conclusion to collapse when logically negated.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying Unstated Assumptions using the Negation Test
Soru 23Soru

Consider the following argument:

A historical archive plans to digitize its fragile 15th-century parchment manuscripts using a novel non-contact blue-spectrum laser scanner. The archive directors claim that implementing this imaging technology will significantly extend the physical lifespan of the original manuscripts compared to existing research practices. They argue that once ultra-high-resolution digital replicas are available online, scholars will no longer need to physically handle or open the bound originals.

Evaluate the following statement:
"The high-intensity light emitted by the laser scanner during the digitization process does not itself cause physical or chemical degradation to the parchment pages."

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: True

Cevap

The statement is TRUE because it represents a necessary unstated assumption for the archive directors' conclusion to hold.
The argument relies on a comparison between the harm caused by manual handling and the overall effect of the digitization process. For the conclusion to hold true—that digitization extends the physical lifespan of the manuscripts—the procedure itself must not introduce a new source of damage that counteracts the benefits of reduced handling. Therefore, assuming the laser light does not degrade the parchment is necessary for the conclusion to stand.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Deconstruct the argument into its core components.
Premise: Digital copies will eliminate the need for scholars to physically handle the manuscripts. Conclusion: Using the laser scanner to digitize the manuscripts will extend the physical lifespan of the originals.
Identifying the link between the premise and conclusion reveals the gap in the reasoning.
2
Apply the Negation Test to the statement.
Negated statement: The high-intensity light emitted by the laser scanner during digitization DOES cause physical or chemical degradation to the parchment pages.
Logical negation of a valid assumption must collapse the author's conclusion.
3
Evaluate the impact of the negated statement on the argument's conclusion.
If scanning inflicts chemical or physical damage on the parchment, digitizing them does not extend their lifespan. The argument collapses.
Because the negated claim invalidates the conclusion, the original statement is a necessary unstated assumption.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying Unstated Assumptions via the Negation Test
Soru 24Soru

Consider the following argument:

A national archive facility plans to digitize its endangered 18th-century parchment collection using high-intensity multispectral scanners before sealing the physical documents in permanent anoxic (oxygen-deprived) glass enclosures. The director asserts that executing this procedure will ensure that the physical parchments suffer no further chemical degradation over the next fifty years.

Statement:
The intense radiation emitted during the multispectral scanning process will not initiate chemical reactions in the parchment that cause degradation after the documents are sealed.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: True

Cevap

True. The statement represents a necessary unstated assumption for the argument.
The argument asserts that the two-step procedure will guarantee that no further chemical degradation occurs over fifty years. For this conclusion to hold, the initial scanning phase must not introduce latent chemical damage that manifests after oxygen is removed. If high-intensity scanning initiates internal chemical reactions that persist inside the anoxic enclosure, the claim of zero further chemical degradation fails. Therefore, the statement that scanning will not trigger such post-sealing degradation is a required assumption.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the argument's premises and conclusion.
Premises: The archive facility will scan parchments with high-intensity multispectral scanners and then seal them in anoxic enclosures. Conclusion: Executing this procedure will ensure the parchments suffer no further chemical degradation over the next fifty years.
Establishing the logical bridge between the action (scanning and sealing) and the promised outcome (no further chemical degradation) is required to locate implicit gaps.
2
Apply the Negation Test to the statement.
Negated statement: The intense radiation emitted during multispectral scanning WILL initiate chemical reactions in the parchment that cause degradation after the documents are sealed.
Negating a necessary assumption must cause the conclusion of the argument to fall apart.
3
Evaluate the impact of the negated statement on the argument's conclusion.
If scanning triggers ongoing chemical decay, sealing the parchments in oxygen-free glass will not prevent chemical degradation, thereby disproving the director's assertion.
Because the conclusion collapses under negation, the statement is proved to be an indispensable assumption.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying Unstated Assumptions using the Negation Test
Soru 25Soru

A commercial freight airline plans to install real-time artificial intelligence sensors on all of its cargo aircraft engines to continuously monitor mechanical vibrations and thermal stress. Company executives claim that because these sensors will detect minor hardware wear before component failure occurs, the airline will eliminate unscheduled maintenance delays and thereby increase its net operational profit over the coming fiscal year.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the executives' argument depends?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The financial expenditures required to purchase, install, and service the sensors will not exceed the monetary savings generated by eliminating unscheduled maintenance delays.

