Soru

Zorluk: OrtaInferential Comprehension and Deduction

Read the passage below carefully and answer the question that follows:

For decades, agricultural experts pushed for industrial hillside farming in the steep Kigezi Highlands of southwestern Uganda, dismissing ancient stone terraces as obsolete remnants of pre-colonial farming. However, as erratic rainfall patterns intensified soil erosion and triggered catastrophic landslides, local farming collectives quietly returned to the labor-intensive practice of constructing contour terraces lined with native deep-root grasses. Unlike modern plastic barriers or uniform commercial embankments, these stone structures allow torrential water to seep gradually into the subsoil while trapping vital organic sediment. Recent agricultural surveys reveal that households utilizing these restored terraces harvested twenty percent more sorghum during drought periods than those relying solely on chemical fertilizers and bare furrows. Furthermore, younger villagers who had previously migrated to urban centers seeking employment are now being hired by neighboring districts to construct similar hillside contours. Though government agencies initially treated the traditional technique with skepticism, regional climate funds have recently begun allocating budgetary grants to subsidize terrace maintenance.

What can be logically inferred regarding the resurgence of traditional stone terracing in the Kigezi Highlands?

  1. The demonstrated ecological and economic benefits of the traditional method eventually led formal institutions to reconsider their initial stance.Cevap
  2. B
    The adoption of stone terracing has completely eliminated youth unemployment and rural-to-urban migration across southwestern Uganda.
  3. C
    Constructing and maintaining contour stone terraces requires significantly less physical effort than deploying commercial embankments.
  4. D
    Regional climate funds were originally established to promote industrial hillside farming techniques to agricultural experts.

Cevap

The resurgence of traditional stone terracing demonstrated clear ecological and economic benefits that ultimately persuaded formal funding bodies to shift from skepticism to providing financial subsidies.
The passage establishes that government agencies originally viewed stone terracing with skepticism. However, after surveys proved a 20% yield increase during droughts along with improved sediment retention and job creation, regional climate funds began allocating grants to support the practice. It is logically deduced that the method's proven success altered institutional support.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify key textual evidence regarding institutional attitudes toward traditional terracing.
The text states that government agencies initially viewed the technique with skepticism.
Tracking shifts in attitude helps determine what caused institutional policy to change.
2
Analyze the empirical results of returning to traditional stone terraces.
Terraced farms trapped organic sediment, improved water seeping, produced 20% more sorghum during droughts, and created local employment.
These tangible outcomes represent the practical and financial advantages of the practice.
3
Synthesize the cause-and-effect relationship between performance outcomes and institutional response.
Because of these positive findings, regional climate funds began allocating budgetary grants to support terrace maintenance.
This logical progression confirms that institutional skepticism was overcome by empirical success.

Anahtar Kavram

Inferential Comprehension and Deduction
Bu soruyu puanla