Examkin

Critical Reasoning: Inference and Conclusions

88 soru

Tüm türler88Çoktan seçmeli48Doğru / Yanlış23Eşleştirme9Boşluk doldurma8
Soru 1Soru →

A marine conservation agency abides by the following guidelines regarding commercial oceanic operations: An oceanic research institute will approve a coastal zone for deep-sea mining only if the zone undergoes an ecological impact assessment. An ecological impact assessment is conducted whenever a designated marine habitat contains endangered coral species, unless the habitat is classified as a protected sanctuary. Furthermore, any coastal zone that undergoes an ecological impact assessment requires the implementation of continuous acoustic monitoring.

If the statements above are true, which of the following MUST also be true?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: A coastal zone cannot be approved for deep-sea mining without the implementation of continuous acoustic monitoring.

Cevap

A coastal zone cannot be approved for deep-sea mining without the implementation of continuous acoustic monitoring.
The passage establishes a chain of necessary conditions: approval for deep-sea mining requires an ecological impact assessment (Approval -> Assessment), and an ecological impact assessment requires continuous acoustic monitoring (Assessment -> Monitoring). Combining these transitive statements yields Approval -> Monitoring. The contrapositive of this deduction is that without continuous acoustic monitoring, a zone cannot receive approval for deep-sea mining.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Formalize the conditional statements provided in the passage.
Statement 1: Approval -> Assessment. Statement 2: Coral AND NOT Sanctuary -> Assessment. Statement 3: Assessment -> Monitoring.
Mapping the premises into logical notation clarifies valid deductions and prevents common fallacies.
2
Chain the conditional statements linking Approval, Assessment, and Monitoring.
Approval -> Assessment -> Monitoring. Thus, Approval -> Monitoring.
Transitive logic allows combining two nested conditional rules sharing a middle term (Assessment).
3
Take the contrapositive of the combined deduction.
NOT Monitoring -> NOT Approval.
A conditional statement is logically equivalent to its contrapositive, confirming that without monitoring, approval is impossible.

Anahtar Kavram

Conditional Logic and Formal Deductions
Soru 2Soru →

Under municipal transit regulations, a technology firm receives a commercial testing permit for autonomous trucks on public highways only if its navigation software achieves a Tier-1 safety certification. Achieving a Tier-1 safety certification requires completing at least 500,000 miles of simulated urban driving without a single critical system disengagement. Furthermore, unless a firm holds a commercial testing permit, it is forbidden from deploying autonomous vehicles during peak traffic hours.

If the statements above are true, which of the following must also be true?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: A technology firm that deploys autonomous vehicles on public highways during peak traffic hours has completed at least 500,000 miles of simulated urban driving without a critical system disengagement.

Cevap

A technology firm that deploys autonomous vehicles on public highways during peak traffic hours has completed at least 500,000 miles of simulated urban driving without a critical system disengagement.
The passage establishes a chain of necessary conditions: to deploy during peak traffic hours, a firm must hold a commercial testing permit; to have that permit, it must hold Tier-1 certification; and to achieve Tier-1 certification, it must complete 500,000 simulated miles without a critical disengagement. Therefore, any firm deploying vehicles during peak hours must have completed those 500,000 simulated miles.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Formalize the conditional statements given in the passage
Statement 1: Commercial Permit -> Tier-1 Certification. Statement 2: Tier-1 Certification -> 500,000 Simulated Miles without critical disengagement. Statement 3: Deploy Peak Hours -> Commercial Permit.
Translating natural language indicators ('only if', 'requires', 'unless') into formal logic clarifies necessary and sufficient conditions.
2
Chain the conditional statements together transitively
Deploy Peak Hours -> Commercial Permit -> Tier-1 Certification -> 500,000 Simulated Miles.
Because each condition is necessary for the preceding one, the entire chain must hold true.
3
Deduce the logically necessary conclusion
Deploying during peak traffic hours necessarily implies having completed at least 500,000 miles of simulated driving without a critical disengagement.
If the antecedent of the chain is true, all necessary conditions down the chain must also be true.

Anahtar Kavram

Transitive Chaining of Necessary Conditions
Soru 3Soru →

A long-term agricultural study in a semi-arid basin established that whenever seasonal rainfall drops below 250 millimeters, farmers who irrigate their crops using unlined soil canals lose at least 35 percent of their diverted water to seepage. Conversely, any farm in the basin that adopts high-efficiency drip irrigation retains at least 85 percent of its diverted water regardless of seasonal rainfall levels. Last season, seasonal rainfall in the basin was 210 millimeters, yet Farm X lost less than 20 percent of its diverted water.

If the statements above are true, which of the following MUST also be true regarding Farm X last season?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Farm X did not rely on unlined soil canals to irrigate its crops last season.