Cevap

The argument relies on the assumption that the total expenses associated with purchasing, installing, and servicing the AI sensors will be less than the financial savings achieved by preventing unscheduled maintenance delays.
The conclusion asserts that implementing AI sensors will increase net operational profit by eliminating unscheduled maintenance delays. For an operational improvement to yield net profit, the financial benefit (savings from avoiding delays) must outweigh the costs required to achieve that improvement (purchasing, installing, and servicing the sensors). If costs exceed savings, net profit will not increase. Therefore, assuming that sensor implementation expenses do not exceed savings is strictly necessary.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Deconstruct the argument into premise and conclusion.
Premise: AI sensors detect minor engine wear before failure, eliminating unscheduled maintenance delays. Conclusion: Installing the sensors will increase net operational profit next fiscal year.
Isolating the gap between reducing delays (an operational metric) and increasing net profit (a financial metric) reveals the unstated premise.
2
Apply the Negation Test to the potential assumption.
Negated statement: The expenditures to purchase, install, and service the sensors WILL equal or exceed the savings gained from preventing delays.
If sensor implementation costs exceed the savings from avoided delays, the overall financial result will be a net decrease or neutral impact on profit, completely breaking the author's conclusion.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying Unstated Assumptions via the Negation Test
Soru 26Soru

In an effort to reduce carbon emissions from corporate travel, management at Veloce Strategy announced a policy requiring all employees traveling distances under 300 miles to take passenger trains instead of commercial flights. Company executives project that this policy will reduce the firm's total annual travel-related carbon footprint by at least 15 percent, noting that short-haul flights currently account for 20 percent of Veloce's travel emissions and that electric passenger rail produces negligible direct emissions.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the executive's projection depends?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Employees subject to the new policy will not choose to drive personal gasoline-powered automobiles for a significant portion of their business trips under 300 miles.

Cevap

The correct option is the statement that employees subject to the new policy will not choose to drive personal gasoline-powered automobiles for a significant portion of their business trips under 300 miles.
The argument relies on the premise that eliminating short-haul flights (which constitute 20% of emissions) by mandating electric rail will yield a net reduction of at least 15%. For this projection to hold, employees must not replace flights with another carbon-intensive transport method, such as driving gasoline-powered vehicles. If employees were to drive instead, the resulting auto emissions would offset the savings from avoiding short-haul flights, causing the conclusion to collapse.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the premises and conclusion of the argument
Premises: Short-haul flights account for 20% of emissions; electric rail produces negligible emissions. Conclusion: Replacing short-haul flights with train travel will reduce total travel emissions by at least 15%.
Deconstructing the argument reveals the gap between shifting away from short-haul flights and achieving the net 15% reduction.
2
Identify the potential logical gap
The author assumes that employees banned from flying under 300 miles will actually take the train rather than substituting flights with another high-emission transport mode (such as gasoline cars).
If employees substitute flights with driving cars, new emissions from driving could negate the expected savings.
3
Apply the Negation Test to confirm the necessary assumption
Negated statement: 'Employees WILL choose to drive personal gasoline-powered automobiles for a significant portion of these trips.' If true, emissions from driving would rise, destroying the claim that emissions will drop by at least 15%.
Since the negated choice shatters the main conclusion, it is a required unstated assumption.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying Unstated Assumptions via the Negation Test
Soru 27Soru

To reduce the incidental bycatch of harbour porpoises, maritime authorities plan to require all commercial gillnet fishing vessels operating in the North Bay to install high-frequency acoustic deterrent devices on their nets. These devices emit acoustic pulses that cause porpoises to avoid the immediate vicinity of the nets without scaring away the commercial fish species targeted by fishermen. Authorities conclude that widespread adoption of these devices will result in a sustained decrease in harbour porpoise deaths attributable to commercial fishing in the North Bay.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the maritime authorities' conclusion depends?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Harbour porpoises in the North Bay will not over time become habituated to the acoustic pulses in a way that diminishes the devices' deterrent effect.

