A retail merchant displays a designer wristwatch in a window exhibition with a price label of ₦50,000. A customer enters the store, presents ₦50,000 in cash, and demands the item. The merchant refuses to sell, explaining that the price label was a typographical error and the actual price is ₦80,000. The customer insists that a binding contract was formed upon tendering the requested cash. Under the legal principles governing the law of contract, which of the following statements correctly evaluates the legal standing of the parties?
- The price label display is an invitation to treat; the customer made an offer by tendering cash, which the merchant was entitled to decline.Cevap
- BThe displayed price tag constitutes a binding unilateral offer to the public, which the customer accepted by tendering payment.
- CA binding contract was formed, but it becomes voidable at the merchant's option due to a unilateral mistake regarding price.
- DThe contract is legally enforceable by the customer because the price tag represents a legal warranty guaranteed by commercial law.
Cevap
The display of goods with a price label constitutes an invitation to treat; presenting payment represents an offer which the merchant retains the legal right to accept or refuse.
In commercial law, displaying goods with price tags in a store window or shelf is considered an invitation to treat rather than an offer. The customer makes an offer when tendering money to purchase the item, which the seller has the right to accept or decline. Since the shopkeeper declined the offer, no binding contract was created.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
Distinction between an Offer and an Invitation to Treat
Tahmini Süre:1m 30s