Cevap

Farm X did not rely on unlined soil canals to irrigate its crops last season.
The correct answer is derived using formal conditional logic. The stimulus establishes that when rainfall is under 250 mm, using unlined soil canals guarantees a water loss of at least 35%. Since the rainfall was 210 mm and Farm X lost less than 20% of its diverted water, Farm X cannot have used unlined soil canals. By contrapositive reasoning, if the outcome (loss ≥ 35%) did not occur despite the trigger condition (rainfall < 250 mm) being met, the requirement for that outcome (unlined soil canals) must have been absent.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the conditional rule for unlined soil canals.
If (Rainfall < 250 mm) AND (Unlined Soil Canals), then (Water Loss ≥ 35%).
This is a direct premise established by the study.
2
Evaluate the conditions given for Farm X last season.
Rainfall was 210 mm (which is strictly less than 250 mm), and Farm X's Water Loss was strictly less than 20%.
These are the explicit facts provided about Farm X.
3
Apply the contrapositive of the conditional rule.
Since Water Loss was NOT ≥ 35% (it was < 20%) while Rainfall was < 250 mm, the condition 'Unlined Soil Canals' must be FALSE for Farm X.
If P and Q imply R, then P and not-R implies not-Q.

Anahtar Kavram

Applying Contrapositive Logic in Must-Be-True Deductions
Soru 4Soru →

Read the argument below regarding conservation paleontology and synthetic genomics, and match each statement from the text to its corresponding logical role within the overall argument:

"While bioethicists argue that de-extinction efforts targeting apex predators could destabilize contemporary food webs, ecologists emphasize that reintroducing keystone herbivores such as the woolly mammoth would enhance arctic tundra biodiversity by compacting snow cover and suppressing soil warming. However, because funds allocated to synthetic genomics are diverted directly from active habitat protection programs for endangered living species, pursuing de-extinction ultimately undermines global biodiversity preservation goals."

Soldaki öğeye tıklayın, sonra eşleşen sağdaki öğeye tıklayın

Öğeler

Bioethicists argue that de-extinction efforts targeting apex predators could destabilize contemporary food webs.
Reintroducing keystone herbivores such as the woolly mammoth would enhance arctic tundra biodiversity.
Funds allocated to synthetic genomics are diverted directly from active habitat protection programs for endangered living species.
Pursuing de-extinction ultimately undermines global biodiversity preservation goals.

Eşleşmeler

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

The statement regarding bioethicists matches the opposing ethical concern background; the statement about keystone herbivores matches the concession of potential ecological benefit; the statement regarding funding diversion matches the supporting empirical premise; and the statement that pursuing de-extinction ultimately undermines global preservation goals matches the author's main conclusion.
The argument uses a contrastive structure. It begins by introducing competing views (bioethicists' concerns vs. ecologists' cited benefits of tundra mammoth reintroduction) as context and concession. The author then introduces their own central position using 'However', concluding that pursuing de-extinction ultimately undermines global preservation goals because of resource diversion from active endangered species programs.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify structural transition markers and the author's primary thesis
The pivot word 'However' shifts focus from potential benefits to the author's core position that pursuing de-extinction ultimately undermines preservation goals.
Main conclusions in Critical Reasoning frequently follow structural pivot words like 'however' or 'therefore' and synthesize the author's final verdict.
2
Analyze supporting premises directly feeding the main conclusion
The clause noting that funds for synthetic genomics are diverted from active habitat protection provides the explicit evidence for why global preservation is undermined.
Premises explain the 'why' behind the main claim.
3
Differentiate background context and concessions from the main claim
The opening bioethicist point serves as background context, while the ecologist point about mammoth tundra effects functions as a counter-perspective/concession acknowledged in the argument.
Distinguishing secondary claims and concessions prevents misidentifying intermediate or counter-points as the author's final stance.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying Main Conclusions and Final Claims
Soru 5Soru →

In City Y, between 2018 and 2023, the proportion of all daily commuter trips taken via the municipal subway system increased from 20 percent to 30 percent. During this same five-year period, the total number of daily commuter trips taken across all modes of transportation in City Y decreased by 40 percent.

If the statements above are true, which of the following conclusions must also be true regarding daily commuter trips in City Y from 2018 to 2023?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The total number of daily commuter trips taken via the municipal subway system was lower in 2023 than in 2018.

Cevap

The total number of daily commuter trips taken via the municipal subway system was lower in 2023 than in 2018.
The correct option is derived directly through exact percentage calculations. By establishing total 2018 daily commuter trips as TT, subway trips accounted for 20%20\% of TT, or 0.20T0.20T. Because total trips across all modes dropped by 40%40\% by 2023, total trips in 2023 equaled 0.60T0.60T. In 2023, subway trips accounted for 30%30\% of this reduced total (0.30×0.60T=0.18T0.30 \times 0.60T = 0.18T). Comparing 0.18T0.18T to 0.20T0.20T demonstrates a logical and mathematically inescapable reduction in total subway trips.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Define an initial baseline for total daily commuter trips.
Let the total number of daily commuter trips in 2018 be represented as TT.
Establishing a baseline variable allows quantitative comparisons across years.
2
Calculate the absolute number of subway trips in 2018.
Subway trips in 2018 = 0.20×T=0.20T0.20 \times T = 0.20T.
The passage states that 20 percent of all commuter trips were taken via subway in 2018.
3
Determine the total number of daily commuter trips in 2023 after the specified decrease.
Total trips in 2023 = T×(1−0.40)=0.60TT \times (1 - 0.40) = 0.60T.
The total number of daily commuter trips across all modes decreased by 40 percent.
4
Calculate the absolute number of subway trips in 2023 and compare with 2018.
Subway trips in 2023 = 0.30×0.60T=0.18T0.30 \times 0.60T = 0.18T. Since 0.18T<0.20T0.18T < 0.20T, absolute subway trips decreased.
Comparing 0.18T0.18T to 0.20T0.20T shows a net decrease in absolute subway trip volume.

