Marcus, a licensed insurance producer located in Chicago (Central Time), is conducting an evening telemarketing campaign. He uses a prospect list that was last scrubbed against the National Do Not Call (DNC) Registry 20 days ago. Assuming all individuals contacted are currently registered on the National DNC list and have not provided express written consent, which of the following outbound calls constitutes a regulatory violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA)?
- Placing a call at 8:30 PM Central Time to a prospect located in Denver (Mountain Time) who was referred to the agency by a current policyholder earlier that same day.Cevap
- BPlacing a call at 7:30 PM Central Time to a prospect located in New York (Eastern Time) who submitted a request for an auto insurance quote 85 days ago.
- CPlacing a call at 8:15 PM Central Time to a former client located in Seattle (Pacific Time) whose life insurance policy lapsed 15 months ago.
- DPlacing a call at 6:00 PM Central Time to an active policyholder located in Miami (Eastern Time) to recommend an umbrella liability policy.
Cevap
The call to the referred prospect in Denver constitutes a regulatory violation because a third-party referral does not establish an Established Business Relationship (EBR).
The call to the referred prospect is a regulatory violation because a referral from a friend or existing client does not create an Established Business Relationship (EBR). Under the TCPA, a producer cannot call a person on the National Do Not Call Registry based solely on a referral; the producer must obtain the referred person's express written consent first. While the time of the call (7:30 PM Mountain Time) is legal, the lack of an EBR makes the outbound call a violation.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
National Do Not Call Registry Exceptions and Calling Constraints
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s