Soru

Zorluk: ZorExplicit Detail Retrieval

In 1873, physicist Gabriel Lippmann developed the capillary electrometer, a device designed to measure minute electric potentials by observing variations in the surface tension of mercury contact interfaces within a fine glass capillary tube. Lippmann observed that applying a small voltage across a dilute sulfuric acid-mercury boundary altered the interfacial tension, causing the mercury meniscus to shift along the calibrated tube. Crucially, unlike the moving-coil galvanometers of the era—which relied on electromagnetic deflection and were notoriously susceptible to external magnetic field interference��Lippmann’s electrometer operated purely electrocapillarily, rendering its voltage measurements entirely impervious to stray magnetic disruptions. However, because the surface tension response was contingent upon maintaining an uncontaminated liquid-liquid interface, even trace organic impurities in the electrolyte solution severely dampened meniscus mobility, necessitating rigorous chemical purification of the sulfuric acid prior to measurement. Furthermore, while the device exhibited exceptional sensitivity to potential differences as small as a fraction of a millivolt, its rapid dynamic response degraded under sustained direct-current application, as prolonged charge transfer initiated localized electrolytic polarization that diminished measurement fidelity over extended durations.

Based on the passage, which of the following statements regarding Lippmann’s capillary electrometer is explicitly supported by the text? Consider each of the choices separately and select all that apply.

  1. Its voltage measurements were unaffected by external magnetic fields.Cevap
  2. Its meniscus mobility was subject to impairment if the sulfuric acid solution contained organic impurities.Cevap
  3. C
    Its measurement fidelity improved during sustained application of direct current.

Cevap

The statements indicating that voltage measurements were unaffected by external magnetic fields and that meniscus mobility was impaired by organic impurities are both explicitly supported by the passage.
The passage provides direct evidence for two statements: it states that the electrometer was 'entirely impervious to stray magnetic disruptions' (supporting the statement regarding immunity to magnetic fields) and that 'trace organic impurities in the electrolyte solution severely dampened meniscus mobility' (supporting the statement regarding impairment by organic impurities).

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Locate explicit details regarding magnetic field interference in the passage.
The text states that operating electrocapillarily rendered measurements 'entirely impervious to stray magnetic disruptions.'
This directly verifies that external magnetic fields did not affect voltage readings.
2
Locate explicit details regarding the electrolyte solution composition.
The text states that 'trace organic impurities in the electrolyte solution severely dampened meniscus mobility.'
This directly confirms that organic impurities impaired meniscus movement.
3
Evaluate the statement concerning sustained direct-current application.
The text explains that prolonged charge transfer under sustained direct current 'diminished measurement fidelity.'
This directly contradicts the claim that fidelity improved, ruling this choice out.

Anahtar Kavram

Explicit Detail Retrieval
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
Bu soruyu puanla