Anahtar Kavram

Numerical and Statistical Inferences: Base Rate Fallacy and Percentage vs. Absolute Quantity
Soru 6Soru →

Many urban transit advocates argue that expanding municipal light rail networks inevitably reduces highway traffic congestion by drawing drivers off major roadways. However, recent mobility studies demonstrate that new rail lines often induce outer-suburban residential development, ultimately generating additional automobile trips onto regional highways. Although light rail projects unquestionably provide essential mobility options for residents who lack personal vehicles, the core premise that such systems alleviate highway gridlock is demonstrably false. Therefore, municipal transportation authorities should not approve funding for light rail expansions when the sole justification provided is congestion reduction.

Which of the following best expresses the main conclusion of the argument above?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Municipal transit boards should refuse to finance light rail expansion projects if traffic congestion relief is the only rationale offered.

Cevap

Municipal transit boards should refuse to finance light rail expansion projects if traffic congestion relief is the only rationale offered.
The correct option accurately restates the author's main conclusion, introduced by the signal word 'therefore' in the final sentence: municipal authorities should not approve light rail expansions when congestion relief is the sole justification.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the structural role of each statement in the passage.
Identify background context, opposing viewpoints, counter-evidence, concessions, and lead-in signal words.
Main conclusions in GMAT Critical Reasoning arguments are supported by premises and intermediate claims, often signalled by conclusion indicators such as 'therefore'.
2
Distinguish intermediate claims from the ultimate recommendation.
The statement that the core premise of gridlock alleviation is false serves as a intermediate conclusion justifying the final policy recommendation.
Sub-conclusions provide logical steps toward the final claim rather than standing as the ultimate takeaway.
3
Match the ultimate recommendation to the correct paraphrase.
The final sentence argues against funding light rail expansions solely for congestion relief, matching the correct choice.
The correct answer must encompass the author's primary final assertion without overstepping the scope.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying Main Conclusions and Final Claims
Soru 7Soru →

Under the 2026 Municipal Clean Power Accord, any regional microgrid that sources more than 60 percent of its electricity from solar energy must maintain a battery storage reserve capable of supplying at least 4 hours of continuous power, unless it uses hydro-pumped storage as its primary backup reserve. Every microgrid operating in District 7 sources at least 75 percent of its electricity from solar energy. Microgrid Alpha is located in District 7 and does not maintain a battery storage reserve capable of supplying at least 4 hours of continuous power.

If the statements above are true, which of the following must also be true about Microgrid Alpha?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Microgrid Alpha uses hydro-pumped storage as its primary backup reserve.

Cevap

Microgrid Alpha uses hydro-pumped storage as its primary backup reserve.
The passage establishes that any microgrid sourcing over 60% solar power must maintain a battery reserve of at least 4 hours, UNLESS it uses hydro-pumped storage as its primary backup reserve. Microgrid Alpha is in District 7, meaning its solar sourcing is at least 75% (which is strictly greater than 60%). However, Microgrid Alpha does not maintain the 4-hour battery reserve. To remain consistent with the factual premises, Microgrid Alpha must fall under the exception clause. Therefore, it MUST use hydro-pumped storage as its primary backup reserve.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the given conditional rules and factual premises.
Rule: If Solar > 60% AND NOT (Hydro-Pumped Storage) → Must have Battery Reserve ≥ 4 hours. Fact 1: District 7 microgrids have Solar ≥ 75%. Fact 2: Microgrid Alpha is in District 7, so its Solar ≥ 75% (> 60%). Fact 3: Microgrid Alpha does NOT have Battery Reserve ≥ 4 hours.
Establishing formal logical relationships allows for precise deduction.
2
Apply Modus Tollens (contrapositive reasoning) to the conditional rule.
Since Microgrid Alpha satisfies the condition (Solar > 60%) but fails to satisfy the requirement (Battery Reserve ≥ 4 hours), it must satisfy the exemption clause.
If a required consequence is absent for a subject that meets the trigger condition, the exemption condition must hold true.
3
Deduce the necessary truth regarding Microgrid Alpha.
Microgrid Alpha must use hydro-pumped storage as its primary backup reserve.
This is the only logically guaranteed outcome that prevents a contradiction with the provided premises.

Anahtar Kavram

Conditional Logic Contrapositive and Valid Deductions
Soru 8Soru →

In a four-year ecological survey of Archipelago X, marine biologists monitored five deep-water reefs where commercial trawling was strictly restricted to depths shallower than 200 meters. Over the survey period, benthic invertebrate populations decreased by 35% across all five monitored reefs combined, while sea surface temperatures in Archipelago X remained within historical averages. On the two monitored reefs located within 10 kilometers of active deep-sea mineral dredging operations, benthic invertebrate populations decreased by 60%. On the remaining three monitored reefs, which were situated more than 50 kilometers from any dredging operations, benthic invertebrate populations decreased by 20%.

Which of the following can be properly inferred from the statements above?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The percentage decrease in benthic invertebrate populations recorded on the monitored reefs located within 10 kilometers of dredging operations was greater than the percentage decrease recorded on those monitored reefs more than 50 kilometers away.