Cevap

The argument depends on assuming that harbour porpoises in the North Bay will not gradually become habituated to the acoustic pulses, which would undermine the long-term effectiveness of the deterrent devices.
The conclusion asserts that equipping nets with acoustic deterrents will result in a sustained decrease in porpoise mortality. For this long-term prediction to hold true, the animals must continue to be repelled by the signals over time. If porpoises become habituated to the pulses, the devices will lose their effectiveness, causing the conclusion to fail. Therefore, non-habituation is a required unstated assumption.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the premises and conclusion of the argument.
Premise: Acoustic devices deter porpoises from gillnets without scaring away target fish. Conclusion: Widespread installation will lead to a sustained decrease in porpoise deaths from commercial fishing.
Understanding the core gap between the intervention (acoustic devices) and the intended outcome (sustained reduction in deaths) is essential for finding the unstated assumption.
2
Apply the Negation Test to candidate assumptions.
Negate the habituation statement: 'Porpoises WILL over time become habituated to the acoustic pulses, diminishing the deterrent effect.'
If the negated statement is true, porpoises will eventually ignore the signals and return to net areas, causing the conclusion of a 'sustained decrease' in deaths to collapse.
3
Confirm that alternative choices represent out-of-scope claims, extreme statements, or premise contradictions.
Claims regarding cost-effectiveness, fishermen's financial losses, fish displacement, or population doubling are either irrelevant, contradictory, or unnecessarily extreme.
An unstated assumption must be strictly necessary for the conclusion to hold, not merely helpful or plausible.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying Unstated Assumptions using the Negation Test
Soru 28Soru

Consider the following argument:

Municipal planners in Westford plan to reduce peak-hour traffic congestion by offering subsidies to private companies that allow employees to work remotely two days per week. The planners contend that because fewer commuters will travel to office buildings during morning rush hours, overall daily traffic delays on major city roadways will decrease substantially.

Statement: The planners' argument depends on the unstated assumption that the reduction in commuter traffic during peak hours will not be offset by an increase in non-work vehicle trips made during those same hours by remote workers.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: True

Cevap

The statement is TRUE because the argument relies on the unstated assumption that remote workers will not generate new peak-hour non-work trips that offset the decrease in commuting trips.
The statement accurately identifies a necessary unstated assumption of the argument. Using the Negation Test, if remote workers increase non-work vehicle trips during peak hours to an extent that offsets the reduction in commuter trips, the total volume of traffic during peak hours will not decrease, directly invalidating the conclusion that traffic congestion will diminish.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the argument's premises and main conclusion.
Premise: Subsidizing remote work reduces the number of commuters traveling to offices during morning rush hours. Conclusion: Overall daily traffic delays on major city roadways will decrease substantially.
Deconstructing the argument isolates the logical gap between reduced commuting and overall peak-hour congestion reduction.
2
Apply the Negation Test to the statement.
Negated Statement: The reduction in commuter traffic during peak hours WILL be offset by an increase in non-work vehicle trips made during those same hours by remote workers.
If negating a statement invalidates the argument's conclusion, that statement is a necessary unstated assumption.
3
Evaluate the impact of the negated statement on the conclusion.
If non-work trips increase enough to offset the drop in commuter trips, total vehicle volume during peak hours remains unchanged or increases, destroying the claim that traffic delays will decrease.
The conclusion relies on a net decrease in total peak-hour road usage.

