Match each specific form of electoral malpractice listed on the left with its most direct technological or statutory preventive measure on the right.
- Falsification of manual result sheets during collationDirect electronic upload of polling unit results to a central public portal
- Multiple registration and voter impersonationBiometric accreditation and automated voter identification system
- Financial inducement of voters at polling boothsEnforcement of secret balloting cubicles and anti-graft agency monitoring
- Ballot box snatching and violence by armed thugsDeployment of neutral security forces and strict enforcement of penal sanctions
Cevap
Falsification of manual result sheets pairs with direct electronic upload of polling unit results; Multiple registration and voter impersonation pairs with biometric accreditation and automated voter identification system; Financial inducement of voters pairs with enforcement of secret balloting cubicles and anti-graft agency monitoring; Ballot box snatching pairs with deployment of neutral security forces and strict enforcement of penal sanctions.
Each malpractice is paired with its appropriate administrative or technological remedy designed specifically to neutralize that exact vector of irregularity. Result falsification is mitigated by electronic upload; voter impersonation is stopped by biometric checks; vote-buying is prevented by secret balloting and anti-corruption oversight; physical violence is checked by security deployment.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
Institutional and Technological Remedies for Electoral Malpractices