A cocoa farming cooperative in Ondo State receives an agricultural development grant of . The cooperative board evaluates two mutually exclusive projects: Option 1 is installing an automated processing plant estimated to generate in additional future revenue; Option 2 is constructing an irrigation canal system estimated to generate in additional future revenue. According to Lionel Robbins' definition of economics regarding scarcity and alternative uses, what constitutes the true economic cost of choosing to construct the irrigation canal system?
- AThe monetary outlay required to purchase materials and construct the irrigation canal system.
- The foregone additional revenue from the automated processing plant, representing the real alternative sacrifice made.Cevap
- CThe net financial gain of expected from the irrigation canal system after accounting for the initial grant.
- DAn inward shift of the cooperative's production possibility curve resulting from funding allocation.
Cevap
The foregone additional revenue from the automated processing plant, which represents the next best alternative foregone (opportunity cost) when opting to construct the irrigation canal system.
Under Lord Lionel Robbins' formal definition, economics examines how rational agents allocate scarce means among competing ends. When two options are mutually exclusive, the true economic cost (opportunity cost) of selecting one project is the value of the next best alternative sacrificed. Choosing the irrigation canal means giving up the automated processing plant, which would have generated in additional revenue.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
Opportunity Cost and the Scope of Economics
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s