Analyzing Argument Structure and Boldface Roles

7 soru

Soru 1Soru

Public health officials recently claimed that a new vaccination campaign led directly to a 20 percent decrease in seasonal influenza cases this winter. However, data from regional health clinics indicate that the reduction in flu cases occurred almost entirely in counties where strict sanitation protocols were introduced simultaneously. While vaccinations certainly provide individual protection against virus strains, the dramatic overall drop in transmission was primarily driven by improved hygiene practices rather than the vaccine rollout itself.

Which of the following best describes the roles played by the two boldfaced portions in the argument above?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The first is evidence cited to challenge a rival claim; the second is the main conclusion that the argument advocates.

Cevap

The first boldfaced portion is evidence cited to challenge a rival claim, and the second is the main conclusion that the argument advocates.
The correct answer accurately reflects the structural flow: the first boldfaced sentence provides empirical evidence (regional clinic data) that challenges the initial claim made by public health officials, while the second boldfaced sentence asserts the main judgment/conclusion that the author seeks to establish.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the main argument structure and transition signals.
The argument contrasts a claim by public health officials (vaccines caused flu drop) with clinic data introduced by the word 'However'.
Structural signals like 'However' indicate a shift from a cited position to opposing evidence or the author's counter-argument.
2
Analyze the function of the first boldfaced sentence.
It presents factual clinic data showing flu drops coincided with sanitation protocols, undermining the officials' vaccine-only explanation.
This serves as factual evidence used to challenge the rival position.
3
Analyze the function of the second boldfaced sentence.
It asserts the author's central claim: hygiene practices were the primary driver of the reduction.
This is the ultimate position advocated by the argument (the main conclusion).

Anahtar Kavram

Analyzing Argument Structure and Boldface Roles
Tahmini Süre:1m 0s
Soru 2Soru

Economists traditionally argued that implementing tariff protection on infant industries inevitably undermines long-term domestic competitiveness by shielding firms from global market pressures. However, a comprehensive analysis of East Asian industrialization reveals that several key sectors achieved international dominance precisely during periods of heavy protection. These historical outcomes suggest that targeted state protection can foster competitive advantages when paired with strict export performance standards. Granted, protectionism often induces economic inefficiency when unconditioned; nonetheless, since conditional subsidies incentivized rapid technological adoption in these case studies, the conventional view regarding the uniform detriment of tariff protection requires substantial revision.

In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The first is a position that the argument as a whole seeks to challenge; the second is a intermediate conclusion offered to support the primary conclusion of the argument.

Cevap

The first boldfaced portion is a position that the argument as a whole seeks to challenge; the second is an intermediate conclusion offered to support the primary conclusion of the argument.
The argument sets out to critique the traditional economic doctrine regarding infant industry tariffs. The first boldface explicitly states this traditional doctrine, which the passage directly challenges. The second boldface presents an inference drawn from historical case studies ('suggests that...'), which acts as a intermediate claim supporting the main conclusion at the end of the passage.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the author's main conclusion and overall structure.
The final sentence contains the main conclusion: 'the conventional view regarding the uniform detriment of tariff protection requires substantial revision.'
Determining the main conclusion provides the reference point for evaluating all other structural components.
2
Analyze the functional role of the first boldface statement.
The first boldface represents the 'conventional view' / traditional economist argument that tariff protection inevitably undermines competitiveness.
Because the author ultimately concludes this view requires substantial revision, the first boldface is a position the argument seeks to challenge.
3
Analyze the functional role of the second boldface statement.
The second boldface introduces a claim ('suggests that targeted state protection can foster competitive advantages...') inferred from East Asian historical outcomes.
This claim serves as an intermediate conclusion supporting the author's ultimate conclusion that the traditional view is flawed.

Anahtar Kavram

Analyzing Argument Structure and Boldface Roles
Soru 3Soru

Paleontologists long hypothesized that the unusually dense, vascularized bone structure observed in the fossilized limb bones of Spinosaurus served primarily to provide ballast for underwater foraging. However, a recent biomechanical study demonstrated that several terrestrial archosaurs exhibited comparable bone density without engaging in aquatic habits. Therefore, this structural feature does not, by itself, demonstrate an exclusively aquatic lifestyle, though it remains consistent with semi-aquatic behavior when evaluated alongside cranial adaptations.

Which of the following statements accurately describe the rhetorical functions of the boldfaced portions in the argument? Select all that apply.

Geçerli olan tümünü seçin

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The first boldfaced portion presents a hypothesis that the overall argument seeks to challenge.; The second boldfaced portion states the main conclusion that the author's argument aims to establish.

