Arrange the following sequential steps involved in judicial review when a court enforces constitutional supremacy against an inconsistent statutory law, from the initial legislative act to the final legal outcome:
- 1Enactment of a statutory law by the legislature
- 2Filing of a lawsuit challenging the legal validity of the statutory law on constitutional grounds
- 3Judicial evaluation comparing the statutory law directly against constitutional provisions
- 4Formal judicial declaration rendering the statutory law null and void to the extent of its inconsistency
Cevap
The correct sequence of steps in judicial review enforcing constitutional supremacy is: Enactment of a statutory law by the legislature, Filing of a lawsuit challenging the statutory law, Judicial evaluation comparing the statute against constitutional provisions, and Formal judicial declaration rendering the statutory law null and void.
Under the principle of constitutional supremacy, the constitution is the highest law of the land. Judicial review follows a clear chronological path: parliament enacts a statutory law, an affected party files a court challenge, the judiciary evaluates the statutory law against constitutional standards, and finally, the court declares the conflicting law null and void.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
Judicial review and constitutional supremacy