An insurance brokerage firm purchases a list of prospects and downloads the National Do Not Call (DNC) Registry on October 1st to scrub the contact data. The firm's producers begin a manual outbound cold-calling campaign using this scrubbed list. On November 12th of the same year, a producer calls a prospect from the list. The prospect had successfully registered their phone number on the National DNC Registry on October 5th. The producer and the brokerage have no prior established business relationship (EBR) with this prospect.
Based on the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) and federal telemarketing regulations, which of the following statements is correct regarding the legality of this call?
- The call is a regulatory violation because the firm failed to synchronize its contact list with the National DNC Registry within the required 31-day timeframe.Cevap
- BThe call is permissible under safe harbor rules because the prospect registered their number after the firm's initial October 1st list download.
- CThe call is permissible because the producer dialed the number manually, which exempts the call from National DNC Registry restrictions.
- DThe call is a regulatory violation because insurance producers must obtain prior express written consent before making any outbound prospecting calls.
Cevap
The call is a regulatory violation because the firm failed to synchronize its contact list with the National DNC Registry within the required 31-day timeframe.
The correct answer accurately identifies that telemarketers, including insurance producers, must consult and scrub their calling lists against the National Do Not Call Registry at least once every 31 days. Because 42 days elapsed between the October 1st download and the November 12th call, the firm was using an outdated list. Consequently, calling a consumer who had registered their number prior to the required update deadline constitutes a regulatory violation.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
National Do Not Call Registry 31-Day Scrub Rule