In constitutional classification, a flexible constitution is distinguished from a rigid constitution primarily by the legal requirement of a supreme court decision or judicial veto prior to any legislative alteration.
Cevap: Cevap
Cevap
False. A flexible constitution is defined by its ability to be altered through ordinary legislative law-making procedures, whereas a rigid constitution mandates a special, onerous procedure for amendment.
The statement is false because the fundamental criterion distinguishing a flexible constitution from a rigid one is the legislative amendment procedure. A flexible constitution is amended using standard legislative law-making processes, while a rigid constitution requires a special, complex procedure (such as a supermajority or referendum). Judicial approval is not the defining criterion.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
Criteria for Classifying Constitutions: Rigid vs. Flexible Amendment Processes