Examkin

Soru

Zorluk: OrtaEliminating Paradox-Deepening Traps

Consider the following situation: One year ago, the municipal government of Meridia halved the frequency of its residential garbage pickup, expecting this reduction in service to yield substantial financial savings. Surprisingly, the latest fiscal audit revealed that Meridia's overall expenditures for residential garbage collection have risen by 15% since the new schedule was implemented.

Evaluate the three statements provided and match each to its logical impact on the discrepancy described above.

  • Because garbage accumulated for an entire week, the heavier loads caused collection routes to take significantly longer, forcing the municipality to pay its sanitation workers substantial overtime.Resolves the Discrepancy
  • Shortly after the schedule change, the municipality replaced its aging garbage trucks with a new fleet that is highly fuel-efficient and requires very little maintenance.Deepens the Discrepancy
  • Meridia's recycling program, which operates under a completely separate budget funded by a federal grant, also saw a reduction in pickup frequency.Irrelevant to the Discrepancy

Cevap

The statement regarding overtime pay resolves the discrepancy. The statement regarding fuel-efficient trucks deepens the discrepancy. The statement regarding the recycling program is irrelevant.
The correct matching properly identifies the logical function of each statement: the overtime statement explains the unexpected cost increase (Resolves), the efficient-trucks statement provides a reason costs should have dropped further (Deepens), and the recycling statement discusses a separate budget (Irrelevant).

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the two conflicting premises in the stimulus.
Premise 1: Collection frequency was halved to save money. Premise 2: Total collection expenditures actually increased by 15%.
Understanding the exact nature of the conflict is required to evaluate how new information impacts the scenario.
2
Evaluate the statement about overtime pay.
It introduces a mechanism (overtime wages due to heavy loads) that drove costs up despite the reduced number of pickups, bridging the two premises.
A resolving statement must show how the expected outcome (savings) was thwarted by an unexpected factor.
3
Evaluate the statement about new, fuel-efficient trucks.
It introduces a factor that would further lower costs, making the 15% increase even more inexplicable.
A paradox-deepening trap exacerbates the conflict between the original premises rather than bridging them.
4
Evaluate the statement about the recycling program.
It has zero effect on the paradox because it is explicitly funded by a separate grant and budget.
Statements relying on outside scope or explicitly walled-off parameters do not impact the core argument.

Anahtar Kavram

Eliminating Paradox-Deepening Traps
Bu soruyu puanla

Konular

Eliminating Paradox-Deepening Traps

Bu konudan daha fazla soru