Cevap

The percentage decrease in benthic invertebrate populations recorded on the monitored reefs located within 10 kilometers of dredging operations was greater than the percentage decrease recorded on those monitored reefs more than 50 kilometers away.
The passage explicitly states that benthic invertebrate populations decreased by 60% on the monitored reefs within 10 kilometers of dredging operations and by 20% on the monitored reefs more than 50 kilometers away. Because 60% is mathematically greater than 20%, it must be true that the percentage decrease was greater on the reefs located closer to dredging operations.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the factual premises provided in the passage.
Identified explicit facts: 5 deep-water reefs monitored; trawling restricted < 200m; overall 35% decline; sea surface temps normal; 2 reefs within 10 km of dredging had a 60% decline; 3 reefs > 50 km from dredging had a 20% decline.
GMAT Critical Reasoning inference questions require evaluating statements solely based on what must be strictly true from the provided facts.
2
Distinguish strictly logical deductions from assumptions and causal speculations.
Recognized that comparing 60% to 20% yields a direct mathematical truth (60% > 20%), whereas asserting causation (dredging caused the drop) or absolute counts (total number of organisms) requires unstated facts.
Valid inferences cannot depend on unstated premises, external real-world knowledge, or speculative leaps.
3
Evaluate the answer choices against the strict deduction.
The statement comparing the percentage decreases on reefs near dredging (60%) versus reefs farther away (20%) MUST BE TRUE based solely on the explicit numbers given in the passage.
A 60% decline is strictly greater than a 20% decline, making this comparison a valid inference.

Anahtar Kavram

Distinguishing Inferences from Assumptions and Speculations
Soru 9Soru →

In 2021, digital audiobook licenses accounted for exactly 20 percent of all new catalog acquisitions made by the City Library System, with physical printed books accounting for the remaining 80 percent. By 2025, digital audiobook licenses represented 40 percent of all new catalog acquisitions, with physical printed books making up the remaining 60 percent. The total number of physical printed books acquired by the library system in 2025 was exactly the same as the total number of physical printed books acquired in 2021.

If the statements above are true, which of the following must also be true on the basis of them?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The total number of new catalog acquisitions made by the City Library System was greater in 2025 than in 2021.

Cevap

The total number of new catalog acquisitions made by the City Library System was greater in 2025 than in 2021.
The conclusion that total acquisitions were greater in 2025 than in 2021 is logically inescapable. In 2021, physical printed books constituted 80 percent of total acquisitions (P=0.80T2021P = 0.80 T_{2021}). In 2025, physical printed books constituted 60 percent of total acquisitions (P=0.60T2025P = 0.60 T_{2025}). Because the absolute number of physical printed books (PP) was identical in both years, 0.60T2025=0.80T20210.60 T_{2025} = 0.80 T_{2021}, which simplifies to T2025=43T2021T_{2025} = \frac{4}{3} T_{2021}. Thus, total acquisitions in 2025 were 33 percent higher than in 2021.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Express physical book acquisitions as a function of total acquisitions for both years
In 2021, P2021=0.80×T2021P_{2021} = 0.80 \times T_{2021}. In 2025, P2025=0.60×T2025P_{2025} = 0.60 \times T_{2025}, where PP represents physical books and TT represents total acquisitions.
Establishing algebraic relationships allows comparison between proportions and absolute amounts.
2
Apply the given condition that physical book volume remained constant
Since P2021=P2025P_{2021} = P_{2025}, set the equations equal: 0.80×T2021=0.60×T20250.80 \times T_{2021} = 0.60 \times T_{2025}.
Directly uses the premise stating that physical book acquisition counts were identical.
3
Solve for the ratio between total acquisitions in 2025 and 2021
T2025=0.800.60×T2021=43×T2021≈1.33×T2021T_{2025} = \frac{0.80}{0.60} \times T_{2021} = \frac{4}{3} \times T_{2021} \approx 1.33 \times T_{2021}.
Proves mathematically that total acquisitions in 2025 must be larger than in 2021.

Anahtar Kavram

Numerical, Proportion, and Statistical Inferences
Soru 10Soru →

In 2022, synthetic fiber products accounted for exactly 30 percent of the total metric tons of textile exports produced by Country X, with natural fiber products making up the remaining 70 percent. In 2025, synthetic fiber products accounted for 50 percent of Country X's total metric tons of textile exports, while natural fiber products made up the remaining 50 percent. If the total volume (in metric tons) of synthetic fiber textile exports produced by Country X increased by 20 percent from 2022 to 2025, which of the following statements must be true based on the information provided?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The total volume (in metric tons) of natural fiber textile exports produced by Country X was lower in 2025 than in 2022.