Cevap

The correct selections are the statements asserting that the first boldfaced portion presents a hypothesis that the argument seeks to challenge, and that the second boldfaced portion states the main conclusion of the argument.
The statement identifying the first boldfaced portion as a hypothesis being challenged is accurate because the author presents biomechanical data on terrestrial archosaurs to question its validity. The statement identifying the second boldfaced portion as the main conclusion is also accurate because it articulates the author's final deductive judgment regarding the limits of bone density as standalone proof.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the first boldfaced portion in context.
The first boldfaced statement ('the unusually dense, vascularized bone structure...') is introduced as something paleontologists 'long hypothesized.' It represents an earlier hypothesis.
Identifying the contextual framing reveals whether a statement represents the author's view or a position being evaluated.
2
Analyze the structural shift and counterevidence.
The pivot word 'However' introduces new biomechanical evidence regarding terrestrial archosaurs, which undermines the assumption that high bone density exclusively implies aquatic foraging.
Tracking structural transition markers clarifies how the author uses evidence against the initial hypothesis.
3
Analyze the second boldfaced portion and determine the main conclusion.
Introduced by 'Therefore,' the second boldface ('this structural feature does not, by itself, demonstrate an exclusively aquatic lifestyle') encapsulates the main assertion derived from the preceding evidence.
The conclusion signal indicates the central claim advocated by the author.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying Boldface Roles and Rhetorical Structure
Soru 4Soru

Conservationists have proposed introducing a controlled population of apex predators to a coastal nature reserve to curb the overabundance of herbivores. Critics of the initiative contend that the immediate predation will significantly reduce the populations of several endangered prey species in the reserve. However, ecological models indicate that without apex predators, hyper-herbivory will degrade the vegetative canopy completely, destroying the nesting habitat for those exact prey species within five years. Therefore, implementing the predator introduction program is essential for the long-term survival of the reserve's endangered fauna.

In the argument given, what are the respective roles played by the two boldfaced portions?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The first is a claim cited by critics to challenge a proposed course of action; the second is the main conclusion of the argument, which advocates taking that course of action.

Cevap

The first boldfaced statement is a claim cited by critics to challenge a proposed course of action, while the second boldfaced statement is the main conclusion of the argument advocating for that course of action.
The correct option accurately captures the structural relationship in the argument: the first boldfaced portion presents the counterargument raised by critics against predator introduction, whereas the second boldfaced portion represents the author's primary conclusion that predator introduction should proceed despite those concerns.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the author's position and main conclusion in the passage.
The author supports the predator introduction program, concluding in the final sentence that implementing it is essential.
Structural indicator 'Therefore' combined with the normative claim in the second boldfaced statement marks it as the main conclusion.
2
Analyze the function of the first boldfaced portion.
The first boldface expresses the objection raised by critics ('Critics of the initiative contend that...').
It represents an argument against the conservation proposal that the author subsequently counters using ecological model data.
3
Match the functional roles of both boldfaced portions to the option choices.
The first is an opposing claim cited by critics, and the second is the main conclusion supported by the author.
This accurately reflects the structural dynamics of the passage without reversing roles or misattributing authorship of claims.

Anahtar Kavram

Analyzing Argument Structure and Boldface Roles
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
Soru 5Soru

Proponents of urban transit reform advocate for making municipal bus and rail networks free of charge, contending that eliminating fares significantly reduces peak-hour traffic congestion by inducing drivers to abandon their personal vehicles. However, comprehensive empirical evaluations of municipal zero-fare initiatives demonstrate that the overwhelming majority of newly attracted transit passengers were previously pedestrians or cyclists, not automobile commuters. Therefore, the zero-fare strategy fails to achieve its primary environmental objective while simultaneously depriving transit systems of vital operational revenue. Consequently, city councils should reject zero-fare proposals and instead allocate budgetary reserves toward improving transit service frequency and reliability.

Which of the following best describes the roles played by the two boldfaced portions in the argument?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The first is a claim presented to support a policy proposal that the argument as a whole opposes; the second is an intermediate conclusion drawn in the argument to support its main recommendation.

Cevap

The first boldfaced statement is a claim presented to support a policy proposal that the argument as a whole opposes, while the second boldfaced statement is an intermediate conclusion drawn in the argument to support its main recommendation.
The correct answer accurately describes the structural framework of the passage. The first boldfaced portion expresses the core assertion of transit reform proponents whose policy proposal the author opposes. The second boldfaced statement is introduced by 'Therefore' as an intermediate conclusion drawn from factual evidence, serving directly to justify the author's final recommendation ('Consequently...').

