Although the Macpherson Constitution of 1951 established a Council of Ministers to increase Nigerian participation in governance, the executive authority of these newly appointed central ministers was severely constrained. Which of the following best describes the major structural limitation imposed on central ministers under this constitution?
- Ministers were assigned responsibility for initiating policy discussions and speaking on departmental matters in the legislature, but lacked actual administrative direction and executive control over their respective departments.Cevap
- BMinisters held full executive control over regional civil services but were constitutionally forbidden from introducing bills in the central House of Representatives.
- CMinisters were required to exercise collective cabinet responsibility by resigning as a group whenever the central Governor vetoed a legislative bill.
- DMinisters were chosen directly through nationwide universal adult suffrage, isolating them from regional legislative assemblies.
Cevap
Ministers were assigned responsibility for initiating policy discussions and speaking on departmental matters in the legislature, but lacked actual administrative direction and executive control over their respective departments.
The correct answer accurately reflects the main constitutional defect of the 1951 Macpherson Constitution's executive organ. Although twelve Nigerian ministers were appointed to the central Council of Ministers, they functioned primarily as parliamentary spokespersons for departmental business rather than executive heads with administrative direction over civil servants.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
Ministerial Roles and Executive Limitations under the Macpherson Constitution of 1951