Soru

Zorluk: Çok zorInferential Comprehension and Deduction

Read the passage below carefully:

When the municipal government of Ogbomoso commissioned the restoration of the historic palace ramparts, preservationists insisted on using traditional clay-and-cow-dung mortar, citing its thermal efficiency and breathability. However, municipal engineers opted for modern Portland cement to expedite completion before the rainy season. Within three years, moisture trapped behind the impervious cement shell dissolved the internal sun-dried bricks, causing structural collapses far worse than a century of natural weathering had ever inflicted. The city council subsequently banned synthetic sealants on heritage sites, redirecting funds toward training local artisans in indigenous masonry techniques. Meanwhile, commercial developers in the district continued erecting concrete high-rises adjacent to the ramparts, citing the city's growing population and the insufficiency of earthen architecture for modern urban density.

Statement: The city council's policy prohibiting synthetic sealants on heritage sites was primarily motivated by a broad ideological rejection of modern urban building technologies.

Cevap: Cevap

Cevap

False. The passage demonstrates that the policy was a direct, pragmatic response to catastrophic physical deterioration caused by trapped moisture, rather than a broad ideological rejection of modern building technology.
The deduction that the policy was ideologically motivated is false. Textual evidence shows that the council acted in response to physical damage (dissolved sun-dried bricks caused by trapped moisture) and restricted its action to heritage sites, while permitting modern concrete high-rise construction elsewhere.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the passage to identify the immediate trigger for the city council's policy change.
The text states that moisture trapped by Portland cement caused severe structural collapses, after which the council banned synthetic sealants on heritage sites.
Establishing the precise cause-and-effect relationship reveals the motivation behind the municipal decision.
2
Evaluate whether the text supports a broad ideological motivation against modern urban technology.
The council's ban applied specifically to heritage sites, while commercial developers concurrently continued building concrete high-rises for urban density without council interference.
Distinguishing between targeted material-specific policy and broad ideological rejection prevents unwarranted extrapolation.
3
Compare the statement's claim against the synthesized textual evidence.
The claim attributes an ideological anti-modernization motive to a decision that was actually driven by practical failure analysis and confined to heritage conservation.
Determining the alignment between the deduction and the explicit context confirms the truth value.

Anahtar Kavram

Differentiating Empirical Cause-and-Effect from Unwarranted Ideological Inferences
Bu soruyu puanla