Soru

Zorluk: Çok zorStrengthening Arguments

To combat regional power grid instability, energy directors plan to construct geothermal plants along an active fault line, where subterranean heat is greatest. Skeptics claim that drilling deep geothermal wells in seismically active areas risks triggering earthquakes that damage local infrastructure. However, the lead engineers contend that operating these geothermal facilities will net a decrease in major seismic hazards. They reason that extracting subterranean thermal energy cools surrounding rock formations, inducing thermal contraction that gradually dissipates accumulated tectonic tension via harmless micro-tremors rather than catastrophic faults. Which of the following, if true, provides the strongest support for the lead engineers' contention?

  1. Geological monitoring of fault systems subjected to sustained thermal cooling indicates that frequent micro-tremors effectively vent stored strain, preventing the buildup of stress required to initiate major earthquakes.Cevap
  2. B
    Rapid thermal contraction in deep rock formations creates micro-fractures that increase subterranean fluid pressure, substantially destabilizing neighboring fault planes.
  3. C
    Geographic regions containing natural geothermal activity report a lower overall incidence of major earthquakes than geothermally inactive regions.
  4. D
    Municipal buildings located near the proposed geothermal sites were recently retrofitted with reinforced foundations designed to withstand moderate tremors.
  5. E
    Geothermal power plants produce baseload electricity at significantly lower operational costs than biomass or hydroelectric facilities in mountainous regions.

Cevap

The argument is most strengthened by the statement confirming that geological monitoring of fault systems under thermal cooling shows frequent micro-tremors effectively vent stored strain, preventing major earthquakes.
The correct answer provides direct empirical validation for the engineers' underlying causal assumption. By confirming that sustained thermal cooling causes micro-tremors that safely vent accumulated strain and prevent large stress build-ups, it establishes that thermal extraction can indeed prevent catastrophic earthquakes, firmly supporting the conclusion.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Deconstruct the core argument
Premise: Extracting subterranean thermal energy causes thermal contraction in rock formations. Conclusion/Mechanism: Thermal contraction releases tectonic stress through harmless micro-tremors, reducing the overall risk of major destructive earthquakes.
Identifying the unproven assumption or causal bridge in the premise-to-conclusion path is necessary to evaluate potential strengtheners.
2
Identify the logical gap
The engineers assume that micro-tremors generated by thermal cooling actually succeed in dissipating enough accumulated stress to stop catastrophic earthquakes from occurring.
To strengthen the argument, an answer choice must confirm that this mechanism works as hypothesized in real fault systems.
3
Evaluate the choices against the logical gap
The option establishing that geological monitoring confirms micro-tremors from cooling vent stored strain and prevent stress buildup directly validates the engineers' causal claim.
Validating the underlying physical assumption directly increases the probability that the conclusion is true.

Anahtar Kavram

Strengthening Arguments by Validating Causal Mechanisms
Bu soruyu puanla