A software company operating as a monopoly sells its proprietary structural analysis software to both commercial engineering firms and academic institutions. The company sets a price of 300 per license for academic institutions, preventing any resale between the two consumer groups. Which of the following economic conditions justifies charging the higher price to commercial engineering firms under third-degree price discrimination?
- ACommercial engineering firms exhibit a higher price elasticity of demand than academic institutions.
- BLowering the license fee for academic institutions causes an outward shift in the software demand curve.
- The price elasticity of demand for the software is relatively inelastic among commercial engineering firms compared to academic institutions.Cevap
- DThe software monopolist completely eliminates consumer surplus in both market segments, reducing it to zero.
Cevap
The price elasticity of demand for the software is relatively inelastic among commercial engineering firms compared to academic institutions.
Under third-degree price discrimination, a profit-maximizing firm divides consumers into separate sub-markets based on differing price elasticities of demand. The firm charges a higher price in the sub-market with relatively inelastic demand because buyers there are less responsive to price increases, whereas it charges a lower price in the sub-market with relatively elastic demand.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
Third-degree price discrimination and sub-market elasticity pricing rule