Anahtar Kavram

Negation Test for Unstated Assumptions
Soru 29Soru

Consider the following argument:
A commercial pharmaceutical company plans to transition its temperature-sensitive vaccine shipments from refrigerated delivery trucks to insulated containers cooled by solid carbon dioxide (dry ice). Company executives calculate that because dry ice maintains low temperatures without drawing power from vehicle engines, fuel consumption per delivery truck will drop by 12%. They conclude that adopting these dry-ice containers will reduce the company's total carbon emissions from vaccine distribution.

Statement: The carbon emissions produced during the industrial manufacturing and supply of the dry ice will not exceed the carbon emissions saved by the reduction in truck fuel consumption.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: True

Cevap

True. The statement represents a necessary assumption because if dry ice manufacturing emissions exceed the fuel emission savings, the overall carbon emissions from vaccine distribution would increase, destroying the argument's conclusion.
The argument relies on a scope shift from vehicle fuel emissions to total distribution emissions. To bridge this gap, the process of supplying dry ice must not generate more carbon emissions than the vehicle fuel savings eliminate. Applying the Negation Test confirms that if dry ice production emissions exceed fuel savings, the conclusion fails completely.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the argument's premise and conclusion.
Premise: Dry-ice containers reduce truck fuel consumption by 12% by eliminating the engine power draw of refrigeration units. Conclusion: Adopting dry-ice containers will reduce total carbon emissions from vaccine distribution.
Understanding the precise gap between the premise (truck fuel emissions) and the conclusion (total distribution emissions) is essential for identifying unstated assumptions.
2
Apply the Negation Test to the statement.
Negated Statement: The carbon emissions produced during dry ice manufacturing and supply WILL exceed the emissions saved by reduced truck fuel consumption.
If the negated version of a statement causes the argument's conclusion to logically collapse, that statement is a necessary assumption.
3
Evaluate the impact of the negated statement on the conclusion.
If manufacturing emissions exceed fuel savings, net carbon emissions increase, making it impossible to reduce total distribution emissions.
Since the negated statement invalidates the conclusion, the original statement MUST be true for the argument to hold.

Anahtar Kavram

Negation Test for Unstated Assumptions
Soru 30Soru

Consider the following argument:

A commercial aquaculture firm plans to replace traditional fishmeal with a novel kelp-based bio-feed in its ocean net-pen salmon farms. Management reasons that because the bio-feed increased salmon growth rates by 15 percent in land-based tank trials, switching to the bio-feed in ocean net-pen operations will significantly increase the farm's overall annual net profits.

Statement: The argument depends on the unstated assumption that salmon raised in ocean net-pens absorb nutrients from the kelp-based bio-feed with sufficient efficiency to maintain a growth advantage comparable to that observed in land-based tanks.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: True

Cevap

The statement is TRUE because the argument relies on the necessary assumption that growth enhancements observed in land-based trials will translate to open ocean net-pen environments.
The argument projects higher profitability based entirely on growth rate gains observed in land-based tank trials. For this extrapolation to hold, the author must assume that salmon in ocean net-pens can digest and absorb the bio-feed effectively enough to reproduce these growth gains. Negating this statement eliminates the expected benefit, causing the conclusion to fail.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Deconstruct the argument into premises and conclusion.
Premise: Kelp-based bio-feed enhanced salmon growth rates by 15% in land-based tank trials. Conclusion: Replacing traditional fishmeal with bio-feed in ocean net-pen operations will increase overall annual net profits.
Identifying the components reveals the underlying gap between the test environment (tanks) and the operational environment (ocean net-pens).
2
Identify the unstated logical bridge required to connect the premise to the conclusion.
The author must assume that the performance gains observed in land-based tanks will hold true under open ocean net-pen conditions.
An assumption is an unstated premise required for the conclusion to remain valid.
3
Apply the Negation Test to the statement.
Negated statement: Salmon in ocean net-pens do NOT absorb nutrients from the bio-feed with sufficient efficiency to maintain a growth advantage comparable to land-based tanks.
If the negated statement is true, the growth advantage vanishes in ocean net-pens, rendering the expected profit increase unsupported and invalidating the argument.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying Unstated Assumptions (Environment Transfer & Negation Test)
Soru 31Soru

A regional hospital system plans to transition its patient health records from localized physical servers to a centralized cloud-based network. Hospital administrators argue that this migration will significantly reduce overall diagnostic turnaround times in the emergency room, noting that the cloud system allows physicians to retrieve patient medical histories instantaneously from any workstation rather than waiting several minutes for local server queries. Which of the following is an assumption on which the hospital administrators' argument depends?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Delays caused by local server queries currently account for a meaningful portion of the overall diagnostic turnaround time in the emergency room.

