The British colonial administration encountered distinct structural obstacles when extending Indirect Rule across Southern Nigeria. While the policy failed in Eastern Nigeria primarily due to the imposition of Warrant Chiefs on acephalous communities, which structural distortion best explains why Indirect Rule provoked significant popular resistance and civil unrest in Western Nigeria?
- AThe total replacement of traditional Yoruba Obas with European District Officers who served as direct tax collectors in native courts
- The disruption of traditional checks and balances by elevating the Oba's authority into an autocratic power accountable to colonial officials rather than to indigenous councilsCevap
- CThe mandatory conversion of traditional Yoruba rulers to Christianity, which alienated them from their predominantly Islamic and traditionalist subjects
- DThe refusal of educated Lagos elites to accept administrative appointments as Warrant Chiefs within the Western Native Authority system
Cevap
The disruption of traditional checks and balances by elevating the Oba's authority into an autocratic power accountable to colonial officials rather than to indigenous councils
In pre-colonial Yoruba society, governance functioned as a balanced constitutional monarchy where executive authority of the Oba was checked by institutional bodies such as the Oyomesi council and Ogboni society. Under Indirect Rule, Lord Lugard and colonial administrators appointed Obas as 'Sole Native Authorities'. This system granted Obas unprecedented autocratic power backed by British police and court power while stripping traditional councils of their veto powers. This destruction of traditional checks and balances, coupled with forced tax collection, generated intense popular resentment across Yoruba towns.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
Structural Distortion of Yoruba Constitutional Monarchy under Indirect Rule
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s