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the overall main conclusion of the argument.
The final sentence contains the main conclusion: city councils should reject zero-fare proposals and allocate funds toward service frequency.
Isolating the primary recommendation establishes the author's ultimate stance.
2
Analyze the structural role of the first boldfaced portion.
The phrase 'eliminating fares significantly reduces peak-hour traffic congestion...' is introduced as a belief held by 'Proponents of urban transit reform'.
Because the author ultimately opposes these proponents, the first boldfaced claim serves as support for a rival position.
3
Analyze the structural role of the second boldfaced portion.
The phrase 'the zero-fare strategy fails to achieve its primary environmental objective...' follows the premise regarding rider demographics and is introduced by 'Therefore'.
Since it is a judgment derived from evidence that in turn justifies the final recommendation ('Consequently...'), it functions as an intermediate conclusion.

Anahtar Kavram

Analyzing Argument Structure and Boldface Roles
Soru 6Soru

Ethologists long maintained that the intense, synchronized flashing of male fireflies in tropical canopies functions primarily as a cooperative signal to attract distant females to the group. However, recent high-speed video analysis demonstrates that individual males adjust their flash timing to obscure the flashes of adjacent rivals. Therefore, the collective synchronization is merely an unintended byproduct of relentless competition among individual males to monopolize female attention. Consequently, models that rely on group-level selection to explain this phenomenon are fundamentally flawed.

In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The first is a traditional position that the argument seeks to refute; the second is the main conclusion advocated by the argument.

Cevap

The first boldfaced statement is a traditional position that the argument seeks to refute, and the second boldfaced statement is the main conclusion advocated by the argument.
The passage begins by outlining a traditional hypothesis regarding firefly flashing behavior. The author uses contrast transition words ('However') and evidence to undermine this traditional view, concluding ('Therefore') with the main claim in the second boldfaced selection. Thus, the option identifying the first as a position the argument refutes and the second as the main conclusion is correct.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the structural role of the first boldfaced portion
Identified as the traditional hypothesis ('Ethologists long maintained that...') which the author challenges.
The author introduces a contrast signal ('However') immediately after this statement to present counter-evidence.
2
Analyze the structural role of the second boldfaced portion
Identified as the author's main conclusion ('Therefore, the collective synchronization is merely an unintended byproduct...').
The claim follows the premise evidence regarding flash timing and expresses the core claim that the argument aims to establish.
3
Match the identified roles to the corresponding answer choice
Selected the option describing the first as a position the argument refutes and the second as the main conclusion.
This option accurately captures the rhetorical relationship between the opposing background view and the author's primary position.

Anahtar Kavram

Analyzing Argument Structure and Boldface Roles
Soru 7Soru

Marine biologists once theorized that the sudden proliferation of deep-sea glass sponge reefs off the Pacific coast was primarily driven by recent changes in ocean water temperature. However, this hypothesis overlooks crucial historical sedimentation data. High-resolution oceanographic core samples demonstrate that these sponge colonies have maintained stable growth cycles for over three millennia, regardless of thermal fluctuations. Because glass sponge structures rely on dissolved silica rather than temperature stability to construct their structural frameworks, the recent expansion is actually attributable to agricultural runoff that boosted coastal silica concentrations.

Which of the following statements accurately describe the structural function of the boldfaced portions in the argument above? Select all that apply.

Geçerli olan tümünü seçin

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The first boldfaced portion presents a hypothesis that the argument seeks to refute.; The second boldfaced portion states the main conclusion that the overall argument advocates.

Cevap

The correct selections are the statement identifying the first boldfaced portion as a hypothesis the argument seeks to refute, and the statement identifying the second boldfaced portion as the main conclusion advocated by the argument.
The passage begins by presenting a prior theory regarding temperature changes, which the author proceeds to undermine using oceanographic data. Thus, the statement describing the first boldfaced portion as a hypothesis the argument seeks to refute is accurate. The author then presents evidence about glass sponge silicious reliance to conclude that agricultural silica runoff explains the reef expansion; thus, the statement describing the second boldfaced portion as the main conclusion advocated by the argument is also accurate.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the main argument flow and identify the role of the first boldfaced segment.
The text states 'Marine biologists once theorized that...', followed by 'However, this hypothesis overlooks...'. Thus, the first boldface portion is an opposing claim/hypothesis being challenged by the author.
The contrast transition 'However' signals that the author disagrees with the initial temperature theory.
2
Analyze the evidence provided and the role of the second boldfaced segment.
The argument uses evidence about core samples and sponge biology to lead up to 'is actually attributable to...'. Thus, the second boldface portion is the author's primary conclusion.
The structural signal 'is actually attributable to' marks the ultimate explanatory claim the author presents.
3
Evaluate the choices against the identified structural roles.
The options accurately describing the first segment as a refuted hypothesis and the second segment as the main conclusion are correct.
They precisely mirror the rhetorical functions identified in steps 1 and 2.

Anahtar Kavram

Analyzing Argument Structure and Boldface Roles
Analyzing Argument Structure and Boldface Roles Alıştırma Soruları — GRE General Test | Examkin