Cevap

The argument depends on the assumption that delays caused by local server queries currently account for a meaningful portion of the overall diagnostic turnaround time in the emergency room.
The conclusion asserts that cloud retrieval will significantly reduce overall diagnostic turnaround times because retrieving histories will take seconds rather than several minutes. For this conclusion to hold, the time saved during file retrieval must represent a meaningful component of the total diagnostic timeframe. Applying the Negation Test shows that if server delays are trivial in the context of the total diagnostic duration, the migration will fail to deliver a significant reduction in overall turnaround time.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the main premise and conclusion of the argument.
Premise: Cloud servers allow instantaneous retrieval of medical histories instead of waiting several minutes for local server queries. Conclusion: Moving to cloud servers will significantly reduce overall diagnostic turnaround times.
Deconstructing the argument isolates the logical bridge between instantaneous record retrieval and overall diagnostic turnaround time.
2
Identify the logical gap between premise and conclusion.
The author assumes that saving several minutes during file retrieval will result in a significant overall reduction in total diagnostic turnaround time.
If file retrieval time is negligible compared to the total time needed for diagnostics, saving those minutes will not significantly affect the total time.
3
Apply the Negation Test to the correct choice.
Negated statement: Delays from local server queries do NOT account for a meaningful portion of overall diagnostic turnaround time. Outcome: If server query delays are negligible, eliminating them cannot significantly reduce overall turnaround times. The conclusion shatters.
A valid unstated assumption must be necessary to the conclusion; its logical negation must collapse the argument.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying Unstated Assumptions (Negation Test)
Soru 32Soru

Consider the following argument: To preserve its historical archives, a municipal library plans to store its entire collection of 19th-century paper maps in sealed, low-humidity desiccant vaults. The chief archivist claims that because high ambient humidity significantly accelerates cellulose hydrolysis in paper, maintaining ultra-low moisture levels in these vaults will completely prevent further degradation of the map collection.

True or False: The archivist's argument depends on the assumption that environmental factors other than humidity, such as light exposure or airborne acids, are not independently causing ongoing paper degradation in the collection.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: True

Cevap

True. The statement represents a necessary unstated assumption for the argument.
The statement is true because the archivist asserts that low humidity will 'completely prevent further degradation.' If other unaddressed factors like light exposure or airborne pollutants independently cause paper degradation, humidity control alone cannot achieve complete prevention. Applying the Negation Test shows that if other factors do independently cause degradation, the conclusion fails.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the conclusion and premise of the argument.
Premise: High ambient humidity accelerates cellulose hydrolysis in paper. Conclusion: Low-humidity desiccant vaults will completely prevent further paper degradation of the map collection.
Analyzing the exact scope of the conclusion ('completely prevent further degradation') is necessary to determine what conditions must hold true.
2
Apply the Negation Test to the statement.
Negated statement: Factors other than humidity (such as light exposure or airborne acids) ARE independently causing ongoing paper degradation in the collection.
If the negated statement is true, maintaining low humidity will not completely prevent degradation because other environmental factors will continue to degrade the paper.
3
Evaluate the impact of negation on the author's conclusion.
The negated statement demonstrates that humidity control alone is insufficient to guarantee complete prevention of paper degradation, directly invalidating the archivist's conclusion.
Because logical negation of the statement invalidates the argument's conclusion, the original statement is a required unstated assumption.