Cevap

The total volume (in metric tons) of natural fiber textile exports produced by Country X was lower in 2025 than in 2022.
The option stating that natural fiber export volume was lower in 2025 than in 2022 is logically inescapable. Letting the 2022 synthetic volume be SS, the total 2022 volume is S/0.30S / 0.30, making 2022 natural fiber volume 2.333S2.333S. In 2025, synthetic volume grows by 20 percent to 1.20S1.20S. Because synthetic fiber constitutes 50 percent of the 2025 total, natural fiber must also equal 1.20S1.20S. Comparing 1.20S1.20S to 2.333S2.333S proves a mandatory decline in natural fiber export volume.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Express the 2022 volumes in terms of an arbitrary variable for synthetic fiber volume.
Let 2022 synthetic fiber volume equal SS. Total 2022 volume V1=S/0.30=3.333SV_1 = S / 0.30 = 3.333S. 2022 natural fiber volume = 0.70×V1=2.333S0.70 \times V_1 = 2.333S.
Establishing base relationships allows precise mathematical comparison between years.
2
Calculate the 2025 volumes using the given 20 percent increase in synthetic fiber exports.
2025 synthetic fiber volume = 1.20S1.20S. Since synthetic fibers represented 50 percent of total 2025 volume V2V_2, V2=1.20S/0.50=2.40SV_2 = 1.20S / 0.50 = 2.40S. 2025 natural fiber volume = 0.50×2.40S=1.20S0.50 \times 2.40S = 1.20S.
Translating the 20 percent volume increase into 2025 total and category volumes.
3
Compare the 2022 and 2025 natural fiber volumes.
2022 natural fiber volume = 2.333S2.333S, while 2025 natural fiber volume = 1.20S1.20S. Since 1.20S<2.333S1.20S < 2.333S, natural fiber export volume necessarily decreased.
Direct mathematical deduction shows that natural fiber volume was strictly lower in 2025.

Anahtar Kavram

Combining proportions and absolute subgroup growth to derive absolute changes in remaining categories.
Soru 11Soru →

From 2015 to 2025, solar power generation in Country X expanded rapidly, growing from supplying 5 percent of the nation's total electricity consumption to 20 percent. Over the same ten-year period, the average greenhouse gas emissions per megawatt-hour of electricity generated from non-solar sources decreased by 10 percent. Total electricity consumption in Country X increased by 50 percent between 2015 and 2025.

If the statements above are true, which of the following must also be true on the basis of them?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The total volume of greenhouse gas emissions produced by non-solar electricity generation in Country X was greater in 2025 than it was in 2015.

Cevap

The total volume of greenhouse gas emissions produced by non-solar electricity generation in Country X was greater in 2025 than it was in 2015.
The conclusion that non-solar greenhouse gas emissions were greater in 2025 than in 2015 is mathematically inescapable. Setting 2015 total consumption to 100 units yields 95 non-solar units at rate RR (95R95R emissions). A 50 percent growth in total electricity by 2025 yields 150 units, 80 percent of which is non-solar (120 units). At a reduced rate of 0.90R0.90R, non-solar emissions equal 120×0.90R=108R120 \times 0.90R = 108R, which exceeds 95R95R.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Calculate 2015 baseline non-solar production and emissions
If 2015 Total Electricity = 100 units, Non-Solar Electricity = 95 units (95%). With emission rate RR, 2015 Emissions = 95R95R.
Establishes the quantitative starting point based on stimulus premises.
2
Calculate 2025 total electricity and non-solar production
2025 Total Electricity = 100×1.50=150100 \times 1.50 = 150 units. Non-Solar Share = 100%−20%=80%100\% - 20\% = 80\%. Non-Solar Electricity = 150×0.80=120150 \times 0.80 = 120 units.
Combines total consumption growth (+50%) with the new solar grid proportion (20%).
3
Calculate 2025 non-solar emissions rate and total non-solar emissions
2025 Emission Rate = 0.90R0.90R. 2025 Non-Solar Emissions = 120×0.90R=108R120 \times 0.90R = 108R.
Applies the 10% rate reduction to the new non-solar production volume.
4
Compare 2015 and 2025 absolute emissions
108R>95R108R > 95R, proving non-solar emissions increased by 13.68%.
Identifies the logically inescapable deduction.

Anahtar Kavram

Disentangling Percentage Proportions from Absolute Quantities
Tahmini Süre:2m 30s
Soru 12Soru →

Historically, municipal water utilities facing severe drought conditions have implemented tier-based pricing structures that dramatically increase per-gallon rates for high-volume consumers. Economists reasoned that raising the marginal cost of excess usage would compel households to reduce discretionary consumption, such as lawn irrigation. Recent empirical data, however, reveals that in municipalities where tier-based pricing was instituted alongside subsidies for water-efficient household appliances, overall water consumption decreased significantly less than in municipalities that implemented tier-based pricing alone. This disparity occurs because the financial savings produced by the subsidized appliances effectively buffer households against the higher marginal cost of discretionary water use. Therefore, a municipal policy intended to maximize water conservation by combining tier pricing with appliance subsidies will likely prove ineffective unless ________.

