Soru

Zorluk: ZorInferential Comprehension and Deduction

Read the passage below carefully:

In the shallow intertidal zones of Zanzibar’s eastern coast, red seaweed cultivation has long served as a vital source of income for female farmers. In recent years, however, rising sea surface temperatures have induced severe thermal bleaching in nearshore waters. Farmers were initially presented with two distinct paths: navigate into deeper, rougher offshore waters requiring motorized boats, or shift toward onshore post-harvest value addition. Recognizing that raw seaweed exports command minimal prices on global markets, a local initiative installed solar-powered dehydrators and processing equipment. This allowed the community to extract commercial-grade carrageenan locally for industrial supply chains. Despite a forty percent drop in overall raw harvest volume caused by persistent marine heatwaves, the cooperative’s total revenue rose by sixty percent over three years. Seeing this economic shift, adjacent coastal councils have started redirecting local infrastructure grants away from vessel purchase subsidies and into community-owned processing facilities.

Based on the passage, evaluate the following statement:
"The neighboring councils' decision to redirect grants implies that onshore processing generates higher economic returns per unit of harvested seaweed than expanding raw offshore sea harvesting."

Cevap: Cevap

Cevap

The statement is TRUE. The text establishes that value-added processing generated a 60% revenue increase despite a 40% drop in raw harvest, logically prompting local councils to favor processing infrastructure over raw harvest subsidies.
The statement is correct (TRUE) because the passage implicitly links the council grant reallocation to the demonstrated financial efficiency of carrageenan processing. A 40% reduction in raw yield accompanied by a 60% revenue increase proves that value addition yields far higher returns per unit than raw harvesting. Therefore, shifting subsidies from boats to processing facilities is a direct deduction supported by the text.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the financial outcome of introducing local seaweed processing relative to raw harvest volume.
Raw harvest volume dropped by 40%, yet overall revenue grew by 60% after converting raw biomass into carrageenan.
This establishes that value-added processing generates significantly greater financial value per unit of seaweed than exporting raw yield.
2
Examine the policy shift made by adjacent municipal councils.
Councils redirected infrastructure grants from boat purchase subsidies to community processing facilities.
Subsidizing boats supports raw deep-sea harvesting, whereas funding processing facilities supports high-margin carrageenan extraction.
3
Synthesize the economic evidence to test the validity of the statement.
The reallocation of funds logically confirms the deduction that processing yields higher economic returns per harvested unit than raw yield expansion.
The statement correctly reflects the implicit economic rationale behind the councils' policy change, making it TRUE.

Anahtar Kavram

Inferential Comprehension and Deduction
Bu soruyu puanla