Anahtar Kavram

Negation Test for Unstated Assumptions
Soru 33Soru

Consider the following argument:

To reduce water consumption, a semiconductor manufacturing plant plans to replace its traditional chemical-mechanical polishing (CMP) liquid slurry rinsing system with a dry electrostatic aerosol cleaning process. Plant management claims that this transition will significantly lower the facility's overall monthly operating expenses.

Statement: The argument relies on the unstated assumption that the electrical energy required to operate the dry electrostatic aerosol cleaning system will not incur operational costs that exceed the financial savings achieved from reduced water usage.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: True

Cevap

True
The statement is True. The conclusion makes a claim regarding net financial outcomes (overall monthly operating expenses). The premise only establishes a savings in one specific input (water). For a reduction in one input to guarantee a overall cost reduction, additional energy costs introduced by the new machinery cannot exceed the savings generated from the reduced water usage. Negating this claim directly invalidates the author's conclusion.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Deconstruct the argument into premise and conclusion.
Premise: The plant is switching from a liquid slurry rinse to a dry electrostatic aerosol process to reduce water consumption. Conclusion: This transition will significantly lower overall monthly operating expenses.
Identifying the gap between reducing a single resource (water) and lowering overall expenses requires analyzing all potential cost shifts.
2
Apply the Negation Test to the assumed statement.
Negated statement: The electrical energy required to run the aerosol system DOES create operational costs that exceed the financial savings from reduced water usage.
If the negated assumption is true, total operating expenses will net an increase, causing the main conclusion to collapse.
3
Determine necessity of the unstated claim.
Because the collapse of the conclusion under negation proves the claim is essential, the original statement is a required unstated assumption.
A valid unstated assumption in GMAT Critical Reasoning must be a necessary condition for the conclusion to hold.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying Unstated Assumptions via the Negation Test
Tahmini Süre:1m 30s
Soru 34Soru

To combat financial losses caused by subterranean pipe ruptures, the Metro Water Authority plans to install acoustic leak sensors along all major underground distribution mains. These sensors automatically alert maintenance crews to micro-vibrations characteristic of escaping water. Authority directors project that this technology will enable rapid repairs, reducing physical water loss by at least 40 percent within two years. Consequently, the directors conclude that implementing the acoustic network will significantly increase the utility's net annual revenue over the next two years. Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The financial cost of purchasing, deploying, and servicing the acoustic sensors will not exceed the monetary value of the water saved through prompt leak repairs.

Cevap

The argument assumes that the total financial costs of acquiring, deploying, and maintaining the acoustic sensors will not surpass the financial savings generated by preventing water loss.
The argument leaps from a premise about physical savings (reducing physical water loss by 40%) to a financial conclusion (increasing net annual revenue). For a net revenue increase to materialize, the financial benefits of the saved water must exceed the total capital and operational costs associated with buying, installing, and servicing the acoustic sensors. Negating this statement demonstrates that if costs exceed savings, net revenue cannot increase, proving that this unstated premise is logically necessary.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Deconstruct the argument structure into premises and conclusion
Premise: Installing acoustic sensors will reduce physical subterranean water loss by at least 40% within two years. Conclusion: Implementing this network will significantly increase the utility's net annual revenue over the next two years.
Identifying the gap between physical water volume reduction and net financial revenue is essential for uncovering unstated assumptions.
2
Identify the logical gap between the premise and conclusion
The author assumes that reducing physical water loss will translate into a net financial gain.
Net revenue accounts for both revenues generated/saved and expenses incurred.
3
Apply the Negation Test to the candidate assumption
Negating the statement gives: 'The financial cost of purchasing, deploying, and servicing the sensors WILL exceed the monetary value of the water saved.'
If expenses exceed savings, net revenue will fall or remain negative, causing the conclusion to fail completely.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying Unstated Assumptions via the Negation Test
Tahmini Süre:1m 50s
ÖncekiSayfa 2 / 2
Identifying Unstated Assumptions Alıştırma Soruları — GMAT — Sayfa 2 | Examkin