Which of the following most logically completes the passage?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: the marginal rates for high-volume water consumption are set high enough to outweigh the monetary savings generated by the appliance subsidies

Cevap

The correct completion is that the marginal rates for high-volume water consumption are set high enough to outweigh the monetary savings generated by the appliance subsidies.
The passage establishes that the combined policy fails because the monetary savings from appliance subsidies offset the higher marginal rates of tier-based pricing, eliminating the economic disincentive to conserve discretionary water. To prevent this failure (i.e. 'unless...'), the financial penalty imposed by the high-volume marginal rate must exceed the savings gained from the appliance subsidies, ensuring that excess water usage remains net-costly to the household.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the core argument structure and premises in the stimulus.
Premise 1: Tiered pricing increases marginal costs to reduce discretionary water use. Premise 2: Adding appliance subsidies resulted in LESS overall water reduction than tiered pricing alone. Premise 3 (Mechanism): Financial savings from subsidized appliances offset the higher cost of discretionary water use.
Understanding the causal conflict is necessary to identify what missing condition restores the policy's effectiveness.
2
Identify the logical gap created by the conclusion stem ending in 'unless'.
The passage asserts the combined policy will fail 'unless' a specific condition neutralizes the offsetting mechanism.
The word 'unless' introduces a necessary condition to prevent the stated failure.
3
Synthesize the mechanism to find the necessary condition.
Since failure occurs because appliance savings >= price increase penalty, success requires price increase penalty > appliance savings.
If the marginal rate penalty is greater than the financial savings from the subsidy, households will no longer have a net buffer to finance discretionary water use.

Anahtar Kavram

Completing the Passage via Paradox Neutralization / Mathematical Balance in Arguments
Soru 13Soru →

Consider the following international aerospace guidelines: A private satellite operator is granted a commercial orbital license only if its collision-avoidance system passes an automated telemetry audit. Passing an automated telemetry audit requires maintaining an active propulsion unit capable of immediate de-orbiting maneuvers.

Based on these guidelines, evaluate the following statement:
"If a private satellite operator maintains an active propulsion unit capable of immediate de-orbiting maneuvers, that operator is guaranteed to be granted a commercial orbital license."

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: False

Cevap

False. The statement commits a mistaken reversal fallacy because having an active propulsion unit is a necessary condition, not a sufficient condition, for receiving a commercial orbital license.
The evaluated statement is logically false because it commits a mistaken reversal. The rules state that receiving a license requires passing an audit, which in turn requires an active propulsion unit (License → Audit → Propulsion). Thus, maintaining a propulsion unit is merely a necessary prerequisite for obtaining a license, not a guarantee of receiving one.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Formalize the conditional premises from the passage
License → Telemetry Audit, and Telemetry Audit → Active Propulsion. Combining these yields the conditional chain: License → Telemetry Audit → Active Propulsion.
Identifying the directional relationships establishes which conditions are necessary versus sufficient.
2
Translate the evaluated statement into formal conditional logic
The statement asserts: Active Propulsion → License.
We must compare the claimed implication against the premises to test logical validity.
3
Evaluate the validity of the deduction
Claiming that Active Propulsion → License reverses the necessary condition chain (License → Active Propulsion). This is an invalid deduction known as a mistaken reversal.
Meeting a necessary requirement does not guarantee that the outcome itself will occur.

Anahtar Kavram

Mistaken Reversal in Conditional Reasoning Chains
Tahmini Süre:1m 30s
Soru 14Soru →

A global shipping line recently introduced smart refrigerated containers equipped with automated sensors that adjust cooling levels based on cargo respiration rates, reducing energy consumption by 25 percent during ocean transit. The company expected this innovation to significantly cut total operational expenses for shipping perishable produce. However, logistics analysts point out that refrigerated containers spend over 60 percent of their total voyage time idling at port terminals or waiting at customs checkpoints, where power is supplied by third-party grid connections at fixed hourly tariffs rather than generated by the vessel's engines. Consequently, analysts conclude that the adoption of these smart containers will __________.

Which of the following statements most logically fills the blank in the argument above?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: yield a significantly smaller percentage reduction in total shipping expenses than the company anticipated.

Cevap

The statement asserting that the adoption of smart containers will yield a significantly smaller percentage reduction in total shipping expenses than the company anticipated.
The correct option correctly synthesizes two key facts: the 25 percent energy savings apply only during ocean transit, but ocean transit constitutes less than 40 percent of total voyage time (since over 60 percent is spent at port under fixed hourly tariffs). Therefore, applying a partial savings rate to less than half of the total voyage time leads to a much smaller total percentage reduction in costs than anticipated.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the main premises and key contrast in the passage
Premise 1: Smart containers cut energy consumption by 25% during ocean transit. Premise 2: Over 60% of total voyage time occurs at ports under fixed hourly tariffs, meaning transit represents less than 40% of voyage time.
Understanding the distribution of time and costs is necessary to evaluate the total financial impact.
2
Synthesize the premises to draw the logical conclusion
Because energy efficiency applies to less than 40% of the trip time while 60%+ remains bound by fixed port tariffs, the overall reduction in total trip expenses will be diluted.
The conclusion must logically bridge the gap created by the contrast word 'However'.

Anahtar Kavram

Completing the Passage Logically (Synthesis of Quantitative Trade-offs)
Tahmini Süre:1m 50s
Soru 15Soru →

During the annual performance review, every project manager who met their sales target received a performance bonus. Furthermore, any manager who received a performance bonus was granted extra vacation days.

