Soru

Zorluk: OrtaInferential Comprehension and Deduction

Read the passage below carefully and evaluate the statement that follows.

In the semi-arid environs bordering Lake Chad, Kanembu women have for centuries harvested spirulina, a nutrient-dense microalga locally known as dihé, from small seasonal alkaline ponds. Using rudimentary woven baskets, the harvesters scoop the blue-green scum from the water's surface, filter out excess liquid, and pour the thick paste onto sunny sand dunes to dry into mineral-rich cakes. While commercial health food industries worldwide have recently popularized spirulina as a synthetic-free superfood, the Kanembu’s traditional extraction techniques remain entirely manual and deeply tied to seasonal flood recession patterns. Recent irrigation initiatives upstream, however, have diverted substantial water flows from the primary feeding rivers into large-scale commercial sugarcane plantations. Although regional development authorities praise these agricultural projects for boosting domestic sugar production and generating employment, the reduced water volume entering the lake basin has led to increased salinity levels and the premature drying of secondary alkaline pools. Consequently, the natural breeding cycles of dihé have become increasingly unpredictable, forcing local harvesting collectives to travel significantly further into remote wetlands to maintain their seasonal yields.

Statement: The upstream irrigation projects were initiated primarily to assist local Kanembu harvesters in expanding dihé production for commercial markets.

Cevap: Cevap

Cevap

The statement is False because the passage indicates that upstream irrigation projects were created for sugarcane farming rather than to support spirulina harvesting.
The statement is false because the passage explicitly attributes the upstream irrigation projects to commercial sugarcane plantations intended for sugar production, while traditional spirulina (dihé) harvesting suffered disruption as a side effect.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the primary objective of the upstream irrigation initiatives mentioned in the passage.
The text states that water flows were diverted to support large-scale commercial sugarcane plantations to boost sugar production and employment.
Establishing the stated purpose of the irrigation projects is essential to evaluate the validity of the claim.
2
Analyze the impact of these projects on the Kanembu spirulina harvesters.
The reduced water volume caused premature drying of pools and disrupted dihé breeding, forcing harvesters to travel further.
This confirms that dihé harvesting was adversely affected rather than intentionally modernized or targeted for expansion.
3
Evaluate the accuracy of the statement based on logical deduction.
The statement incorrectly claims the initiatives aimed to assist spirulina harvesters.
Attributing the sugarcane irrigation goals to spirulina production expansion is a misrepresentation of the text.

Anahtar Kavram

Distinguishing stated cause and purpose from unintended consequences in passage-based comprehension
Bu soruyu puanla