Evaluate the following statement based strictly on the information above:
If a project manager did not receive extra vacation days following the annual performance review, that project manager did not meet their sales target.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: True

Cevap

True
The statement represents a valid contrapositive deduction. By combining the two premises (Target Met → Bonus and Bonus → Extra Vacation), we deduce that meeting the target guarantees extra vacation days. The contrapositive (lacking extra vacation days guarantees the target was not met) must therefore be true.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify and formalize the conditional statements given in the passage.
Premise 1: Target Met → Bonus. Premise 2: Bonus → Extra Vacation.
Converting natural language into formal conditional statements clarifies logical relationships.
2
Chain the conditional premises together.
Target Met → Extra Vacation.
If statement A implies statement B, and statement B implies statement C, then statement A logically guarantees statement C.
3
Form the contrapositive of the chained conditional statement.
NOT Extra Vacation → NOT Target Met.
The contrapositive of a valid conditional statement is always logically equivalent and must be true.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying Must-Be-True Statements and Valid Deductions
Soru 16Soru →

Under a regulatory framework established in 2024, any commercial cargo vessel operating on Baltic maritime routes must reduce its sulfur oxide emissions by at least 75 percent relative to its 2020 baseline during any calendar quarter in which it transits within 100 nautical miles of a major port. In the first quarter of 2026, every vessel in Maritime Corp's fleet operated exclusively on Baltic maritime routes and completed multiple transits within 100 nautical miles of major ports. During this same quarter, every vessel in Maritime Corp's fleet maintained sulfur oxide emissions at least 80 percent below its 2020 baseline, even though Maritime Corp did not purchase any low-sulfur synthetic fuels.

Which of the following can be properly inferred from the information provided above?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: During the first quarter of 2026, every vessel in Maritime Corp's fleet satisfied the regulatory framework's sulfur oxide emission reduction requirement during its transits within 100 nautical miles of major ports on Baltic maritime routes.

Cevap

During the first quarter of 2026, every vessel in Maritime Corp's fleet satisfied the regulatory framework's sulfur oxide emission reduction requirement during its transits within 100 nautical miles of major ports on Baltic maritime routes.
The correct option is logically guaranteed by the text. The regulation requires a minimum 75% emission reduction for ships transiting within 100 nautical miles of major ports on Baltic routes. The passage confirms that every vessel in Maritime Corp's fleet operated on these routes, made such transits in the first quarter of 2026, and maintained reductions of at least 80%. Because 80% is greater than or equal to 75%, every vessel in the fleet necessarily met the regulatory requirement.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the explicit regulatory condition given in the stimulus.
Regulations mandate at least a 75 percent reduction in sulfur oxide emissions relative to a 2020 baseline for vessels operating on Baltic routes within 100 nautical miles of a major port.
Establishing the precise criteria for compliance is necessary to evaluate claims about meeting regulatory standards.
2
Synthesize the facts regarding Maritime Corp's fleet during the first quarter of 2026.
All Maritime Corp vessels operated on Baltic routes, completed transits within 100 nautical miles of major ports, and achieved emission levels at least 80 percent below their 2020 baseline.
Comparing the fleet's actual performance (80 percent reduction) to the required threshold (75 percent reduction) reveals that the compliance standard was met.
3
Evaluate answer choices to eliminate out-of-scope hypotheses and 'could be true' speculations.
Only the statement declaring complete fleet compliance is logically guaranteed by combining the facts provided.
GMAT Critical Reasoning inference questions require selecting an option that MUST be true based solely on the given premises without external assumptions.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying Must-Be-True Deductions vs. Out-of-Scope Speculations
Soru 17Soru →

Fill in the blank to logically complete the passage based on the premises provided.

Aşağıdaki boşlukları doldurun

To reduce overall regional water consumption, an agricultural district mandated that farmers replace traditional overhead sprayers with subterranean drip irrigation systems, which deliver water directly to plant roots with minimal evaporative loss. Following the mandate, total volume of water withdrawn for agriculture in the district actually increased, even though no new cropland was developed and climate conditions remained identical. This outcome occurred because the increased water delivery efficiency encouraged farmers to replace drought-tolerant grains with high-value, water-intensive fruit crops. Therefore, the mandate failed to reduce overall water consumption because .
Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

The total increase in water usage resulting from switching to water-intensive fruit crops exceeded the amount of water saved through the implementation of drip irrigation.
The correct logical completion must bridge the premises to explain why total regional water withdrawals rose. Since drip irrigation saves water per unit delivered but prompted a switch to crops that require significantly more water overall, total consumption will only increase if the extra water consumed by the new crops is greater than the water saved by the technology.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the paradox presented in the passage.
Drip irrigation increases water application efficiency, yet overall regional agricultural water withdrawals increased.
Understanding the premise conflict is necessary to determine what missing piece of evidence completes the causal explanation.
2
Analyze the explanatory premise provided in the text.
Farmers switched from drought-tolerant grains to high-value, water-intensive fruit crops due to the improved irrigation efficiency.
The change in crop selection introduces a factor that increases total water demand per acre.
3
Synthesize the premises to complete the logical conclusion.
For total water usage to rise despite reduced evaporation loss, the additional water required by the fruit crops must outweigh the physical water savings achieved by drip technology.
A net increase in total volume withdrawn requires that the consumption increase from crop switching is larger than the efficiency savings.

Anahtar Kavram

Completing the passage by synthesizing premises to explain a net quantitative outcome
Soru 18Soru →

Premises: A technology firm requires all software engineers who work on cybersecurity infrastructure to complete an advanced cryptography certification. Marcus is a software engineer at the firm who has not completed the advanced cryptography certification.

Based solely on the premises above, evaluate the following statement:
Marcus does not work on cybersecurity infrastructure at the technology firm.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: True

Cevap

The statement is True.
The statement is True because it is the contrapositive of the rule stated in the premise. The premise dictates that working on cybersecurity infrastructure requires completing the cryptography certification. Therefore, lacking the certification guarantees that Marcus does not work on cybersecurity infrastructure.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the conditional relationship established in the premises.
If an engineer works on cybersecurity infrastructure, then they have completed the cryptography certification (Cybersecurity Infrastructure → Certification).
Establishing the formal conditional rule allows for valid logical deduction.
2
Apply the contrapositive rule of formal logic.
If an engineer has not completed the cryptography certification, then they do not work on cybersecurity infrastructure (NOT Certification → NOT Cybersecurity Infrastructure).
The contrapositive of any valid conditional statement is always logically equivalent and must be true.
3
Compare the contrapositive to the factual premise about Marcus.
Since Marcus has not completed the certification, it logically follows with absolute certainty that Marcus does not work on cybersecurity infrastructure.
Matching the given fact to the valid contrapositive guarantees the conclusion.

Anahtar Kavram

Valid Deduction via Contrapositive
Soru 19Soru →

A municipal energy commission released a report containing the following facts regarding regional energy infrastructure:

• In any municipality where smart meters were installed in more than 80 percent of residential units, peak-hour electricity demand decreased by at least 15 percent during summer months.
• In every municipality where peak-hour electricity demand decreased by at least 15 percent during summer months, municipal electricity tax revenues fell unless local utility rates were increased.
• Last summer, District X had smart meters installed in 90 percent of its residential units, while its local utility rates were held constant.

If the statements above are true, which of the following must also be true regarding District X last summer?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Municipal electricity tax revenues in District X fell.

Cevap

Municipal electricity tax revenues in District X fell last summer.
The conclusion that municipal electricity tax revenues in District X fell is strictly guaranteed by combining the premises. First, because District X installed smart meters in 90% of units (exceeding the 80% threshold), peak-hour electricity demand was guaranteed to decrease by at least 15% last summer. Second, the premises state that whenever such a demand decrease occurs, tax revenues fall unless utility rates are raised. Because District X held utility rates constant, tax revenues must have fallen.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze Premise 1 and apply facts given for District X.
Smart meters were installed in 90% of residential units in District X (> 80%). Therefore, peak-hour electricity demand in District X decreased by at least 15% last summer.
The rule states that Smart Meters > 80% guarantees Peak Demand Decrease ≥ 15% in summer.
2
Analyze Premise 2 and synthesize with the result from Step 1.
Since Peak Demand Decrease ≥ 15% occurred, municipal electricity tax revenues fell UNLESS local utility rates were increased.
Conditional rule: Peak Demand Decrease ≥ 15% ⇒ (Tax Revenue Fell OR Utility Rates Increased).
3
Evaluate the condition regarding utility rates in District X.
Local utility rates were held constant (not increased). Therefore, the 'unless' exception is false, forcing the main clause—municipal electricity tax revenues fell—to be true.
When the alternative condition (rate increase) is explicitly negated, the remaining outcome (revenue fall) must occur.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying Must-Be-True Statements and Valid Deductions
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
Soru 20Soru →

An urban transit authority conducted a comprehensive survey of all commuter rail passengers traveling on Line X during peak morning hours. The survey established that every passenger who traveled with a monthly pass completed their journey in under 45 minutes. The survey also determined that 30 percent of all morning peak passengers on Line X did not travel with a monthly pass, and that no passenger without a monthly pass completed their journey in under 30 minutes.

If the statements above are true, which of the following must also be true on the basis of them?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: At least some morning peak passengers on Line X took 30 minutes or more to complete their journey.

Cevap

The statement that at least some morning peak passengers on Line X took 30 minutes or more to complete their journey must be true.
The correct answer is strictly derived from combining two premises: 30 percent of peak morning passengers did not hold monthly passes, and zero passengers without monthly passes completed their journey in under 30 minutes. Therefore, all passengers within that 30-percent subset took at least 30 minutes (30 minutes or longer), guaranteeing that at least some passengers took 30 minutes or more.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the explicit premises given in the stimulus.
Premise 1: 100% of monthly pass holders finished in under 45 minutes. Premise 2: 30% of total passengers did not hold a monthly pass. Premise 3: 0% of non-pass holders finished in under 30 minutes.
Inference questions require strictly factual evaluation without external assumptions.
2
Synthesize the facts regarding non-pass holders.
Since non-pass holders make up 30% of the total passenger population and none of them completed their trip in under 30 minutes, every member of this 30% group took 30 minutes or longer.
If a subset of passengers exists and none of them took under 30 minutes, then every passenger in that subset took 30 minutes or more.
3
Evaluate the options to distinguish a strict deduction from unstated assumptions and speculative claims.
The option asserting that at least some passengers took 30 minutes or more is guaranteed by the 30% group of non-pass holders.
A valid GMAT inference must be 100% true based strictly on the premises.

Anahtar Kavram

Distinguishing strict logical deductions (Must Be True) from unstated causal assumptions or speculative extrapolations.
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
Sayfa 1 / 5Sonraki